Al Neuharth's Hysterical 'Plain Talk': News Coverage Used to Be Slanted, But Isn't Now

Photo of Tom Blumer.

AlNeuharth1008.jpgAl Neuharth's Friday mini-column in USA Today should have been in a section the paper doesn't have: the comics.

Neuharth claimed that today's newspapers play the news straight, while in the "olden days" they didn't.

Put down all drinks before reading (bolds are mine):

Fewer newspapers try to dictate votes
Plain Talk by Al Neuharth

More newspaper bosses across the USA have wised up to the fact that you readers are smart enough to decide who to vote for in Tuesday's election. Newspapers making presidential editorial endorsements this year likely will be the lowest percentage ever. Editor & Publisher, the trade journal, compiles the numbers.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Endorsements so far this year:
• John McCain, 105.
• Barack Obama, 234.

Four years ago:
• President Bush, 205.
• John Kerry, 213.

In the olden days, some newspapers actually were backed or funded by political parties. Not only did most endorse candidates, but news coverage often was slanted or opinionated.

Now most newspapers try to be fair and objective in news columns. But editorial endorsements make readers suspicious.

Neuharth has no comment about the imbalance this year compared to 2004. But that's beside the point.

No Al. At least for me, newspaper endorsements shouldn't make us suspicious in and of themselves. What should make us suspicious is the that fact the news coverage is inarguably more "slanted and opinionated" now than it was in "olden days." The most cursory comparison of Associated Press and United Press International dispatches from the 1960s and 1970s to the apparatchik-like drivel we have to endure from the likes of the AP's Jennifer Loven, Martin Crutsinger, Jeannine Aversa, and countless others proves the total folly of Neuharth's narrative.

When the news coverage is fair and balanced, we don't mind newspapers expressing their informed opinions on candidates and issues. But when bias and political correctness pervade every page of the national and local news sections of so many metro papers, we can't help but think that the entire operation is dedicated to disseminating propaganda, instead of informing the public. Then their endorsements become mere extensions of that non-stop effort.

More and more readers are turning away from that. Yet most newspapers won't turn away from their suicidal tactics. Fortunately for USA Today, Neuharth isn't involved in day-to-day operations, and the paper generally tends (emphasis "tends") to play it straight, and its subscriber numbers have held steady over the past five years. USAT is an exception. Unrelenting bias is the rule.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Where is the multicolored pie chart?

I expected that Al would have arranged for some sort of brightly-colored pie chart.

At least a bar graph.  You know, red for McCain and Bush, blue for Obama and Kerry...

Or would that have worked against the point he was irrationally attempting to make?

--Mike 

www.thebrattonreport...

The bubble these elite

The bubble these elite leftists live in needs to be popped...they absolutely refuse to see any kind of reality...no matter what..even at their own expense...

Unbelievable...it just really is unbelievable to me the rose-colored glasses they look through.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Hi.....I'm Al Neuharth.....and I've

been living under a rock for 20 years.....hey, its still 1984 right?

"If a man does his best, what else is there"?

General George S. Patton Jr.

Begrunt... ...been living

Begrunt...

...been living under a rock for 20 years

...that or he was speaking with what's left of his mind from a padded room somewhere...

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

I think Al Neuharth is

I think Al Neuharth is entering that twilight land of senile dementia.

How old IS that photo?????  Al is 84 now....

I wonder why most

I wonder why most newspapers even bother having a separate editorial page - the whole paper functions as one. 

McNotObama '08

A man whose time has long

A man whose time has long since passed...

A little off, but PLS READ

 

Sorry about length.....Please pass it on. Drop it on other blogs, I've hit some, but let's keep it moving. Thanks Steve

This letter written to Obama, is so well written, it may even make some of
> his supporters think twice; or maybe not. Nonetheless it has 7 remarkably
> great questions to the type of man he is. I don't know who Mark Gregg is
> but
> I am so glad this eloquent letter is circulating..... please help keep it
> going.

> Dear Mr. Obama,
> My name is Mark Gregg. I am a 50 something conservative white male. I have
> followed your campaign closely, including the speeches you and others made
> at the democratic national convention. I am respectfully providing you
> with
> seven simple (probably shallow) reasons why I could never vote for you. I
> believe my opinion is shared by many people. While there may not be quite
> enough to prevent you from becoming president of this nation, I do think
> there is an awakening to the fact that you are not a (the) messiah that
> the
> media and liberal Hollywood entertainers are trying to portray you.
> 1. I hear your mantra of change, change, change. Yet, you picked a long
> term, liberal, Washington insider (Joe Biden) to be your running mate.
> This
> is NOT change. It is a move that hypocritically refutes the very thing you
> supposedly stand for. Your campaign then slammed McCain for picking Sarah
> Palin, apparently, because she is NOT a Washington insider. She is a
> maverick who cleaned-up Alaska 's quagmire of political scandals. Which
> way
> is it, Barack? Is it okay for you to pick a Washington insider under the
> mantra of 'change', but not okay for John McCain to pick a smart,
> aggressive, reformer?
> 2. You have the single most liberal voting record in the senate. This
> indicates to me and others like me that you may very well be an angry
> black
> man seeking to punish our country for sins of a different generation. I am
> not racist. I have some biases just like you and every other human alive.
> Unlike the Democratic Party who claims to be for the minority (but their
> record heavily refutes this), I will give any person who truly needs help,
> help. I married a 'minority' girl 35 years ago (she is Hispanic) and have
> seen the evils of prejudice first hand. However, I have also seen my wife
> and my children and others in her family throw off the veil of self
> imposed
> prejudicial bondage and move ahead. They love our country and do not view
> themselves any different than I view myself as a citizen of this country.
> Your lovely wife so disappointed people like me during this campaign when
> she stated it was the first time she had ever been proud of this country.
> She apparently never noticed the massive aid we give dozens of other
> countries. She apparently never noticed the sacrifice of literally
> millions
> of veterans who helped make this country a free nation and helped liberate
> other nations from brutal dictators such as Adolf Hitler. She apparently
> does not remember that she attended Ivy League universities with
> scholarship
> money that ultimately (at least some of it) was paid for by our taxes.
> This
> troubles me more than you know. She is an angry black woman who appears to
> not like her country very much. I don't want her representing me to the
> rest
> of the world.
> 3. You claim Christianity but apparently do not realize that the Bible
> teaches that he, who does not work, does not eat. The Bible does not say
> or
> even suggest that he, who CANNOT work, should not eat. Yet, your liberal
> policies reward people who are capable of working, but choose to not do
> so.
> This bothers me. I know that if you are elected our taxes will spiral
> upwards. You should heed the words of Winston Churchill: 'We contend that
> for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing
> in
> a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.' If I like anything
> about you, it is your campaign promise to balance the federal budget.
> Unfortunately, we have heard this a huge number of times from a number of
> different politicians and we realize that when you energize the very
> liberal
> Nancy Pelosi, Robert Byrd, Ted Kennedy, etc, etc, and the many other
> democrats like them, a balanced budget will never, ever happen on your
> watch. (Remember also Obama said in his book 'Audacity of Hope', ''I
> will
> stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly
> direction''..... Remember those are HIS words not mine. What better place
> for the Muslins to control our country, than in the office of the
> President
> of USA .)
> 4. During your question and answer session with Rick Warren of Saddleback
> Church your answer concerning the question of where does life begin,
> stunned
> me: 'Above your pay grade?' Does this mean when something bad happens as
> President of this nation that you are going to look at your salary to
> determine if you can respond? I am sorry, but this was the most serious
> gaffe I have seen you make. Frankly, it shows me that you are pandering in
> the most obvious manner. You will choose your words not from your heart,
> but
> from an agenda that I believe is still hidden from the American people.
> 5. If anything stands out about you it is probably your appeasement
> mentality. In this era of rampant, radical Islamic extremism and with the
> latest stunt pulled by the re-energized Russian government, I am not sure
> appeasement is healthy. I again revert to the words of Winston Churchill:
> 'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.'
> 6. You and your party tacitly believe that a 13 or 14 year old girl must
> have the parents' approval to have the school nurse provide them with a
> Tylenol when they have a headache at school. Yet, this same girl can
> become
> pregnant and the school can skirt her off to a clinic and abort the child
> in
> her body without the parents knowing or being notified. This scares the
> hell
> out of me. You have two little girls. Would you be upset if this happened
> to
> them and you were not informed? Then why do you stand for this? It makes
> no
> sense to me.
> 7. My seventh and final point (for now) is your supporters. I have watched
> the Hollywood entertainers that support you, systematically embrace Hugo
> Chavez of Venezuela and others like him. I see the continuous smut and
> garbage produced by Hollywood, the very people who promote you the most
> vigorously. It is not a positive point to me and others like me to see
> these
> over-paid, bizarre, poor examples of human existence fawn over you and
> push
> you and your liberal agenda as hard as they do. The way I see it; when the
> devil is for you, we should question whether or not we should be against
> you.
> In closing, I just want you to know that you scare me. I cannot vote for
> you. It is not because of your skin color. It is because these items I've
> listed and many, many others like them. Do not claim that my dislike for
> you
> is race based. It is because I do not feel you have the best interests of
> this nation at heart.
> Respectfully,

> Mark A. Gregg 

 

I AM JUST SICK AND TIRED OF BEING SICK AND TIRED..............THIS COUNTRY IS HEADING DOWN CRAPPER...........AND JUST REMEMBER WHEN IT"S TIME FOR BLAME.....YOU REMEMBER WHO!!!

Don't buy it now....Never have.

Neuharth is a pinko jerk.....Always has been.  Washed up and out of touch.  These people never go quietly, it takes an event like the defeat of Obama to silence them for a while.  All the more reason to vote McCain/Palin November 4, 2008. 

USA Today is just a blander

USA Today is just a blander liberal paper written like it's a telegram... 

McNotObama '08

What

The Matrix must be in full effect these days I don't get it I do but then again I don't.

I think AL has his holidays mixed up...

This is Halloween not April fools day.

 

"I need more cowbell!" SNL

Newspaper Bias

Al Neuharth is actually right.  The peak of Newspaper manipulation probably occurred in the election of 1964.  That year the publishing and broadcast industries were at their peak of concentration.  Fewer people controlled more of the industry than at any other time in history before or since.  That was when the industry was most committed to one candidate over the other.  They wanted the unqualified boob over the General at the time the US was involved in the Vietnam War.  There is a completely one-sided effort in this election but fewer newspapers are involved mostly because so many of them are simply expiring from economic exhaustion. 

The technology of newsgathering and dissemination has changed since then.  At that time, even GM was helpless against an ignorant twit writing "Unsafe at Any Speed" because the broadcasters and publishers backed him.  Creative students would do QuickTime movies on the web to the world.  Matt Drudge matches and exceeds the reach of the NYT routinely.   

Think of this election as the battle of the bulge for the MSM.  This election may be the MSM last hurrah because their business model is collapsing.  .  The legacy media that was built in the Roosevelt era must regain control or be washed away by history and technology.  Prime Minister Howard's Liberal party replacement in Australia is demonstrating the plan.  First they ally with the reactionary branchs of Christians to create a central Internet censoring authority.  Ten years or so after the office of censor is established the authority will turn and declare the Christians to be hate groups. 

The Hays Office that took control of Hollywood for the liberals operated on the same plan in the 1930's.   Today it does not take millions of dollars of infrastructure to make movies do web publishing..  Everybody can make  movies.  The censors will need Digital Rights Management enforced by armed men to make it work.  I do not think their efforts will work any better than prohibition did. 

 

Hmmm What is it the newspapers can't ignore?

Somebody is off script, somebody has left the reservation.

 http://sarah-palin-2008.blogspot.com/2008/10/second-obama-staffer-spills-guts.html

Hey laree...good link..I

Hey laree...good link..I heard this on Rush today also...I'm pretty darned sure it is the same he was reading from...I haven't had the time to go look for the link on his site, so glad you have one here.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Neuharth not very insightful; compare Johnson

Mr. Blumer, you're right; Neuharth's analysis is ludicrous.

Now for someone who really knew journalism (and had much more insight than Neuharth despite living more than two centuries ago), let's consider the great English writer Dr. Samuel Johnson. His piece "Of the Duty of a Journalist" has some things that no longer apply, but it is surprising just how much of it is still right on target. For example:

"...The journalist, indeed, however honest, will frequently deceive,
because he will frequently be deceived himself. He is obliged to
transmit the earliest intelligence before he knows how far it may be
credited; he relates transactions yet fluctuating in uncertainty; he
delivers reports of which he knows not the authors. It cannot be
expected that he should know more than he is told, or that he should
not sometimes be hurried down the current of a popular clamor. All that
he can do is to consider attentively, and determine impartially, to
admit no falsehoods by design, and to retract those which he shall have
adopted by mistake.

"This is not much to be required, and yet
this is more than the writers of news seem to exact from themselves. It
must surely sometimes raise indignation to observe with what serenity
of confidence they relate on one day what they know not to be true,
because they hope that it will please, and with what shameless
tranquility they contradict it on the next day, when they find that it
will please no longer...."

The gap between journalism as it should be and journalism as it is actually practiced has obviously remained a constant from the 18th century to our own day full of Obama-worshipping press sell-outs, don't you think?

Come On!  Al isn't that

Come On!  Al isn't that stupid.  The MSM (including USAToday) have seen ALL the polls showing the public is not pleased with the bias in the news.  Al Neuharth is just pandering for readers to buy his paper.

 

Kinda like Murtha begging for money after calling voters in his state racist rednecks. 

It's difficult to find a

It's difficult to find a paper that is not liberal. Even if the editorial page is somewhat conservative, most small-town papers rely on the liberal in-the-tank-for-Obama Associated Press for their national news coverage.

National Review Online has an excellent article by Victor Davis Hanson titled: The End of Journalism

Another excellent article is by Orson Scott Card titled: Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?

-------------------------------------------------------------

"There is no longer a media in this country.  There is simply an established propaganda arm for the Democrat Party and any and all who relate to it in any way, elected and unelected." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Newspapers are better than ever, Al?

Hey Al, is that why your company, Gannett, just announced layoffs of 10 per cent of the personnel in your local newspaper division (including my state's Des Moines Register and Iowa City Press-Citizen)?  And what about the layoffs of 45 people at USA Today almost a year ago?  Yep, the newspaper business sure is thriving. 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.