Walter Williams Column: Profiling and the Trayvon Martin Case
Right now, there isn't enough known about the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, a black, by George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old part-Hispanic, during his neighborhood watch tour in an Orlando, Fla., suburb. If evidence emerges that Zimmerman's actions were not justified, he should be prosecuted and punished; however, there's a larger issue that few people understand or have the courage to acknowledge, namely that black and young has become synonymous with crime and, hence, suspicion. To make that connection does not make one a racist. Let's look at it.
Twelve years ago, a black Washington, D.C., commissioner warned cabbies, most of whom were black, against picking up dangerous-looking passengers. She described "dangerous-looking" as a "young black guy ... with shirttail hanging down longer than his coat, baggy pants, unlaced tennis shoes." She also warned cabbies to stay away from low-income black neighborhoods. Did that make the D.C. commissioner a racist?
In some cities, such as St. Louis, black pizza deliverers have complained about having to deliver pizzas to certain black neighborhoods, including neighborhoods in which they live. Are they racists? The Rev. Jesse Jackson once remarked, "There is nothing more painful for me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery — (and) then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved." Does that make the reverend a racist?
The former Charleston, S.C., black chief of police, Reuben Greenberg, said the problem facing black America is not racial profiling. He said, "The greatest problem in the black community is the tolerance for high levels of criminality." Former Los Angeles black police Chief Bernard Parks, defending racial profiling, said: "It's not the fault of the police when they stop minority males or put them in jail. It's the fault of the minority males for committing the crime. In my mind, it is not a great revelation that if officers are looking for criminal activity, they're going to look at the kind of people who are listed on crime reports." Are former police Chiefs Greenberg and Parks racist?
According to the Uniform Crime Report for 2009, among people 18 or younger, blacks were charged with 58 percent of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, 67 percent of robberies, 42 percent of aggravated assaults and 43 percent of auto thefts. As for murder, more than 90 percent of the time, their victims were black. These statistics, showing a strong interconnection among race, youth and crime, are a far better explanation for racial profiling and suspicion than simple racism.
Black Americans have spoken out against racial profiling by police. They've been insulted by store personnel who might give them extra scrutiny. There's the insult of the sound of a car door being locked when a black approaches. It's insulting to have taxi drivers pass up a black person and pick up white people down the street. In a similar vein, I'm sure that a law-abiding Muslim is insulted when given extra scrutiny at airports or listening to Fox News reporter Juan Williams, who was fired by National Public Radio in 2010 for publicly saying that he gets nervous when he sees people on a plane with clothing that identifies them as Muslim. Blacks and Muslims who face the insults of being profiled might direct their anger toward those who've made blacks and crime synonymous and terrorism and Muslims synonymous.
God would never racially profile, because he knows everything, including who is a criminal or terrorist. We humans are not gods; therefore, we must often base our decisions on guesses and hunches. It turns out that easily observed physical characteristics, such as race, are highly interconnected with other characteristics less easily observed.
For most blacks to own up to the high crime rate among blacks is a source of considerable discomfort. Beyond that, it creates suspicions and resentment, which are destructive of good race relations, and it's devastating to the black community, which is its primary victim.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
- Walter E. Williams's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
➚Don't air the dirty laundry
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 12:20am.
Of course you're right, Mr. Williams, and though there seems to be a lot of skepticism every time statistics are offered, most people understand simple percentages.
Am I influenced by experience? Certainly. Anecdotally, I should not respect it as significant, but 100% or the times I've been held up at gunpoint (once), it was by a black man. 100% of the times my wife has had her purse ripped off of her arm (once), it was by a black boy. This, in a town of less than 100,000 and a black population of 4.6%.
Are my inferences invalid? What difference does it make? They exist.
I don't believe a change is gonna' come until there is an awakening among blacks that the liberal experiment has gone terribly wrong. But as you said some years ago concerning black education,
If the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan set out to destroy black academic excellence in Philadelphia, I doubt whether he could achieve as much damage.
I don't know about you, Mr. Williams, but I'm ready to remove that leading "If" from your observation, and examine the possibility this has all been a goal from as far back as the War On Poverty. Originally targeted at blacks, that "war" has been expanded to include all Americans who can be convinced their plight is hopeless without government help.
Here we go!!!!
Submitted by NascarShizzle on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 2:34am.
More hand-ringing and beard scratching to follow... courtesy of Walter Williams. Walter...please look at 'your village!' Remember what Hillary Clinton said..."It take's a village to raise a child."
"Racial profiling" occurs everytime a minority looks at a
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Mon, 04/02/2012 - 3:29pm.
Caucasian and instantly hates him.
Dr. Martin Luther King preached that is was wrong to judge a man by the color of his skin, but judge him on what is in his heart.
So, when jessejaxsuuunnnn and little al sharpton scream racism where none exist, does that mean they do not follow the teachings of Dr. King?
When a black person looks at a White person, and instantly hates them, does that mean they do not follow the teachings as well?
I keep hearing how great Dr. King was, and I agree, he was an awesome LEADER of his race, but there is little evidence that any blacks have any idea what his teachings were because of the racist 'leaders' of the black communities today.
There are no 'new black panthers', just another version of a black cancer growing in the black neighborhoods.
The 'cancers' like the 'gangsta garbed' young people in those communities, the provide nothing of value, but they do offer fear and intimidation to the residents.
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
Many supposed King supporters do the opposite.
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 11:41am.
King was fantastic, yet they do the exact opposite; put race into everything and judge based on it also. 180 degrees backwards again, and is a sign of the times.
Good article: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1569730 Trayvon was not shot because he was black.
I read that the shooter has a similar % WHITE as Obama. First they called Zimmerman WHITE, then when pressed, some media started saying WHITE HISPANIC to be more accurate (which it is vs. just white). Based on that logic, Obama should be called a WHITE AFRICAN. So Obama IS A "WHITEY" just like Zimmerman. Funny to think about the hypocrisy and craziness of this very deliberate and politically motivated race baiting.
Divide and conquer. King would be crying!
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
That would be a great tagline.
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 11:45am.
"If George Zimmerman is a 'White Latino', then barack obama is a 'White African'."
Excellent comparison Maximus!
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
I revised my comments (below
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 11:50am.
I revised my comments (below - it would not let me since you made a comment). Some media I think I hear is still just saying white. Based on that you could just refer to Obama as white also!
--- REV---
King was fantastic, yet many now do the exact opposite and put race into everything, and judge based on it also! 180 degrees backwards again, and is a sign of the times.
Good article I would rec: http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1569730 Trayvon was not shot because he was black.
I read somewhere that the shooter has a similar % WHITE as Obama. Think about that! First, the media called Zimmerman WHITE; but, then when pressed, some media started saying WHITE HISPANIC to be more accurate (which it is vs. just white). Some media still call Z just white.
Based on that logic, Obama should be called WHITE, or a WHITE AFRICAN. So Obama IS A "WHITEY" just like Zimmerman!! Funny to think about the hypocrisy and craziness of this very deliberate and politically motivated race baiting. A divide and conquer Marxist media. King would be crying!
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Spot on, Mr. Williams
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Tue, 04/03/2012 - 8:34am.
But one more point; of course it is someone's right to dress as they please, but if they dress as a threatening thug (dark glasses at night, hoodie, etc.), is it incumbent upon the rest of us to ignore what strikes us as obvious; that this person poses a threat?
Do these young males(blacks, hispanics AND whites) dress the way they do for reasons of convenience or economic need? Or do they dress that way to project a "badass" image to their contemporaries? So they prefer to be prejudged by their peers, but not by others, right?
I think we know the answers to those questions, but the media is too timid to broach the subject.