Poll-Cooking With AP: Obama Approval at 60% -- With 46-29 Dem-GOP Split
The chefs in the kitchens at AP-GfK, a joint effort of the Associated Press and GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate Communications, have been working overtime cooking up a scrumptious dish for fans of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.
After tasting the output this morning, the AP's Liz Sidoti and Jennifer Agiesta could hardly contain their glee (also saved here for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes):
President Barack Obama's approval rating has hit its highest point in two years - 60 percent - and more than half of Americans now say he deserves to be re-elected, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll taken after U.S. forces killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.
In March, the same poll had the president's approval rating at 53%. The graphic which follows, obtained from the the poll's "topline" at AP-GfK's web site, reveal that the AP pair enjoy feasting on empty calories:

The graphic demonstrates that even March's 53% Obama approval rating was cooked, as its Democrat-Republican-Independent mix of 45-33-4 is wildly at odds with more comprehensive polls, like this one from January at Gallup showing a 45-44 Democrat-Republican split.
In May, AP-GfK doubled down on the filler. The 46% Democrat, 29% Republican, and 4% independent sample makeup alone is responsible for at least five points of the 7% "bounce" from March. The increase from 17% in March to 20% in May in the "Don't Know" component, a group which would seem to be more likely impressed by the most recent news reports they may have seen or heard than others, could explain the other two points. If so, May's cooked poll, adjusted for the change in recipe ingredients, would show no bounce.
The latest poll's sample is so laughably distorted that Sidoti and Agiesta should be ashamed of themselves as journalists for taking its results seriously. Instead, they've reacted like over-candied kids. Their report, to coin a phrase, spikes the football, and even tries to create a sense of further momentum:
In worrisome signs for Republicans, the president's standing improved not just on foreign policy but also on the economy, and independent Americans - a key voting bloc in the November 2012 presidential election - caused the overall uptick in support by sliding back to Obama after fleeing for much of the past two years.
Comfortable majorities of the public now call Obama a strong leader who will keep America safe. Nearly three-fourths - 73 percent - also now say they are confident that Obama can effectively handle terrorist threats. And he improved his standing on Afghanistan, Iraq and the United States' relationships with other countries.
... Overall, Obama's approval rating is up slightly from 53 percent in March and a 47 percent low point following last fall's midterm congressional elections, in which Republicans won control of the House and gained seats in the Senate. It was 64 percent in May 2009, just months after he was sworn into office.
Also, 53 percent now say he deserves to be re-elected; 43 percent say he should be fired, making it the first time in an AP-GfK poll that more people say he should get a second term than not.
It seems likely that a party-ID makeup in the neighborhood of January's, which is still a bit distorted compared to Gallup's 45-44 split, would have returned a May presidential approval result of about 50%.
The sad thing is that the AP surely knows that folks like yours truly and others will see through the poll's outrageous distortion. It seems pretty obvious that they don't care. What's appears to be far more important to the self-described Essential Global News Network is convincing the relatively less-informed who will see or hear the fantabulous 60% headline and won't look any further that the President is hugely popular, that his popularity is growing, and that they might as well get used to having Barack Obama in charge until January 20, 2017 -- while of course betting that most readers and viewers will never see the dirty work done in the kitchen that brought about the phony results.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Why do they bother?
Submitted by c5then on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:24am.
Why not just poll the White House staff and publish that? It would certainly be easier.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
I bet the WH staff numbers
Submitted by Free Stinker on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:33am.
I bet the WH staff numbers would be lower . . .
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
I know.....
Submitted by adamsmith on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:28am.
I now know a number of Obama voters who are asking, "How could I have voted for this?". The numbers from 2008 simply aren't there. To report these kinds of numbers I have to wonder, who has Soros purchased now?.....
adamsmith, Exactly! Every
Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 12:00pm.
adamsmith,
Exactly! Every single Republican I know who voted for Obama today regrets their vote. Interestingly enough, most of them were filled with remorse right after the police incident with Obama's friend. They were shocked to find out how radical Obama really was. All I did is listen and then tell them, "I TOLD YOU SO!".
However, that being said. I do know quite a few Democrats and Independents who were completely disappointed with President Obama who now, after Bin Laden's death, have gotten a second wind in their sails. these individuals were not planning to vote for Obama again, but now they will do it.
There is no denying that politically Obama has benefited over the killing of Osama, however, I agree that his approval rating is nowhere near 60%.
I believe, however, that within two weeks or so, all of these numbers will go down as the summer comes in, gas prices go up, unemployment goes up. The reality of life will remind those who have jumped back into Obama's bandwagon why they were disappointed at him just two weeks ago.
Every single Republican I
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 3:54pm.
Every single Republican I know who voted for Obama today regrets their vote.
How can you be a Republican and still vote for Obama?!
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Great question. No true
Submitted by Smartypants on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 4:30pm.
Great question. No true Republican voted for Barack Obama, period.
Well, as much as I would like
Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 6:24pm.
Well, as much as I would like to agree with you guys, that is not true. It is just like when Democrats voted for Ronald Reagan. It happens.
However, I would add to your lines abvoe, no true Republicans would have stayed home and not voted as so many did since they weren't too happy with John McCain.
Some of the biggest and loudest critics of President Obama stayed home and did not vote for John McCain.
I remember NB full of individuals who said they were not going to vote for McCain.
I blame the election of Obama on those who voted for him and on those Republicans who statyed home and did not vote.
I have never understood the logic of staying home and not voting. At the end of the way what happens more often than not is that you get a much worse elected official than the one you disliked from your party.
I have never understood the
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 6:51pm.
I have never understood the logic of staying home and not voting. At the end of the way what happens more often than not is that you get a much worse elected official than the one you disliked from your party.
Agreed. Those who thought McCain would have been just as bad as Obama can't really think that today. Despite his faults, he would have still been a noticeable improvement over what we have now.
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Oh Reary?
Submitted by VinnyBoombatz on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 10:50am.
I suppose there are some Democrats who are somewhat disappointed in some of the things that Obama has done. Like not going far enough with the Public Option in Health Care reform. Democrats who are disappointed in Obama however, I doubt, would vote for any of the Republicans, who mostly try to kiss up to the Tea-Baggers, and look out for the Millionaires and Billionaires while cutting services and benefits to middle class workers, and seniors by cutting medicaid and medicare.
I don't know what these fools are smoking...
Submitted by Hologram5 on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:34am.
But it has to be the cat's meow for them to be even thinking that this poll reflects reality... I wouldn't vote for the clown again even if they threatened my life.
Soros Strikes Again!
Submitted by changein2012 on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:38am.
GfK is partially funded by Soros organizations. This is simply more leftist propaganda fed to an all too eager media. You can find Georgie boy funding just about every leftist lie that exists today.
60% approval my arse!
I remember a couple of years ago reading a story posted on
Submitted by lsudolemite on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:45am.
MSN's website featuring a "nonpartisan" group claiming Bush lied hundreds of times about the Iraq War. With my BS detector on red alert, literally 5 minutes of Googling revealed that this "nonpartisan" organization was a Soros front group. The bylined writer apparently couldn't be bothered to take the time to inform us of this somewhat relevant information.
We are living in the Soviet Union now
Submitted by lsudolemite on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:40am.
Obama has his Pravda, and we're all supposed to smile and nod along when they ecstatically report on the stunning success of Obama's latest 5-year plan.
They have to lie
Submitted by gwalt on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:44am.
They have to lie to get elected. Then they lie---to each other---after they get elected. It truly is an affliction. Question: Do they really believe these kinds of stories?
Answer: Lets hope so.
"A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered". Ronald Reagan
I thought as much
Submitted by IgnatzJFahrquar on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 12:13pm.
Heard about this poll on the drive in this morning and immediately wondered how unbalanced was the sampling.
This should be great filler for the Lamestream for another week or so plus all the talking points by the usual suspects.
really?
Submitted by jessieH on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 1:08pm.
I guess we will see in November, 2012. Everyone I have talked to says obama's days are numbered[ not their exact words. I had to clean it up]..
2008 vs 2012
Submitted by okiehawk44 on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 1:34pm.
Many voted for Obama in 2008 to prove to themselves that they weren't racists and now they will have to vote for any one else in 2012 to prove that they aren't idiots.
LOL
Submitted by GW on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 2:50pm.
.
Thanks
Submitted by GW on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 2:50pm.
It seems likely that a party-ID makeup in the neighborhood of January's, which is still a bit distorted compared to Gallup's 45-44 split, would have returned a May presidential approval result of about 50%.
I was wondering what the neighborhood of the actual number would be, but I didn't know how the general population of voters identified themselves (Repub / Dem / Ind)
I saw these "polls" in the MA
Submitted by povertypimpin on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 2:53pm.
I saw these "polls" in the MA senate seat special election which had Coakley up anywhere from 10-15 points right up to the day before the election. It was clearly done to take the air out of any enthusiasm building among Republicans and independents leaning towards Brown. You simply ignore all the polls and vote.
Much of this reporting, and
Submitted by Smartypants on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 4:35pm.
Much of this reporting, and the related polls, is designed to pump up enthusiasm in Obama's base and to dispirit those who would vote against him. I still find it hard to believe that mere months removed from an absolute shellacking at the ballot box, that B.O.'s approval is anywhere near 60%. Further, what kind of a person changes his/her mind about this guy simply because the military carried out the killing of OBL? B.O. had little or nothing to do with that mission, other than to sign off--and he hesitated even at that. You may as well pass judgment on him based on what color tie he happens to be wearing in a given day. It's time people have some principles and learn to stick with them.
Leno
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 9:39pm.
This poll has the same validity as Leno's Jaywalking. Probably the same people.
Article review
Submitted by VinnyBoombatz on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 10:41am.
If you'd like to read a great critique of this "article" on the AP poll, go here:
http://www.ginandtacos.com/2011/05/12/polling-experts
enjoy!
progressives...what liars
Submitted by scarletandgold on Thu, 05/12/2011 - 7:12pm.
only progressive candidates pose as tea party candidates....like in the new york contest..only progressives will lie and make up phony poll results...keep up the presuure americans..we are winning...and they are sinking fast...lol i love it..progressives,,, vermin every one of of them