Hollywood's Variety is wounded. They are upset that their buddies across the lines of the Hollyweird writer's strike have written some mean things about them on the Internet and they are just cut to the quick over it all. Aghast, really. So, instead of dealing with this criticism, Variety decided that it's all Rush Limbaugh's fault because he has made "modern politics" so "poisonous." I guess they really are so used to creating their own reality in La La Land that they don't know their creation from God's creation! In "Strike fight rages on in a bubble," Variety complains that this writer's strike is getting ugly. But, it isn't because unions are filled with thugs, loudmouths and the uncouth, no it's because talk radio is filled with a bunch of meanies. I know, this absurd claim makes my head spin in amazement, too. The Industry newser has been scanning the Internet to see what some of these petulant Writer's are saying about them on message boards and they are not happy:
Scanning message boards and blogs uncovers all manner of allegations about kowtowing to corporate interests. The assumption is that those not fully following the Writers Guild’s script must be bowing to pressure from their ownership or currying favor among advertisers, with journalists lacking the spine to bite the hands that feed us.
Gosh. Imagine that? Someone impugning the integrity of the "news" folks out there. Of course, we have been doing it for a long time, but now even their left-wing pals are doing it. This insult must be too close to home, eh?
So, why is this all happening? Blame Rush!
In this way, strike rhetoric is oddly mirroring modern politics, where partisans now filter straight-ahead reporting through an “us vs. them” prism, seeking out accounts that buttress their views while shunning those that might challenge them.
This represents a relatively recent dynamic, fueled by the Rush Limbaugh era of talkradio, cable news and the Internet, which barely existed during the last strike in 1988. It’s an especially poisonous environment when applied to this fracas, since talent and the studios must eventually reunite once the saber-rattling and marching ends, whereas political combatants (or at least their public mouthpieces) are now locked in a state of perpetual warfare, the better to spice up the give and take on “Hannity & Colmes.”
So, did Variey just NOW notice that unions brook with no dissenting views? Have they never known that union thugs get a tad upset when their bombast and wind is denied as God's honest truth?
Then the Entertainment Paper lays it on the line. We, all of us who have principles and ideals that we want to promulgate, are living in a "bubble." And, that bubble has "noxious air" inside it keeping us from being reasonable. We conservatives are always "encouraging hostility toward 'mainstream' media" and just don't understand how fair and balanced the MSM really is.
Gosh we're stupid.
And then Variety pleads with their left-wing pals in the writer's strike by reminding them that they are of a feather...
At the risk of sounding defensive, then, it’s time for a reality check before writers’ collective persecution complex shifts into overdrive: Just as reporters are generally permissive on social issues (a common conservative harangue, rejecting the possibility of setting aside personal opinion to report objectively), print journalists’ natural impulse is to side with writers, inasmuch as we earn our living bent over keyboards too.
See. They ADMIT to being left-wingers! And that admission comes after they scold us eeeevil conservatives for attacking them for being left-wingers! Man, two head turners in the same story.
But, all that being said, I have to endorse Variety's last section that serves to scold the entertainment industry, both sides, for not seeing reality. So, while, the paper itself has a bit of trouble seeing reality, they did catch a fleeting glimpse of it near the end. Here are the last few paragraphs of the piece, the only ones that ring true in the whole thing:
Based on those factors — as well as Hollywood labor history, where post-strike deals seldom mollify anyone — the notion that the studios will suddenly crumble to restore harmony is the sort of magical thinking normally reserved for stage versions of Peter Pan.
Notably, “Lost” co-creator Damon Lindelof touched upon several of these points in a New York Times op-ed Sunday that bolstered the studios’ case as much as the guild’s. In it, he referenced fears that the traditional TV model is “dying” and experiencing a transformation that’s “nothing short of terrifying” — concerns this season’s tepid TV ratings have surely reinforced.
Given that uncertainty, both sides are in a sense negotiating from a position of weakness. It’s just that the conglomerates are loath to publicly acknowledge their vulnerability, lest they send stockholders scrambling to more stable investments.
This “All is well” bravado from studios since the writers walked has made execs look callously indifferent to the strike’s collateral damage. The guild, by contrast, effectively started stressing middle-class writers’ plight but has overreached with misguided flourishes like Jesse Jackson’s opportunistic appearance at last week’s Fox rally, couching what’s fundamentally a financial clash in civil-rights vernacular.
In such distressing times, the cathartic urge to lash out is understandable. With thanks to Aaron Sorkin, though (but sorry, no residuals), shooting the messenger isn’t a sign of toughness, but merely a tip-off that you can’t handle the truth.
Now that was good stuff. With the onset of cable and satellite, TV is not the powerhouse it once was and audiences are shattered and spread hither and yon. The days of millions upon millions of viewers for any particular show seem long gone. And the movie industry isn't making cash much any more as so-called stars rape the industry for tall paychecks before a show even hits the theaters. Pile on top of that the emerging video medium on the Internet and we get so much competition for eyeballs that neither the entertainment industry, nor the writers have much ground from which to negotiate. Both have a dwindling pie and neither can expect the big money that Hollywood used to deliver its successful people of the past. Well, at least not the obscene wealth it once delivered.
The golden goose has been cooked and it's about time they all realized it.
But, remember... it's all Rush Limbaugh's fault!















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
While I agree with the main
November 14, 2007 - 23:34 ET by zfWhile I agree with the main thesis here, I do have to disagree with two minor points and one major:
The reason that stars get so much money is that a powerful star with lots of Box-Office appeal can make even a medicore movie millions of dollars it wouldn't otherwise make simply on the basis of his or her star power and how that attracts viewers. Big salaries don't "rape" the industry, they help feed it. Are some stars overpaid? As in all industries and jobs, the answer is yes. But that's the fault of the employers, who should be smart enough to realize when an actors glamor and attraction is gone and that they are no longer worth playing big bucks for.
Secondly, I don't agree that wealth is no matter how large is ever "obscene." It's only obscene if you came by it dishonestly. Otherwise, people should be allowed to enjoy their wealth and money and not feel guilty about it being "too much."
The major point I disagree with is why the movie industry is losing money. In my opinion it's not because of the encrosion of the Internet, cable or any other medium. None of those mediums can compete with the experience of going to a movie theater with a large screen and an awesome audio system, buying popcorn and candy, sitting down with your family and or friends and enjoying a movie with a large audience. My opinion is that it's becauses movies have stopped being entertainment and have become either left-wing socialist propoganda pieces, preachy assualts on America and her values, tedious anti-war vitiriol, mindless sex-fests, or artsy-fartsy crap. With all that, I'm not suprised large amounts of people are staying away in droves.
Other than that, I agree with you. :)
P.S. Actually, maybe if the industry did "kow-tow" to those corporate interests and advertisers and make movies people want to see and that will make money because it entertains them and not attacks them the industry would turn around. But no, those hypocritical stars have their so-called principles.
They don't want to do
November 14, 2007 - 23:45 ET by RESTLESS 1They don't want to do movies that entertain the whole family. Most want to be avant-garde and push the envelope. Going against the grain and getting their asses kissed by mindless robots is much more important than making any money for the people bankrolling a film.
I'm pretty much talking about directors, actors and the like, as they are usually paid no matter what the movie makes at the box.
"None of those mediums can
November 15, 2007 - 12:06 ET by MikeB"None of those mediums can compete with the experience of going to a movie theater...", spending $3.50 for a quarter's worth of popcorn, spending $2.50 for another quarter's worth of soda pop, sitting down with your family and friends and trying to enjoy a movie in spite of all the obnoxious, giggling teen-age girls, all the little kids whining and crying and kicking the back of your seat.
I would much rather rent or buy the dvd and watch it at home with popcorn and/or soda I purchased at the grocery store for a reasonable price. The home experience would be much enhanced if I had a 57" hi-def tv with a Bose sound system attached, which would make it the equivalent, or near equivalent, of the theater sound system.
And, being the cheap b*stard that I am, if I won't rent a non-entertaining "left-wing propaganda piece, preachy assault on America and her values, tedious anti-war vitriol, mindless sex fest, or artsy-fartsy crap", I sure won't pay $3.50 for a cheap ticket, or more for a regular ticket to see it.
Other than these points, zf, I mostly agree with you.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Limbaugh
November 15, 2007 - 00:47 ET by ScrapironOld, Retired and glad of it.
Rush is so proud that he has so much influence on the Holy'wood crowd.
Made my day
November 15, 2007 - 05:59 ET by well99I went to the link and read the story.I enjoy checking out the comments.Hollywood just doesnt get it.I doubt they ever will.
Writers' strike
November 15, 2007 - 08:36 ET by fosstenHollywood is finally getting their comeuppance. Remember the arrogance of newsies talking about how there's nobody to police the internet news sources, and that bloggers aren't journalists?
Interesting that while the writers are on strike, forcing all scripted TV shows to play reruns, the bloggers continue.
I'd love it if this thing dragged out to a bitter end. The way I see it, all I really care about on TV is seeing NFL games and tennis matches, NEITHER of which require any writing or commentary for me to enjoy them. In fact, less is more as far as I'm concerned.
If I were Rush, I'd take total credit for this and wear it as a badge of honor. This is no time to defend Rush - it's a time to celebrate him. Think of the heads exploding if Rush takes credit for this.
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
EL RUSHBO...
November 15, 2007 - 08:36 ET by danybhoyOf course it's El-Rushbo's fault, since he is the man who runs America. If people believe this, BDS will soon become RDS.
"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise" Mark Levin
So if everybody just did
November 15, 2007 - 09:13 ET by Free ThinkerSo if everybody just did what liberals want and don't ask questions then everyhing would be ok. How dare two viewpoints be discussed!
Has anyone given thought
November 15, 2007 - 09:15 ET by Long Island PeteHas anyone given thought to the reason why they blame Rush? They need more people to blame and they got sick of blaming Bush. So why not blame Rush. The reason is they are uneducated and have a hard time spelling. This way they only have to change one letter.
Check out Rush's website, he
November 15, 2007 - 09:25 ET by msh1973Check out Rush's website, he is all over this story. Rush is "King of the world", what a riot! :)
If they blame Rush...it's
November 15, 2007 - 09:55 ET by ConservativeRexIf they blame Rush...it's only a matter of time before they blame Bush.
Honestly, has this strike or will this strike affect any of us? I doubt it. Frankly, they can stay on strike until MGW floods them out, I could care less.
On the other hand, who doesn't miss all the shows bashing the USA? All the shows with not so subtle sexual innuendo when children are awake. The one's bashing the current administration are favorites in Hollywood. Not including movies making the military look evil.
So to hell with them, stay on strike. If they never come back it'll be too soon.
Wouldn't it be great if the
November 15, 2007 - 10:49 ET by mattmWouldn't it be great if the hated Bush gave the hated Rush a Medal of Freedom? Oh, the blood vessels that would pop and the nut-houses that would fill up! It would be simply maaaarvelous!
BTW Hollywood needn't worry, there are plenty of bathroom-wall poets who can take over for the current crop of so-called "writers"...
Now, if only the "stars" would go on strike.... There are probably better actors at local theaters and small troups than in Hollyweird anyway...
It's all good - RDS, BDS, libs on strike....keep it going!
small troups
November 15, 2007 - 14:55 ET by RackieJust between you and me mattm, it's spelled troupes...just in case you use it again.
You could have e-mailed me,
November 15, 2007 - 15:13 ET by mattmYou could have e-mailed me, y'know.... but thanks for the correction... : )
Bush/Rush ....
November 15, 2007 - 11:03 ET by CrashPerhaps they meant Bush?
As an actor I can attest to how good writing has gone down hill, or you can just look at the low television ratings. Last week a lumber yard burned to the ground. One news reporter said, "There's nothing left, but, rubble."
But hey, I've never heard of an authors strike.
Hacks Whacked! Oh my.
November 15, 2007 - 14:11 ET by RackieHacks Whacked! Oh my.