WaPo's Dana Milbank: 'The Senate Really Has 100 Blanche DuBoises'

Photo of Tom Blumer.
  • Bookmark and Share

2008-12-02-CNN-CB-Milbank.jpg

To say that there's good reason not to be impressed with a quite a few U.S. Senators is to state the obvious.

But I really hope that Dana Milbank either hasn't read or really doesn't remember A Streetcar Named Desire. Because in his coverage of the Senate vote last night to go forward to debate on its health care bill, the alleged journalist stooped well below the level of most of the blogosphere by in essence calling the United States Senate the House of 100 Prostitutes -- and worse.

Yes he did -- in a column the Post put on the top of the front page.

After observing the opportunistic, advantage-taking machinations of Democratic Senators Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas in return for the final two "yes" votes needed for passage, Milbank wrote the following:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Landrieu and Lincoln got the attention because they were the last to decide, but the Senate really has 100 Blanche DuBoises, a full house of characters inclined toward the narcissistic.

The health-care debate was worse than most. With all 40 Republicans in lockstep opposition, all 60 members of the Democratic caucus had to vote yes -- and that gave each one an opportunity to extract concessions from Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid.

In Streetcar (plot overview here), Blanche DuBois's past in Laurel, Mississippi, before arriving in New Orleans at the play's start, involved far more than narcissistic inclinations:

.... Blanche moved into a fleabag motel from which she was eventually evicted because of her numerous sexual liaisons. Also, she was fired from her job as a schoolteacher because the principal discovered that she was having an affair with a teenage student.

If Milbank wants to make a case for Senators prostituting themselves based on last night's activities, he would at a minimum have to stop at 60, because the other 40, some of whom surely have surely heard buy-off overtures in previous months, refused to give in.

But much more to the point, Milbank engages in stereotyping, up to and including, (based on his invocation of DuBois) willingness to engage in adult-child sex under the right conditions, of the kind he would be likely be among the first to decry if he heard it anywhere else, especially if written or uttered by an eeeeeevil conservative.

How would Milbank and Post management feel if someone wrote that "the Washington Post really has hundreds of Walter Durantys"? Or Janet Cookes?

Milbank's intemperance in what is supposed to be one of the newspapers of record is reprehensible, and cries out for an apology and disciplinary action. It also makes one wonder where the Post's layers of fact-checkers and editors were.

There is precedent from 2003 for dishing out some discipline:

Boston Globe sports columnist Bob Ryan was suspended for one month without pay after saying on television that the wife of New Jersey Nets guard Jason Kidd, who was allegedly the victim of domestic abuse, needed someone to "smack her."

"Bob Ryan's comments were a clear and egregious violation of the standards of The Boston Globe," editor Martin Baron said in a statement. "Bob has been told in no uncertain terms that his remarks were offensive and unacceptable."

The columnist was also barred from appearing on radio or television for one month.

Ryan was "only" referring to one woman's situation (the fact that Kidd's wife was a domestic abuse victim is really irrelevant to the offensiveness of the comment). Milbank has slandered 100 Senators -- yes, including those like Landrieu and Lincoln who deserve intense criticism for putting a price on their votes.

If Milbank really remembers Streetcar, and really believes what he wrote in describing all 100 U.S. Senators, I would suggest that the Post consider finding someone else who can actually see that there really are politicians legitimately interested in serving their constituents and their country -- not enough of them by any stretch -- and who hasn't been totally blinded by cynicism.

So will the Post, which frequently in its own pages decried the supposedly overheated rhetoric from the right, do the right thing?

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

So will the Post

So will the Post, which frequently in its own pages decried the supposedly overheated rhetoric from the right, do the right thing?

Don't bet on it!

Yes, predictable

Paint them all as offenders, to delude the true offenses of the few.

No doubt they will pretend to be clever like our resident liberals, and start the tit for tat, while never addressing the very real danger of our politician being bribed with tax payer funds. 

But who care, everyone does it,,,,right?

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Paint them all as

Paint them all as offenders,

Of course. They all do it.  

And also predictable, the opposing Republicans are said to be in "lockstep" while the Democrats simply "all had to vote yes."

But they weren't "in lockstep." Because, you know, Republican unity is mindless conformity, while Democrat conniving and bargaining for solidarityis a matter of principle.

Riiiiight....

Great ....

.... observations.

Yes, Dana deserves censure,

Yes, Dana deserves censure, but let's not hold our breaths about the WaPo doing anything about it. This is the same paper that campaigned for Craig Deeds 24-7!

-----
www.Random-jumbled-thoughts.blogspot.com

....says Elmer J

....says Elmer J Fudd.

 

I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.

 

Milbank might be on to something . . .

Milbank:  "Landrieu and Lincoln got the attention because they were the last to decide, but the Senate really has 100 Blanche DuBoises, a full house of characters inclined toward the narcissistic."

Oh, my.  Narcissistic politicians?  Is that possible? :-)

Milbank: "The health-care debate was worse than most. With all 40 Republicans in lockstep opposition,"

Hey, for once the GOP has a solid position on a major issue.

Milbank: ". . . all 60 members of the Democratic caucus had to vote yes -- and that gave each one an opportunity to extract concessions from Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid."

Whoooa! Dana, do you mean to tell me that the Dem "Yes" votes to move toward Federal control of one-sixth of the economy have nothing to do with Constitutionality or principal, but with (cough) what kind of deal they can cut?  Oh, my.

By the way, doesn't that make the Dems 'negotiating' the equivalent of extortion?  The White House calls this kind of horse trading "change we can believe in."

Milbank: " .... Blanche moved into a fleabag motel from which she was eventually evicted because of her numerous sexual liaisons. Also, she was fired from her job as a schoolteacher because the principal discovered that she was having an affair with a teenage student."

Well, judging by her history, Blanche was certainly a Democrat, and possibly the AFT shop steward at the school she was fired from.

The good news -- if there is any -- is that by being a House of 100 Prostitutes, the Senate can approach ACORN for assistance in getting a Federal loan to sustain their 'business.' 

Disagree

I can't agree that they aren't all whores, but they are all whores at times. Kind of like a full-time street hooker vs a working girl looking for pin money a couple nights a week.

Landrieu: I'm not a whore, and by the way the price is $300m, not a lousy $100m. 

Isn't The Real Shocker...

...that a member of the lamestream media would diss the entire Senate? If history shows anything, only those EEE-ville Republicans get this level of disrespect from the lamestream media. Dems are usually coddled with the lamestreamers often going so far as to omit the party affiliation of Dems caught in scandal and corruption.

--

We need to stop calling them "Progressives" when in reality they are big government "Socialists" who no longer value the individual's rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Whores

Get the dictionary. "To whore after-- to pursue something immoral and depraved." It appears Milbank is right. Quite appropriate language for the bunch in Washington.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

 If it is 300 million just

 If it is 300 million just to buy landrieu's vote I cannot imagine whate her pimp must charge to actually sleep with her. 

Shove it down our throats in '09 and we'll shove it up your A** is '10.

Read the play, and remember that .....

.... Milbank deliberately went to the primary meaning of the word by referring to Blanche.

He gets no figurative wiggle room from me. 

The Allentown SEUI thug said it best on that Eagle Scout thing:

” No one except union members may pick up a ho..."

I'm still laughing about

I'm still laughing about Reid trotting out the old, 'greatest debating body ever' line.  SURE.  Harry Reid has saved or created thousands of debates in multiple nonexistent venues.

Or maybe this is Reid's idea of a debate: 

"Will you vote my way for $100 million?"

"What do you take me for?  Do you think I'm some cheap French Quarter whore?   Put $300 Million on the dresser and we can talk."

Not too far....

It is good technique to paint all the Senators with the "whore" paint brush in order to relfect the total blame being laid on the democrats.  And after the last few years of earmarks and other questionable spending it's very hard to defend any our elected politicians.  This is why the Republicans must walk the walk before they ever get another dollar from me.

www.coastaldecorations.com

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.