Walter E. Williams Column: Racial Double Standards
Back in 2009, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said we were "a nation of cowards" on matters of race. Permit me to be brave and run a few assertions by you just to see whether we're on the same page. There should be two standards for civilized conduct: one for whites, which is higher, and another for blacks, which is lower. In other words, in the name of justice and fair play, blacks should not be held accountable to the same standards that whites are and should not be criticized for conduct that we'd deem disgusting and racist if said or done by whites.
You say, "Williams, what in the world are you talking about?" Mitt Romney hasn't revealed all of his fall campaign strategy yet, but what if he launched a "White Americans for Romney" movement in an effort to get out the white vote? If the Romney campaign did that, there'd be a media-led outcry across the land, with charges ranging from racial insensitivity to outright racism. When President Barack Obama announced his 2012 launch of "African Americans for Obama" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdjoHA5ocwU), the silence was deafening. Should the same standards be applied to Obama as would be applied to Romney? The answer turns out to be no, because Obama is not held to the same standards as Romney.
Liberals won't actually come out and say that criticism of Obama is in and of itself racist, but they come pretty close. Former President Jimmy Carter said that criticism of Obama shows that there is an "inherent feeling" in America that a black man should not be president. Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC's "Hardball," said that critics of Obama are crackers. Morgan Freeman said that the campaign to see that Obama serves one term is a "racist thing." Former Obama czar Van Jones said that Romney's campaign sign "Obama Isn't Working" implies Obama is a "lazy, incompetent affirmative action baby."
Racial double standards also apply to how crime is reported. I'm betting that if mobs of white youths were going about severely beating and robbing blacks at random and preying on black businesses, it would be major news. News anchors might open, "Tonight we report on the most recent wave of racist whites organizing unprovoked attacks on innocent black people and their businesses." If white thugs were actually doing that, politicians would be demanding answers. Such random attacks do happen, but it's blacks preying on whites.
On St. Patrick's Day in Baltimore, a 19-year-old white man was viciously attacked by a mob of black thugs. He broke loose, but a second mob of black thugs attacked him, taking all of his belongings. Baltimore County Delegate Pat McDonough demanded the governor send in the Maryland State Police to control "roving mobs of black youths" at Baltimore's Inner Harbor. Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and other activists demanded that McDonough apologize for talking about "black youth mobs."
Similar episodes of unprovoked violence by black thugs against white people chosen at random on beaches, in shopping malls and at other public places have occurred in Philadelphia, New York, Denver, Chicago, Cleveland, Washington, Los Angeles and other cities. Most of the time, the race of the attackers, euphemistically called flash mobs, is not reported, even though media leftists and their allies are experts in reporting racial disparities in prison sentencing and the alleged injustice of the criminal justice system.
Racial double standards are not restricted to the political arena and crime reporting; we see it on college campuses and in the workplace. Black people ought to be offended by the idea that we are held accountable to lower standards of conduct and achievement. White people ought to be ashamed for permitting and fostering racial double standards that have effects that are in some ways worse than the cruel racism of yesteryear.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
- Walter E. Williams's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
It is shameful
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 12:39pm.
But the shame belongs to liberal blacks and whites for allowing (and encouraging) the double standard. Conservatives has been railing against it for eons.
And Chris Matthews is an ignorant fool, a Beckel of Bob, for calling us crackers....an appellation that is very specific in Florida history. He's too stupid to know any better.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
It's a cultural thing
Submitted by Dragoon on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 1:05pm.
The standards have to be different because it's all cultural. To be successful, in the traditional sense, is obviously white and for any minority to take that route is to turn your back on your cultural background. Unless you're rich and famous while still acting like you just came from the streets. Obviously that is all bunk but unfortunately these people still seem to believe that.
Probably the most insight I ever got into the "angry black" mindset was from Bebe Moore Campbell. Her angry black woman lead character viewed whites as the man, asians as honorary whites, hispanics as stealing jobs from blacks, and interracial couples as ignorant morons.
An aside, I still have to wonder where all the polling of asians has gone in the past decade. If you were to believe the popular polls, that entire racial group up and disappeared.
An interesting point
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 2:41pm.
Asians as an ethnic minority are the fastest growing group in the U.S. right now.
And oddly, no one ever mentions their voter preferences. Hmmmmm. Must not be democrat.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Anecdotal evidence
Submitted by GW on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 3:46pm.
I read a while back (no link, sorry) that Asians tend vote liberal.
THIS Asian (me) is a staunch conservative, but I'm unlike my family in more ways than one. My mom basically worships The Zero. My dad votes Democrat, even after voting for Michael Manley in Jamaica and then moving our family from Jamaica because of ... Michael Manley. I still don't quite understand that.
My Asian room mate in Seattle voted Democrat, and when given the chance, voted along racial lines: Gary Locke for Governor of Washington State because he is ... Asian.
I think the lack of media coverage o nthe Asian vote is more due to a lack of demographic significance, but that's just a guess on my part.
My belief is...
Submitted by Dragoon on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 4:25pm.
Asians don't fall into the economic/educational groups that Democrats prefer to round up as their voting blocs. Typically they are more financially successful and educated in the hard sciences. So, I think their success is something you don't want to acknowledge when you're attempting to practice the politics of envy. And I vaguely recall reading that Asians tend to vote conservative but I can't cite that.
*Anecdotal evidence ahead*
My high school girlfriend's family was from South Korea. They had done well in their native country but had decided to move to the States. Unfortunately they had most of their possessions stolen while in transit so they pretty much had their suitcases. Her parents pawned off their wedding rings to pay for an apartment. By the time she graduated, her parents had a successful business and she was going to head off to an expensive university. It doesn't really fit the narrative.
Another thing that I'm left wondering is how do they measure people like me in the polls. I'm biracial (Japanese/Euromutt) and don't see myself being pigeonholed in the current paradigm.
I have no idea
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 4:28pm.
...but as I said, it's a fascinating topic.
Perhaps something to look into....maybe a Forum topic where we can do a bit research and have a nice discussion.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Dragoon-
Submitted by GW on Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:16am.
My kids are English, German, Chinese, and Sub-continent Indian. And I think they happen to be cute.
I admit to being confused by where Asians tend to land on the Liberal-Conservative scale. The family values, work-ethic, emphasis on education, etc. that is stereotypically Asian leads me to believe the lean would be conservative. Once you throw in an entrepreurial spirit, you're really leaning right.
On the other hand, Michelle Malkin is treated horribly by other Asians for being conservative. My mom (governed entirely by emotion, which makes her a perfect Democrat) runs around in Lib circles and used to run an Asian Film Festival. You better believe she views everything through the lens of race: skin-deep diversity.
Is it possible that Asians fall in to the elite category of liberals? The limosine liberals I know (of any race) are also educated and hard-working, but still see things in terms of oppressors and race and so forth.
GW-
Submitted by Dragoon on Thu, 06/21/2012 - 12:12pm.
I think one of the biggest obstacles we have is that Asian cultures, at least Japanese culture, does not favor those who stick out or are disruptive. If I remember correctly, the saying is "the nail that sticks out gets the hammer." So, I think that might be a driving force as to why Asians don't raise a stink about being "disenfranchised" or what have you. And while I think Blonde is right that a study into Asian voting trends would be interesting, I don't know if you'd get much enthusiasm to participate.
Conservatives like Michelle Malkin are probably doubly despised for being a woman and a minority who happens to be on the right side of the spectrum. Too bad the diversity that the Democrats advocate for doesn't involve any differing political ideas.
As far as Asians being in the liberal elite, I can't really say. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of spokespeople for them. Hell, usually when I think of that particular group it's a bunch of white people telling us how bad white people are to non-white people.
A little off-topic, but since
Submitted by ant on Thu, 06/21/2012 - 4:59pm.
A little off-topic, but since you bring up Michelle Malkin, I remember years ago, perhaps because the left all of a sudden discovered her blog she was bombarded by comments of the most vile kind. The left likes to portray itself as the 'fair, tolerant, compassionate' kind, but the racial animosity and pure disgusting hatred I saw aimed at her that day was despicable. I could not even repeat some of those posts here without getting in trouble. Ironic too, that it is their side that talks of civility and 'anti-bullying'. A tactic that, in and of itself, is meant to bully and silence.
Michelle Malkin
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 06/21/2012 - 5:14pm.
She's still bombarded with the most vile of insults. Every once in awhile she'll retweet them or post them on her blog, just to let everyone know how tolerant the other side is.
Double standards all around!
Submitted by Dragoon on Thu, 06/21/2012 - 5:44pm.
I've seen some of the comments made about Michelle Malkin and I'm always a little surprised that they'd use that kind of language. Kind of like the talking heads referring to the TEA Party as "teabaggers." I'd imagine anyone with a lick of sense would point out that you really undermine your position if you start using the tactics you accuse your opponents of using.
Yes Blonde*
Submitted by cajun2 on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 6:15pm.
The differences in various ethnic groups are interesting. You will never hear the lib talkers go on about Asians in this country. They are disciplined, family oriented, strive for independence, frugal, and work to ensure their future and that of the younger generation. How far away is that from our young people today who are spoiled brats wishing for comfort without effort and material goods. As Mr Williams stated, blacks have a different set of expectations, see themselves as victims, therefore give themselves different boundaries.
I would love to see Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell and Dr Janice Shaw Crouse do a panel discussion on this very subject. It would entice me for obvious reasons but it would be very enlightening to those who look for lesser expectations, justifications for irresponsible behavior and the disintergration of morals and values in our society.
As you can tell, cajun is sick of liberals.
Caj
Submitted by Radical1979 on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 6:20pm.
It's why I think blacks in the inner cities hate Asians so much. They come here and accomplish a great deal through hard work and sacrifice. Some joke about how Indians own so many franchise business' like Dunkin Donuts or 7/11's, but with our Dunkin I see the same faces all the time. Working hard all the time.
I think just a little focus
Submitted by ant on Thu, 06/21/2012 - 9:39am.
I think just a little focus is lost in making most issues 'blacks and whites'. Not to deny that there isn't animosity between the groups based solely on skin-colored or other factors (revenge, superiority beliefs, etc.) but the real problem here is the divide between liberal (progressive ideology) and conservative. And that is a HUGE divide. I guarantee these 'flash mobs' are not made up of blacks who identify as conservative, and I guarantee they are supporters (in voice and thinking...not money, that goes to sneakers and smart phones.) of Dimocrat politicians and policies. To be black in this Country is to be Democrat and to be Democrat is to be an angry, racist thug and bully. This can be evidenced at any CBC meeting, Union display or MSNBC broadcast.