How many times do we have to see the MSM reporting on a "massacre of Iraqi civilians" that turns out to be a false story planted by our enemies before we can definitively say that the MSM is purposefully aiding and abetting the terrorists? How ever many that may be, the tally is certainly on its way to overflowing and here we have another galling example of the same thing. This time Rueters is caught taking directions from the terrorists and insurgents in Iraq with the tale of "60 decomposed bodies" supposedly found in Baquba by the never identified, amorphous "Iraqi police."
BAGHDAD, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Iraqi police said on Sunday they had found 60 decomposed bodies dumped in thick grass in Baquba, north of Baghdad.
There was no indication of how the 60 people had been killed, police said.
No indication of how they were killed? Try no indication that they were killed!
According to an Aug. 8th letter from Major Rob Parke of the U.S.Army that was sent to Bob Owens of the confederateyankee blog, the Army has not been able to find a single ounce of proof that this story is true.
Bob,
This story is false. We have had coalition soldiers looking for the last two days at the locations that IPs reported these bodies. We've asked all the locals in the area and they have no idea what we are talking about. We've gone to areas that might be close, gone to suspicious locations, all turned up nothing.
Most of the news stories all say the report stated decomposing bodies which would indicate if it was true, it happened before we arrived. Considering we discovered an Al Qaeda Jail, courthouse, and torture house in western Baqubah, it wouldn't surprise me if there were 60 bodies buried out there somewhere. Bottom line is we have done some extensive looking and found nothing.
There have been quite a few of these fake massacre stories that the MSM have pawned off as "news" when all they turned out to be was propaganda promulgated by our enemy insurgents in Iraq. There was the fake "6 burning Iraqis" story from last November, and the "20 beheaded bodies" in June, just to mention a few.
The MSM claims that this is because it is so hard to gather news in Iraq because of the danger to reporters and media folk. This is certainly a true statement, but it is no excuse for merely reporting just any old tale that is handed to them on a silver platter as they sit in the comfort and relative safety of the U.S. protected green zone.
Danger in no way absolves them from printing the truth. But, then, all these tales of woe that can be used to prove how evil the USA is would happen to be their true agenda. Truth need not apply.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I wonder if those 60 bodies
August 10, 2007 - 12:27 ET by Roger the ShrubberI wonder if those 60 bodies came from the 2 billion that watched Live Earth... Hmmm....
}}---> Baghdad Bob lives on
August 10, 2007 - 12:30 ET by Cool ArrowJoan Baez is doubtless writing a song right now
I dreamed I saw Baghdad Bob last night. ~~~
Hahaha! I heard she's
August 10, 2007 - 12:45 ET by Roger the ShrubberHahaha!
I heard she's banging the Green Helmet Guy.
Yea Rog, but a very
August 10, 2007 - 12:48 ET by BlazerYea Rog, but a very reliable source told me she was cheating on GHG, with the IRB.
http://www.snappedshot.com/archives/964-Professional-Protester,-Jihadi-style.html
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
}}---> Oh, the Huge Manatees
August 10, 2007 - 12:53 ET by Cool ArrowYou're killin' me!!!
roflmao
I love it!
August 10, 2007 - 12:53 ET by Roger the ShrubberI love it!
Islamic Rage Boy Parody Roundup
August 10, 2007 - 12:56 ET by Blazerhttp://www.snappedshot.com/archiv
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
Thank you for making my day!
August 10, 2007 - 12:58 ET by Roger the ShrubberThank you for making my day!
Blazer... I too thank
August 10, 2007 - 13:05 ET by bigtimerBlazer...
I too thank you...I am still laughing.
Loved the 72 Cair Bears....LMAO!
Your welcome. For me it's
August 10, 2007 - 13:11 ET by BlazerYour welcome. For me it's the one where he has John Kerry sticking out of his mouth with the clean room suit on.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
Most of the AP that work
August 10, 2007 - 12:32 ET by BlazerMost of the AP that work in the middle east, or anywhere in the world for that matter are usually indigenious to the regions they cover, and are freelance. This gives little or no discrimination to the fact these so called reporters may be politically motivated.
I blame any news outlet that posts, or prints anything from the AP, or Reuters without checking facts, and sources. The fact is a lot of these reporters are P.O.'d , just like the Libs here, that the surge is working .
The only credentials you need to work for the A.P., or Reuters, is a telephone, a fax, a modem, and an imagination.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
The leftist reporters are
August 10, 2007 - 12:32 ET by bigtimerThe leftist reporters are going to rush to report anything that in their defeatist minds will hurt our military, make voters change their minds about the surge and help the leftist party let alone the enemy we are physically fighting.
The leftist press...the good ol' enemy within...along with their party.
Leftist Reporters
August 10, 2007 - 12:45 ET by PTWI'm so glad I tuned into to this insightful post....for a second there I thought Iraqis were actually being killed in Iraq. Now I know it's just leftist propaganda!
You attempt at "irony"
August 10, 2007 - 13:13 ET by Jack BauerYou attempt at "irony" falls way short. Maybe you were aiming at "sardonic."
Try this one for size Swift.
When "news" of a so-called "massacre," or even an erroneous "koran toilet dunking" tale is splashed by a global "news" sewer, such as al-Reuters, people take notice.
People who can whip up to a frenzy insane mobs who wish to take out their outrage on some poor schlub who doesn't share their tribe, or brand of religion.
And that causes other people to die.
That's why some of us don't think it's a jolly jape to make stuff up, or at a minimum, to print incendiary stories without even the most basic standards of "journalism."
Such as "proof."
Speaking of Insane Mobs
August 10, 2007 - 13:43 ET by PTWNevermind the news that's being splashed (more often then not it's simply reported as fact....that point I give to you) but consider our political and military leaders comments that have whipped this country into a frenzy. We may agree that we do have enemies, but the Shia and Sunnis in Iraq are a separate peoples than our sworn enemy (Al Qaeda). "Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor....the citizenry, infused with fear and blined by patriotism, will offer up there rights unto the leader and gladly so"....Caesar.
An insane mob that already misunderstands that the PURPOSE of the surge was to give Iraqi politicians breathing space to reconcile historic hatreds.....the Surge works if they find reconciliation in laws that govern each group fairly...oil revenue...etc.
My only point to you is that we have to question all reports...not just the media, but the military, and government as well. Otherwise we're not a democracy but an insane mob running from one firefight to the next....all these groups have agendas.
While you are ripping our
August 10, 2007 - 13:46 ET by Warner Todd HustonWhile you are ripping our military apart, perhaps you could show us the quotes and sources of all those American military officers that are "whipping this country into a frenzy"... you know, those military guys you hate and mistrust so much?
You Expect Too Much
August 10, 2007 - 14:40 ET by mattmYou can't expect these Lib America-Haters to be able to actually back up anything they say with facts. This is why they resort to fake news and idiotic arguments.
matt... Hear! Hear!
August 10, 2007 - 14:43 ET by bigtimermatt...
Hear! Hear!
Insane Mob
August 10, 2007 - 15:18 ET by PTWAt no point was I "ripping our military apart"....this rhetoric is why it's so difficult to have an honest discussion on important issues of our time. I have no reason to "hate and mistrust the military" and I respect how they faithfully execute the mission of our government's policies. You and I should question everything with regards to our national security and how we defend our country and freedoms.
Do you not recall the President saying our mission was accomplished? Did you not see Powell's UN presentation about stockpiles of WMD? Did you not notice that Lt. Generals and Generals were demoted because they lied about abuses at Iraqi prisons and cover ups like Tillman's death? Or the military recruitment presentations saying that "You have more chance of dying here in the United States at, what is it, 36-percent die, kill rate here in the United States, people here just dying left and right, you have more chance of dying over here than you do over there." The U.S. does not have a 36-percent kill rate. If that were true, more than 100 million people, one-third of the U.S. population, would be killed each year. this is from a video taped recruitment session in a SC highschool.
The "whipping into a frenzy" comment is pretting straight forward...Unmaned Aerial Vehicles with nuclear capability, pretty well confirmed Al Qaeda and Iraq ties, mushroom clouds, dirty bombs, fight them there so we don't fight them here (are Iraqis planning to invade the US)....you all know the sources for those comments....the same people who set the policy the military executes.
I'm saying our democracy and country would be much stronger is we trust but verify. Don't be sheep.
PTW, what generals were
August 10, 2007 - 15:33 ET by bassndudePTW, what generals were demoted for said reason? The last general demoted that I know of was Janis Karpinski, for shoplifting. True she was at Abu Ghraib, but that was not the reason for the demotion.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
shoplifting....? Not that other thing
August 10, 2007 - 16:17 ET by PTWIf you think Karpinski was demoted for shoplifting we may have to start at the beginning.
PTW; That was the
August 10, 2007 - 16:25 ET by bassndudePTW;
That was the official reason. However, that can be debated. What I want to know is all the other generals your talking about. The way you said it, there must be dozens out there.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Why we question military and govt. officials....my main point
August 10, 2007 - 18:49 ET by PTWBassndude -
Lt. Gen. Philip Kensinger censured for lying and reprimanded 6 other officers in the Pat Tillman case.
Again...not attacking the military just some healthy skepticism when necessary.
PTW, Kensinger was never
August 11, 2007 - 09:51 ET by bassndudePTW, Kensinger was never reduced in rank. Censured is a reprimand placed into a perminate record. There are no prisnors involved in this case. This was not in Iraq. This has nothing to do with what I asked or about your statement of generals reduced in rank for prisnor abuse. This dose not fit your statement. Try again.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
You're an idiot Insane Mob.
August 11, 2007 - 11:53 ET by SportPoliticsI recall 3 weeks of shock and awe and a foreign government collapsing and surrendering as the end of major combat operations. If not let's have another 3 weeks of shock and awe, you moronic leftist turd.
I also recall the UN Powell dissertation, and am still amused at it's far less than WMD everywhere characterization by kookball libs like yourself. I recall a radio intecept, a fuzzy one, where Iraqi military were talking about moving things or some such vague statements before inspectors got there, as well as a rebuilt building or two satellite picture that Clinton bombed as he claimed it was filled with WMD, you moronic TURD leftist.
You people lie so plainly and openly while you spout your stupid rhetoric concerning things that NEVER WERE SAID, and NEVER OCCURRED.
So, just rest assured, this person realizes you have to tell gigantic liberal FABLES in order to make a weak, SICK, attacking, pointless babble.
I'll start listening when you pieces of trash have something to say that isn't stinking with mischaracterization and less than half truths.
Gawd, you're really, really pathetic.
Let's have us another 3weeks of Shock and Awe since the hellbound liberals need a real war to whine about.
ps- Go read Bush's speech you moronic FOOL, he claims there is a long hard slog ahead for the military, in the very SPEECH you turdbuckets whine about. Go READ IT PINHEAD.
The fallacy in your post,
August 10, 2007 - 14:54 ET by Dan The Man 2The fallacy in your post, one of many "Surge works if they find reconciliation in laws that govern each group fairly...oil revenue...etc." says they need laws. They have laws they need to have a firm governmnet taht will hold the people together. The US had to have such a governmet after the Civil War and we went forward but only after many years were we whole. Time is the element the USA doesnt seem to have the stomach for.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
ooops
August 10, 2007 - 15:06 ET by Clear thinkerooops
PTW, the quote you so
August 10, 2007 - 15:01 ET by bassndudePTW, the quote you so attribuite to Caesar is not true. Caeser never said it, or anything like it. Nor was it said by Shakesphere in the play. There is nothing in Roman history has anything like this, nor is it mentioned in his biographies. IF you ever read the play, you will find that it is not in there either. Soooooo, the question I have is, are you in the habit of fostering and promoting lies? Its obvious that you dont research anything you belive.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
bass.... I think he meant
August 10, 2007 - 15:06 ET by Clear thinkerbass....
I think he meant Ceasar Romero.
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
LOL clear. I get tired of
August 10, 2007 - 15:16 ET by bassndudeLOL clear. I get tired of these guys comming here and expecting us to take everything they say as truth, when it is obvious they have never taken the time to look and see if what they say IS true. Spouting lies and lines is all they do. Incapable of doing any research or thinking for themselves.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
bass... It reminds me of
August 10, 2007 - 15:22 ET by Clear thinkerbass...
It reminds me of the prank that Penn and Teller pulled at a large "Save the Earth" type rally. They had someone go around asking for people to sign a petition to ban Dihydrogen monoxide. Many attendees, including the rally co-ordinator signed the petition not knowing that DM is water!
Too funny!
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
Clear, I saw that.
August 10, 2007 - 15:28 ET by bassndudeClear,
I saw that. Laughed till my eyes watered. Libs will ban anything. Heaven help us if they ever get congress, the senate and the whitehouse. They will ban air!
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Caesar's Quote
August 10, 2007 - 15:30 ET by PTWTake the quote for the context....it still applies. Just because you don't know he said this does not make it less relevant. That's a convenient way of killing the message. Can you prove to me he never said this "or anything like it"? No you can't so don't get bogged down. We all get our history and quotes from the same sources: books, blogs, and bs...and sometimes urban legends. Let's get past your point...and say that I said it. Is it still relevant!
PTW, as a matter of fact,
August 10, 2007 - 15:44 ET by bassndudePTW, as a matter of fact, it is not hard to prove Caesar did not say this, or anything like it. Rome was very fond of speeches and kept very good records of speeches, esp. of Caesar. Had he said this, he would have been speaking of himself, warning the Romans of his intentions while expanding the empire. Like I said, It was never uttered by Caesar, the warrior emperor of Romes empire. He himself beat the drums of war quite often. All the way to England and Hadrians wall. Just for your information, the first time this quote shows up anywhere is in 2001. Go figure. The point of it is, you have not researched your posts very well, if at all. But that dosent surprise me at all. I doubt you are capable. Most of what you have posted is not reasoned thought. It is diatribe.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
You still didn't prove he didn't say it
August 10, 2007 - 15:55 ET by PTWNot reasoned thought...you've got to be kidding! My only point that you keep missing is trust but verify....and diatribes are what people say when they don't like the message.
PTW... You just don't get
August 10, 2007 - 15:57 ET by Clear thinkerPTW...
You just don't get it, do you?
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
that's what he did
August 10, 2007 - 15:58 ET by CelumnazThat's what's funny. He did verify, you didn't.
Diatribes are what people
August 10, 2007 - 16:05 ET by bassndudeDiatribes are what people say to those who say "trust but verify", but dont themselves. You cannot espouse the reasoned debate clause, if you yourself have not verified the very things your saying. IE, "...generals that have been demoted...." for prisoner abuses, and not name a general one that has been demoted for prisoner abuse. Nor give a date of said demotion for prisoner abuse. If you read above in this thread, you will find the only general demoted in recent times was for shoplifting.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
What PTW? Nothing else to
August 10, 2007 - 17:02 ET by bassndudeWhat PTW? Nothing else to say?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
... notice that PTW never
August 11, 2007 - 02:09 ET by Warner Todd Huston... notice that PTW never once proved his case that all our generals are liars and everyone in our government unreliable?
Warner Todd Huston: I
August 12, 2007 - 11:46 ET by bassndudeWarner Todd Huston: I notice that PTW has nothing more than the talking points of Kos or DU. He is dismissive of facts and would rather go with the propaganda. It is people like him that make the world a dangerous place.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
quote
August 10, 2007 - 15:45 ET by CelumnazFake but accurate?
http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/dubiousquotes/a/caesar_quote.htm
quote
August 10, 2007 - 15:50 ET by bassndudeOr here.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
bass -- I seem to recall
August 10, 2007 - 19:02 ET by Jack Bauerbass -- I seem to recall that flowery, pompous faux "Shakespeare" quote is the misattribution taken from a misattribution from that illiterate fool Barbra Striesand on her "website" which reads like an dyxlexic on acid.
Apparently some people cannot tell the difference between the greatest writer in the English language, and some anonymous hack trying for profundity and missing by the proverbial country mile.
Hilarious.
Jack, that is very true.
August 11, 2007 - 09:56 ET by bassndudeJack, that is very true. Besides, the quote is nothing more than some anti-war activist trying to be cerebral. Maybe Sheehan?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Pretty sure it's not
August 11, 2007 - 13:02 ET by dervishPretty sure it's not Sheehan. All the big words are used correctly, and the phrase contains more than one sentence.
PTW: You are making a
August 10, 2007 - 16:57 ET by BDPTW:
You are making a mistake by assuming that it is certain PEOPLES that we are at war with in the GWOT. That is incorrect. We are at war with an ideaology.
This is the hallmark of the new type of warfare we will continually face over the next century.
Maybe they should ask...
August 10, 2007 - 12:52 ET by gib4ksuMaybe they should ask Michael Yon, as he reported the bodies a month ago, and they were definately killed by Al Qeada.
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/bless-the-beasts-and-children-part-2.htm
"Some people wonder all their lives if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan
Yon's report is not the same
August 10, 2007 - 13:19 ET by Warner Todd HustonYon's report is not the same ones we are talking about here to my knowledge.
What ever happened to the old adage...
August 10, 2007 - 13:14 ET by c5thenFool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
With Reuters (the terrorist news service) it has to be changed to:
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me thirteen times, I'm an active participant in the lie.
And the AP (Al Qaeda Press) is no better.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic
c5... Love
August 10, 2007 - 13:17 ET by bigtimerc5...
Love your....
.....AP (Al Qaeda Press)
Perfect!
Here is another
August 10, 2007 - 13:43 ET by gib4ksuHere is another screw up from the liars:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=26602_Reuters_Busted_by_a_13-Year_Old&only
"Some people wonder all their lives if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan
Under the circumstances, an
August 10, 2007 - 15:04 ET by JerUnder the circumstances, an appropriate disclaimer such as "details of the reported massacre have not been independently confirmed" would have been desirable.
But Reuters is simply reporting what the Iraqi Police have stated to be true. Even Major Parke says he would not be surprised if "there were 60 bodies buried out there somewhere."
Apparently the conservative blogosphere wants to have it both ways: If an Al Quaeda massacre is unreported, it's said to be a deliberate concealment by the media since it wasn't commited by U.S. troops. An if it is reported, it's said to be an effort to show how bad off things are in Iraq.
Ohhh please jer. Any other
August 10, 2007 - 15:10 ET by bassndudeOhhh please jer. Any other time they would be scratching at the mortor to get to the story. But in Iraq, they wont leave the bar in the green zone, and get their stories from fictious people and report lies as truth. There in lies the diffrence. Reporters report the facts, they are not supposed to report made up stories. And if they do, they should expect not to be called on it.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
bassndude... I suspect
August 10, 2007 - 15:21 ET by Jerbassndude...
I suspect that the 180+ journalists who have been killed in Iraq did not all meet their fate in Baghdad bars.
Jer
CORRECTION..Jer...Your right, 3
August 10, 2007 - 15:43 ET by Clear thinkerJer...
Your right, 3 died from EID'S the rest died of liver disease. Cor...(One died in a bar fight.)
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
Jer, Most of the 180
August 10, 2007 - 15:25 ET by bassndudeJer, Most of the 180 journalists who have been killed in Iraq reported real stories, not made up stories.That was then, this is now. If you report real stories, you go out among the folks, with the troops or something. Most of them sit in the green zone now. Most all of them. One reason they are so easly fooled. Or are they fooled? Could it be they are looking for anything that contains the phrase, "dead Iraqi civilians"?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Once again,
August 10, 2007 - 15:42 ET by JerOnce again, bassndude...
previous complaints [e.g. Michael Yon's diary which was the subject of a NewBusters blog post several weeks ago] centered around the failure to report certain mass killings of Iraqi citizens.
But, like you, I'm interested in facts. I think we can agree on that.
Jer
Yes, jer. That we can agree
August 10, 2007 - 15:45 ET by bassndudeYes, jer. That we can agree on.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Of course, you don't know
August 10, 2007 - 15:29 ET by TheDeuceOf course, you don't know what killed all those 'journalists', either, I'd gather. No car accidents or heart attacks?
Now, if you're telling me that printing unconfirmed stories is excusable because the place is dangerous, then that's your cross to bear. I happen to prefer higher standards for truth...like it actually being confirmed as THE truth before it's put above-the-fold. But, these stories get frontpages simply because they support the left's preconceived notions and fuel further bouts of BDS.
Did you know that more people died living 'peacefully' under Hussein than have been killed in the entire time US forces have had boots on the ground in Iraq? 'Course, Hussein had 30 years to kill his people, that still doesn't account for the hundreds of thousands raped and tortured by his goons.
Why is it that the left believes that 'the people' noted in the 2nd is somehow different than the 'the people' mentioned elsewhere in our founding documents? Oh , that's right...leftists aren't very American to begin with...nevermind.
TheDeuce... Regarding
August 10, 2007 - 15:56 ET by JerTheDeuce...
Regarding "unconfirmed" stories, did you read the first sentence of my initial post concerning the suggested disclaimer?
Second, if you're trying to convince me Saddam was a monster and a mass murderer, don't bother. You're preaching to the choir.
Finally, do you really believe "leftists aren 't very American"? If so, that's your cross to bear.
Jer
Deuce...
August 10, 2007 - 15:59 ET by Clear thinkerDon't worry, you will have lot's of help bearing that cross. Here let me help.
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
It's never felt very
August 27, 2007 - 12:27 ET by TheDeuceIt's never felt very burdensome, but all help is appreciated. This site has done wonders in and of itself.
Americans who are leftist by
August 11, 2007 - 02:06 ET by Warner Todd HustonAmericans who are leftist by ideology are only "American" by nature of birth. By nature of everything else they are anti-American, unAmerican, America haters, and against every single American principle.
Agreed.
August 11, 2007 - 10:08 ET by Sergeant ROCKAgreed.
Rock
August 11, 2007 - 10:24 ET byWould you define an American as someone who agrees to this philosophy?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Your point?
August 11, 2007 - 10:37 ET by Sergeant ROCKYour point?
only
August 11, 2007 - 10:46 ET byto define our terms, that when I speak of an American I mean those who hold certain philosophical views (ie: right to: life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, property, constuctionist view of the Bill of Rights, etc.)
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Philosophy
August 11, 2007 - 10:51 ET by Sergeant ROCKLiberals are convinced that they too follow this philosophy.. hence, my suspicion.
Of course, they would be wrong.
libs will be hard pressed to
August 11, 2007 - 11:09 ET byconvince me their view is:
endowed with inalienable rights?
i don't believe liberals hold to the constructionist view of the constitution, or private property rights (rather private property is protected only until it is for the good of the state to confiscate it)
so let them claim to stand for these truths as enumerated in the Declaration and Constitution. Their positions contradict the claim.
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
Bruce
August 11, 2007 - 11:15 ET by BlondeNo doubt about it.
I want to take those profits.....
Need I say more?
Liberalism = Mental Illness
August 11, 2007 - 11:15 ET by Sergeant ROCKI didn't say that they were correct in that view. In their delusion, I think, that they really believe what they stand for is 'American'. Take 'gay rights' or 'abortion' for instance. They really believe that such things are in the Constitution. They are absolutely nuts, of course. Hence, liberalism is indeed a mental illness.
Wasn't the original
August 11, 2007 - 11:34 ET byquote mental disorder?
Supreme Court, National Security, Borders, Fiscal Restraint, my litmus test for President.
I stand
August 11, 2007 - 11:42 ET by Sergeant ROCKI stand corrected!
Michael Savage is da' man!
Same ol' tactics..
August 11, 2007 - 10:08 ET by Sergeant ROCKThis time Rueters is caught taking directions from the terrorists...
Not surprising. This tactic is used by the Palestinians all of the time and the MSM is much too eager to comply.