I wasn't aware that Michael Hirsh of Newsweek magazine was a writer of such biting satire but after reading his latest titled, "Why Isn't Al Gore Running?," I found myself marveling at his wit... or sad for his intellectual incuriosity should he be serious for an Al Gore candidacy for president in 2008. Unfortunately, my hope that he was displaying a Swiftian penchant for satire is easily overcome by the impression he is, indeed, seriously touting another Gore run for the White House. You Lilliputians be damned because Hirsh's Goreliver stands astride the country -- nay the world -- like a colossus of Brobdingnagian proportions. And that is really, really big you should know. Not bad on Goreliver's part for a drop out of divinity school, eh?
No, sadly I do believe that Newsweek's Hirsh was completely serious when he imagines that Gore would make the ideal 2008 candidate. After all, according to Hirsh, Al Gore is saving the planet no less and what better way than to do it from the Oval Office? So, I'll have to settle for ridiculing Hirsh's efforts as opposed to saluting him for his biting wit and perspicacity.
To show Hirsh's complete inability to grasp what qualifies a person as a great leader, the very first few words of his sycophantic puff piece seems to say that because Gore was seen in the company of two Hollywierd celebs, that must really mean something important.
There he was again on the world stage--in Oslo this time--celebrating his Nobel Peace Prize with singer Melissa Etheridge and actress Uma Thurman, the Hollywood hottie who called him "adorable" and said listening to him talk was "like watching a beautiful racehorse run."
So, because Gore has the admiration of one B level actress and one aged songstress who hasn't had a number one hit for 10 years (and even then it was in Canada -- 14 years for a Hit in the US), we are supposed to be overawed with his star power? I'm not sure if Hirsh realizes it, but William Hung put out a big selling album once. If Gore sidled up to that warbler are we any better assured that Gore's scientific acumen puts him the the Einstein club?
But wait, all may not be well. Hirsh scolds his idol for forsaking his duty to cure America and the world of its ills by not wanting to run for office.
But Al Gore isn't running. Which raises the question: maybe Gore's gotten a little too adorable--too comfortable in his role as a globe-trotting guru. What about his own damn country?
Oh, et tu Brute? The unkindest cut of all is disappointment that devolves into carping from a slobbering fanboy, isn't it? I wonder if Gore just sent Hirsh an autographed pair of his Fruit of the Looms that Hirsh would be satisfied enough to forget all about this campaigning business?
Still, Hirsh is so in lust with Gore that he indulges in a seriously absurdist effort to rehabilitate Gore's standing as a serious man. He even casts Gore into the literary role of a Shakespearian character to show how great his idol is.
Why isn't Al Gore--Nobel laureate and enviro rock star, embodiment of the alternative history that never was, winner of the largest popular-vote total in U.S. presidential history (at the time) --seeking the job that many people still think should have been his in 2000? Yes, we've all heard that Gore's reached a kind of peace within himself, and what fire that is left in his belly is guttering out. But shouldn't this Hamlet of the Hustings be tormented with a little of the melancholy Dane's anguished ambition, telling himself: "The time is out of joint; O cursed spite, that ever I was born to set it right?"
Talk about being overwrought. And I haven't yet gotten past the very first paragraph of this love letter to failure!
Of course, you see, the whole country is out to get the apple of Hirsh's eye. For even as Albert Gorxote de la Luncha is tilting at his windmills, the eeeevil Bushies are conspiring to undermine his Globaloney crusade. Hirsh gives us a litany of the many mean things that Bush has done to Al Gore as Gore, so concerned about our well being and improving the fortunes of his carbon offset selling company, mounted the stage at the Bali enviro-shakedown conference to address his fellow pretenders to the academia de la sciences.
Gore is obviously not without ambition to set things right: he appears to want to save the entire planet single-handedly. "Without realizing it, we have begun to wage war on the earth itself," he said in his Nobel acceptance speech. "It is time to make peace with the planet." After receiving his prize, Gore flew onto Bali, where the U.S. government this week succeeded in single-handedly blocking a proposal that called on industrialized nations to cut greenhouse-gas emissions by 25 percent to 40 percent by 2020. The Bush administration's lonely stand at the two-week-long meeting of nearly 190 nations--convened to start talks on a successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012--came even as new NASA satellite data showed a frightening acceleration in the melting of the Arctic. "My own country, the United States, is principally responsible for obstructing progress here in Bali," Gore declared as the Bali negotiations bogged down. And that comes after 10 years of limbo for Kyoto, thanks in large part to the Bush administration. Even Australia, whose zealously pro-Bush prime minister, John Howard, was defeated recently in part because of his opposition to Kyoto, has now signed the protocol. That leaves the United States as the only developed nation that has not joined the agreement.
There is so much blarney in that bloated paragraph that one would be excused in thinking that Gore is less like a Guru and more like a Dodo whose socialist utopianism wrapped in the pretty trappings of scienceism is about to become extinct as more and more voices are raised on a daily basis calling his outlandish theories into question. Not that Hirsh is deterred by facts. After all, Hirsh IS saying that Al Gore could become president here. We are talking real fanaticism on Hirsh's part, a fascination that precludes reason.
Also, the global warming issue was far down the list of Australian's concerns in their recent election. But, it amuses to point out that even Howard's leftist replacement, Kevin Rudd, has just spent time backtracking on his support for draconian Kyoto solutions to so-called "climate change."
Next Hirsh deems that the solution to "climate change" is to get a president that will force the world to observe radical cuts in their economies and lifestyles to implement Kyoto.
Gore's passion and prescience on global warming are admirable. But let's get real: without a U.S. president who's fully behind an emission-reduction program, it's simply not going to happen. That's the lesson of Bali. America is still the only superpower, and there is no replacement on the horizon. The way to really save the planet is to move into the Oval Office.
So, um, we shouldn't use American power to stop the daily murdering of Iraqis under Saddam by invading Iraq and instituting regime change, but we should use American might to force other countries to worry about "climate change"? American interventionism is evil if Bush does it, but good if Gore does it? In this we can see the utter lack of a moral compass in Hirsh and his ilk.It says loads about their messianic presumptions, though.
But, after reading his entire piece -- and I commend anyone with the stamina to get through the whole, long, interminable rant -- one realizes that Hirsh may be less the Goreophile he at first appears and more just a prosaic Bushitler hater. As what initially appears to be Goregasms of love for the jolly green giant turns into antipathy for his not having beaten G.W. in a grudge match in 2004.
Well, Al, I'm glad you're at peace, but your planet and your country aren't. If you believe that instead of the "nuclear winter" that you and other politicians worked to avoid during the cold war we now face a "carbon summer," as you put it in your Nobel speech, then why the devil are you cavorting around on stage with Hollywood types in Oslo? Gore, we must remember, originally took himself out of what many Americans believed should have been his rightful rematch with George W. Bush when the former veep announced at the height of Bush's popularity that he wouldn't run again.
And the gnashing of teeth and the wearing of sackcloth and ashes continues all the way from 2000, to 2004 to 2008! Woe is he, sayeth the Gore lamenter! I picture Hirsh standing in a field next to his downed craft, brandishing in the air a clenched fist damning his fate and lack of battle skills as G.W. "the red baron" Bush, zooms over head and flies his red plane to victory over and over again right in Hirsh's ever reddening face. Like many of Hirsh's type, he has become unhinged.
But, even as his Bush Derangement Syndrome reaches into his very soul, Hirsh sees a hint of hope, fleeting yes, but a sparkling bauble that he cannot resist reaching for.
Why not you, Al? The last time Gore decided not to run, memories of his close race with Bush were still fresh in the minds of unforgiving Dems. "In 2002, there was lot of anger at him within the Democratic Party," says one former adviser. "He could have taken Bush in 2004, but the road to the nomination was not going to be easy. The party really treated him terribly." Now he's got real hero status, having transformed his image from wooden wonk to globo-guy. And while the Dems have several candidates of substance to choose from, serious doubts about electability continue to plague the two front runners. But time is running out fast for Gore."The only way he becomes president now is if there's a catastrophic collapse of the field, and something we haven't seen in ages, a brokered convention," says the former adviser. Better that, perhaps, than a broken environment.
The comedy gold here is priceless. Hirsh really should consider quitting his day job and taking up a seat at the table of the joke shop behind John Stewart's The Daily Show. I mean, really. The guy has comedy chops that are second to none. Of course his capacity at political analysis sits at the opposite end of the scale from his comedic capabilities, sadly. So, in this case, we really should say Hirsh should quit his day job!
In any case, it's hard to believe that between the panting, hanger on Hirsh and Al "the Goricle" Gore, the saner of the pair appears to be Gore.
And that is really saying something!



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This was just an exercise in
December 15, 2007 - 07:14 ET by Gary P JacksonThis was just an exercise in stroking Algore's already bloated ego. But, it wouldn't surprise me if Algore jumped in this deal. His ego IS that big!
Al Gore - The Shit Heard
December 17, 2007 - 16:00 ET by FlashmanAl Gore - The Sh!t Heard 'Round The World.
Holy Cow! Talk about a
December 15, 2007 - 07:50 ET by motherbeltHoly Cow! Talk about a "target-rich environment"!
That column is a "man-crush" on stilts!
Kudos to you, WTH, for slogging through the whole thing. It was all I could do to get through the bits you supplied here!
To liberals, Bush is an egotistical "I want to rule the world!" madman, but it would be OK for Gore to bully the entire world into following his prescription. And the part about "forcing" the world to act was hilarious. A President Gore could get China to cooperate? ROFL!!
Rush Limbaugh commented the other day that Gore won't run because then he would have to actually debate AGW and he doesn't want to do that.
I don't know if that's it in its entirety. Think it's part of it, but I also think Hirsh is the proverbial blind squirrel who occasionally finds a nut, and this is the money quote (emphasis added):
"He could have taken Bush in 2004, but the road to the nomination was not going to be easy. The party really treated him terribly." Now he's got real hero status, having transformed his image from wooden wonk to globo-guy.
He's a global hero. Why would he want to get back into the "rough-and-tumble" of politics, especially when he knows the Clintons would have the long knives out for him (Bill is sure that the reason he lost was that Gore shunned him)? Better to be the hero globe-trotter, fawned over and hailed as mankind's rescuer, if only we'd let him.
And by not running he can
December 15, 2007 - 08:02 ET by sublight68And by not running he can keep being the martyr who had the 2000 election stolen from him.
If he were to be nominated and lose the general election again, it would be harder to maintain that righteous indignation.
Shakespeare? Maybe. But
December 15, 2007 - 07:53 ET by danboShakespeare? Maybe. But wrong play. The Merchant of Venice might be more appropriate. The character. Iago.
But I do second. Please Al run. You won't be able to hide from debates. Except from the Des Moines paper. Everyone will hit you in your weak spot. Your pseudo science. And the media won't be able to avoid it.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Sorry, danbo, but Iago was
December 15, 2007 - 08:04 ET by motherbeltSorry, danbo, but Iago was in "Othello."
...did he live in Florida...
December 15, 2007 - 08:11 ET by Warner Todd Huston...did he live in Florida... Key Lago, Florida?
Thanks I stand corrected.
December 15, 2007 - 08:37 ET by danboThanks I stand corrected. It was in Othello.
Right character, wrong play.
Guess I said Merchant of Venice, because the setting was in Venice.
Iago misled and tricked Othello into believing Desdemona was unfaithfull. With tragic results.
The Wiki take on Iago which is interesting.
"Iago is one of Shakespeare's most sinister villains, often considered such because of the unique trust that Othello places in him, which he betrays while maintaining his reputation of honesty and dedication. Shakespeare contrasts Iago with Othello's nobility and integrity. At 1097 lines, he speaks more lines in the play than Othello, more than any other non-title characters in Shakespeare." "Iago is often referred to as "honest Iago," displaying his skill at deceiving other characters so that not only do they not suspect him, but they count on him as the person most likely to be truthful.
Iago fits into the malcontent character type because of his bitter and cynical view of the world around him."
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
I hope the idiot does
December 15, 2007 - 07:58 ET by Seabeach4348I hope the idiot does decided to run. I'd love to see him cut to shreads when he is forced to finally debate his AGW bull. Then he'll do another meltdown when he loses.
But Algore is enjoying what probably are his finest days right now, and the attention lavished upon him by guys like Hirsh (and let's not forget his little buddy Leonardo Retardo DiCaprio) and others is just too distracting.
"I hope the idiot does
December 15, 2007 - 09:41 ET by ckc1227"I hope the idiot does decided to run. I'd love to see him cut to shreads when he is forced to finally debate his AGW bull."
This is one reason why he isn't running. He's not killing that golden goose.
Besides, as I said yesterday, why settle for being president of the US when you can be the undisputed, self-appointed king of the world's idiots? The latter is more profitable and less stressful, with zero accountability required.
Gore In . . . Oh, Wait
December 15, 2007 - 09:56 ET by NoMoreClintonsYes, Gore is enjoying his finest days right now. But it's all downhill from here compared to the massive publicity he has already received. He's not going to top that. Unless . . . what's left for Ego Al to do? With Hitlery in the middle of a melt down and the other two basically unelectable, now would be the time for Gore to step in and "save" the Democrat party from defeat in '08. What's scary is that, given the somewhat uninspiring crop of GOP candidates, he would have a good shot at winning.
As for being able to "top
December 15, 2007 - 10:23 ET by motherbeltAs for being able to "top that" I said earlier I wish they would just give him a belated Pulitzer for "Earth in the Balance." Then maybe, when there are no more awards for him to win, he'll finally just go away.
I will answer the 'informed' Hirsh's silly question.
December 15, 2007 - 12:46 ET by kgI will answer the 'informed' Hirsh's silly question.
Al Gore is in it for the money right now. Becoming President is of no finicial advantage. Carbon credits and pushing man made global warming, however, affords the possibility of Gore making billions. As long as there are 'scientists' in search of grant money and governments falling for this fairytale, Gore will continue to sell the idea that the world will soon end. Gore easily fell for the story back in the 90's and has realized that if he fell for it others would too. The rest is now history.
Rush Has It Right
December 15, 2007 - 15:49 ET by Wildcatter1980Rush Limbaugh, I think, hits the nail on the head regarding a potential Goreacle presidential candidacy. Algore won't run because he will then have to debate global warming.
When you look at all the errors in his film/book, The Goreacle will be exposed for the charlatan he is. His opponents will also be able to savage him with regard to his obvious hypocrisies over high individual energy usage and all the ways he is setting himself up to benefit if the government enacts his policy recommendations regarding climate change.
Just my $0.02
Gore won't run
December 15, 2007 - 22:52 ET by joe3Wildcatter,
In the words of Ed McMahon, "you are correct sir!"
In addition to the errors of ommision and commision imbedded in Gore's movie and the rubber stamp UN Climate report, my understanding is that whatever scientific "evidence" they used to support their conclusions was prepared prior to 2005. Since that time, numerous peer reviewed analyses clearly refute much of the Goracle's proclamations and in fact, a group of 100 scientists and climatologists sent a letter to the "Bali Heil" convention unequivalently challenging the faulty data, as well as the paranoid and socialistic efforts to manufacture a crisis where none exists. That will set the stage for the UN to undertake and try to enforce a massive redistribution of wealth on a global basis under the guise of "saving the planet".
You Are Correct.
December 16, 2007 - 15:08 ET by Wildcatter1980From the letter by ~100 scientists to Ban Ki-moon:
Just my $0.02
History will judge Gore way ahead of Bush
December 15, 2007 - 15:52 ET by ruckroverWhatever is said on Newsbusters about Gore, the fact is with his advocacy for action on Global Warming he has achieved more of substance for the future of civilisation than Bush. Bush has squandered the American economy and good name and is one of the worst presidents ever. Gore's influence at the recent Bali conference illustrates he is a man of substance.
All politicians have egos - I mean look at Cheney for instance. It's what they do that counts in the long run, and history in a hotter more degraded planet will judge Gore well.
Gore, the fact is with his
December 15, 2007 - 21:27 ET by Warner Todd HustonThat is only if you're foolish enough to believe in the entire theory of global warming. If you are smart enough to realize it's BUNK, then you'll also realize that Gore has done NOTHING for the world... well, except make it a worse place to live.
Al Gore is a liar and a Propagandist
December 17, 2007 - 07:13 ET by PopularTechAl Gore only has a B.A. in Government (no higher degree achieved, no science degrees)
The Education of Al Gore (The Washington Times)
Gore Deserves Nobel Prize for Propaganda (CNSNews)
Gore's guru disagreed (Financial Post, Canada)
The Gore Lies (National Review Online)
The Science of Gore's Nobel (The Wall Street Journal)
"What a pompous jerk. ...it's time for Al Gore to get over himself." - Jack Cafferty, CNN, 2007
Hypocrite:
Al Gore and Global Warming - Is He a Hypocrite? (Video) (10min)
Al Gore's Gulfstream (Video) (7min)
Al Gore, Environmentalist and Zinc Miner (The Wall Street Journal)
- Environmentalist Gore allowed zinc mine (USA Today)
Al Gore's Inconvenient Toxic Waste Dump (NewsMax)
Al Gore, polluter? (WorldNetDaily)
Al Gore Refuses to Take Personal Energy Ethics Pledge (US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee)
Al Gore: The Other Oil Candidate (CorpWatch)
Bush's Ranch House 'Far More Eco-Friendly' Than Gore's (CNSNews)
- George W. Bush's eco-friendly ranch compared to Al Gore's energy-expending mansion = True (Snopes)
Eco-warrior Al Gore serves up endangered fish at daughter's party (Daily Mail, UK)
Gore home's energy use: 20 times average (WorldNetDaily)
- Al Gore's residence uses considerably more energy than the average American home = True (Snopes)
Gore isn't quite as green as he's led the world to believe (USA Today)
Hypocrite Gore Should Practice What He Preaches (The Tech, MIT)
Integrity in the Balance: Al Gore's Record On the Environment (CorpWatch)
Meet the real Al Gore (WorldNetDaily)
Occidental Petroleum Corporation Connections (The Wall Street Journal)
Old-Growth Timber used to Rebuild the Veranda of the Vice Presidential Mansion (Newsweek)
Whose Ox Is Gored? The Former Vice President's Environmental Exaggerations and Hypocrisy (The Wall Street Journal)
Al Gore Pushes 'Pollution Tax' (NewsMax)
Profiteering:
Al Gore Gets Rich ($100 Million) After White House (ABC News)
Al Gore is criticised for lining his own pockets after £3,300 ($6,757) per-minute green speech (Daily Mail, UK)
Gore's 'carbon offsets' paid to firm he owns (WorldNetDaily)
Gore Cashing in on $6 Trillion Energy Business (NewsMax)
Global Warming, Inc. (The Wall Street Journal)
The Money and Connections Behind Al Gore’s Carbon Crusade (Human Events)
Will Not Debate:
Dennis T. Avery Challenges Al Gore to a Debate (The Heartland Institute)
Lord Christopher Monckton Challenges Al Gore to a Debate (Center for Science and Public Policy)
Ivy League Professor Bets Al Gore $10,000 He’s Wrong About Global Warming (NewsBusters)
Why Won’t Al Gore Debate? (The Heartland Institute)
Will Al Gore Melt? If not, why did he chicken out on an interview? (The Wall Street Journal)
Sign the Petition: Al Gore, Debate Global Warming (5500+ Signatures)
An Inconvenient Truth:
"I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it [global warming] is..." - Al Gore, 2006
Al Gore's climate change film 'is propaganda' (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
UK Court finds 9 Inaccuracies in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (The New Party, UK)
- Al Gore's 'nine Inconvenient Untruths' (The Daily Telegraph, UK)
- Al Gore told there are nine inconvenient truths in his film (The Times, UK)
- Gore’s Nine Lies (FrontPage Magazine)
- Judge attacks nine errors in Al Gore's 'alarmist' climate change film (Daily Mail, UK)
Schools must warn of Gore climate film bias (Daily Mail, UK)
- British Schools Ordered to Offer 'Balance' When Showing Al Gore's Global Warming Film (FOXNews)
35 Inconvenient Truths (Science and Public Policy Institute)
25 Inconvenient Truths for Al Gore (The National Review Online)
23 Scientific Errors (Science and Public Policy Institute)
20 More inaccuracies (PDF) (UKPRwire)
16 Errors in Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth (Science and Public Policy Institute)
6 Inconvenient Truths Indeed (Robert C. Balling, Ph.D. Geography)
Al Gore 'Debates' Global Warming (Video) (9min)
Scare Tactics in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (Video) (8min)
Marlo Lewis Critiques Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" (Video) (1hr 2min)
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
Hirsh alleges that "Al Gore
December 15, 2007 - 18:06 ET by TEHirsh alleges that "Al Gore [was the] winner of the largest popular-vote total in U.S. presidential history (at the time)...."
I haven't read all of the comments to see if this bit of absolutely preposterous nonsense has been identified, but Al Gore did not have "the largest popular-vote total in U.S. presidential history (at the time)" as alleged by Hirsh. In 1984 Ronald Reagan received 54,455,472 votes. In 2000 Al Gore received only 50,999,897 votes. Thus, Reagan received 4,455,575 more votes in 1984 than Gore received in 2000. This is such an easily verifiable fact, but it comes as no surprise from those leftist blithering idiots at Newsweek who are so blinded by their leftist fundamentalism that such a false allegation nevertheless gets printed in their rag.