Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion

AP Poll Report Claims Confidence That Obama Will 'Fix' Economy; Actual Poll Asked If He Will 'Improve' It

By Tom Blumer | November 11, 2008 | 15:28

Change font size:  A |  A
Tom Blumer's picture

APandGfKlogo1008Now that Barack Obama has won the presidency, the poll cookers at the Associated Press have dutifully generated a barely-disguised press release for him.

A report this afternoon on the results of an AP GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media Poll is headlined "Most in AP poll confident Obama will fix economy " at Yahoo!, Google (shorter report), and the wire service's home site (all are dynamic links subject to change).

There are "only" two problems:

  • The underlying sample is heavily skewed towards Democrats, including strong Democrats.
  • Much more important, in fact crossing into downright dishonesty, the poll question asked had to do with whether respondents thought that Obama would "improve" the economy, not "fix" it.

Here are the first two paragraphs of the relatively short, unbylined report (bolds are mine to note fawning and erroneous reporting):

In one of the economy's darkest hours in decades, it looks like people are taking Barack Obama up on his exhortations for hope and change.

Seven in 10, or 72 percent, voice confidence the president-elect will make the changes needed to revive the stalling economy, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll released Tuesday. Underscoring how widely the public is counting on its new leader, 44 percent of Republicans joined nearly all Democrats and most independents in expressing that belief.

The rest of the report as it currently exists could be the topic of a separate post, and perhaps will be.

The underlying poll is available at this link as a PDF; click on "Nov. 6th-10th: Post-Election Poll" once there.

The poll sample was not only overweighted by party affiliation, but also by the strength of that affiliation (Questions PID1 and PID2 at Page 7 of the PDF). It consisted of 48% Democrats (21%. strong 19% moderate, 8% indie leaners) vs. 34% Republicans (13% strong, 11% moderate, 10% indie leaners).

More fundamentally, here is the actual poll question about the economy (Question CUR10 at Page 5 of the PDF; bolds are mine):

How confident are you that Barack Obama will be successful in bringing about the changes needed to improve the economy?

The phrase "bringing about the changes" is a totally unnecessary addition of words. I can't see a reason to do it unless the goal is to cleverly echo Obama's campaign rhetoric to influence the poll's result. The question should simply have been, "How confident are you that Barack Obama will be able to improve the economy?"

The difference between "improving the economy" and "fixing" it is so obvious it doesn't even require discussion.

Reporting a poll result that asked about "improvement" as if it really asked about "fixing" the economic situation, or "making the changes needed to revive the stalling economy" is flat-out, inarguable journalistic malpractice by a group that ought to rename itself the Assembled Propagandists.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Share this
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Business Coverage
  • Economy
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Polling
  • Barack Obama
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 


  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Jon, I pretty much do the
    6 min 4 sec ago
  • There're other factors
    8 min 47 sec ago
  • I don't understand how this
    13 min 21 sec ago
  • It isn't even an analogy.
    16 min 31 sec ago
  • I say give the Chicoms the tooling, too, and let them produce...
    23 min 53 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Full Video of Rick Santorum at CPAC
  • Gov. Perry Tells NewsBusters He's Just 'Fighting on a Different Front'
  • Jay Leno Pines for More Socially Liberal Republican Party
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.