Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'

AP Howler: BP Spill Handling a 'Stain' on Admin's 'Reputation for Relying on Science'

By Tom Blumer | November 12, 2010 | 11:42

A  A
Tom Blumer's picture

Thursday evening, NB's Ken Shepherd accurately pointed out how little establishment press interest there has been in prominently carrying an Associated Press report about how the Obama administration has been, in the words of the wire service's Dina Cappiello, "downplaying scientific findings, misrepresenting data and most recently misconstruing the opinions of experts it solicited."

This is not to excuse those who have given her report short shrift, but the AP and Cappiello herself did their level best to try to minimize the significance of what was to come in their headline and first paragraph, respectively:

Govt's handling of science on oil spill questioned

 

The oil spill that damaged the Gulf of Mexico's reefs and wetlands is also threatening to stain the Obama administration's reputation for relying on science to guide policy.

First, as to the "Please don't read this, it's really boring" headline:

  • This isn't about some abstract entity known as the "Gov't." It's about a presidential administration headed by Barack Obama and populated with environmental extremists like Carol Browner and Ken Salazar. The headlines during Hurricane Katrina were about "the government." No, they were about George W. Bush's alleged mishandling of the situation (which was in reality largely the fault of Louisiana's governor and the mayor New Orleans.
  • "Handling of science of oil spill" -- How about "misrepresenting facts of oil spill"?
  • "Questioned" -- What a weasel word. How about "criticized," "skewered," "condemned," or "faulted"?

As to the administration's "reputation for relying on science," since when?

To name just three examples:

  • The administration continues to push for radical controls over almost everything anyone does in the form of cap and trade legislation based on scientifically unsupported and largely discredited notions relating to supposedly human-caused global warming -- er, climate change -- oh, I meant climate disruption.
  • The administration continues to support life-destroying embryonic stem cell research when adult stem cell research is where virtually all meaningful medical progress has been achieved.
  • It deliberately modified the Bush administration's successful PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) program for fighting AIDS in Africa to minimize and mostly exclude abstinence education, even though "No generalized HIV epidemic has ever been rolled back by a prevention strategy primarily based on condoms."

Cappiello's first paragraph attempts to tell readers that what follows in the rest of her report represents a rare exception. Sorry, ma'am, it's more like the rule.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

  • Bias by Omission
  • Double Standards
  • Oil spill
  • Business Coverage
  • BP Gulf Oil Spill
  • Pollution
  • Economy
  • Environment
  • Events
  • Government Agencies
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Political Scandals
  • Dana Cappiello
  • Wire Services/Media Companies
  • Associated Press
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Sorry

Submitted by Anneke9 on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 11:52am.

Sorry, this was posted to wrong story and deleted...

Camouflage conservative in Baghdad-by-the-Bay
  • Login to post comments

At what point does

Submitted by Ashrak on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 12:52pm.

At what point does embarrassment actually set in for today's journalists?

That an individual right exists requires that some policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
  • Login to post comments

Stain

Submitted by Six String Spiff on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 12:52pm.

The Obama admin has been nothing BUT a stain itself...

 

on the United States Constitution.

 

Can anybody give me any evidence of this President doing ANYTHING for this country that hasn't either:

A. Made things worse.

B. Trashed a foreign relation

C.  Legitimized an enemy

 

??
 

  • Login to post comments

No trade agreement, lying about the spill, Axelfraud

Submitted by Tomorama on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 1:38pm.

Stain, and that was just this week................

 

I penned a letter to the Boston Globe this morning even though they did put the AP story on page two yesterday, they NEVER published two huge stories along the way........

Obama and Salazaar allowed for BP to forgo already in place inspections right before the oil spill   

Obama and Salazaar thought so highly of the safety of this very site they were going to give it a safety award

And of course, Obama received more money from BP than anyone else last electiojn cycle

Again, all the news that's fit to omit, or misreport, deflect or simply lie "for" your "cause".

If you make poverty easy, you will have more of it. Benjamin Franklin
  • Login to post comments

Obama admin. Muzzling science since the beginning

Submitted by Gary Hall on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 1:44pm.

This should be no surprise; the Obama administration has been muzzling science since the beginning. And, as expected, the national media is keeping the information away from the broad public.

Back in June of 2009, in an online only post, CBS picked up this "shocker (my bold):"

EPA May Have Suppressed Report Skeptical Of Global Warming

[..] Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty "decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data." [..]

That appears to conflict with an e-mail from McGartland in March, who said to Carlin, the report's primary author: "I decided not to forward your comments... I can see only one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office." He also wrote to Carlin: "Please do not have any direct communication with anyone outside of (our group) on endangerment. There should be no meetings, e-mails, written statements, phone calls, etc."

One reason why the process might have been highly charged politically is the unusual speed of the regulatory process. Lisa Jackson, the new EPA administrator, had said that she wanted her agency to reach a decision about regulating carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act by April 2 -- the second anniversary of a related U.S. Supreme Court decision.
 

Surprise surprise.

Noel covered it here: Media Ignore EPA Suppressing Skeptical Global Warming Report

(;~/  gary

  • Login to post comments

When the President lies about

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 10:55pm.

When the President lies about his record and BC, why else has he sealed them, then why do we think he will not change the numbers to fit his reality.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

THE LEFT HATES SCIENCE!!!

Submitted by Tenebrous on Fri, 11/12/2010 - 11:33pm.

Ok, that's the kind of thing the papers would say, except with a different noun, if a conservative president had done the same thing. And they've said it over things that weren't even close, which shows you something.

---- Let us all eviscerate the trolls and fill their carcasses with bile and venom.
Visions and Principles blog
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Media: Obama Down But Not Out
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use