And they will sink much lower.

Why the net news shows made the decision to self destruct, and in such an obvious and public manner, will be the subject of many books in the future.

Gosh, looks like it's time to feed the dog.

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

ooh can we say irrelevant? Of course they'll blame the internet.

____________________________________________ 
The Emperor, he has no clothes

Is there a clue in there somewhere?

Can somebody please help the fringe media find the clues?

http://gjresult.com

They're going to continue losing market share because the american people don't believe their lies anymore.  CNN et. al are essentially doing nothing but playing to their hardcore supporters in NY/Calif/DC.

I still believe that they're doing this because they're hoping Obama will take over the media like he's taking over the banks, student loans, the schools, farms, energy and medicine.  Once he does that, all the media will be govt. employees who serve at his will and pleasure, and they won't have to worry about 'audience' or 'ratings' anymore because their jobs will be secure, totally funded (like PBS) by taxpayer dollars.

  It would also be interesting to see how many of their viewers actually use them as a primary news source.

They decided to be advocacy groups instead of news outlets.   They chose sides and base their stories to support their ideology.     Nobody wants to listen to them talk down to us or tell us how wonderful Obama is every chance they get.    They go out of their way to insult more than half the country with their snippy little comments about the Tea Partiers and opponents to Obama while they lie right to our faces.     They are clearly not in the information business as they only pass out propaganda.     Even people who agree with their political tilt do not watch their broadcasts because they filter out to much news if they deem it too dangerous to Democrats.

No one trusts them.

" if Republicans are able to stop Barack Obama on health care, 'it will be his Waterloo, it will break him...."  -Sen. Jim DeMint

What the MSM has brought to my life to enrich it:

....hold on...um,...well, I mean,...<crickets>

Okay, nothing.

FOX News says that they report and we decide.  Works for me.

http://www.pelicanmarsh68.blogspot.com

Anyone see a parallel between the evening newcast ratings and Obama's ratings?  Coinkydink, do you think?

Being the cowardly repeaters that y'all are, try a different thought: drop the agenda driven drivel that you presently have and start REPORTING. Don't have a side, report only, drop the bias (pipedream), and see what happens. 'Course, you'll have to do this for about a month, with the hope that those of us who DON'T watch, might be drawn back by the few who have a self flaggelating idea of what news is.

Proud member of the MOB - Move Over Barack, we want our country back! 

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Isn't it James O'Keefe?

aww that's a shame, their ratings down. probably why they had to "retire" Charlie-Diane probably cheaper and saves them money, whoa was that a sexist comment? after how they treated Sarah Palin-so what!  Anyways, they better not cancel my favorite show, NCIS! JAJT

can you next do one on their declining ad revenues?

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/10/22/drudge-notes-network-news-nosedive

Unless they stop regurgitating the same stories and get out and do reporting, this will not stop. 

Before we all start high fiving each other on the "debacle" that is the government run media, look at the stats again. 

Nearly 20 million Americans still tune into to view these socialist propagandists drool on themselves each evening.  Then you add in the influence of the "lesser" propagandists CNN, HLN, MSNBC, CNBC, Bloomberg, the local affiliates of each of the "big" three, the newspapers, magazines, radio programs, and web sites and you have nearly half of Americans getting some if not all of the targeted messages of these people.

The sad truth is that the conservative message is barely audible.  For example, the health care issue has been and is controlled by the above media.  If you don't think so, tell me who authored, who is sponsoring and what is contained in the Republican health care alternative legislative efforts?  Tell me who, authored, who is sponsoring, and what is contained in the Republican cap and trade alternative legislative efforts?  

For heaven sakes, our own Republican candidate for president was largely picked for us by the above media.  That his legislative efforts as a senator and his stances on most issues, to this day, hardly qualified him as a conservative candidate was no matter.   

We have a lot of work ahead of us.  The need for web sites like this one is without question.  But, we need more.  We need a means for identifying who indeed is conservative at the local, state, and federal level for legislative office.  The sad truth is that we know more about those that oppose us than those that are with us. 

I am currently living in a priory with a number of friars over 70 years old.  They gather at 5.30pm everyday to watch ABC Nightly News.  They all read the NYT every morning.  When I gently point out the biases of these media outlets, they acknowledge the problems but still cannot bring themselves to trust the New Media. 

The internet presents a direct challenge to those who cut their teeth on the morning paper and the evening news.  The very notions of a 24 hour news cycle, spin doctors, and news blogs are all too much.  Too much information.  Too much yammering.  Too much to filter.  The task of juggling the data and its interpretation is scary.

My brother friars ask me, "How do you know what to read on the internet?"   I always say, "You have to get lost before you can be found.  Dive in!"

Fr. Philip, OP

http://www.hancaquam...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBe6wmrBZRQ&feature=player_embedded#t=103