Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate

Republic Windows & Doors Files for Bankruptcy

By Tom Blumer | December 16, 2008 | 15:25

Change font size:  A |  A
Tom Blumer's picture

The Chicago company that was the site of a six-day worker sit-in has filed for bankruptcy. Though this appears to have been expected, it seems that many aspects of this story went under-reported or unreported.

The Chicago Sun Times story written by Francine Knowles and Sandra Guy makes it appear that Bank of America, the lender whose refusal to extend a credit line allegedly caused the company's failure, ended up "lending" over $1 million to fired workers (bolds are mine):

Republic Windows and Doors filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy Monday, the company said.

The bankruptcy filing for liquidation was a requirement of Bank of America in the negotiated settlement with the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Republic said.

..... Republic made headlines last week after the plant closed when Bank of America, concerned about the company's financial viability, refused to extend it additional credit. That left 240 workers without a job -- workers who were not given the legally required 60 days' notice of a layoff.

The workers successfully staged a protest against Bank of America to demand severance and vacation pay and challenge the lack of proper notice. Politicians and union leaders blasted Bank of America's action, given that it took $15 billion in the federal bank bailout package. Bank of America ultimately agreed to provide $1.35 million in lending for Republic's layoff package.

(Bank of America spokesperson Julie) Westermann said Monday that while the bank recognized it wasn't its responsibility to pay Republic's workers, it provided the loan to enable Gillman "to do what was right."

..... Westermann said all of Gillman's proposals "involved a second line of credit, which we could not responsibly give him considering the state of his company."

Gillman has no plans to reopen the Goose Island plant, he said last week. But his family does plan to focus on its nonunion, Iowa-based Echo Windows.

This Associated Press item from December 11 notes that JPMorgan Chase paid in another $400,000, and that the total of $1.75 million "will go into an escrow account for the workers," from which payments averaging about $7,000 per worker will be made.

Though the agreements involved "loans," it is clear that Chase and B of A aren't going to be receiving any repayments. Thus, it seems that the following words or terms might be better fits for accurately describing the funds disbursed: gifts, blackmail, shakedown payments.

I'm no labor lawyer, but this Worker Adjustement and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act exception found on Page 11 of the Department of Labor's "Worker's Guide to Advance Notice of Closings and Layoffs" seems to indicate that the two Sun-Times writers' blithe, automatic assumption that Republic acted illegally is suspect:

A "faltering company" is not required to give notice of a layoff or plant closing when, before the plant closing, it is actively seeking capital or business, which if obtained would avoid or postpone the layoff or closure, and if it reasonably believes that advance notice would hurt its ability to find the capital or business it needs to continue operating.

The material on Page 21 of the same guide relating to companies filing for bankruptcy does not seem to make any exception to the excerpted paragraph.

This makes sense. But if the results at Republic somehow serve as a precedent, it would appear that any failing company could absurdly but "successfully" threaten its lender into coughing up funds by saying, "We haven't given our workers the required legal notice. If you don't lend us the money we've requested, you're just going to have to pay their accrued wages and benefits. So if you know what's good for you, you'll cut the check."

The union plant has closed, with fired workers talking nobly about reopening it. The non-union plant remains active. Yet somehow all of this is being seen as a worker "victory." The only "victory" I see is in Iowa. The results in Chicago represent yet another in a long line of reasons not to start up a business, especially in Illinois.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Share this
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Bias by Omission
  • Business Coverage
  • Crime
  • Double Standards
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Political Groups
  • Unions
  • Barack Obama
  • Jesse Jackson
  • Illinois
  • Regional Media
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Is possible to be more stupid
    1 min 13 sec ago
  • And now we have Reno V.2.0
    3 min 55 sec ago
  • choice of words...
    5 min 5 sec ago
  • Hola Timothy! Long time, no see
    7 min 4 sec ago
  • JFK
    9 min ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.