At NYT, Former Congressman Who Called for Rick Scott's Shooting Wants 'Atmosphere of Civility and Respect'
Oh c'mon, this is too easy.
Here's a paragraph from former Congressman Paul Kanjorski's op-ed in the New York Times, published online yesterday, in the print edition today ("Why Politicians Need to Stay Out in the Open"):
We all lose an element of freedom when security considerations distance public officials from the people. Therefore, it is incumbent on all Americans to create an atmosphere of civility and respect in which political discourse can flow freely, without fear of violent confrontation.
Here's Kanjorski, when he was still a Congressman, discussing Florida Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Scott last year (HT Mark Hemingway at the Washington Examiner):
"That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. He stole billions of dollars from the United States government and he's running for governor of Florida. He's a millionaire and a billionaire. He's no hero. He's a damn crook. It's just we don't prosecute big crooks."
The same column at the Scranton Times-Tribune recalls other gems from Kanjorski, who called the health insurance industry "blood suckers," and "said at a town hall meeting that Democrats 'sort of stretched the facts' to sound as if they would end the Iraq war."
Kanjorski also said the following while defending last year's "financial reform" law:
We’re giving relief to people that I deal with in my office every day now unfortunately. But because of the longevity of this recession, these are people — and they’re not minorities and they’re not defective and they’re not all the things you’d like to insinuate that these programs are about — these are average, good American people.
You don't have to be a genius to see the racism inherent in that statement, but in case anyone needs help: If the people Kanjorski “deal(s) with in my office everyday” are “average, good American people” because “they’re not minorities and they’re not defective,” then those who are minorities and “defective” in some way are not “average, good American people.”
This is the guy to whom the New York Times goes for an op-ed on civility.
The Old Gray Lady, which has been obsessed with partisan "vitirol" (right-wing only, of course) since Saturday's Tucson murders, is turning itself into a sick, sad joke. No further commentary required.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
- Tom Blumer's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Ah, but Kanjorski is a leftski
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:16pm.
Which means that in his mind, it's 'civility' and 'respect' from thee, not from me.
The hypocrisy of these people is staggering.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Even though there always
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:27pm.
Even though there always going to be one America, thanks to the radical, con artist living in our White House, We the people are now divided into real Americans ( Conservatives and most independents ) and un - american traitors ( democrats, socialists ).
Barack_Must_Go.....
What is in their water supply?
Submitted by Walker01049 on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:46pm.
This shooting tragety has really brought out the crazies. The ones with the "D" behind their names. Then there's the MSM at their very best. They must all drink from the same fountain! After reading the Constitution on the House floor they now want to get rid of the 1st and 2nd amendments. Hugo Chavez is is in good company with these people. (almost said idiots but that would be insensitive)
Paul Kanjorski
Submitted by fastaire54 on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 4:52pm.
Come on now. You can't blame Congressman Kanjorski for making these reprehensible comments about shooting someon. He only said them because he had been listening to Rush Limbaugh that day and he was infuenced unconciously by all the vitriol he heard. It was Rush's fault.Long history of killing the opposition.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 5:22pm.
Hey, it's OK to kill your opponents!
Hitler - 6 million +
Stalin - 30 million +
Mao - 75 million +
Castro - a few lousy thousand + (but in fairness it was a small island)
Throughout history, these progressive/leftist/communist/socialist/fascist bastards have had only one answer for getting and keeping power. Kill the opposition.
Is that going over the top? If so, where am I wrong?