More Grading on the Curve: At RTT, Acceptable Weekly Unemployment Claims Threshold Is Now Any Reading Below 400,000
The Department of Labor reported today that initial claims for unemployment benefits increased to 362,000 from an upwardly revised (as usual) 354,000 the previous week. Expectations were for a reading of 351,000 (Business Insider's email) or 352,000 (Bloomberg).
Over at the Associated Press, also known as the Administration's Press, the headlined reaction in its 9:17 a.m. report was: "Applications Hover Near Low Levels." As usual, it took a New Media source, in this case Zero Hedge, to point out something potentially troubling in the news, namely that "this is the first time we have seen three consecutive weeks of rises since August 2010." True, the rises have been modest, but next week will almost certainly see an upward revision to this week (the case for 51 of the past 52 weeks, averaging almost 4,000 and with no decreases). Modest or not, they run counter to presumptive press claims that the job market is "healing" (Reuters) and "improving" (Bloomberg). The howler of the day came from RTT News, which "offers custom news and information solutions" for which subscribers apparently pay at least $250 a month:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly But Remain Below 400,000
(RTTNews) - New claims for unemployment insurance in the U.S. ticked up unexpectedly last week, according to figures released Thursday by the Labor Department.
Labor Department figures put the level of initial jobless claims at a seasonally adjusted 362,000 for the week ended March 3rd, an increase of 8,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 354,000.
Additionally, the previous week's claims levels were upwardly revised from the 351,000 initially reported.
While most economists had predicted that new claims would hold level at the 351,000 initially reported for the previous week, the latest figure still remains comfortably below the 400,000 level that most economists believe is the threshold for lowering the overall unemployment rate.
Jobless claims have remained below the key 400,000 level for all but two of the last 18 weekly reports.
Gosh, three years ago, according to Christopher Rugaber at AP, the threshold for meaningful improvement was 325,000. He has since gone to 375,000, which he stuck to in his report today. But RTT's take is the first I've seen of 400,000.
It does not seem that an outfit like RTT would determine that figure on its own. It appears that it may have gleaned the number from an October 2011 CNNMoney.com report, where Annalyn Censky wrote that "Economists often look to see initial claims fall below 400,000, to signal a lower unemployment rate ..."
It must be nice to have the media grade your work on a curve that is 15% to 23% (50K and 75K divided by 325K) more generous than it was less than three years ago, for no apparent reason beyond enabling almost any economic news about the current presidential administration during an election year to be cast in a favorable light.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
This was being spun before it was released
Submitted by c5then on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 11:37am.
I was checking a number of business / market sites early this morning and the good spin that was being put on the expected "slight uptick" in the unemployment claims was astounding.
Great News!!!...The patient didn't die, they are just in a coma.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
From the same (gov't) people who.....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:23pm.
decided that the two biggest expenditures (after housing) of every household in the U.S., food and fuel, would no longer be in included when calculating inflation because, well, they're just "too volatile".
They've decided it "looks better" for them to be able to report the current rate of inflation at 3% rather than the actual rate of 11% (http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts).
I saw this...
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 12:28pm.
"Applications Hover Near Low Levels."
This was the first headline that jumped out at me when I logged into my favorite on-line news sources, and I knew, without even looking at the by-line, that it was an AP article. That "Hover Near Low Levels" part was a dead giveaway.
Hay, AP, let us know when unemployment rates actually reach "low levels," will you? Especially those "historically low levels" the press loves to talk about. "Hovering near" them isn't much of an improvement. Especially when they start "hovering" higher and higher, as your own article points out.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Tomorrow government will release February's unemployment
Submitted by Conservator on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 3:47pm.
It's likely to show a sharp increase based on the results of Gallup's Mid-February report.
U.S. Unemployment Increases in Mid-February
Underemployment also up, to 19.0%
"...Gallup's mid-month unemployment reading, based on the 30 days ending Feb. 15, serves as a preliminary estimate of the U.S. government report, and suggests the Bureau of Labor Statistics will likely report on the first Friday of March that its seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased in February. Gallup found that unemployment decreased to 8.3% in its mid-January report, and suggested that the U.S. unemployment rate the BLS reported for January would decline.
Gallup also finds 10.0% of U.S. employees in mid-February are working part time but want full-time work, essentially the same as in January. The mid-February reading means the percentage of Americans who can only find part-time work remains close to its high since Gallup began measuring employment status in January 2010..."
How will liberal MSM spin this unfortunate but likely news?