Pittsburgh Paper: Hugo Chavez Has 'Right To Come Here and Make Money'

Photo of Warner Todd Huston.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review recently published a story about Citgo gas stations in Pittsburgh finding a dip in gasoline sales. The piece sympathetically portrays Hugo Chavez, the America hating dictator of Venezuela, as a victim attacked by mean American boycotters even as they then claim at the end of the story that it isn't boycotters, but a down economy causing the dip (or maybe it isn't, the story can't make up its mind). So, if it is a down economy, why did the Trib-Review spend so much energy with the first half of the piece decrying a non-existent boycott of that poor, innocent Chavez? Why all this sympathy for Chavez? Your guess is as good as mine.

In fact, there aren't a whole lot of facts presented in this piece at all, so when all is said and done, there is no real conclusion reached, prompting the question of just what the heck the point of the article was in the first place if it weren't for exploiting the mean American boycotters angle? The very first line in the piece sets the tone of pity for Chavez.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Greg Marnell thinks everyone has a right to do business in the United States, even Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez.

In their attempt to make a victim of Hugo Chavez, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review apparently had to find the most misinformed citizen of the city. Then our somewhat brainless Pittsburgh consumer blurts out his next absurdity.

"America's the melting pot, isn't it? Everybody has the right to come here and make money," said Marnell of Monroeville.

Um, when did Hugo Chavez move to the USA to join its "melting pot" and when did he "come here" to make money? Last I checked he still lives in Venezuela and did not "come here." Last I checked Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A is still owned by a FOREIGN nation and is not, strictly speaking, an American company. Therefore, the "melting pot" claim is invalid because that refers to people who have come here to live here, make their fortune here and raise their families here. Chavez has done none of that. The PT-R next sets up their boycott scenario.

But Chavez's increasing anti-U.S. antics may be hurting the oil-rich South American nation at the gasoline pump. So says gasoline distributor Don Bowers, who acknowledges motorists seem to be buying less gasoline from Citgo, a subsidiary of Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. In recent months, Bowers, who heads gasoline operations for Superior Petroleum of Ross, said he is distributing "a couple hundred thousand gallons less" to Citgo gas stations and convenience stores. He declined to provide more detailed figures.

They even quote the wounded Don Bowers as wondering why people are reticent to buy gas from a company owned by one of America's greatest self-proclaimed enemies, "I don't know why people now are beginning to not buy. It didn't bother them before, when Chavez was banging his shoe on the podium," he said. Well, could it be that Chavez has been seen meeting with Cuba's communist terror Fidel Castro. Could it be his public tour of the oppressive Iranian regime? Could it be his repeated TV appearances where he calls the USA and our president about every name he can think of? Could it be his constant, clownish claims that the USA is making plans to "invade" Venezuela? Could it be that Americans are just tired of this jerk's antics and don't want to spend their hard earned money at his gas stations? But, wait. After half a story claiming that the sales are down and Americans might be boycotting the foreign ownership of this gas chain, suddenly the article shifts gears to say there is no downturn in sales but if there is it's the bad economy and not American distaste with the South American dictator.

Oil industry experts said they have seen no nationwide shunning of Citgo gasoline. "Maybe (Bowers') sales are just down, he's probably seeing weaker demand due to a weaker economy," said Jim Williams, an energy economist and president of WTRG Economics, London, Ark. Williams pointed out that nationwide, gasoline sales have been "tepid," essentially unchanged from one year ago. Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration show that for the first seven months of the year, gasoline sales were below the same month in 2006.

OK, Trib-Review, which is it? Is it a mean spirited boycott of that innocent Chavez or is the sales slump due to this horrible economy... or is there no downturn in sales at all? Talk about a head spinning piece! But, maybe there is method to the madness of this confused report, after all? Maybe this report is just an excuse to advertise that Chavez is giving away cheap heating oil now that a cold Pennsylvania winter is about to come upon us?

Citgo is involved in distributing discount-priced home heating oil, a program started last year by Joseph Kennedy, a former Democratic congressman and son of the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy. The nonprofit Citizens Energy, which Kennedy operates, provided 100 million gallons of home heating oil at a 40 percent discount.

So, along with making any American seem mean and evil if they are patriotic enough to turn away from a foreign enemy's stores, the Trib-Review wants to help Chavez advertise his propaganda program of selling cheap heating oil to American citizens. Smooth, PT-R, very smooth. The piece ends with this plaintive plea:

"I'm hoping there's no impact on our business," said Mark Tyke who with brothers Tony and Bob own Tyke's Citgo in Monroeville, a full-service gasoline station founded about 50 years ago by their father and uncle. The Tykes have been Citgo retailers for a dozen years. "People aren't dealing with Venezuela, they're dealing with local people."

Sorry Mikey, but a real American would hope you lose every penny and have to close your business down... unless you want to buy your oil from a company that is not one of our biggest enemies, of course. It's called patriotism, Mikey. But apparently that is a word that you don't know the meaning of. It seems clear that, with a libertarian leaning editorial board, patriotism hasn't much of a premium placed on it at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. And this is one of the failings of a libertarian point of view. It leaves no room for such trivial things as patriotism when business is to be conducted. That feeling, though, also leaves no room for taking into account the harm a foreign nation might do to us while conducting that business, as well (just ask the customers of GazProm). So, the PT-R, with it's acclaimed business oriented, libertarian mindset, doesn't care if Hugo Chavez gets a propaganda coup out of the consumers in Pittsburgh. The PT-R pays no mind to the support that such an effort gives a communist dictator who is a vocal enemy of the United States. Nice going Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Check your patriotism at the door and pump away.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hey, I don’t get my gas

Hey, I don’t get my gas there. I think the problem with the Citgo
stations is that they smell like sulfur. 

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

Remembering the UN

Great post ... I didn't at first, but I finally "got it". Thanks...

Click here for a great

Click here for a great billboard running somewhere in the south.

Then, click here to see the response from Citgo.

To contact Citgo, click here.

Rochester, Minnesota: A Fem_Leftist City!

Cool billboard....

Stupid response. "CITGO Petroleum Corporation emphatically rejects this appalling misuse of our brand image against President Chávez, the legitimately-elected leader of a democratic nation". Appalling? I'll bet they cheered this idiot when he ranted at the U.N., but yet they call this billboard appalling?

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Anti Free Will law

"mean American boycotters". Yep, I heard about the proposed change to the Constitution in response to this boycott. You know, the change being proposed by the Democrats to repeal free will in the U.S? Until the law is changed, it's just one more thing that makes everyone hate America. Besides, it was Cheney who forced free will on us in the first place  -- last Halloween, dressed up as Darth Vader.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

So, let's review: 

So, let's review:  Americans performing a protected activity (boycotting someone they disagree with) are bad.  Foreign communists (who hate what we stand for) making big money off of our economy have the right to do it.  Hmmm.   Makes sense to me.  Shouldn't we add an amendment to the Constitution for that?

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices.... Government has to make those choices for people" -HRC

I'm less concerned with

I'm less concerned with Citgo doing business here than I am about American companies going hog-wild on sending work to China and elsewhere, especially the R&D work and especially the technology companies.

I am also concerned about companies like Cisco and Google bowing to the Chinese government and helping to build the Great Firewall of China. The Internet is all about open communication and open borders and companies like Cisco and Google, who would not be where they are without the openness of the Internet, are helping to set the standard on how to muzzle it.

Let Citgo do business here as we still have American-owned choices, that is, of course, until the Democrats get their wish and force Exxon-Mobil and other US-based oil companies out of business, but we have little power over companies like Intel or Motorola (and the hundreds of others) who've moved R&D work overseas.

 

Libertarian?

Perhaps Libertarians (big L) don't have much use for patriotism (nationalism), but I don't get why they would want to support a blatant statist thug like Chavez, who is the antithesis of liberty.

Big Ls are fun to provoke, by the way. It doesn't take much.

Citgo - Fenway

Hmm… That Citgo sign looks very familiar. Being a resident of the World Champions of
Baseball *HINT* I am ashamed every time I look up at that despicable
thing. Leave it to uneducated
(especially about how their own country works) to preach to us that foreign
DICTATORS have rights in this country. F
that.

I thought that sign looked

I thought that sign looked familiar. You're right. I just went to Fenway during the ALCS to drop some equipment off and I remember that sign.

(In regards to the dropping off equipment, I work for Game Creek Video, they do the video processing for all of the major sports and entertainment shows. They were in charge of the ALCS and the World Series.)

Also, I did send Citgo an e-mail.

Part of Americana

I used to think that big Citgo sign behind the Green Monster was really cool, a part of the American fabric.  Every time I see it now it just frosts my behind. 

Stranger Than Truth

CITGO actually wanted to remove the sign in the early 1980s but there was a widespread public outcry against the idea. The Boston Landmarks Commission postponed the sign's removal, and CITGO fixed it up the following year. 2 years ago the lights were replaced by LEDs.

Keep the boycott going,

Keep the boycott going, folks... I've been boycotting Citgo for a few years now...I'm glad to see that this kid of thing can work. 

CITGO...

I used to get my oil changed at some place that has a Citgo connection. I would guess that it is a locally owned buisiness, I was always treated well there, the people were cool, but I quit going ther because of the fact that it was connected to Citgo in some way. I sort of feel bad about the not supporting the local people involved, I'm sure they have nothing to do with Chavez, but they are Citgo.

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

Citgo... We have a local

Citgo...

We have a local CITGO that was owned by some very nice locals. I used to have very pleasant conversations with the owner and his wife. After hearing about the connection to Chavez I quit that particular business. One day I ran into the owner at the P.O. and he asked why I stopped coming in. I told him why and he shook his head in agreement. His only recourse (according to him) was to sell the business to a group of small time Indian investors. Within a month of his station/store being sold, the new owners signed a contract with Chevron. The old owner said that it was easier to sell than to get out of the CITGO contract.

The funny thing is... he said he had no regrets and totally understood why people stopped coming to his business. He equated peoples actions to patriotism. He also stated that when on the road he would rather push his car past a CITGO to buy gas elsewhere. Another silent warrior against our enemies.   

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

Warner

More people are taking advantage of the "cent off" on gasoline offered by the major supermarkets and CITO convience stations are probably not one of the predetermined stations for the price mark down.

Or it could be Dick Scaife is proving that the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is a money-losing hobby? 

Another defense of Socialism

This is a thinly disguised puff piece that provides cover and defends yet another Socialist dictator.

Obviously, the paper doesn't get it that in a capitalist country like the U.S., people vote with their pocketbooks and wallets.

"Oil industry experts said they have seen no nationwide shunning of Citgo gasoline."

This is BS.  As I wrote last spring, CITGO is the only gasoline company regularly running ads....even though (at least around here) their prices are among the lowest.  That makes it obvious that the quiet, individualized boycott is having an effect on their gas stations.

 

A swing and a miss here,

A swing and a miss here, Newsbusters. I find little bias in this article. One criticism could be that the article should have mentioned the word "socialism". The Trib is traditionally a Conservative newspaper (except when it comes to endorsing Murtha), but, as a daily/weekly reader of that paper, methinks someone is looking for something that is not there.

You need to actually read

You need to actually read the Newsbusters piece. It might help with your confusion. Focus on the last bit. That explains it all

Sorry, Warner, I have to

Sorry, Warner, I have to disagree with you on this topic. I agree with you the majority of the time, but not this time. I think you are trying to find something that isn't there.
I thought the article was fairly balanced, except for the "socialist" omission.

I also do not see where the Trib has "Libertarian" leanings.
Have you actually read the paper like I have for the past 10-15 years? I think we will have to agree to disagree on this topic.

Roger, I think you've missed some things about the CITGO piece

Your observation that the article avoided mentioning socialism is only a hint of the intent and misdirection of the article.

Beginning with the opening sentences and continuing throughout, there was a not-so-subtle suggestion that CITGO "deserves" the business of Americans. The blatant tug at the heartstrings represented by the fuel program just reinforced the idea.

Later, the article deliberately covered over the Chavez human rights abuses and dictatorial takeover of Venezuela with the benign-sounding "anti-American antics."

In fact, Roger, it wouldn't surprise me if the original idea for this puff piece was initiated by CITGO itself.

NO ONE has the right to

NO ONE has the right to come here and make money. NO ONE has the right to BE here and make money. We merely have the right to go out and attempt to make money. There are lots and lots of small businesses out there that go under because they aren't making money.

That said, Hugo has the right to open a business here and attempt to make money. And the great people of this, the Greatest Nation on God's Earth, have the inalienable right to tell him to piss off and find another country to disparage!!!

I really think that questioning others' masculinity is a game probably better left to people who haven't had more cock in and out of them than a Tyson Chicken regional distribution center. AceOfSpades 06162007

Really? And what exactly

Really? And what exactly gives Chavez that "right?"

But I'm a free American. I have the "right" to buy or not buy my gas where I want or dont want. And I dont buy Citgo.

Maybe all those Communist

Maybe all those Communist celebrities that visited him (e.g. Sean Penn)gave him the right.

Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"

Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."

It's not just Hugo that we Americans are boycotting

I have a friend whose daughter works for Citgo in their R&D department and she tells him that the business is off so much its frightening! This individual boycott of people that blast our great country isn't limited to that Latin thug, look at any movie starring the loud mouthed Hollywood Actors and Actresses and see how well they're doing, i.e George Clooney, Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Leo DiCaprio, Sarandon, to name just a few.

Citgo Signage

The Citgo signs in my area have all been removed at the convenience stores and gas stations. The stores have been told the will be getting new ones with a different name. I can only guess this is because of poor sales and bad publicity due to Chavez. The new name will catch up to him too. I will help to make sure it happens. Even if I have to walk in front of a store with a sign, people will know Chavez owns it.

"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."  Hillary Clinton, 6-28-04 San Francisco

Radio, TV ads for CITGO

Have any of you noticed the radio and television ads for CITGO?  How PROUD they are of supplying petroleum from (pick one) Venezuela or "the largest source of crude oil in the Western Hemisphere" or some such?   

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.