Part 1 ("The Big Picture") is here.
Quick:
- Which company sold the most light trucks in the U.S. in June?
- Which company came in at Number 9 in car sales in June, down from Number 7 a year ago?
- Aren't smaller players in the auto industry obviously gaining ground on the big guys because of their small, fuel-efficient cars?
If you don't know the answers to these questions, it's because the press has been doing a poor job of covering what's really been going on in the industry since the Era of the (Failed) Auto Company Bailouts began in December of last year.
Answers to the three questions are in the charts that follow:

(Source Data: Wall Street Journal monthly Auto Sales Chart for June 2009 and June 2008)
The answers to the three questions are as follows:
- (in white on blue above) In June, Ford sold more light trucks than General Motors for the first in many, many years. Just a year ago, GM had a lead on Ford of over 50%.
- (in black on yellow) In June, Chrysler was the Number 9 seller of cars in the U.S. Even a year ago, it was only Number 7, miles behind the top five in the category, and even badly trailing Hyundai. In the past year, Kia has passed Chrysler and established a bit of distance. VW outsold Chrysler during June, for the first time in probably forever -- and remember that this was a month when the 25% of dealers that were terminated had going-out-of-business deals going. It seems more than a little likely that BMW will catch Chrysler in the coming months.
- (in white on green, for irony) While many of the larger makers have focused their efforts on smaller cars, the rest of the pack, contrary to established non-wisdom, has made significant inroads in generally higher-profit light trucks. While light truck sales at the six biggest players are off over 25% in the past year, the smaller players are down less than 9%.
If the establishment press was doing its job covering the industry, the first two items would be widely-known stories. The third, though a bit less obvious, certainly throws into doubt the conventional wisdom that going small is the ticket to success.
Other developments that bear watching include:
- Given Chrysler's dealer terminations, Toyota may soon overtake Chrysler in truck sales. Honda might catch up and pass both.
- Ford has a shot at overtaking Honda in car sales.
- Toyota is perilously close to surrendering its lead to GM as Number 1 in monthly car sales.
The last item just noted is the only one in either of the two posts about the industry situation that is even remotely favorable to GM. If it comes to pass accompanied by heavy press coverage, it will be further proof (as if we really need any) that the press is firmly on the side of the failed bailout attempts, never mind the wreckage they have inflicted on the economy, the rule of law, and on people who didn't deserve it.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Auto-eroticism
July 5, 2009 - 11:53 ET by metaphorsbwithuIt's not that the media have been ignoring this story, it's just that they haven't been getting their marching orders yet.
Bad numbers are just not "sexy" when attached to the Obamadministration, so how will Obama and his enablers rationalize his problem, and how are they to approach this problem?
Never let a "crisis" go to waste, remember?
Don't be surprised if the president institutes quotas on the number of cars these companies can sell in the near future, which ones consumers may buy, and at what price.
Can "Affirmative Action" in the auto industry be next?
Now that's sexy!
metaphorsbwithu
Re AA
July 5, 2009 - 13:58 ET by slickwillie2001I can also see discounts on new Government Motors cars being given to the politically-correct class. Kind of a roundabout reparations program.
But being Government Motors, we can expect the quality to go in the toilet, so even with the discount no one will want them. The UAW cares as much about building good cars as the NEA cares about providing our children a quality education.
Maybe the Bamster will have to take over one of the big car rental outfits so they have some fleet customers.
That's called voting with your dollars.
July 5, 2009 - 10:52 ET by superconThe very concept of this big govt. take over of two huge auto companies and the way it was done is too impalatable for many people. They simply won't spend their money with companies that treat it's dealers and secured investors so shabbily. How many Indiana school teachers or fire fighters are going to buy a Chrysler after the screwing they recieved with their pension fund? It's un-American.
We will see how long it is before those companies are looking for more govt. money or get sold at firesale prices. Nobody wants to do business like that.
Hey Janet Napolitano...I'm proud to be a Right-winger.
Vote with your dollars
July 5, 2009 - 17:05 ET by American.Patriotis absolutely right. some left wing loon from our local paper is asking subscribers what they are choosing to give up in this poor economy, as if it's a patriotic duty to sacrifice. What garbage.
I choose not to spend money and support this economy, and when the market turns I'll be well positioned to reenter and regain some of the wealth lost by the irresponsible actions of the current clown in office.
"When I look in the mirror, I say, 'He did not sell his soul for short-term politics.'" President George W. Bush, June 18, 2009
Buy FORD or
July 5, 2009 - 10:52 ET by Delsaany other on the market!
Stay away from Government owned auto makers!
Period!
Like A Good Neighbor
July 5, 2009 - 11:42 ET by JDWGovernment controls automotive, the market, education, insurance, banks...
Their Chrysler/GM plan is not producing, totally unexpected! No doubt health care will succeed from the start.
JDW
DAILY WAVE
Jobs, jbs, jobs ... Spending, spending, spending
No problem
July 5, 2009 - 14:04 ET by FranksamI've said it before, and I'll say it again. If everybody with an Obama sticker on their foreign branded car bumpers will buy a GM or Chrysler auto, our federal car companies will do just great.
The Obama voters tend to love unions with everyhting except their own money, so I'm not holding my breath.
Franksam, that is a good
July 5, 2009 - 15:13 ET by kangarooFranksam, that is a good observation, but slowly but surely I have been seeing less and less Baz stickers on cars, I have only noticed this cause my philosphy is when you see a Baz sticker, put a Ron Paul sticker over it, since that's what the gov is looking for, because we are terriosts in the making don't ya know!! That would be a fabulous joke on the twits that voted for the mongrel, just sayin
Government Motors Corp.
July 6, 2009 - 14:47 ET by teeaa01I have been a lifelong buyer of General Motors products but as long as the government is running the show, never again will my foot darken the door of any Government Motors dealership.
"When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators" P.J. O'Rourke