Wisc. Paper: Neocons Want Petraeus for President? Huh?

  • Bookmark and Share

It's no wonder that sensible people just shake their heads and wonder what's wrong with the extremists of the far left when they come up with such off the wall nonsense and then try to pass it off as real political analysis. It just makes people who have even the slightest clue about what is really going on in the world double over with laughter. Such is the case with today's comedic attempt at political forecasting by nut in residence Ed Garvey of the Madison, Wisconsin Capital Times.

Columnist Garvey, in true nutroots fashion, thinks he has hit on the perfect Neocon conspiracy. The Neocons don't want any of the current candidates for president. No, sir, they are trying to angle for General Petraeus to take up their Neocon banner!

I know that you're scratching your head wondering how in Heaven's name he came up with this one. I did too.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

After dismissing the current crop of Republican candidates, McCain, Romney, Rudy and Thompson, Garvey imagines he spies the Neocons real move: Petareus is the man.

I think the money boys and the neocons have a candidate, and it isn't Fred Thompson, Rudy, John McCain or Ron Paul. In their view, it is time for a president in uniform. It is time for the modern-day Douglas MacArthur. When MacArthur clashed with President Truman over war policy in 1951, with the general wanting to run the risk of engaging China, President Truman did what he had to do. He asserted that under our Constitution, men in suits controlled men in uniforms. He fired the war hero, and the conservatives of that day wanted MacArthur to run for president in 1952. Cooler heads prevailed, and MacArthur faded away.

First of all, Garvey presents the facts of the Constitution as if Truman made them up out of whole cloth just to beat a possible rival candidate as he prepared for reelection. Garvey misses the fact that Truman didn't just "assert" anything about civilian control of military policy. It is a F-A-C-T that civilian government controls the military under the American system. It's a little something called the Constitution of the United States that ordains this arrangement. Not a scrambling president from the 1950s.

Maybe Garvey is more woeful proof of the lack of quality of our educational system?

Next Garvey launches into a litany of warped, untrue and oft times disproven, leftist tropes about this war under the rubric of what he feels is the "danger" we face.

Here is how I see the danger. The Congress will do nothing to punish the administration for lying us into war, taping our phones, humiliating us by use of secret prisons and torture and on and on. There won't be an impeachment or censure because the leaders don't have time both to argue over bridges and highways and to deal with those who have stolen our democracy. The Democrats won't cut the funding for this outrageous occupation, and voters will blame the Democrats for the mess. Millions won't vote, and, with a couple of billion to spend, the neocons will help establish another third party effort, and they win!

Chicken Little strikes again.

And what "danger" does Petraeus present to the country? As far as Garvey is concerned, the report Patraeus will give next month is the danger.

Can this be stopped? Only if people raise the roof over the Petraeus report and demand an end to this suicidal episode. Only if Democrats in Congress take the lead, discard the Petraeus report, and end the funding of the occupation.

Yes, you understand correctly. Not only is Garvey basing his far fetched claims on a report that is over a month in the future, one he knows absolutely noting about what it might contain, but he sees moves by people who have made none... based on a report that no one has seen.

Now, it isn't so amazing that a member of the nutroots is roaming freely about the countryside like this. What is amazing is that the MSM would give such a person a platform with which he could give evidence of his psychosis while at the same time imposing it upon the rest of us.

I haven't seen such an off base, wild eyed, silly excuse for political analysis since Rosie O'Donnell went off into the cold, dark night. I mean, in his off time, this Garvey guy probably stands on the street corners in Madison wearing a sandwich board and shouting unintelligibles through a megaphone while Mothers steer their children to the safety of the other side of the street and as other upstanding citizens walk by trying to avoid making eye contact.

But his rants were good enough for the Capital Times to irresponsibly print.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More Leftist Ranting...

I lived in the beautiful community of Madison, Wisconsin for close to eight years, and I must say that this screed does not surprise me in the lease from the Cap Times.

In many circles, Madison is known as "63 square miles, surrounded by reality". This tripe does nothing to dispel that characterization.

As I aged, and was going to start a family, I made the choice to NOT live there and expose any kids I might have to the corrosive brand of Liberalism that is spewed around indiscriminately.

It reminds me of a book title by commedienne Brook Butler - "When beautiful places happen to bad people". Very appropriate for Madison.

Kahuna

There are persons...who see not the full extent of the evil which
threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy...will
be merciful.

Thomas Paine, Dec. 23, 1776

Holy Cow, what are they

Holy Cow, what are they drinking over there???? This is right up there with the claim that Bush intends to cancel the 2008 election. Definitely moonbat territory.

One minor quibble with the post: It sounds like you are interpreting "assert" to mean "claim." It doesn't mean that. It means to state positively and forcefully (that's where "assertive" comes from).

So Truman did, indeed assert that the Constitution provides for civilian control over the military.

mother... Shhhhh... don't

mother...

Shhhhh... don't tell anyone. The elections have already been canceled. 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

I realize that, but it

I realize that, but it seemed to me he was not using it in that context.

Well, I think you may be

Well, I think you may be right. But I am something of a stickler (My sons call me the "grammar cop") and I won't let him get away with that. So this guy decides to use "assert" as "claim". Doesn't make it true. And the meaning of words doesn't depend on the context, unless it is a word that actually HAS more than one meaning. As in house, used as a noun and a verb.

I'm tired of people making up their own definitions and deciding on new spellings, e.g. lede intead of lead (as in burying the lede in a news story), and discrete instead of discreet (discrete has an entirely different meaning), and "in lieu of" instead of "in view of."

And he unintentionally hit the nail on the head! LOL!

OK, I'm finished ranting now. Phew!

If it helps. I agree with

If it helps. I agree with your rant. Not that I am by any means the perfect grammarian myself.

lede is legit

The most important structural element of a story is the lede —namely contained in the story's first sentence.

Lede (pronounced /lid/) is a traditional spelling, from the archaic English,[1] used to avoid confusion with the
printing press type formerly made from lead or the typographical term "leading".[2]

The lede is usually the first sentence, or in some cases the first two sentences, and is ideally 20-25 words in length. The top-loading principle applies especially to ledes, but the unreadability of long sentences constrains its size. This makes writing a lede an optimization problem, in which the goal is to articulate the most encompassing and interesting statement that a writer can make in one sentence, given the material with which he or she has to work. While a rule of thumb says the lede should answer most or all of the 5 Ws, few ledes can fit all of these. (From Wikipedia News Style)

I grew up in the Dairyland

I grew up in the Dairyland state and even worked for a short time in politics there.  Remember that cheese has a deleterious effect on the frontal lobes---as a result, Wisconsin has lurched from relative sanity from Joe McCarthy who was right about the Big Picture and wrong about specifics.  To absolute nutroot brain-rot, when in 2000 Al Gorebot, the Inventor of the Internet, won the state by 5000 votes largely in Madison & Milwaukee, both run by crooked Dhimmi-machines and full of demented grad students with nothing to do besides touching themselves and getting into radical politics.   In 2004 Kerry won by 10,000 votes in much the same fashion. 

Remember Ed Gein and the more recent cannibal from Milwaukee---Wisconsinites have a habit of eating their own.  They thing people are Camembert or Cheddar, depending on their taste-buds.

Ed Garvey bio

From the website of the University of Wisconsin

http://law.wisc.edu/faculty/biog.php?iID=471

Ed made an impact early in his career and it's been a 35 year downhill slide since. Unfortunately for us Warner Todd, he is not hanging out on street corners with a sandwich board. He's a pillar of the lefty community. A lot of people actually pay attention to him.

... and mores the pity. This

... and mores the pity. This guy is a grade A loon.

hmmmm

I wonder who or what Garvey thinks the Commander in Chief commands?

What the heck would Garvey

What the heck would Garvey know? He isn't even in command of his faculties!
LOL