'The View' to Dump Shepherd Over 'Conservative Religious' Views?


Are the producers and Barbara Walters over at TV's "The View" already about to dump a new View co-host over her controversial views? Rumors to that effect are beginning to leak out, anyway. While Rosie got well over a year to spout her anti-American, anti-Bush garbage before the folks at The View finally got motivated to dump her for a new hostess, it looks like the new gal isn't as lucky. What seems to have disgusted "The View's" backstage handlers this time is a perceived "conservative" doubting of evolution in favor of a religious viewpoint that Sherri Shepherd recently revealed in one of her early appearances.

So, at issue is the comment new Viewette Shepherd said about evolution. As Bill Zwecker, Chicago Sun-Times TV writer says:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

A source on the show's staff insists things ''are running quite smoothly'' in this post-Rosie O'Donnell era, but there is talk Walters (plus Whoopi Goldberg and others) have been quite taken aback by some of Shepherd's recent remarks -- especially one when she questioned the validity of biological evolution.

''While Barbara was very big on [panel candidate] Kathy Griffin, she was concerned about hiring another 'loose cannon' after all the problems with Rosie," the source says. "But now she reportedly has made a couple of comments that seem to indicate she's thinking she may have made a mistake [in going with Shepherd instead].''

Naturally, the official word from "The View" is that everything is "running quite smoothly" but then again, they never acted as if Rosie's mental breakdowns were upsetting anyone until the day they dumped her, now did they? Come to think of it, they never did admit she was trouble!

Still, Rosie got the benefit of many, many months to spew her verbal diarrhea, and indulge in her circus antics before they finally dumped her. But, then we all know why that is, right? Of course, it's because she had views that emerged from the leftist extreme. And spewing out views from the left is "free speech," right?

And now we have rumors that "The View" folk are ready to dump their newest member after only weeks on the show. Why?

Because her one "controversial" view might be perceived as coming from the right end of the ideological spectrum, and a religious one at that. And of course we know that any possible view that could be imagined as religious or coming from the eeeevil right are to be unmercifully quashed by those more caring and more tolerant lefties!

Remember, Rosie got well over a year. Shepherd has only been there since Sept. 10th!

Much as I hate Wikipedia, here is its recap of the so-called controversy over Shepherd's comments:

Shepherd was the subject of controversy due to the September 18, 2007 broadcast of "The View" She was asked by co-host Whoopi Goldberg "is the world flat?" She first responded "…I don't know" and expanded that she "never thought about it", the co-star of two network programs continued that it was more important to her that she thought about how she was "going to feed my child." Barbara Walters replied to this defense of her scientific illiteracy, "You can do both." This came after she stated that she didn't "believe in evolution. Period", and before she began to quote scripture.

The very next day, Shepherd explained that she never had to defend her religious beliefs before, and that she became overwhelmed with the many questions that were being thrown at her. By the time Goldberg added her question, Shepherd was nervous and did not fully comprehend what was being asked. She stated that she knows that the world is round.

Well, there you have it folks. For a "controversy" this one seems silly, tame, even boring compared to the hatred spewed on a daily basis by the queen of scream! Yet, this poor, confused gal gets a few weeks to make her fatal error while Rosie got to bellow for over a year before the ax fell.

Bummer for Sherri and free speech on "The View."


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

}}---> I agree with the VIEW

The last thing this gaggle needs is a Black woman who goes against the stereotypical grain.

Certainly there are stereotypical hyphenated-Americans out there who will suspend their beliefs for a few bucks.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Not a view fan

I'm not a view fan, and really shouldn't comment on this subject, but my understanding of this story is that a religious, black, woman who cast doubts on evolution is being run off the show? Whoda thunk it?

On a completely different matter - are these two long lost twin separated at birth? You decide!

http://www.irna.ir/e...

http://news.aol.com/...

"Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds
the universe together...."

-Carl Zwanzig

There's only one "view"

There's only one "view" allowed to carry the theme of this farce.   

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

Their idea of "diversity"

Their idea of "diversity" is 4 women of different ethnicities and sexual orientation, all with the same opinion.

Uh-oh. They could have a problem now. Elisabeth Hasselbeck provided the "correct" balance: one conservative to three liberals. That's how it usually is on the news panel shows too. Two conservatives and one of them religious? Watch out.

Let's hope she's a stronger conservative than she started out, or they will chew her up and spit her out. Before she's "let go" that is.

I agree ...

Take her off The View ... her stupid non-answer to if the world is flat shows a great lack of being able to put forth coherent thoughts into verbal words ...

Replace her with Star Parker. Then Liz could play back-up to a real conservative who can voice strong and solid ideas that the lefties on the panal will stumble over themselves to sound intelligent against ... and fall flat on their faces.

But, they won't ...

Earth is square - "prove" me wrong...

Can someone please prove to me that the world is not flat...? If you dare...

Shepherd was absolutely brilliant. But it looks like the pea-brained, round-earthers will be beating her into submission...

Note

This article is not about the merits of evolution, therefore it will not be debated here

Sorry Matt

I got carried away.

~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~

Eh-gad. Red letters and

Eh-gad. Red letters and all...

I think he means it... v

I think he means it...

v

Thank you

Thanks Matthew. I was a tad afraid that this would go that a way. It's about The View giving Rosie all sort of time to spew her stupid comments but giving this gal almost no time at all. Rosie a leftist gets all sorts of leeway, this gal who is spouting a religious view is nailed right away.

Warner,

I bet if she were a flaming America-hating Muslim she would be cut more slack that even Rosie was.


When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything.
-Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference.

Muslims can certainly

Muslims can certainly believe the world is flat - we must respect them after all...

Christians to the back of the bus, please...

Bottom of the ship - steerage class - behind the engine room

It's the new American caste system:) 

Matt, instead of just deleting everything

Matt, instead of just deleting everything here, could you move them to the forum?

btw - "religious bias" was listed as topic.  The MSM certainly is biased towards evolution versus creation.

Unfortunately that's not possible

with our software.

Whoever wants to is free to start up the discussion in the off-topic forum if you are so inclined.

Why aren't religious bias

Why aren't religious bias blogs moved to the forum altogether?

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

yes, far away from the rest

yes, far away from the rest of society - where we belong, dammit:)

I think Matt and the gang

I think Matt and the gang are getting a little confused about prioritization of certain topics. 

If a blog is written that involves several topics with a hotbutton (the naughty "E" word) thrown into the mix, why then the forceful discouragement of the one that's most beat to death?

Because it's boring?

Because you assume it can never be settled?

Why not edit out the whole blog at the outset if you already know where it will likely slide?

Else all you're doing is dictating to us, "When NB talks, you shut up and listen."

Geez, you guys. . .stop taunting the audience about topics they're forbidden to comment on.

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

I've hesitated to respond to the complainers, because

any answer on the merits of Matthew's decision is sure to be taken into the off-topic quicksand.

IMO, "religious bias" in the context of the article clearly means a discussion of The View's general bias against religion.  

In this case, discussions about evolution are sidetracks.  

Discussions about evolution are sidetracks.

Evolution is a "religious bias".

v

See?

;^>

Then religious bias is an

Then religious bias is an albatross RJ.  Time to do something about it.  Whatever NB does with it, I won't complain.  But they really do have to do something.

- You absolutely cannot have the topic of religious bias here without risking the topic spinning off into "big headache" debates. 

- You equally have an issue where bloggers have more freedom to comment than the other members are allowed.  It's as if writers like WTH are allowed to throw the pitch, but no one (not even conservatives) are really allowed to swing at it.

If general members have to take religious bias to the gulag, everyone else here should rightfully come along with us.  >;)

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

Oh, and another thing. 

Oh, and another thing.  From here on out, I move that Warner Todd Huston be referred to as "Grimace".  All in favor. . .?

=)

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

See?

;^>

Okay, that's one "si" in

Okay, that's one "si" in favor of WTH's new nickname.  But next time, vote English only please.  >;)

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

I'm religious and therefore

I'm religious and therefore do not have the right to vote - or an opinion for that matter - sorry:)!

Now about those non-religious football games coming up this weekend - oops - let's move over to this new-bias website's open thread - where football doesn't even belong on this site whatsoever... 

... gee, I always thought of

... gee, I always thought of myself as more of a curmudgeon than a grimace.

Now, GET OFF MY LAWN YOU KIDS!

Gang, I think discussion

Gang, I think discussion about the merits of eliminating an off-topic debate is taking this thread off-topic.

*****

"I heart famous people."

...have to replace this

...have to replace this keyboard now...

Number 1, 2 and 3

If I could have my pick of any one show on television to simply evaporate and go away, "The View" would be first, second and third on my list.

The constant coverage this show gets from media simply interested in covering itself frankly nauseates me.

Liberals Alergic to the Bible

Oh no!  It's the Bible!  Run for your liiiiiiiiives!

Are these women a bunch of vampires?  Just throw some holy

water on them and watch them melt.  Hold up a cross and they'll shrink

in terror.  Nevermind that godless communism killed 100 million people

last century.