Their agenda is continuing, all this is is more propaganda to bring war crimes/criminality to the Bush administration and this war...they will never be happy with a Victory...they hate  Pres.Bush with that much passion, and it will not end until they have someone behind bars...

You know the so-called Neo-cons.

Believe me, congressional hearings are going to be star-studded television with all the msm panting with delight.

Makes one puke knowing what is coming on down the road....heck, just listen to the arm of the DNC network, msnbc...they are now non-stop on this theme, especially with VP Cheney of late...with Matthews leading the way, Olbie and ankle-biter Maddow at the heel...they are on the march, it is past sad, it is desgraceful.

Hess by the way, got full of illusions of grandeur by the pressers Rummie had...too bad...I never, ever cared for the self-aggrandizing witch...I watched/listened to her on C-Span, especially when she was in the Wa. Journal from time to time...it really was hard to take...for me anyway.

The next four years are going to be absolute madness.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I guess that 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium that Saddam Hussein had stockpiled was to be used as sand for some beach front property of his?

Still, this is something that the President could easily bring up, but why he doesn't is beyond me.

As cash strapped as Saddam was because of the embargoes, I'm sure he could have sold it to someone on the black market if he really wasn't interested in nukes.

Of course, those U.N. inspectors constantly going into Iraq year after year should have been a clue that something was up.

But, all of that is conveniently forgotten. 

One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.

I read this article this morning when I woke up. I am sorry to say I am not surprised. This behaviour is delusional. The refusual to accept reality and to substitute one of your own is patholgical. I am certain thier are medical terms to describe this condition, but I am not a doctor so I will leave that to the professionals. We really need to make sure that these people get the help they deserve. Perhaps a sanity hearing or an intervention is in order. It must be communicable because so many people seem to have developed this condition all clustered around a single location. We must remember to be compasionate and not challenge these peoples perceptions directly. I understand this only causes them to dig thier heels in even more firmly and deny reality even more. Medical help must be obtained at once. Competency hearings must be held to determine if they can continue to live unsupervised outside of institutional care. Nancy Pelosi seems also to have an advance case of this condition.

Someone should contact the CDC. Washington might have to be quaruntined. Would some Doctor or Healthcare professional please assist us with this matter. It is of the upmost urgency. To delay any further would only confirm the liberal misconception of conservatives not having any empathy. Let us come together and prove them wrong.

AP=ahole propagandists. It's like reading pravda and izvestia. And Waxman is such a POS that Congress should continually fly its flag at half mast for having such a low life as a member.

Henry Waxman just might be the ugliest man alive - not only in looks - but in demeanor as well.  Shoe slime is more pleasant than this man.

George Orwell once recommended that "we all keep our eyes open and see to it that the lies do not creep out of the newspapers and into the history books." ("As I Please," 17 Nov 1944)

When one sees people like Henry Waxman and Pamela Hess working so hard to get the lies into the history books, I'm glad that people like Christopher Hitchens, Tom Blumer, and the whole NewsBusters team (and many others on the conservative side) are there to say, "Not so fast!"

Thanks, Mr. Blumer, for taking the trouble to keep track of the "sixteen words" controversy, and for refuting it as often as the liars try to make it a 'known fact.'

I've said that, without the dishonest press we have, the Democrats couldn't win an election.  The beginning of the 16 words "British Intelligence has learned......" continues to be true, to this day.  Where is the lie?  No one is willing to back people like Waxman into a corner and ask him that question.  If that were done, on national television, this would go away in an instant.  Apparently, the press feels it's not responsible to protect the President of the United States (only if he's a Republican) from slanderous remarks.

The picture that this presents to me is that, for the next 2 years, the Democrats will continue to lie and deceive the public trying to solidify their gains in the congress.  They want power and will continue to do this stuff, with the assistance of the press, to turn people off against all Republicans. 

Finally, Waxman is elected every 2 years because he represents a group of Democrats who only want a partisan hack in there representing them.  He's patently dishonest, not only in his representations here; but also in his statements on energy and global warming, which he will attack in the same dishonest way.

The Democrats should be ashamed of the way they've conducted themselves, as far as the 16 words are concerned, but they continue to lie and win, so why change now.  Without an honest media, there is no need to change strategy.

Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.  

... on a daily basis.  They are assisted in thier delusional thinking by a scheming and plotting PROPAGANDIST media with a clear objective:  PROMOTE LIBERALISM at all cost.  Truth be DAMNED!  The delusion is that they believe they will get away with it.  Their SINS will find them out and they will have to give an account for every careless word and OUTRIGHT LIE.  Especially while NEWSBUSTERS and other blogs are around.  GO GET 'EM NB!

Yes, it's even on fact check.

http://www.factcheck.org/bushs_16_words_on_iraq_uranium.html

 Of course fact check also has the Shinseki thing and they got that wrong too. I'm surprised they're doing this instead of focusing on their more immediate goal which is to give Obama credit for success in Iraq.

  Congress declares war and funds wars. The President runs the war.

  Congress passed the public law 207-143 on 16Oct2002, the authorization of the use of force against Iraq. That was 2 months prior to the State of the Union speech. Henry Waxman was a signatory to that law and voted yea.

 Waxman indicts only himself. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Waxman and those with like minds should be awakened one "cold" morning by someone with a green face.

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than him.          John Stuart Mill---

Waxman is just another one of the village idiots who continues to run his mouth. He like Dodd, Kennedy, Kerry, Reid, Pelosi, etc. like to hear themselves rant. I'm willing to bet that they all have a tv set tuned to each of their liberal media outlets just so they can listen to themselves.

I truly believe that not one of these liberal politicians honors or has honored the oath of office they took when they were sworn it.

Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.

For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.