MSNBC's Chuck Todd posted a blog post today on his First Read blog titled "George Allen, Liz Cheney to Spin for Thompson." So, any takers to wonder if Chuck Todd would have posted a blog post titled "Sandy Berger to Spin for Clinton," or "Oprah to Spin for Obama"? Does anyone think that Chuck Todd would have used such a negative word as "spin" to describe the assistance a high profile supporter would give a Democrat candidate?
After that misleading headline, Todd cynically starts his post with the following:
One of the fun parts of being the host network of the debate is finding out first who the campaigns are lining up to spin for them post-debate.
I see. So no candidate's supporter could ever come on to offer post debate commentary without it being "spin"? No one could possibly be honestly supporting their candidate? Is that how Chuck Todd sees the situation?
Now, politics fanatics would know that the post debate media pit is called the "spin room." But the headline doesn't explain that at all and certainly leaves the feel that Chuck Todd is saying "George Allen, Liz Cheney to Lie for Thompson." Leaving off the "room" to spin room materially changes the feel of the headline for most people who are not as plugged into the media and politics.
There's little doubt this could have been an accident.
No wonder the MSM can't report anything right! After all, they think everyone around them are liars, so they must imagine that they can put their "spin" on the news. After all, everyone else is doing it and all that.
His other observations were more like real reporting, straight, to the point and lacking his own "spin."
The campaign with the most interesting spinners on their team for tomorrow's CNBC/MSNBC/WSJ debate: Fred Thompson. His campaign has requested Spin Room credentials for one-time presidential hopeful/former Virginia Sen. George Allen as well as Liz Cheney, daughter of VP Cheney. The other notable spinner for Thompson, since we're in Michigan, is former Sen. Spence Abraham. BTW, for those keeping score, two of the three candidates who finished in the top 3 at the 2006 Southern Republican Leadership Conf. straw poll (hosted in Memphis in March '06) are both now with Thompson. Bill Frist finished 1st and George Allen finished in a tie for third. Mitt Romney was the surprise of the straw vote for placing second.
So, why did he feel the need to start off with his own cynicism for politicians?
Only a real "journalist" knows for sure!



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
So no Republican
October 8, 2007 - 19:31 ET by general companySo no Republican candidate's supporter could ever come on to offer post debate commentary without it being "spin"?
But Dems can hire crooks right under their noses and all's well, beyond comprehension?
You got it! These are the
October 8, 2007 - 20:45 ET by TruthMongerYou got it! These are the rules - so let's PLAY BALL!!!
A service of the new NB respect police
Todd has been knocking
October 8, 2007 - 19:42 ET by bigtimerTodd has been knocking Thompson all day on msnbc....what I have heard of it as I have been posting here.
Nothing new with this guy, he has always been a rabid leftist...he just has somewhat hid his rabid part with the spin from the various msm shows he has been on...plus his ex- work at either Roll Call or that other capital hill paper I can't think of at the moment.
It is aggravating, but I say spin away you leftists...you are obviously scared of Thompson or you all wouldn't have been so busy for months putting him and his wife down every chance you've had to do so since he has announced....especially today.
Can't wait to hear their tripe first thing in the morning on msnbc...it will be going non-stop, I have already heard how Thompson dare not make one single little mistake or he is done...he won't make it any further...blah blah blah...
Carry on you fools...carry on...we shall see.
I'm with Fred!
October 8, 2007 - 19:44 ET by Free StinkerI'm with Fred!
The MSM is starting to show their fear of him.
. . . and no matter how horrific the terrorist attack, it's conducted by losers. Winners don't need to hijack airplanes. Winners have an Air Force. --P.J. O'Rourke
We should be concerned if
October 8, 2007 - 20:01 ET by LighthouseJWe should be concerned if the left is _not_ concerned with any given GOP candidate.
"Boats are safe in the harbor, but that's not what they're made for." -- Maritime quote
LJ... Well
October 8, 2007 - 20:04 ET by bigtimerLJ...
Well now...excellent point ya got there...never looked at it that way.
LOL
LighthouseJ,
October 8, 2007 - 20:17 ET by Dave RLOL-You mean candidates like McCain?
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Dave... Now you guys
October 8, 2007 - 20:19 ET by bigtimerDave...
Now you guys really have me laughing...
You also have made a great point about the msm and McCain.
bt,
October 8, 2007 - 20:29 ET by Dave RDon't you find it just a little odd that the liberal MSM always sucks up to the RINOs?
They appear to be particularly fond of those who just might keep a lot of real conservatives at home come election day.
You know, people like McCain. LOL.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Warner Todd Huston with the Fred bias beat
October 8, 2007 - 20:16 ET by Daniel BakerCan we get a Rudy bias writer, and a Romney bias writer
_______________________________
Learn about "the best choice for people of faith" http://www.evangelic...
I HAVE written of Rudy and Romney
October 8, 2007 - 20:35 ET by Warner Todd HustonNO WAY do we need a Rudy and Romney reporter here!
I'm happy to have Fred always on the front pages! LOL
Actually, I HAVE written about anti-Rudy and anti-Romney MSM bias. Especially early in their campaigns. They were all posted right here at Newsbusters. But, you are right that I haven't done it lately.
Warner,
October 8, 2007 - 20:53 ET by Dave RThat's okay, as the MSM treads pretty lightly on RINOs, anyway.
It appears they are a little more afraid of Fred than R & R.
-Thats RINO #1 & RINO # 2. Interchangeable if you aske me.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Start writing about the media bashing Fred after the debate
October 8, 2007 - 21:17 ET by Daniel BakerSomething tells me there will be plenty of comparisons of Fred to George Bush after a folksy debate performance coming up.
_______________________________
Learn about "the best choice for people of faith" http://www.evangelic...
Daniel, let's all hope Fred is nothing like George W. Bush.
October 8, 2007 - 21:24 ET by Dave RElse we is hosed.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
Chucky Todd is so scared of Fred....
October 8, 2007 - 20:24 ET by Dave RIf Fred stuck his head in the studio door and said BOO!, lil' Chucky would dive under the nearest desk.
"Sandy Berger to Spin for Clinton,"
LOL-Ah, Warner, are you sure you didn't mean "Sandy Berger to shred for Clinton?"
-Sorry. Couldn't help myself there.
When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.
"Spin" is a nasty word, all right, but...
October 9, 2007 - 04:14 ET by sarcasmoTry spending a few months being constantly being called "spammers" by the clue-impaired yammering-class, with 0 proof. This is indeed media bias, but it's hardly the worst type of bias-offense this election on the part of the media...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.