It's a variation on the old riddle, "What's black and white, but read all over?"
If you change one word and add two others, the answer to the resulting question -- "What's still mostly black and white, but red all over?" -- would be, based on just-released information about their daily circulation, "all but one of the nation's top 25 newspapers turning in comparative numbers."
The figures come from the newspaper industry's Audit Board of Circulations (ABC), and cover the April-September 2009 time period.
Here are a few paragraphs from Michael Liedtke's coverage of the carnage at the Associated Press, which depends largely on newspaper subscription fees for its lifeblood. Note the "so far" reference in Liedtke's third paragraph:
Circulation at newspapers shrank at an accelerated pace in the past six months, driven in part by stiff price increases imposed by publishers scrambling to offset rapidly eroding advertising sales.
Average daily circulation at 379 U.S. newspapers plunged 10.6 percent in the April-September period from the same six-month stretch last year, according to figures released Monday by the Audit Bureau of Circulations.
It's the largest drop recorded so far during the past decade's steady decline in paid readership - a span that has coincided with an explosion of online news sources that don't charge readers for access. Many newspapers also have been reducing delivery to far-flung locales and increasing prices to get more money out of their remaining sales.
The latest decline outstripped a 7.1 percent decrease in the October 2008-March 2009 period and a 4.6 percent decline in last year's April-September window.
I will be taking a more detailed look over a longer term at the situation later, but a few things stick out noticeably in the Top 25 Daily and Sunday lists found at Editor & Publisher:
- Only one daily paper, the Wall Street Journal, with a +0.61% increase compared to April-September 2008 (corrected from yesterday's originally reported -0.61%), staved off a year-over-year decline. Every other daily listed that has a change recorded (three don't), shows a decline of 5% or more. 15 of the 22 reporting a change had a decline of over 10%.
- On the Sunday side, the results were only slightly better, and still horrid. Only the Arizona Republic, at -0.87%, got close to holding last year's circulation. The New York Times's 2.66% drop was the runner-up. Seven of the 24 papers reporting changes sank by more than 10%.
- Speaking of the Times, its daily circ plunged 7.28% to 928,000 copies. After holding its own during the preceding six months largely as a result of transforming itself into a shameless soapbox for candidate/President Barack Obama, ABC's most recent results brought the Times below the million mark for the first time in a very long time with a convincing thud.
- USA Today's 17% drop, and its accompanying fall from the first-place perch now occupied by the Wall Street Journal, was relayed to parent company Gannett's employees and the general public earlier this month. According to Gannett, this is largely due to travel industry cutbacks in free papers provided to hotel guests. However, the Journal has pointed out that it has made inroads into some of the very hotels that represent USA Today's bread-and-butter revenue source.
Papers which one thought might have bottomed out after steep declines in several previous reporting periods were still among the worst performers this time around. Examples (from the Daily list):
- The Los Angeles Times, which was over 1 million subscribers not that many years ago, fell 11.05% to 657,000. LA blogger Patterico can give you dozens and dozens of reasons why.
- The Boston Globe, the supposedly premier paper in all of New England, fell 18.48% to 264,000. That's less than four filled-up Gillette Stadiums.
- The San Francisco Chronicle dived by 25.82% to 252,000.
What may be the biggest shock is a paper that is no longer on the list.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution did not make the top 25. A year ago, it was at 275,000. Since the currently reported circulation at the Number 25 St. Petersburg Times is 240,000, that means that the AJC, after a string of previous double-digit drops, decline by at least another 12.7% (35,000 divided by 275,000). Atlanta is the country's ninth-largest metro area.
That the four grievously biased papers identified in the three previous paragraphs are among the serially worst performers especially supports the notion that while the Internet and technology in general have clearly been factors in the print industry's decline, bias in its various forms -- leftist slants, annoying PC language, and the suppression of stories that don't fit the conventional "wisdom" template -- have also contributed to the accelerating decay in many instances. Simply put, they don't get it, and they're paying dearly for it.
Image was found at Memebox.com.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Oh gee
October 27, 2009 - 14:14 ET by well99I feel bad.I guess being a goverment media outlet has a bad side.Dont worry bailouts for all.Well those that support the Dear Leader.
→ News bailouts
October 27, 2009 - 14:23 ET by Cool ArrowI wonder how many hits the White House website gets now. Maybe they're just talking about "officially" buying the names of all these press outlets.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
CA
October 30, 2009 - 11:42 ET by well99They might as well since the msm has been thier disinformation network.
For years, I have
October 28, 2009 - 03:11 ET by jdhawkFor years, I have subscribed to the online versions of the Wall Street Journal and Investors Business Daily. They are inexpensive, delivered "to my door" without my having to wrestle the dog for them and both have the best editorial sections of any newspapers in the country.
But, hey, you don't have to subscribe to enjoy the IBD editorial section. Not long ago, they made it free. You can find it here: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/IBDEditorials.aspx.
I commend to you the 9 part series that started today in the IBD editorial section. It is from celebrated author and economist Thomas Sowell. It is titled, The Economics of Health Care. You can find the first part here: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=510506.
Why buy a mewspaper?
October 27, 2009 - 14:36 ET by Wall WatcherWhy buy a mewspaper? Just register as a Democrat and they will mail you everything that is going to be in major newspapers. The best part of my way is the mailings beg for money instead of making you pay for it.
I always tell hotels that stay at that I am offened when they put a lib paper in front of my door. To me it is like someone in the dead of night took a crap at my doorstep. Some hotels will take a nominal fee off for not getting the paper.
A Chapter for the next SuperFreakonomics maybe?
October 27, 2009 - 18:36 ET by DeskpilotThe Dead tree news industry is in the camp of the haves:
They HAVE p*ss poor publications and circulation; They HAVE lower payrolls, therefore HAVE less of a payroll tax obligation which means that local and federal government HAVE less tax revenue coming in. They HAVE lost their integrity, (how long ago, I can't peg). They HAVE a long, long, long way to go to earn the respect of readers.
The paper industry on the other hand is sitting in the HAVE NOT side of the equation:
They HAVE NOT the demand for their product, They HAVE NOT consumed vast quantities of energy turning trees into paper; They HAVE NOT hired anybody new and HAVE NOT provided their local government any additional tax revenues.
So, for Obama, that means no jobs gained OR saved in TWO industries.
For the tree huggers fringe of the liberal left, they should be dancing with glee with mother nature!
Less housing being built and less newspapers printed means less tree harvested. Less fuel being consumed by logging trucks! All the millions of saplings that timber companies have put back after every harvest will now have a chance to grow into the mature trees that the likes of Daryl Hanna can be proud of and go live in whan she matures like the tree.
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, You're welcome - Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)
A Graphic History of Newspaper Circulation Over the Last Two Dec
October 27, 2009 - 22:07 ET by MadRatThere was a link to this site on BoingBoing.net and I'd just post the graph if I were able. You'll notice that the newspapers seem to plunge the most right around the time the War on Bush began.
http://www.theawl.co...
Circ is
October 27, 2009 - 22:10 ET by jessieHCirc is lowest in decades. GOOD! In the words of most liberals, it saves a ton of trees. The B.S. they print is proof they are in on the govt. corruption. The media has been bought and paid for. Where are the leaders we elected to protect us from these type of lies from the media and the corrupt govt.?
I was kind of hoping
October 27, 2009 - 23:58 ET by ahusserThe Washington Post was included in that circulation drop. It is so lefty it doesn't even pretend anymore. Creigh Deeds (Virginia dem gubernatorial candidate almost exclusively uses WaPo quotes in all his adds TV and Radio (nauseatingly ad infinitum in my opinion). They have repeatedly smeared the Repuplican candidate, Robert McDonnel, while wholeheartedly backing the Dem. But inside the beltway is firmly entrenched Obama land.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
ahusser... They all went
October 28, 2009 - 00:13 ET by bigtimerahusser...
They all went Whole Hog. ... they're not about to stop now.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
BT
October 28, 2009 - 10:49 ET by ahusserAs a cop in DC (not the Metropolitan Police) and the usual coverage by lefties about cops we used to call the WaPO the L Street Daily Worker.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'
boycott 'em in the name of "climate change"
October 28, 2009 - 02:09 ET by OldJoeAfterall, their "carbon footprint" is scandalous. Not to mention huge amounts of energy to run presses, toxic inks and chemicals. I'm surprised more papers don't voluntarily shut down.