ABC Cap Gains Tax Hit Ignores Charles Gibson's 'Finest Hour' Questions at April 2008 Dem Debate
To add an exclamation point to Brad Wilmouth's great post last night ("ABC Pushes for Tax Hike on Capital Gains, Ignores Likelihood of Tax Revenue Loss") -- in ignoring the likelihood that raising the capital gains tax rate would reduce capital gains tax collections, the network also "somehow" forgot now-retired World News Tonight anchor Charles Gibson's aggressive questioning on the topic during an April 2008 Democratic Party presidential debate.
That night, ABC, represented by Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, who was then the host of ABC's Sunday morning news show, drove leftists crazy (noted at the time in NewsBusters posts here and here), because, as NB's Brent Bozell noted, "For once it veered from liberal orthodoxy."
One of Gibson's "veers" consisted of questions he asked presidential contenders Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton about capital gains taxation. The now-defunct New York Sun characterized it as "Gibson's Finest Hour" (I would suggest that it might really have been "Gibson's Only Fine Hour"), and wrote it up thusly (internal link added by me; bolds are mine):
... for a few moments in yesterday's presidential debate on ABC News, anchorman Charles Gibson sounded like a charter member of the Club for Growth or Americans for Tax Reform. It came when Mr. Gibson questioned Senator Obama about the capital gains tax. Mr. Gibson quoted Mr. Obama as talking about raising the tax to 28% from 15%. "But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent," Mr. Gibson said. "And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent. And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down. So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?"
Why, Robert Bartley couldn't have put it better himself. Mr. Obama was totally flummoxed, betraying a fundamental lack of understanding of the Laffer Curve. The Democrat of Illinois spoke of the need to "finance health care for Americans who currently don't have it," and of the need to "invest in our infrastructure" and in "our schools."
Mr. Gibson, to his credit, wouldn't let the point go. "But history shows that when you drop the capital gains tax, the revenues go up," he replied to Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama replied by changing the subject, to "a housing crisis that this president has not been attentive to."
Mr. Gibson tried the same question, more or less, on Senator Clinton. She, at least, disavowed raising the capital gains rate above 20%, ruling out a return to the 28% rate contemplated by Mr. Obama. But when Mr. Gibson pressed her on why she would raise it at all, she went into lunk-headed, static analysis mode, displaying a lack of understanding as severe as that afflicting her rival. "You know, Charlie, I'm going to have to look and see what the revenue situation is," she said.
The Tax Foundation has a transcript of the exchange. The following segment from it is worth excerpting, given the fiscal circumstances largely created as a result of Obama administration policies during its first two years (bolds are mine):
OBAMA: And you can't take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children and our grandchildren, and then say that you're cutting taxes, which is essentially what John McCain has been talking about.
And that is irresponsible. I believe in the principle that you pay as you go. And, you know, you don't propose tax cuts, unless you are closing other tax breaks for individuals. And you don't increase spending, unless you're eliminating some spending or you're finding some new revenue. That's how we got an additional $4 trillion worth of debt under George Bush. That is helping to undermine our economy. And it's going to change when I'm president of the United States.
GIBSON: But history shows that when you drop the capital gains tax, the revenues go up.
OBAMA: Well, that might happen, or it might not. It depends on what's happening on Wall Street and how business is going. I think the biggest problem that we've got on Wall Street right now is the fact that we got have a housing crisis that this president has not been attentive to and that it took John McCain three tries before he got it right.
In addition to Gibson's grilling on cap gains, both he and Stephanopoulos did a creditable job of pushing Obama on the substance and relevance of his relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah "God D**n America" Wright, and in giving Mrs. Clinton opportunities to pile on. This of course drove the left even further over the edge.
As Bozell further noted at the time, after one single night of decent journalism:
Like an abused spouse, ABC responded by repeating all the leftist complaints on its airwaves and supinely saluting the impressive dexterity of the Obama campaign.
That would appear to explain why Sawyer and ABC won't mention Gibson's April 2008 performance. They're apparently ashamed of it.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Gibson refers to reducing
Submitted by bkeyser on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 11:08am.
Gibson refers to reducing Capital Gains Tax as the Bush Doctrine.
Gibson obviously read something he was forbidden to read; actual historical financials relative to tax rates and collections. ABC surely found that piece of heretical literature and burned it, forever banning it from its properties and possession of its employees. We can't have them reading something that ole John Maynard Keynes wouldn't approve.
Yes, and Georgie's bravery
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 11:16am.
Yes, and Georgie's bravery was a one-hit wonder too.
I just commented in the other thread that when discussing civility with Laura Ingraham, Georgie equated Obama's "enemies" comment with O'Connell's "one-term president" comment and then asked Ingraham how she would advise O'Connell and Boehner to be more civil.
So they had an attack of integrity...like a sneeze. Happens to everyone once in a while. It certainly doesn't make up for the mountain of bias on the other side of the scale.
The More Things Change
Submitted by Blonde on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 11:34am.
...the more things stay the same.
"But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent," Mr. Gibson said. "And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent. And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?"
Why, Robert Bartley couldn't have put it better himself. Mr. Obama was totally flummoxed, betraying a fundamental lack of understanding of the Laffer Curve. The Democrat of Illinois spoke of the need to "finance health care for Americans who currently don't have it," and of the need to "invest in our infrastructure" and in "our schools."
But Obama and the democrats keep trying to repeat making raising the tax rates magically turn into increased revenue! They're smarter than everyone else who's tried it before, you see.....so surely it will work THIS time!
What they fail to understand (every single time, I might add) is that "other things remaining the same" will never, ever remain the same. People make their decisions on economic realities, not pie-in-the-sky political scenarios. But the democrats (nor apparently, the people who vote for them) will never understand.
It's funny (sad funny), but you can never make a liberal understand that. It's like trying to answer the libtard question "what have you conservatives given us?"...and spout off a laundry list of government programs. They build in the premise that they're owed and it's government's (i.e. everyone else's) obligation to give, while they should merely receive. Maddening, that.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
And in spite of all the
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 11:38am.
And in spite of all the evidence, Obama insists that "it might happen, it might not."
He is like a child with "magical thinking."
I might have to steal that too!
Submitted by Blonde on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 11:45am.
Obama & his magical thinking.
Of course, it is rather open to liberal misinterpretation.
I have to love the old fall-back position..."investments!!!!". At least the clown didn't invoke "for the children" in the SOTU....oh wait, I think he did.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Liberal Missunderinterpretating
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 7:16pm.
It's not magical thinking if it feeeels real.
Anything said by Gibson and
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 11:47am.
Anything said by Gibson and Stephanopoulos during that debate was in defense of Hilary Clinton and nothing more.
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Assuming that Obama was
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 12:09pm.
Assuming that Obama was correct about an increase of 4 Trillion in the National Debt under 8 years of Pres. Bush (20 percent of that was under reckless spending by the democrats in his last two years). So 3.2 trillion of debt accrued under 6 years of Pres. Bush, despite two wars and a Clintonian recession; and three trillion of debt accrued under TWO years of Obama. 4.5 Trillion of Debt, MORE THAN all eight years of the Bush/Republican Congress and Bush Democrat Congress, accrued under three years of Obama. Yet, Obama's words about not getting out the Chinese credit card and pay go, are laughable. If a republican had said those words in 2008 and faced the situation we had now, those words would be repeated ad nauseum to the public on every major libtard tv, radio and newspaper. But, don't dare suggest any bias.