Absolutely Punked: AP Publishes Fake Story About GE Repaying Treasury
This is about as weak as it gets.
This morning as seen here (saved here at my web host for future reference), an unbylined 90-word Associated Press report at 9:57 a.m. told readers the following, in part:
Facing criticism over the amount of taxes it pays, General Electric announced it will repay its entire $3.2 billion tax refund to the US Treasury on April 18.
GE uses a series of foreign tax havens that the company says are legal and that led to an enormous refund for the 2010 tax year.
At 10:40 a.m., CNBC called BS on AP:
GE Rebuffs Tax Refund Report as 'Hoax'
General Electric called an earlier media report Wednesday that it would repay a $3.2 billion tax refund to the Treasury Department a "hoax."
Members of an activist group calling themselves the "Yes Men" claimed responsibility for the hoax, according to a report from Reuters.
Earlier Wednesday morning, the Associated Press reported that the U.S. conglomerate — using "a series of foreign tax havens" — would repay the "enormous" refund it received for the 2010 tax year.
Shares of GE, which is a minority shareholder in NBC Universal, the parent company of CNBC.com, slipped on the AP report.
... "It's a hoax and GE did not receive a refund," said Deirdre Latour, a GE spokeswoman.</p>
... "The "Yes Men" sent the release to draw attention to GE's approach to taxes, according to Andrew Boyd who described himself in a phone interview with Reuters as a member of the group."
AP's retraction, currently time-stamped at 1:35 p.m. but apparently originally published at about 10:30 a.m., now reads as follows:
The Associated Press mistakenly published a story Wednesday about General Electric Co. that was based on a fake press release.
The fake release said that General Electric, responding to criticism over the amount of taxes it pays, would repay a $3.2 billion tax refund for 2010 to the Treasury Department.
The fake release, which was emailed to the AP, included a GE logo and a link to a website designed to look like GE's website.
The idea that GE would voluntarily pay $3.2 billion in tax it apparently wasn't required to legally pay is so absurd that the legitimacy of the press release upon which the Associated Press relied -- apparently without calling or e-mailing for any kind of authentication (but that logo and fake web site sure looked OK!) -- should have been seriously questioned from the start. But it clearly wasn't.
The AP demonstrates more and more with each passing day that it is not a serious news organization and has inadequate controls to prevent false, misleading, and slanted news from being published. Its subscribing newspapers, radio outlets, and TV stations -- and the American people -- are being poorly served.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
"Immoral, but legal."
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 2:26pm.
Nice.
P.T.
Submitted by Bob K on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 3:10pm.
Barnum was right,,,,There is a sucker born every minute. And apparently, they choose journalism as a career many times.
More like every 15 seconds.
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 3:56pm.
More like every 15 seconds.
You're right about AP . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 4:09pm.
We've heard for years how the network news rooms and newspaper desks have been drawing down personnel and overseas offices, and are now relying primarily on news services like AP and Reuters for stories.
This proves how misplaced that investment was.
All AP had to do was call GE's headquarters to confirm or deny.
AP
Submitted by ripper58 on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 4:12pm.
can't afford fact checkers?
They could afford NINE of
Submitted by profdlp on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 12:40am.
They could afford NINE of them to read Palin's book...
Those were fact-checkers? The
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 9:42am.
Those were fact-checkers? The results they produced made me think they were third-graders from the George Soros boarding school.
Same thing as with Union Carbide.
Submitted by troglodyt on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 4:34pm.
It's surprising how little effort you have to put into a hoax like that and see it work.
iz funne germanzee jokez
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 04/14/2011 - 6:56am.
iz sit murrycane so butt don't pop off. merkel, she conservative. yez yez yez. got boney fides. we know not funnee but merkel hate unionz. merkel unionz busterz. that funny. ha! merkel! soros! global warmtimez!
More please
Submitted by rogue operator on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 6:55pm.
We need a whole lot more stories like these to demonstrate the left's ideological blindness and willingness to reprint whatever it thinks the state wants them to say.
"and has inadequate controls
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 9:05pm.
"and has inadequate controls to prevent false, misleading, and slanted news from being published."
Inadequate controls to prevent slanted new stories? From their liberal biased history, it seems the AP has controls requiring that slanted news be published.
A Matter of Standards
Submitted by rogue operator on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 11:10pm.
When your editorial standard is what makes one political party look good and another look bad, rather than newsworthiness and an honest attempt at objective truth, it's no surprise that such a gaffe could happen. That's why I think more of this type of messing with the news media would be helpful. Force them to check facts. Publicly ridicule their shameless support of Democrats and the political left.
Absurd Press
Submitted by batcat on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 10:23pm.
It was great to see those scumbags get nailed like that. Absurd Press spews out so much bulls**t you would think they would know bulls**t when it's sent their way. I guess they just got so use to pushing bulls**t out that they didn't recognize it coming in.
AP Defends Obama First - Researches Later
Submitted by Boil It Down on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 10:51pm.
Since the AP have been such grand promoters of Obama, who has taken on Immelt as a chief advisor, you‘d think they’d have gotten a heads up before embarrassing themselves any further.
The AP has discredited their own brand so frequently in attempts to cover for Obama and reshape his image that they look more like a PR firm for him than a news aggregator. They always rush recklessly to defend Obama, which causes them to make a lot of mistakes. Some of their articles bear little resemblance to reality with regard to Obama.
I often wonder how they maintain their respected status as their credibility continually declines. -bidn-