The Chicago company that was the site of a six-day worker sit-in has filed for bankruptcy. Though this appears to have been expected, it seems that many aspects of this story went under-reported or unreported.
The Chicago Sun Times story written by Francine Knowles and Sandra Guy makes it appear that Bank of America, the lender whose refusal to extend a credit line allegedly caused the company's failure, ended up "lending" over $1 million to fired workers (bolds are mine):
Republic Windows and Doors filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy Monday, the company said.
The bankruptcy filing for liquidation was a requirement of Bank of America in the negotiated settlement with the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Republic said.
..... Republic made headlines last week after the plant closed when Bank of America, concerned about the company's financial viability, refused to extend it additional credit. That left 240 workers without a job -- workers who were not given the legally required 60 days' notice of a layoff.
The workers successfully staged a protest against Bank of America to demand severance and vacation pay and challenge the lack of proper notice. Politicians and union leaders blasted Bank of America's action, given that it took $15 billion in the federal bank bailout package. Bank of America ultimately agreed to provide $1.35 million in lending for Republic's layoff package.
(Bank of America spokesperson Julie) Westermann said Monday that while the bank recognized it wasn't its responsibility to pay Republic's workers, it provided the loan to enable Gillman "to do what was right."
..... Westermann said all of Gillman's proposals "involved a second line of credit, which we could not responsibly give him considering the state of his company."
Gillman has no plans to reopen the Goose Island plant, he said last week. But his family does plan to focus on its nonunion, Iowa-based Echo Windows.
This Associated Press item from December 11 notes that JPMorgan Chase paid in another $400,000, and that the total of $1.75 million "will go into an escrow account for the workers," from which payments averaging about $7,000 per worker will be made.
Though the agreements involved "loans," it is clear that Chase and B of A aren't going to be receiving any repayments. Thus, it seems that the following words or terms might be better fits for accurately describing the funds disbursed: gifts, blackmail, shakedown payments.
I'm no labor lawyer, but this Worker Adjustement and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act exception found on Page 11 of the Department of Labor's "Worker's Guide to Advance Notice of Closings and Layoffs" seems to indicate that the two Sun-Times writers' blithe, automatic assumption that Republic acted illegally is suspect:
A "faltering company" is not required to give notice of a layoff or plant closing when, before the plant closing, it is actively seeking capital or business, which if obtained would avoid or postpone the layoff or closure, and if it reasonably believes that advance notice would hurt its ability to find the capital or business it needs to continue operating.
The material on Page 21 of the same guide relating to companies filing for bankruptcy does not seem to make any exception to the excerpted paragraph.
This makes sense. But if the results at Republic somehow serve as a precedent, it would appear that any failing company could absurdly but "successfully" threaten its lender into coughing up funds by saying, "We haven't given our workers the required legal notice. If you don't lend us the money we've requested, you're just going to have to pay their accrued wages and benefits. So if you know what's good for you, you'll cut the check."
The union plant has closed, with fired workers talking nobly about reopening it. The non-union plant remains active. Yet somehow all of this is being seen as a worker "victory." The only "victory" I see is in Iowa. The results in Chicago represent yet another in a long line of reasons not to start up a business, especially in Illinois.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
→ BOA must be proud
December 16, 2008 - 15:43 ET by Cool ArrowBOA wasn't going to be left holding the bag even though they enjoy the free gift of my tax money.
BOA was also the organization that spearheaded the loans to illegals scheme.
Shakedown
December 16, 2008 - 16:16 ET by DirjjShakedown indeed. That's what you get when you mix Unions with Chicago.
Bust the Unions I say. All of them. Especially the UAW and the Teachers.
ab
Not just Illinois
December 16, 2008 - 18:57 ET by Conservative BluesI used to live in Bay City and then Saginaw, MI. You can't get a respectable business to move there because the union presence is so strong. While many people share the blame for Michigan's 8 consecutive years of recession (starting with that embarassment Granholm), the unions should receive the largest share.
Ecclesiastes 10:2 - "The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left."
They should just
December 16, 2008 - 20:35 ET by 10ksnookerMove to a more freedom loving state, if there are any left.
Blackmail...
December 16, 2008 - 16:26 ET by dmntd1Not completely blackmail and extortion, more of a fire-sale.
The loan was on condition of a complete liquidation bankruptcy. Essentially, the bank bought the company, and forced them into BK. Most people don't realize that a creditor can force a debtor into BK with little/no warning. Although most won't, as it would be stupid, it does extend down the the little man getting forced into BK by Chase or BofA on a mere credit card.
That said, I still hold fast to my original thought that this was an attempt of the company to break the union, in an effort to keep costs down, while keeping the factory open. Now, the workers have succeeded in protesting themselves out of a job, right in the middle of the Christmas Holiday season...
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy." - Winston Churchill
Really?
December 16, 2008 - 18:09 ET by CobraMan"Most people don't realize that a creditor can force a debtor into BK with little/no warning."
That's not true, a creditor can not force anyone or any company into bankruptcy as long as that company, or person, MAKES THEIR PAYMENTS ON TIME! As long as you make your payments as per your loan agreement (a legal agreement, BTW) , you can't be "forced" by your creditor into anything, including bankruptcy.
This company was "forced" into bankruptcy due to declining sales and rising employment and operational costs. The BoA had nothing to do with it, other than being the creditor who provided them with a line of credit prior to that company's decline.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
→ Good Point Cobra
December 16, 2008 - 20:40 ET by Cool ArrowBankruptcy may have been a requirement of receiving credit from BOA, but the window company was not legally bound to seek credit from BOA only.
Involuntary BK
December 16, 2008 - 23:32 ET by dmntd1You're correct, they can't if they're making their payments on time. My bad, and I should have clarified that. However, it's pretty obvious that this factory wasn't paying timely, by pretty much any standard of...well.... those of us that post on NB...
As it stands, however, I still hold that the factory's owners were forced into an untimely liquidation BK, instead of a potentially beneficial (almost all the way around, there are always losers in NON-PC reality) reorganization BK. The re-org BK would have broken the union contracts, but might have kept the workers employed. The employees, while wronged by most every moral and legal standard, essentially protested themselves onto the unemployment line, instead of into lower, but still present, wages.
One of the reasons in the link below is that the debtor is "grossly incompetent". Another is that the debtor is transferring assets, and it's possible the employer was transferring the assets to the non-union factory.
Believe it or not, I researched this when I realized an employer was positioning himself for BK, and trying to get away without paying nearly $150,000 in back salaries and expenses. I didn't force in time, and lost out on nearly $10,000.
7 Reasons to Consider Filing an Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy." - Winston Churchill
Irony
December 16, 2008 - 23:37 ET by astonrickenbachThe next day after the settlement Bank of America announced the layoff of 35,000 works. Wonder what those workers think about this? Not that a mill would make much of a difference.