'Scandal-Free' Admin Update: 80% of DOE 'Green' Loan $ Went to Obama Backers
In Hawaii today, according to an Associated Press dispatch filed by Ben Feller, President Barack Obama is reported to have told supporters that, in Feller's words, "everything they worked for and that the country stands for is on the line in his 2012 re-election bid."
Well, if what those donors have "worked" for is an inside track to government money, and if what the country stands for is crony capitalism, the President is right. The following excerpt from Peter Schweizer's new book, "Throw The All Out," provides the details in just one commercial arena (via The Daily Beast; HTs to Doug Ross, Conservatives4Palin, Victory Chronicles, and Heritage; bolds are mine; extra paragraph breaks added by me):
After he was sworn in as president, he proclaimed that taxpayer money would assuredly not be doled out to political friends. “Decisions about how Recovery Act dollars are spent will be based on the merits,” he said, referring to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. “Let me repeat that: decisions about how recovery money will be spent will be based on the merits. They will not be made as a way of doing favors for lobbyists.”
... an examination of grants and guaranteed loans offered by just one stimulus program run by the Department of Energy, for alternative-energy projects, is stunning. The so-called 1705 Loan Guarantee Program and the 1603 Grant Program channeled billions of dollars to all sorts of energy companies. The grants were earmarked for alternative-fuel and green-power projects, so it would not be a surprise to learn that those industries were led by liberals. Furthermore, these were highly competitive grant and loan programs—not usually a hallmark of cronyism. Often fewer than 10 percent of applicants were deemed worthy.
Nevertheless, a large proportion of the winners were companies with Obama-campaign connections. Indeed, at least 10 members of Obama’s finance committee and more than a dozen of his campaign bundlers were big winners in getting your money. At the same time, several politicians who supported Obama managed to strike gold by launching alternative-energy companies and obtaining grants. How much did they get?
According to the Department of Energy’s own numbers ... a lot. In the 1705 government-backed-loan program, for example, $16.4 billion of the $20.5 billion in loans granted as of Sept. 15 went to companies either run by or primarily owned by Obama financial backers—individuals who were bundlers, members of Obama’s National Finance Committee, or large donors to the Democratic Party.
The grant and guaranteed-loan recipients were early backers of Obama before he ran for president, people who continued to give to his campaigns and exclusively to the Democratic Party in the years leading up to 2008. Their political largesse is probably the best investment they ever made in alternative energy. It brought them returns many times over.
... One might think that the Department of Energy’s Loan Program Office, which has doled out billions in taxpayer-guaranteed loans, would be directed by a dedicated scientist or engineer. Or perhaps a civil servant with considerable financial knowledge. Instead, the department’s loan and grant programs are run by partisans who were responsible for raising money during the Obama campaign from the same people who later came to seek government loans and grants. Steve Spinner, who served on the Obama campaign’s National Finance Committee and was a bundler himself, was the campaign’s “liaison to Silicon Valley.”
... Another Obama fundraiser positioned to lead the allocation of taxpayer money to Obama contributors was Sanjay Wagle, who served as the managing co-chairman of Cleantech & Green Business Leaders for Obama. Wagle’s day job was as a principal at VantagePoint Venture Partners. After the 2008 election, Wagle joined the Obama administration as a “renewable energy grants adviser” at the Department of Energy. VantagePoint owned firms that would later see federal loan guarantees roll in.
As one might expect, it goes on and on and on.
It's bad enough that this is to some degree business as usual inside the Beltway. But two things make it unique. First, its scope. $16 billion in just one program is a lot of money, even in a world where we're being conditioned to be unimpressed by anything which isn't followed by 12 zeroes. Second, the brazen hypocrisy. Obama didn't just make a point of claiming that he would run a clean and above board operation in Washington during the 2008 campaign -- supposedly in stark contrast to his predecessor and the pre-2007 Republican majority in Congress -- he hammered at the theme at seemingly every conceivable opportunity.
Jonathan Alter and Allan Lichtman, both of whom have claimed that the Obama administration has been free of scandal during its nearly three years controlling the White House thus far -- call your offices.
Will the relatively disengaged majority of the electorate every hear about what Schweizer has detailed in the above segment from his book? It's not looking good; a search on his last name at the main site of the Associated Press, which may as well call itself The Administration's Press, at 7:00 p.m. ET came up empty. Ben Feller, you too need to call your office -- and get a grip.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Don't forget SEIU!
Submitted by IdahoJim on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 8:57pm.
SEIU has been collecting dues from public sector workers and turning around and giving huge amounts of money to the Democrat party and Obama's re-election campaign. Money, BTW, that comes from the American taxpayers.
If that's not a scandal, then MSM is blind or blinkered.
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
We can't win this argument
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 8:59pm.
He gets you/us with "the merits" part of the statement. Merits, by every measure are subjective. He'd fight to the death that drilling for oil is merit-less, while funding his democratic buddies is merely a consequence of his side being involved in all the right industries. It's a simple matter of ideology; in Obama's world, environmentalism is the only religion in town- the only one with real merit, while conservatives believe in old technology that poisons the planet; a viewpoint devoid of merit. If every argument you make is a strawman, you can't lose.
Conservatives shoud make this very point known in their opposition to Obama's "AJA". Why should taxpayers be forced to subsidize the progressive 1% when we've already seen on many levels how that subsidy just leads to the loss of those taxpayer funds? They should ask specifically which shovel-ready infrastructure projects would be funded with the money, and who would be contracting the work. They should ask which industries would receive taxpayer money from the AJA and what would be the terms of the loans. They should ask who will be making the decisions relative to the spending of this money. If in any case the administration balks at -or offers vague and misleading answers, conservatives should loudly shout, "This is why we won't vote for your bill. Your administration has a proven track record of failure in this exact regard and we won't make the taxpayers pay another nickle for your crony capitalism."
the Chicago Way
Submitted by MidAmerica on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 9:12pm.
Just try being an 'independent' businessman in Chicago. The doors don't open.
The name of the game on anything related to government contracts is called Pay to Play
And I'll ask the same question I have been since January
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 9:14pm.
Where the Hell are the republicans?
I hope John Bonehead along with the rest of the House repub leadership gets tossed out on their asses come November, as they are about the most useless bunch of spineless wussies I have ever seen.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Groveling in the corner on
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:35am.
Groveling in the corner on their knees praying for obama to love them. The GOP is nothing but a group of wek-kneed closet obama useful idiots. They work to assure the destruction of all conservative candidates just as hard as the DNC does. Hell, they are here on this board continually babbling about the greatness of Romney, too stupid to relize that as soon as they finish off Cain, the DNC will destroy Romney as some bizzare sex cult mormon.
I agree 100%
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:18am.
Romney will be the nominee, and he will get trounced in the general election.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave,
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:30am.
They have little power and have done a lot to get attention when needed. They carry a certain amount of guilt for things that have been done but they are without the resources to actually accomplish much. Last I heard they had passed 22 bills that now sit in the Senate on things like ending funding to Public Broadcasting, rolling back Obamacare, limiting the powers of the EPA, etc....
Say what you will about their accomplishments and the compromises they have done a lot to the extent that there control of the Congress allows.
As far as getting on TV and making their accusations - Issa still hasn't been able to do that as long as he has been railing against the administration. The media is still controlled by those that are supporting one side of the political spectrum and any criticism they allow will be controlled, criticized or condemned.
That being said - they still have to try because that is what we elected them to do.
The reason I bring this up is that a Republican Congress from the late 60s to early 90s served as nothing more than a foil and often did not bother to even show up for work since their votes were useless. If we continue to be overly critical of those that are at least trying they will give up all together. If they do it will be like the first two years of this administration.
The Republican leadership is
Submitted by celator on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:25am.
The Republican leadership is playing gentleman's ping pong while the D's are releasing the Godzilla monsters from hell on the American people. It cannot get more pathetic.
Wow. I'm shocked. A democrat
Submitted by rbosque on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 9:18pm.
Wow. I'm shocked. A democrat using taxpayer money to pay off contributers? Nooooooo!
"Going green"
Submitted by kata on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 10:02pm.
Obama is showing us that recycling works.
I don't want Wall Street out of the Government. I want the Government out of Wall Street. No more "business as usual"! This is ridiculous. Where are the Republicans?!
Excellent reporting Tom. Why isn't Speaker Boehner reporting
Submitted by Rush Fan on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 10:09pm.
these political payoffs during his regular meetings with the press? The press would have a difficult time not reporting it, if Boehner made it the focal point of his press conference.
Well ...
Submitted by Tom Blumer on Mon, 11/14/2011 - 10:16pm.
... the press constantly ignores substantive GOP press releases, but that doesn't mean you should keep on issuing them and keeping the relevant matters on the front burner.
Your basic question is unanswerable, unexplainable and growing quite infuriating.
Yes, it certainly is infuriating. I should have noted in my
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 12:10am.
initial post that Boehner's press conferences are usually covered by at least CSPAN. I guess in this age of massive media bias, every little bit of exposure helps. Then again, perhaps it's time for Boehner to be replaced with someone who has the communication skills of a Newt Gingrich.
Boehner can't even bring himself to throw a speed bump
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:24am.
...in front of Obama.
He may as well switch parties, as he has had 10 months to stop Obama, yet hasn't even managed to slow him down.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Test
Submitted by IdahoJim on Fri, 12/16/2011 - 8:04pm.
Want to see if the new sig is readable.
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
Test #2
Submitted by IdahoJim on Fri, 12/16/2011 - 8:06pm.
Is this better?
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
There has to a better way
Submitted by IdahoJim on Fri, 12/16/2011 - 8:10pm.
to test the HTML in a signature.
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net