Clearly, the most important takeaway from ABC's low-rated White House forum on health care was President Barack Obama's admission that he would go outside the constraints of a nationalized system to get the "very best care" if necessary for his own family.
Hot Air's Ed Morrissey noted that Obama's response should properly be seen as "a Michael Dukakis moment that exposed him as a hypocrite."
A video of the exchange is at YouTube. To the extent possible, see if you think Diane Sawyer, standing next to the inquiring doctor, looks a bit peeved as the nature of his question becomes clear.
ABC's Jake Tapper and Karen Travers understood the newsworthiness of what Obama said, and led with it in their post-forum coverage:
EXCLUSIVE: President Obama Defends Right to Choose Best Care
President Obama struggled to explain today whether his health care reform proposals would force normal Americans to make sacrifices that wealthier, more powerful people -- like the president himself -- wouldn't face.
The probing questions came from two skeptical neurologists during ABC News' special on health care reform, "Questions for the President: Prescription for America," anchored from the White House by Diane Sawyer and Charles Gibson.
Dr. Orrin Devinsky, a neurologist and researcher at the New York University Langone Medical Center, said that elites often propose health care solutions that limit options for the general public, secure in the knowledge that if they or their loves ones get sick, they will be able to afford the best care available, even if it's not provided by insurance.
Devinsky asked the president pointedly if he would be willing to promise that he wouldn't seek such extraordinary help for his wife or daughters if they became sick and the public plan he's proposing limited the tests or treatment they can get.
The president refused to make such a pledge, though he allowed that if "it's my family member, if it's my wife, if it's my children, if it's my grandmother, I always want them to get the very best care."
At the transcript or video, note how Obama "cleverly" chose to answer the question for the most part from an end-of-life care angle instead of from a more generalized viewpoint.
Hot Air's Morrissey elaborated:
If ObamaCare isn’t good enough for Sasha, Malia, or Michelle, then it’s not good enough for America. Instead of fighting that impulse, Obama should be working to boost the private sector to encourage more care providers, less red tape and expense, and better care for everyone.
Sadly, the President is heading in the opposite direction for everybody -- oh, except the self-appointed elites and filthy rich like himself.
The President's "ObamaCare for thee, but not for me" response may, more than competitive jealousy, explain why coverage of the event at other establishment media outlets has been pretty light. You see, exposing the elitism might hurt the passage passage prospects of a "trailblazing" initiative -- like the precursor known as CommonwealthCare aka RomneyCare that is failing so miserably (noted at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog) in Massachusetts.
The post-event coverage of the forum at the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times (both site searches at 11:15 p.m. were on "Obama ABC health," not in quotes) was limited to noting what a ratings bomb it turned out to be -- despite tons of free publicity from those who objected to ABC's unprofessional open-mic in the White House approach. The Washington Post carried a number of wire reports, but I found no original coverage beyond a "tanked on the tube" blog entry. The Post's Howard Kurtz did do a media-angle review giving it good marks ("If that was an infomercial, someone screwed up the script") that I believe did not appear in print. I found a Baltimore Sun review by David Zurawik (HT Media Bistro) that was pretty tough ("what we saw on ABC last night exploits and debases the notion of town hall democracy"). Overall, even in light of the crowd-out effect of other stories, this is light treatment.
At the Associated Press, the wire service's Philip Elliott incredibly portrayed the President's "very best care" hypocrisy as almost heroic (bold is mine):
At an ABC News town hall event on health care, a doctor asked Obama to promise that his wife and daughters would only get the services allowed under a new government insurance plan he's proposing.
Obama wouldn't bite.
If it was his wife, daughters or grandmother, the president said, he'd "always want them to get the very best care."
Memo to Phil: Maybe the President didn't "bite," but he definitely got bitten. Fortunately for him, and unfortunately for us, the press is mostly making sure we don't learn about the self-inflicted wound.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
no real surprises here...
June 26, 2009 - 23:37 ET by spmcintyrejust more of the same from the bamster
there is no spoon...
That's for sure....he
June 27, 2009 - 06:01 ET by motherbeltThat's for sure....he talked for a whole minute "on background" before he slipped in "the very best care" at the end. He was probably hoping he had confused everyone enough that they had forgotten the question by that time.
He also never said that people wouldn't be required to participate in the public plan; that they could keep their private plan if they wanted.
Gee, I wonder why........
What happened to the days when they used to claim that under their system your doctor, not some faceless insurance agent, would decide what is best for you ? Now they are talking about doing the same damn thing! I see, doctors know better than insurance companies, but not better than government "cost-effectiveness" experts.
What a bunch of hypocrites!
I agree, Tom, you can only see half of Sawyer's face, but yeah, she looks peeved.
Fortunately for him, and unfortunately for us, the press is mostly making sure we don't learn about the self-inflicted wound.
Right....under the rug with his other screw-ups.
We are so screwed.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
In Obama's new Amerika, the ruling class will be privileged...
June 27, 2009 - 00:01 ET by R D Helm...while we mere peons will be left fighting over crumbs.
Either you impeach this POTUS impostor bastard now, or else prepare to deal with the decidedly unpleasant consequences, which will take at least two decades to reverse.
In case you missed it, the America-hating lefties in the House voted for the destruction of our country mere hours ago, at the urging of Obama the Pretender.
-Dave
Obama's health care "reform" plan is to blow up the building in order to fix a leak in the roof-Herman Cain
Yep
June 27, 2009 - 00:15 ET by general companyIn case you missed it, the America-hating lefties in the House voted
for the destruction of our country mere hours ago, at the urging of
Obama the Pretender.
Been waiting all night for one of them liberal steal from me supporters to start defending this crime of a bill. Hope they have plenty of room in them there jails? Dont even think about treading on me or mine!
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
You may be out of luck
June 27, 2009 - 00:35 ET by ParagrouperThey are probably trapped by the endless Michael Jackson coverage--watching reruns of "thriller" while congress flushes our economy down the drain.
Liberals are funny like that.
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking." - General George Patton Jr
Liberals are funny like that.
June 27, 2009 - 00:53 ET by general companyBeen a long time since I laughed at a liberal. But you are so right, no conception of responsibility
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
The liberal slime ...
June 27, 2009 - 09:39 ET by SentryDanThe liberal slime has struck again. Pelosi and her ilk produced a 1200 page monster, they knew no one would have a chance to read and then ordered a vote. It passed a test vote. The her henchman Waxman dumped another 300 pages on the House that the libs though would not be noticed. To his credit the House minority leader tried to educate the members about this new addition, but to no avail. And as Dave said, the House early this morning passed this bill. The purpose of this bill is to stick-it to "We the People". There are some 200 demorats in the House who don't have the guts to tell the "witch" and "the one" to shove it.
God help us now. "The one" just gave the shaft to the people who put him into the WH. The idiots need to wake-up before they have less that when "the one" got elected.
Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.
Also remember folks, that the way to SUPPORT THE TROOPS is to support their mission. Anyone who says that they support the troops but don't support their mission is lying about supporting the troops. And if you want to know, yes I do have a dog in the fight, he is a United States Marine.
This is just like any other
June 27, 2009 - 01:35 ET by DoktorFrankenThis is just like any other government benefit debacle. Insurance, health care, retirement plan, etc. The 'leaders' have very different coverage and plans and perks. And they always charge the Right with Class Warfare. Just more Leftist hypocrisy, as usual.
The amazing thing is that
June 27, 2009 - 02:39 ET by RR GOPThe amazing thing is that the Emperor Jones sees nothing wrong with that way of thinking whatsoever.
I think we all know these types-they will take care of themselves and theirs and to hell with everybody else. But at the same time they will demand your sacrifices and loyalty and be expected to allow them privileges...just because they say so. Bosses, politicians, many of the police, judges, the well-to-do, the powerful in all segments of society.
"Patriotism" to them is a matter of the rest of us doing what they tell us to do, and we're too dependent upon them to say 'no'.
That may be taken as a Marxist attitude, but I don't believe Marx was completely full of it, either. I just don't think his followers know their heads from their nether regions.
Actually, it's the kind of stuff that the colonists were tired of 233 years ago but somewhere along the line we allowed it to stick around-maybe because it was just easier, maybe because for a long time we could hide out on our farms, maybe because we thought we could be part of the elite some day, maybe we just got too big and disconnected from everyone else...I just don't know.
But the ideology (or lack of ideology) on the part of our oppressors doesn't matter,,,it's all the same and to me that attitude is un-American.
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Obama Is Too Predictable
June 27, 2009 - 08:10 ET by HoosierEmWhen Obamalamadingdong is asked a question he would rather not answer, he always replies this way:
"That's a great question."
He then proceeds to talk about himself and something profound (at least in his mind) that has happened to him. In doing so, there are very few of his famous "ummmmsss" and "ahhhhhhs" because he **loves** to talk about himself.
If the question is posed to him again, he always turns it around to how it would affect him or how it affected him without ever answering the original question unless he is specifically challenged to answer the question.
Robert Gibbs does the exact same thing for him.
that's an acute observation.
June 27, 2009 - 08:52 ET by Jack Bauerthat's an acute observation. I'll look out for that.
BHO....
June 27, 2009 - 08:16 ET by Prester John.....and his cronies in Congress have obviously read "Animal Farm".
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."
"The Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies"
www.campaignforliberty.com
Animal Farm
June 27, 2009 - 08:33 ET by HoosierEmMy husband bought me the books "1984" and "Animal Farm" to read. I'm in the middle of 1984 right now and Animal Farm is next. I can't wait to see what's in store for this country.
hoosier -- well you have
June 27, 2009 - 08:47 ET by Jack Bauerhoosier -- well you have the perfect example right there with Obama and the State Industrial Health Complex he wants to force on everyone else, but not him and his rich pals.
I'm Getting Sicker by the Day
June 27, 2009 - 08:51 ET by HoosierEmJust imagining what is coming for the American people literally makes my stomach hurt. I'm in my 40s ~ I'm sure under ObamaCare that won't qualify for treatment other than diet and exercise, just like Obama does.
Seriously, I have been thinking about not paying attention to all that is happening in our country but for some reason I cannot do that.
HoosierEm , When You're
June 27, 2009 - 14:51 ET by nixonHoosierEm ,
When You're done with those books , I highly recommend "Atlas Shrugged " and "the Vision of the Anointed " In some ways , they aren't the easiest of reads .But, if You read them they will open Your eyes to what is happening now .
Union Exemption
June 27, 2009 - 08:23 ET by slickwillie2001Some details of how the democratics intend to finagle an exemption to any healthcare benefit value tax for their fatcat union buddies:
Unions Health Benefits May Avoid Tax Under Proposal: http://www.bloomberg.com
Democratics seem to think this is no big deal; I see it as a pitchfork issue.
It's truly disgusting.
June 27, 2009 - 08:39 ET by ThatDudeIt's truly disgusting. They're using this as an extra wedge to force unionization. Where is the media talking about how partisan EVERY action by this "O"ppressident and Congress makes is? I'd made note of the obvious elitism and hypocrisy in Obama's answering of this question in the first thread on the program. Out of everything that was said, this was most important. It quite honestly shows no faith in his health initiative. It's obviously something for the peons and not to be applied to the elites.
Here's what I have to say to the President. You use YOUR money to fund MY health insurance and medical treatment until it is up to par with your own. Until these politicians start putting their money where their mouths are, they all stand as hypocrites. It must feel good to be able to vote yourself a higher salary while taking the bulk of your income from lobbying groups (which I still don't understand how it is legal.)
Yes we can
June 27, 2009 - 08:39 ET by acumenlet them eat cake.
Sawyer didn't quite look herself during the good doctor's sobering question.
Jeez. She looked like
June 27, 2009 - 08:52 ET by motherbeltJeez. She looked like Jessica Savitch during her last days....
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
For Those Of You More Knowledgeable
June 27, 2009 - 08:54 ET by HoosierEmIf the republicans - and I mean the true conservaties, not the RINOs - win more seats in 2010 and even perhaps win the presidency in 2012, can any of this crapola they are pushing through be undone?
I think any law can be
June 27, 2009 - 09:15 ET by motherbeltI think any law can be repealed or modified by a new law.
I heard Dick Morrs on Sean Hannity's radio show yesterday and his analysis of this Presidency was positively terrifying.
He said Obama is trying to ram all this stuff through right now before everyone knows what is going on. Why? Because it's part of his plan to destroy capitalism and socialize this country.
Step one, take over industries and banks; step two, nationalize health care; step three, redistribution of wealth by means of taxes.
And this plan, IMO is a major part of how he's going to do the tax thing.
BTW, Bloomberg had this yesterday (I posted it in a thread that died a quick death, so I don't think many saw it).
In their "magical thinking" they continually disregard the "law of unintended consequences".....
Money quote right at the top:
-- America’s biggest oil companies will
probably cope with U.S. carbon legislation by closing fuel
plants, cutting capital spending and increasing imports. (emphasis mine)
So their legislation to make us "energy independent" will actually make us more dependent on foreign sources.
Hoist on our own petard, (set up by our legislators) we are.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
Re Undoing
June 27, 2009 - 13:16 ET by slickwillie2001We can likely take back the House in 2010, because they are all up for election. That will allow us to block legislation for the rest of the Bamster's time in office.
BUT, to reverse legislation will require a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, and that is impossible in one election cycle. I believe 2012 and a competent President and a filibuster-proof Senate will be required to begin undoing the damage. Our system of government was designed so you can't flip on a dime from one two-year cycle to the next.
There is also an outside chance that the Bamster will become so unpopular and his failure so apparent that even democratics will desert him, but that's unlikely.
My Husband Has Predicted...........
June 27, 2009 - 16:46 ET by HoosierEm..........that Obama will be indicted while in office. I play the Aerosmith song, "Dream On" for him.
Maybe the inspector general issue will gain some traction.
HE... Looks like that IG
June 27, 2009 - 17:00 ET by bigtimerHE...
Looks like that IG issue is just 'poof' gone now....
I'm with you and your choice of song.
We've got a long, bumpy ride ahead.
I still can hope your husband is right though...but indicted by whom?
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
→ Killing the elderly
June 27, 2009 - 09:08 ET by Cool ArrowBut maintenance costs for an HIV carrier is $14,000/year.
Drugs for an AIDS patient are $34,000 per year.
But nothing from the President about controlling these costs.
Under my plan of a cap & trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket - BHO
That's because AIDS is not
June 27, 2009 - 09:10 ET by motherbeltThat's because AIDS is not medical, it's political.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
→ Yeah
June 27, 2009 - 09:16 ET by Cool ArrowAnd since the disease can be controlled for what now appears, indefinitely, we could be seeing those costs stretched over 50 year spans per patient.
Under my plan of a cap & trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket - BHO
Tea Party Patriots
June 27, 2009 - 10:00 ET by kilrod~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tea Party Patriots Action Alert
TAKING TO THE STREETS - SATURDAY, JUNE 27 - NOON
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Tea Party Patriots,
Sometimes the call to duty comes in the middle of the night. This is one of those times. And we apologize for the short notice, but you've spoken loud and clear, and demanded action.
Since sending the email asking you what you wanted to do about passage of the Cap and Trade bill approximately 3 hours ago, I have received thousands of responses. All are demanding action, and all are outraged that the House of Representatives passed the Cap and Trade bill, which will cost each family almost $2,000 per year in additional expenses through increased energy prices across all sectors. Patriots across the nation are telling us it's time to take to the streets. We are in full support of your clearly expressed opinion and are here to assist.
To paraphrase one gentleman in the East on a conference call tonight, we need to lean out of every window and scream that we're mad as hell and not going to take it anymore! And we need to scream until everyone is screaming with us.
THIS BILL PUNISHES EVERY AMERICAN FAMILY.
Today you were scammed by the House of Representatives, and despite the fact that you shut down the phones of virtually every member of the House, and barraged them with millions of emails telling them this was against your will, they ignored you and voted for another bill which they haven't even read. The madness needs to stop and we need to stop the Senate from passing the bill.
Tomorrow, because you have demanded it...we take to the streets.
Take to the Streets to Protest the Cap and Trade Passage in the House
Date: June 27, 2009
Time: Noon until - as long as it takes.
Place: State Capitol; or Federal Building in your City, County or Parish
LIST YOUR EVENT AT WWW.TEAPARTYPATRIOTS.ORG
Please go to www.teapartypatriots.org and list your event. Please try to coordinate with others you see posting events there. If there is already an event in your area, please plant to attend that event, and / or volunteer to help that organizer. This is about coordination, not competition. We need to send a message to the politicians.
Bring signs, bullhorns, and your usual good behavior. It's imperative that we shock the politicians and press by being there in large numbers, but we want to make sure that we maintain our reputation by not causing any damage or destruction.
We wrote and asked what you are willing to do about it...and you answered, by the thousands...you said you wanted to take it to the streets. Now it's time for you to spread the message. The time is short, but we can make it happen.
We believe that the Senate will bring the Cap and Traitor bill to the floor on the sixth or seventh of July. We need to send a forceful message to the Senators that we will not tolerate passage of the ACES act in the Senate.
You are the patriot heroes of a true grass roots movement. We asked, and you told us loud and clear what you wanted to do. You told us it's time to light a grass fire and hit the streets tomorrow?
We apologize for the late notice. Your patriotism in standing up to your government is appreciated, and serves as a powerful testament to the founders of this great nation.
Thanks,
Mark Meckler, Amy Kremer and Jenny Beth Martin
Tea Party Patriots National Coordinator Team
Amy Kremer (amykremer@gmail.com; amykremer on gchat, 678.495.8271)
Jenny Beth Martin (jennybethm@gmail.com; jennybethm on gchat, 404.326.0936)
Mark Meckler (mark@teapartypatriots.org, mark.grassroots on gchat)
Rob Neppell (rob@teapartypatriots.org)
Tea Party Patriots on the Web
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Our Website
Social Network
FaceBook Fan Page
Google Email Group
Products
Contact Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please call or email to let us know your opinion:
Kylie Kremer - Intern: 678.478.1514
Toby Walker - Chairperson - Cap & Trade Committee 254-836-5058
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
jessieH
June 27, 2009 - 10:34 ET by jessieHjessieH What do you think of a NATIONWIDE STRIKE to get their attention. Everyone, except for police, fire & healthcare, call in sick. Sick of the lies & cover ups from the traitors in office. I am ready to tar & feather each & every one of them. That's how angry I am.
ObamaCare
June 27, 2009 - 09:53 ET by KellyRone rule for me, another for you. Typical liberal elitist nonsense.
King of how he views
June 27, 2009 - 22:44 ET by Radical1979King of how he views education also. Public schools are good for the masses, but his two had to go to a private school. I don't begrudge him that, but I resent that he opposes vouchers so other people can use their tax money to give their children the same advantage.
What is sadder than sad to
June 27, 2009 - 22:53 ET by bigtimerWhat is sadder than sad to me is I bet the majority of the very people that are denied the vouchers for their kids that are dems, have voted for the same people that have denied them the right in the first place...
...to me it has been simply amazing.
Talk about Dumb and Dumber
Agenda complete
have voted against vouchers, long before O came into officeDoubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
I find many otherwise
June 27, 2009 - 23:00 ET by Radical1979I find many otherwise seeemingly intelligent people have no idea what Obama's doing, they just love the sound of the words. I know a Sister of St. Joseph who loves Obama. I told her about Obama revoking the medical conscience order and she was dumbfounded. I told her it meant Catholic hospitals can now be forced to perform abortions or lose all federal (medicaide) funding. She had no idea.
People only hear what they want to hear with Obama.
healthcare
June 27, 2009 - 10:26 ET by jessieHjessieH Congress just destroyed the healthcare for America by passing the cap & trade bill. How to pay for it? Tax Americans 95%! WE will have nothing & they will have everything. I would say that is REVOLTing.................
Tom- you'd probably know the answer to this...
June 27, 2009 - 10:46 ET by BKeyserNot knowing the details of the proposed "tax" on health care benefits being bandied-about by some Democrats in the Senate, how might they disproportionately affect those in higher-risk jobs?
According to a Forbes.com article from August, 2008, the top ten most dangerous jobs in the US are:
Isn't it logical that these folks already pay higher premiums for health care? And if the "tax" is percentage based, wouldn't these folks be even further "punished" under the tax plan? I believe McCain's campaign plan called for a near neutral benefit tax/tax rebate (or exemption increase) but I'm not hearing that type of offset today. Any thoughts?
In theory ....
June 27, 2009 - 12:04 ET by Tom Blumer.... as I understand it, these folks will be the kind who will gravitate (or get gravitated by employers who decide to terminate coverage) towards a government plan, where I don't think there will be any risk-based underwriting.
They'll catch a break, sometimes a big one, and they'll be perfect Obama photo-ops for lower premiums, while the rest of the country eats their higher costs.
Ah, I see...
June 27, 2009 - 12:51 ET by BKeyser...so the fact that these higher risk jobs are often "under the union lable" may not be so coincidental.
We are better than you "Common Folk"
June 28, 2009 - 19:03 ET by JJ OKCIt seems fitting that the Congress and the "Upper Elite" have exempted themselves from this bill. They do not have to use the same care. Just like the old "Elites" in the Soviet Union were taking care of the "Commers" so they had to have the best. Where is our education system in this? If I remember there was a movie about this type of takeover in the 80's.
“War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made or kept so by the exertions of better men than himself” --- John Stuart Mill