LAT Caught in Blatant Anti-Fred Thompson Spin

Photo of Warner Todd Huston.

Thompson's Prosecutorial Record Explained

A while back, the L.A. Times tried to make Fred Thompson's record as a Prosecutor in Tennessee look bad. They wanted the public to get the impression that he was incompetent or that he had a bad record. Since that time, I was doubtful, but since I could not prove things one way or the other, I had to live with my doubts.

Well, someone finally took the time and looked into Fred's record to see how his record really stacked up and determined that he was actually quite successful as a prosecutor. My suspicions on the accuracy of the MSM report is justified, after all.

A blogger called Anwyn did some research and actually contacted the L.A. Times writer who basically called Thompson a hack lawyer and Anwyn found that Thompson's record actually showed a very competent man.

After describing how hard it was to come by the info, Anwyn contacted the L.A. Times guy to see if he had more than he let on in his report:

But Joe Mathews of the L.A. Times does have the numbers at his fingertips, after two weeks of digging 35-year-old files out of their boxes in Georgia for his article. And to my surprise and gratitude, he was willing to share them.

He broke them down by numbers of defendants, so there are more than 88 defendants because there were multiple defendants in various individual cases. In total, 88 cases covered 115 defendants, 34 of whom were moonshiners, 21 of whom were counterfeiters, and 17 of whom were bank robbers. The remainder (43) were various other crimes.

Out of 115, nine never stood in Thompson’s district either because they were never captured, were found dead, or were transferred to a different federal district. So we’ll subtract those nine. That leaves 106.

Out of 106, 12 found the charges against them dropped, 66 defendants pleaded guilty or no contest without going to trial, and 28 went to trial. Of the 28 who went to trial, 22 were found guilty, leaving six who were not convicted.

These numbers suggest that Thompson was a completely solid, if not shining, prosecutor. Of course, you could also draw that conclusion by the very fact of his having served as a prosecutor for three years–incompetence is not encouraged at that level by continued employment, one would suppose and hope. Of the 12 cases thrown out, at least two were the direct result of an error of Thompson’s. Joe Mathews:

Well, now, that is a whole different kettle of fish than the "he's incompetent" claim, eh?

Once again, a little time taken to really investigate the facts ... you know, the what, who, when, and where that the MSM claims is their sacred duty to report... proves that an MSM story is filled with spin, lies, and agenda journalism.

Obviously these so-called journalists assume that no one will be able to take the time to follow up on the facts so they imagine that they can pass off their political agenda as "news." Only, this time they were caught. But, isn't that why the Internet so threatens the traditional, dead tree media?


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It certainly seems to me

It certainly seems to me that there is a lot more flak from the left coming at Thompson than any other Republican candidate. I think they are worried about this guy. He's got a very strong position on illegal immigration, which is shaping up to be a major issue in the 2008 race so we are seeing all kinds of below the belt fragging about how he is lazy, incompetent, and should have married someone older and less opinionated.

Thank you for refuting another one of these low wattage pieces with your article. Fred Thompson deserves a more serious look than he is getting

Well said!

Thank you-and you're dead-on about them being worried...the MSM pukes either ignore Fred or impugn him.

Thanks to the team for making that first comment go away-what a dimwit!

 

Name me ONE time the

Name me ONE time the "driveby" media has gotten the story CORRECT when a Conservative is concerned... I might be able to find one ... maybe!

The MSM Lies and Slanders - What's New?

As it is written ...

Jude 1:8-10

(8) Likewise also these pathetic accusationists appeal to worldly resentments based on a lie, despise just Christian government, and speak evil of God, truth, and good men.

(9) Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a baseless accusation, but said, "The Lord rebuke thee."

(10) But these pathetic accusationists speak evil of those things which they don't understand: but what they know only by carnal instinct, as brute beasts, in those things they wither, ruin, and destroy themselves.

2 Peter 2:10-14

(10) But chiefly them that live according to the carnal nature of Man in the petty resentments of liberal stupidity, and despise just government. Presumptuous are they, self-willed, they are not afraid to speak evil of God, the Bible, or good men.

(11) Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not false and baseless accusations against them [God, the Bible, or good men] before the Lord.

(12) But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

(13) And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings - with their mindless accusations and liberal insanities - while they feast with you;

(14) Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: a heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

Well, I'm Shocked!!

The LA Times printing false and misleading information about a conservative and a presidential candidate? Who would have thought!

[sarcasm off]

OK, in all seriousness, printing an article like that without getting all the info is incompetance. Printing an article like that in spite of having the information is liable.

 



The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back!  Fred08.com

Clearing the "Run" Way for Hildabeast

LAT after Fred on the Left Coast ...

After Rudy on the East Coast, NYF Fighters and 9/11 family members:

 http://patdollard.com/2007/11/18/911-firefighters-and-families-plan-anti-giuliani-campaign/

For anyone interested...

Here's some more on that: http://www.911famili... I'm no Rudy fan, but this is just ridiculous.

And what were Hillary's

And what were Hillary's accomplishments as a lawyer?

Successfully avoiding prosecution and jail time for herself and her husband/partner through a multitude of scandals involving fraud, perjury, malfeasance, witness tampering, and more...

Well, heck. That is a LOT to

Well, heck. That is a LOT to accomplish, ain't it? I mean, it COULDN'T have been easy to stem THAT tide of corruption and lawlessness!!

Speaking of which...here's a

Speaking of which...here's a list of their accomplishments.

Nine Solid Months!

 Thank you Warner, not many can persuade the source of hit-pieces to provide the material. A job very well done. 

I've also been pouring over information for the last nine months where I've nearly exhausted current records/material of all the candidates. Only one conclusion was possible.

If you're looking for values instead of entertainment, honesty and stability instead of reinvention, solutions for causes instead of band-aids for symptoms and a man who was made for the job instead of men trying to fill delusions of grandeur; 

Fred DaltonThompson - 44th President of The United States!

For answers to several other Spinswayers hit-pieces and other nonsense;

http://fredthompsonwarroom.blogspot.com/