This "special report" starts out with a Muslim American from Cleveland,
Ohio demanding of George W. Bush at a meeting in that city that the US
take stronger measures to stop anti-Muslim sentiment from spreading in
this country.

I have a better idea. If Mr. Saddig and his fellow Muslims are truly concerned about anti-Muslim sentiment in this country, then why do not he and his compatriates start speaking out and condemning the atrocities being committed by their fellow "peaceful" Islamists. Their silence in this area leads me to conclude that they essentially condone the actions of the more "radical" elements of their religion...I'm sorry, political movement.

I have just about had it with these people. If there is one more major attack in this country that is carried out by Muslims, I am going to be one of those calling, quite loudly, for rounding them up and deporting them. Every last friggin' one of them. And don't tell me it can't be done, either.

And if the pro-terrorist anti-American propagandists at Newsweak don't like it, they can all line up and plant one on my lilly-white, infidel American behind.

Help Fred defeat everybody.

I've been thinking about this problems quite a bit lately, but I couldn't put it any better than Dave R. did!!  Way to read my mind guy!  Thanks!

How dare you question the "strenght through diversity" meme!  You must know that different is better (except when different is white and/or Christian and/or anything that doesn't benefit Liberals).   You need to attend "diversity training" (aka Cultural Marxism Re-education).

Hello All. Good to be back-sea duty calls...Anyway here's an article sent by an Australian friend. Can't find the source, but if this was true, can we Americans grow some cajones and take back America??? Good read...

 Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesdayto get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.

A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia and her Queen at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.

Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were made by parliament. "If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic s tate, then Australia is not for you", he said on National Television.

"I'd be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia : one the Australian law and another  Islamic law, that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law,independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then,that's a better option", Costello said. 

Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the  other country. Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should "clear off.

Basically people who don't want to be Australians, and who don't want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off", he said.

Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by  saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.

Quote: "IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or  Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are  offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on  Bali. We have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of  Australians."

"However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the  'politically correct' crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia .

However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to  understand. This idea of Australia being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity.

And as Australians, we have our own culture, our own socie ty, our own languageand our own lifestyle."

"This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles,  trialsand victories by millions of men and women who have sought  freedom" 

"We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese,  Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society .. Learn the language!"

"Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly  documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture."

"We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us."

"If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don't like "A Fair Go", then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. By all means,  keep your culture, but do not force it on others.

"This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining,whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'."

"If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come  here.You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted." 

>http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/

The Defense Authorization Act of 2006, passed on September 30, empowers President George W. Bush, and subsequent President’s, to impose martial law in the event of a terrorist “incident” or if he or other federal officials perceive a shortfall of “public order” or even in response to “protests” that get unruly as a result of government provocations.

On October 17, 2006, 'a date which will live in infamy'.  The first was a public signing of the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' which suspended habeas corpus allowing the president to declare you an 'enemy combatant' and end your rights to seek legal or judicial relief from unlawful imprisonment.  Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807, severely restricting the President’s ability to deploy the military within the United States.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 tightened these restrictions, imposing a two-year prison sentence on anyone who used the military within the U.S. without the permission of Congress.

But there was a loophole: Posse Comitatus is waived if the President invokes the Insurrection Act. "On September 28, by a vote of 65-34, the Senate formally passed S. 3930, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA).  The next day, the House of Representatives followed suit, passing the act by a vote of 250-170, . . . [whereby] "alien unlawful enemy combatants ... [to be] subject to trial by military commissions" without the constitutional safeguards American citizens possess against illegal detainment and judicial railroading." As far as an American citizen is concerned the definition of the term 'unlawful enemy combatant' has ominous import for them. The law states: "(i) a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, al-Qaeda, or associated forces); or (ii) a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the president or the secretary of defense."(6) "Notice that this definition contains no exception for Americans; it throws the blanket over citizen, permanent resident, and illegal alien alike by using the word 'person' rather than 'alien'."(5)

'The Military Commissions Act of 2006' is a violation of Article 1, Section 9 of the U. S.Constitution which states: "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it." Section 1076 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 changed the name of the key provision in the statute book from Insurrection Act to Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act.

The Insurrection Act of 1807 stated that the President could deploy troops within the United States only “to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.” The new law expands the list to include “natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition”—and such “con- dition” is not defined or limited.  The new law also empowers the President to commandeer the National Guard of one state to send to another state for up to 365 days.

Bush, or any President could send the New York National Guard to disarm the residents of Mississippi if they resisted a federal law that prohibited private ownership of semiautomatic weapons. Governors’ control of the National Guard can be trumped with a simple presidential declaration.

The story of how Section 1076 became law demonstrates how expanding government power is almost always the correct answer in Washington. Some people have claimed the provision was slipped into the bill in the middle of the night. In reality, the Administration signaled its intent and almost no one in the media or Congress tried to stop it.    

“Martial law” is a euphemism for military dictatorship. When foreign democracies are overthrown and a junta establishes martial law, Americans usually recognize that a fundamental change has occurred. Perhaps some conservatives believe that the only change when martial law is declared is that people are no longer read their Miranda rights when they are locked away. “Martial law” means obey soldiers’ commands or be shot. The abuses of military rule in southern states during Reconstruction were legendary, but they have been swept under the historical rug.  

 So you do not “believe it can happen America. 

Keep your head in the sand Infidels, watch American Idol, MSN, ABC, CNN, Fox News, any publication issuing from “The Multiple Media-Political Oligarchy-Academic-Military-Globalists-MultiCultural-PC-Industrial Complex.

Or by the way do you know what the Security Partnership and Prosperity "Act" is going to do?

 Cheers,

Scott