Toledo Blade's Slow-Learning Reporter IDs Prosecutor as GOP, Doesn't Name Party of Dem Indicted

Photo of Tom Blumer.
  • Bookmark and Share

Gutierrez0509(UPDATE: See circulation chart below.)

In early March (covered at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), Toledo Blade Columbus Bureau reporter Jim Provance named the party of Ohio's Republican State Auditor Mary Taylor, who sharply criticized Democratic Governor Ted Strickland's serious lateness with the state's financial statements -- so late that they couldn't possibly be audited until after the Ohio General Assembly passes the budget for the two-year fiscal period that will begin on July 1.

Provance never named Strickland's or any other Democrat's party.

After that episode, NewsBuster commenter HoosierEm reported that Provance responded as follows to an e-mail complaint about his coverage of the Taylor-Strickland story:

I should have mentioned that the governor is a Democrat. I mentioned Ms. Taylor's party affiliation because she is of the opposite party of the person she is criticizing. Just a fact that should be put out there. I should have taken the next step of noting the governor's party."

Lesson learned, right? Hardly.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

In a story in Thursday's Blade, Provance did it again. This time he identified a Republican prosecutor while failing to specifically identify the party of a former high-level assistant of disgraced former Democratic Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann.

Here are the key paragraphs from Provance's story (HT Maggie Thurber):

Former aide to Marc Dann indicted on 10 counts

Anthony Gutierrez, the man at the center of a sexual harassment scandal that helped drive former Attorney General Marc Dann from office, faces theft and fraud charges for allegedly using his ties with his long-time friend to benefit himself financially.

Franklin Country Prosecutor Ron O'Brien Thursday announced a 10-count indictment -- six felonies and four first-degree misdemeanors -- against Mr. Gutierrez one year to the day after Mr. Dann left office just 16 months into his term.

Mr. O'Brien, a Republican, said the timing was not scheduled to coincide with the anniversary.

..... Mr. Gutierrez was the target of a pair of sexual harassment allegations that were settled earlier this year by the attorney general's office. Allegations are still pending in Trumbull and Mahoning counties that Mr. Gutierrez padded bills paid by Mr. Dann's campaign committee for security windows at Mr. Dann's Youngstown area home and then redirected the extra money to three businesses to which Mr. Gutierrez's private firm, MTV Construction, owed money.

Mr. Gutierrez is expected to turn himself in on Monday.

If convicted on all charges, Mr. Gutierrez faces a maximum of eight years in jail and $20,000 in fines, said Mr. O'Brien.

..... Mr. Dann has so far faced no criminal charges. In March, he was fined $1,000 and given a public reprimand by the Ohio Elections Commission for illegally mining campaign funds to finance a $40,000-plus security system for his home as well as personal cell phone use for him and his family.

The panel chose not to refer the case to Mr. O'Brien for possible criminal prosecution, but it is expected next month to examine more serious allegations of misspent funds against Mr. Dann, his wife Alyssa Lenhoff, former press secretary Leo Jennings, and campaign committee Deputy Treasurer Mary Beth Snyder.

Mr. Dann resigned last year under pressure from Republicans and fellow Democrats alike in the wake of the harassment scandal. Mr. Dann admitted at the time that he feared his own extramarital affair with his office scheduler may have set a poor example.

The allusion to Mr. Dann's "fellow Democrats" in the story's final paragraph above is the only reference to the Democratic Party in the entire story. Provance never specifically identified the indicted Mr. Gutierrez or any of Dann's assistants as Democrats.

If Mr. Provance believes this is a "next step" improvement, he has a very steep learning curve to climb.

Meanwhile, the Toledo Free Press reports that the Blade continues to bleed readers:

Blade circulation numbers down 42,700 since 2004

ABC (the Audit Bureau of Circulations) reported The Blade has dropped from 178,274 Sunday circulation in December 2004 to 135,567 in March 2009.

Its combined Monday through Friday numbers have dropped from  131,117 in December 2005 to 110, 728 in March 2009.

..... The Blade’s Director of Circulation, Dick Fuller, did not return repeated phone calls or e-mails by press time.

It could not happen to a more deserving and slow-learning bunch.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

_______________________________________________

UPDATE: I enhanced a chart, also available as a PDF at the Toledo Free Press, of the Blade's circulation bleed during the past four-plus years to strengthen its points (the Free Press's "Pct." changes are really decimal reductions):

BladeCircDecline2004to2009

 

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

C'mon, Tom...The Toledo

C'mon, Tom...The Toledo Blade and Provance have been covering this and the related scandals for months in which the respective party affiliations have been made clear and should be well-known to anyone following the story. 

Jer

Jer

"The Toledo Blade and Provance have been covering this and the related scandals for months in which the respective party affiliations have been made clear and should be well-known to anyone following the story."

You forgot your this:

/sarc

There, I did it for you, so you don't look so, well, you know.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Shy

You mean so I won't look so "childish, intellectually dishonest, immature, disingenuous, etc"? :-)

Thanks, pal.

Check the related stories on the Blade's website via its search engine.  A couple perhaps could have been slightly more thorough with party IDs, but the majority were exceedingly "fair and balanced".  And remember, this is mostly a story of interest within the state of Ohio where the cast of characters are already familiar to the readers.

Jer

Jer

Jer, childish? No, that's going too far. The other three? Well, the evidence does keep mounting. :p

Jer, now you're backpedaling a bit more, saying, in addition to this one, "a couple perhaps could have been slightly more..."

But yes, you still sound oblivious to what a journalist's job -- always -- should be: to report news without some assumption of who might be reading it. You seem okay with him/her thinking "eh, they know this part already, so..."

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Shy... First of all, what

Shy...

First of all, what does :p mean?

Second, my father was a newspaper publisher for almost all of his adult life.  I grew up in the business.  So I'm reasonably familiar with the scope of journalistic responsibilities.  I promise not to lecture you about the music business, if you won't lecture me about the newspaper business.  Fair enough?

Have you read any of the related stories [other than the one Tom linked]?  It doesn't sound like it.  Hint:  Do your homework before spouting off.

Have a good evening, or night, or day or whatever.  I have to check out.

Jer

 

Jer

Jer, I'm not in the music business. The music business stinks. I'm a musician who creates the music, that doesn't stink.

I'm now, in your jurisdiction, within my rights to lecture you. *** EDIT: Wait, I would be anyway, as you are neither a newspaper businessman OR a journalist... your father was. ***

Anyway, on to playing your little game and responding:

If your father advocated that journalists pick and choose, from story to story as it develops, what basic/key facts that remain relevant are added or omitted, then with all due respect he was a shoddy newspaper publisher.

You are good though, Jer, at discrediting common sense arguments, like the one I'm making about journalism/news, to save your hide.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

You know what, Shy... I

You know what, Shy...

I don't appreciate the negative remarks about my father--whom I miss dearly every single day of my life--even if your description was qualified.

I was making an effort to reestablish a degree of amicability with you, but frankly I am no longer interested.  Go annoy someone else with your boorish behavior.  You've managed to completely undermine the friendly banter we formerly engaged in.

Jer 

You sound like Pelosi........

You do not have a leg to stand on in this argument, never had, but you persist on ignoring the blatent hypocracy of certain newspapers regarding their obvious bias in political party reporting. Show me any examples of Republicans not being mentioned for a crime while the democrats name is put out there to influence the readers into thinking that they are involved in something wrong. Did you miss the "with all due respect" preamble by Mr Shy? For a guy who tries to sound educated you surely are lacking in common sense.....and your skin is thin, too.

old cro...

Have you read the related articles I suggested Shy check out?  If not, then take your head out of your a$$ and go do so.  Then I'll discuss it with you.

Jer

What does the repositon of my head.........

have to do with reading? I am quite capable of reading in the dark with a small amount of light. I also choose what I waste my time with, and reading articles that you suggest on this subject are a major waste of time. Answer my question put to you prior - show me ONE example.

old cro... I'm sorry for

old cro...

I'm sorry for the "head in the a$$" remark.  That was uncalled for.  I guess I'm not in a very good mood.  I'll try to get in a better frame of mind tomorrow, and revisit the issue.

Jer

cro

Notice how it's no longer about this article... magically. It's about related articles.

Judge the poor, BAD journalist by his larger body of work, which isn't, well, always as bad.

Sooooo, he chooses to tell you this in one, tell you that in another.... it's his body of work, I tell you! HIS BODY OF WORK!! HE'S NOT BIASED !!!!

And yes, cro, his father trick is lame. Hard to respect and continue dialogue with someone who uses those tactics. 

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

I can't do anything about your intellectual laziness, Shy..

So...Tom Blumer can refer to previous articles to make his case, but if I do, it's irrelevant.  Yeah, that's logical.  I spent a good bit of time reviewing a number of related articles by Provance and asked that you do likewise.  But, you were too lazy and didn't bother--prefering to simply and absurdly proclaim that I had "lost" the debate.  Just like you pretended to win the national security debate the other day because you're a self-proclaimed authority on all matters of national security.  Right, Dr. Kissinger.

It only illustrates why you are and will remain an uninformed simpleton.

Jer

 

Jer.... once again (man you're a headache, among other things)

The last "debate" was actually me calling you out, rightly, for the tasteless claim (quasi-joke?) that Bush had 3,000 civilian deaths (9/11) on his watch vs. none for Bambi.

When you cough up idiocy like that (notice I STILL haven't called you any names, or used condescending ones like "Ace" or "Dr. Kissinger", and I won't, because that's how much of a better man I am) to get a rise, be ready for some of us to indeed rise and call you out.

With this debate, it's about my argument of what is a common-sense principal in journalism -- TO *ALWAYS* REPORT THE FACTS AND DETAILS -- so, that is why I dismiss your urging us to read up on past stories. There's no fuzziness to this one. The writer leaves out the indicted person's party affiliation and includes the prosecutor's???? It's wrong. There's some reason for it, I'm certain. And that's what Tom is getting at.

Get it now?

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Shy... I might as well be

Shy...

I might as well be arguing with a can of beans.  Look, I've listened to Clinton be soley blamed for 9/11 for nearly eight years.  Indeed, there are literally scores of posts here at NB doing precisely that.  Scold me for pointing this out if you wish, but I have assigned blame to both Clinton and Bush--in fact, to your credit, you have also.  We only differ, unsurprisingly, in who should bear the brunt of the responsiblilty.

The other night mattm made the statement that Bush/Cheney had kept us safe for eight years and added a comment about Obama and national security.  In response, I made an admittedly somewhat flip remark, pointing out that on 9/11 nearly 3000 Americans had died on Bush/Cheney's watch whereas thus far none had died under Obama.  Nevertheless, the statement was 100% accurate.  I further added the brief, controversial, but supportable opinion (again, my opinion) that the Bush administration had been "asleep at the wheel".

In reply, I was addressed by mattm with a post headlined "You are a liar."  Well, I am not a liar.  And I don't appreciate being called one.  Consequently, I returned the verbal fire.  You reacted with the mind-boggling question to me:  "What's your beef with mattm?...as if mattm had responded with "Jer, I beg to disagree" instead of calling me a "liar". 

As you know things went downhill from there.  But does that help you with the picture?  Now, we can talk more about the present party ID issue some more, but right now I'm tired.

Good night, and this time I really mean it.

Jer

Jer

"You reacted with the mind-boggling question to me: What's your beef with mattm?

Wrong again. You'll forever be dishonest (I'm no longer calling you "intellectually-") and a phony. Go hunt down that post and read it again and come back with a correction of what my real question was.

Or don't. Like I care. 

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

MrShy's REAL talent.

The only correction which needs to be made is that my initial response was to Willis Johnson, not mattm.  Although it makes mattn's jumping in with the "You're a liar" charge even more inappropriate.

I'm sure you wanted me to engage in a lengthy thesis about Clinton failures vs. Bush failures re terrorism.  [Even though you and I had hashed this out in depth months before.]  You should know my position by now.  I know yours.  Nevertheless, I did briefly but substantively respond to mattn's brief post.  But, as I said before, when someone leads off with "you're a liar", it chills constructive discourse.  So, that was my beef, and I make no apology for it, notwithstanding the fact you wanted me to laboriously explain my "beef" with the rest of his post.

Now, why don't you run along to yet another one of your self-promoting forums and pursue your real talent:  using a political website to hype your music videos.

Jer

Jer

You fabricated a quote of what my question was to you regarding mattm. I simply requested you come back and correct yourself. Nowhere in this last post did you, and in hindsight I wasted my time.

You have zero credibility and integrity.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Wow, you're really flailing

Wow, you're really flailing now.  A little desperate, Shy? I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for you. 

The full quote was "What part of what mattn wrote above do you not get or have a beef with?"

For about the fourth time, the "part I have a beef with" is his writing "You are a liar."  And you, Shy, are without a doubt one of the densest clairvoyants in the history of the world.  [And that's not hyperbole.]

Jer

Jer the Jerk

A-hole. I'm done with you, Jerk.

I asked, CLEARLY, what was it that mattm WROTE.... WROTE..... WROTE....... that you don't get or have a beef with.

I did NOT ask, what is your beef with mattm, the person.

Let's do this again, one more time, for the idiot Jerk.

I....... asked........ what was it that mattm WROTE ...... again........ WROTE...... that you have a beef with.

I'm finished with you. Pompous, lying, manipulative Jerk.

EDIT: You put up a false quote, is what I'm saying here. Of course, all I was ever referring to when I asked what your beef was, was mattm's arguments about 9/11 and Bush. I -- NEVER CARED -- about your personal issues with him. It's all personal with you, though. 

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Dont get mad,

Get even

Everyone else is doing it?

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Shy...

I was referring to what mattn wrote.  That was the whole point all along.  I'm sorry I didn't go back to the thread and quote the entirety of your question.  But I knew what you were referring to, and I assumed you knew what I was referring to.  It was NEVER personal, with mattn or you.  But I certainly didn't appreciate being called a liar by mattn, or subjected to another string of insults from you.

Shy, you are obviously having some kind of meltdown.  I'm worried about you.

Jer

Jerk

Yes, I had a meltdown, because I can't stand people like you.

You're passive aggressive and you twist people's words. You're exactly like my uber-liberal brother, who I can't stand, and who has no moral backbone or integrity and gets a deep-rooted thrill just getting under people's skin.

You're a phony who lives off playing a victim. I never cared about your beef with mattm, and why should I? I care about the bullsh*t you spew regarding NB topics.

You're not cool. You're a Jerk.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Shucks...

I bet this means I won't be getting that complimentary new music video by you for my birthday next week.

Jer

Jer

You know what, Jer...

YOU bring your father and his career into this debate, making it fair game. YOU lose the argument. And then..... this?? A guilt trip on me? That's truly pathetic.

Adios. And stop acting like we were ever amigos.

You are a true liberal, Jer. It's touchy-feely and emotional with you all the time, because it's what you have to resort to with constantly being on the losing end of debates.

Seriously, pulling that stunt makes you look bad.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

MrShy....

I only brought my father into the debate for the sole purpose of pointing out that I had grown up in the newspaper business and thus had some hands-on experience and familiarity with the field of journalism--not to use him as a sympathy prop.  You can say I'm thin-skinned, disingenuous, and immature until you are blue in the face, pal, but I'm not going to just ignore even indirect, qualified negative shots at one of my parents.

You are a pitiful, tasteless, simple-minded dullard with absolutely zero class.  Believe me, one of my consuming embarrassments is my previous effort to be exceedingly generous with my compliments about you and consistently cordial in my exchanges.  Adios, clown.

Jer

Jer

I really got to you, huh? You couldn't help bring personal emotions into the debate, and now following that up with the harshest personal name-calling and insults, could you?

Some people can't help themselves. You're one of them.

I have plenty of adjectives and names for you, but you won't find them in this post because, thankfully, I'm not you.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Right, junior,..you

Right, junior,..you started completely out of the blue with the "intellectual dishonesty", and "seeing through me" crap weeks ago, and continued recently with another string of insults.  I tried to joke about it earlier tonight to maybe break the ice, but you would have none of it, and just continued with the insults.  As I said, zero class.

Jer

Jer

You need to get out more. So those are the "mysterious" harsh insults you referred to earlier? Amazing.

And here you are, in all your *true* classless glory, exposed for all to see, pulling out every *real* ad-hominum, condescending name, etc., you can find and flinging it at me.

Let us all know when you're done.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

You should write a book, Mr Shy......

on "How to smoke out a liberal in 5 easy steps". Me, I'll just reply to jerknowing he hates it when I play word games with his name, or just respond.....

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

cro

Liberals can be all nice-nice, but then this is the sort of thing that's unleashed within. It's vicious, and Jer is not the first. But at least I don't actually know the guy in the flesh, unlike other unfortunate experiences I've had.

Liberalism has GOT to be a disease, I tell you.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Shy...this is just

Shy...this is just unbelievable.  You initiated the personal put-downs a couple of weeks ago.  You initiated the insults a couple of nights ago.  You initiated the condescending lecturing, and repeating your demeaning labeling tonight.  And I'm supposed to throw you bouquets in return, and beg you to slap me around some more?  Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

Maybe you're use to dealing with squishy liberal pantywaists.  Well, I am a huge advocate for civil discourse, but I'm not going to just lay down and let somebody walk all over me.  Seems you can dish it out but can't take it.  Keep on whining about how "viscious" I'm being little one.  It's actually pretty funny.

Jer

"Maybe you're use to dealing

"Maybe you're use to dealing with squishy liberal pantywaists."

No, I'm not, I'm very much used to deeply-full-of-hate, vicious ones like yourself, Jer. It's probably why I said a little while back that I see through you.

And yeah, you're dishonest with yourself, playing Mr. Cordial Nice Guy with people. I get a tad sarcastic with you when you make bad arguments at NB, fine, and this is where it leads?

You made this mess of a bed, so what can I say. 

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

You are sadly mistaken and

You are sadly mistaken and have badly misread me, Shy...

Everyone who knows me knows how truly absurd your accusation is.  I'm not a hater Shy...I never have been and never will be.  Any hate I may harbor is reserved for murderers and monsters like the Hitlers and Stalins of the world, and for heartless, remorseless killers who contaminate society with their evil.

I enjoy political debate...sometimes intense, maybe sometimes it becomes too passionate.  But I don't hate those who happen to possess a political philosophy different from mine.  Most of my friends are conservatives.  They would laugh in disbelief at my being called a "hater".  I welcome the exchange of ideas.  Every word I have ever said about Bush has reflected my true feelings.  When I have praised him I meant it--it certainly wasn't some cynical ploy to curry favor.  And when I have criticized him, it has been honest criticism. I call it like I see it.  If you think I am a fraud, I'm very sorry.  But I do resent it, because it's not true.

Jer

Jer

"Everyone who knows me knows how truly absurd your accusation is."

I don't give a rat's ass what others think of you.

In my book, after this thread's laughably pitiful exchange, you are, without question, an insufferable phony.

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Right, Shy.  I've somehow

Right, Shy.  I've somehow managed to completely deceive all of the people who have known me personally over the course of many years and in some cases all of my life, but you, with your astounding powers of clairvoyance, without ever having met or seen me, have been able to expose me as an insufferable phony. 

You are indeed an amazing man, MrShy.

Jer 

Jer (no "k" this time)

"You are indeed an amazing man, MrShy."

Thank you.

*Mr. Shy puts his gloves back on.*

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Hey MrS... Now you have

Hey MrS...

Now you have me laughing....what Round is this with you two...

Hey Jer...got your gloves on?

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

BT !!!!

Ha :) Hey, actually, putting the gloves on, in this instance, means I got it out of my system.... "the gloves came off".... But they're back on. For now. ;)

Jer drove me insane, so he actually won that battle, I guess. :p

I am not on NB -- ever -- to pound my chest about how many here, or in my personal life, like/respect me or don't. (I care, sure, but in a debate about issues why would I? Why would anyone, if they don't need distractions to make their point/state their case?) Nor do I ever refer to this member or that member treating me this way or that, yada yada, when I'm having a dialogue about an issue.

Jer (and he's not alone here at NB) seems to put a lot of emphasis on cliques, hurt feelings, etc.. NB is not H.S..

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

MrS... Been there done

MrS...

Been there done that...more than once...if you get my drift.

I hear ya'   ;-)

 

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Well shy from a unbiased point of view I would say...

 Jer's gotten to you and it clearly made you feel good about those comments of his father. You got away with it because you said with all due respect to your father.

Pretty sad, both of you, Just Kiss and make, Americans turning liberal and no one will think anything of it

He had my vote

Sorry, bt [and Shy] My

Sorry, bt [and Shy]

My cut man threw in the towel.

Jer

Jer... Fire

Jer...

Fire him!

Immediately!

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

BT :)

Haha... Bad girl (er, woman :)), wanting to see more fights!

:p 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Mr. Shy,

At least you avoided using the F-bombs, among other unsavory vebiage, that I've been spewing the last couple of days. 

I must say a few fine Czech brewed pilsners has me feeling better. Just sayin. :)

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

R1.... Cheers! I'm

R1....

Cheers!

I'm having a brew myself before I close out.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

BT,

I've sent you a buddy request. I apologize it took so long. I've always assumed you were on it I guess. Anyway, thanks for earlier. 

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

R1... It's my

R1...

It's my privilege.

Btw...  I think or assume the same as you do...I don't pay that much attention to the small stuff in the big picture of all...if you know what I mean.

Catch ya later...got to get the heck out of here.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

LOL... come now MrS... I

LOL... come now MrS...

I remember well you pointing out with glee "Cat Fight" here quite awhile back...you did so with glee...bring back any memories?

...hey, I'm a gal, we never forget...  ;-)

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

BT

You got me there, and yes I remember.

And I know the girl/gal thing, very much so. :p

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Hey MrS...being in the

Hey MrS...being in the barrel with Jer is time-share type of thing around here it seems, we all get to tangle with  him.

It was your turn...and you did well...and please take that right...I am chuckling as I post this.

Jer loves every second of it.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

You got it wrong, bt...

Jer doesn't like to fight.  Jer prefers to think of himself as a lover, not a fighter.  Unfortunately, lately Mrs. Jer has taken to just going ahead and throwing in the towel on my behalf during the first round.

By the way, remember earlier today when I reluctantly admitted I had received no PMs begging me to stay at NB?  Well, that part was true.  However, I did receive one PM.  It was from MrShy telling me not to let the door slam me in the ass on my way out.  [wink]

Jer

Shy Guy~Good to "see" you smiling...

I'm so glad to see you guys aren't fighting anymore. Frankly, I'm worn out from NB fights (cautionary tale: don't ever try to be a peacemaker on here!). Instead, let's have some fun & create analysis others can happily debate.  ;)

Everybody have a good rest of the weekend~signing off...

Okay Shy... She's

Okay Shy... She's gone.

Get your gloves back on.  :-)

Jer

STOP RIGHT THERE!

Who's gone? BT? Me?

We're women...we see all. We hear all. We know all.;)

 

GG's first rule of posting.....

what signs out......must sign in

good rule to note Jer

;^ )

The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts 

Botg~

LOL.

OK, I'm leaving now...signing out. Really, signing off the site for the day. Bye bye! ^_^

bai GG

yer not werkin on Sunday?

http://icanhascheezburger.com/2007/05/21/off-to-werk/

The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” -- Chief Justice John Roberts 

Botg~Almost Monday!

Yer not makin' fun of Georgia Girl, are ya? ;) LOVE the pic. LOL.

And here's a pic of how I feel by the time Sunday rolls around (it will be a miracle if this works):

http://www.dailypets.co.uk/2007/06/27/tired-puppyyawn/

 

~GG

Jer #2

:p is a tongue-out smiley (just as ":)" is a smiling smiley.)

You old fogey. Kidding........ :p

 

You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!

 

Jer~Mr. Shy...

Excuse me. Just a brief message to let Mr. Shy know: "You've got mail!"

:) ~GG

well

I swear, it seems like the story changes based on what's convenient at the time.

Once again, famous people are always ID'd because they're so well known, but then other famous people don't need to be ID'd because they're already famous.

 

 

Someone

Someone, like me, who has not been following the stories, doesn't know their party affiliations.  So, Jer, your argument doesn't hold water.  Journalists are supposed to report ALL the facts, not be selective about what they report, unless you are mainstream media and trying to make conservatives/Republicans look bad.  You claim to know the business, which you may, but by your replies you have obviously bought into the liberal midset of using selective reporting to create the story you want.  This is not only dishonest, but a person who does it or even supports it lacks character, morals and integrity and I wouldn't hire them as a janitor.  See, you have sacrificed your soul for an agenda and thus have no credibility.  It is sad that someone who seems intelligent is willing to lose credibilty, charatcter, morals and integrity, because once you lose them, they are rarely regained.

Ozark...

Since you apparently endorse the view of Shy who claims to have "seen through me" and discerned I am actually a "vicious liberal fraud", and you yourself have determined I have "sacrificed my soul and have no credibility, character, morals, or integrity", I suppose it makes little difference to point out that even Tom acknowledges in this article's final paragraph Dann is referenced with "fellow Democrats".  To me, that's a pretty strong hint that Dann and his assistant are, well...Democrats.  But, then again, what do I know. 

Jer