In 1996, Dems Were 'Proud to be Associated with' Ayers and Dohrn

Photo of Tom Blumer.

AyersDohrn1982.jpgOn August 27, 1996, in the midst of that year's Democratic National Convention in the Windy City, the Chicago Tribune had interesting news (posted in full at my web host for fair use and discussion purposes) about what was then a new Internet initiative.

That Tribune story serves to confirm why the distancing from and supposed ignorance of the past activities of William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn by presidential candidate Barack Obama and other members of the Democratic Party ring very hollow.

James Coates's Tribune piece begins with an all-too-typical whitewash of the pair's violent past. But what's revealing is what Ayers and Dohrn were involved with, and who else was involved with them (bolds are mine):

Bernardine Dohrn and William Ayers took to the streets 28 years ago to protest what they considered the injustices in the world, especially the war in Vietnam.

The former leaders of the Weather Underground still are fighting injustice, but--adapting to the changing landscape of American politics--their current arena is the World Wide Web.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

After Dohrn, who wound up on the FBI's Most Wanted List, and Ayers resolved their legal woes, they wound up, together, in the Chicago area.

They work in social programs--she at Northwestern University and he at the University of Illinois at Chicago--and today enjoy the status of folk heroes in leftist circles. And they have discovered the Internet as a medium for social change.

..... Tuesday night, Dohrn and Ayers will open their home in Hyde Park to debut an ideologically oriented site on the World Wide Web, where the whole skein of 1996's protest movements are within the click of a computer mouse for all who call it up at http://www.democrats.com.

The invitation reads "The Progressive Wing of the Democratic Party hasn't gone underground .... We're on the Internet!"

Dohrn and Ayers did not respond to requests to discuss the Web site plans, which also involve more mainstream Democrats, including David Lytel, who set up President Clinton's Web site at http://www.whitehouse.gov.

"There is a lot of room for different ideas in progressive politics, and we're proud to be associated with Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers," said Lytel.

An Internet Archive search indicates that Democrats.com domain was active until late 1996, went dormant, and was revived in early 2000. The first re-appearance of meaningful content occurred in August 2000.

The site's revival was co-engineered by Mr. "proud to be associated with Dohrn and Ayers" himself, David Lytel, as shown at democrats.com's current "About" page:

Democrats.com is an independent community of Democratic Party and progressive activists. We proudly support the Democratic National Committee (http://democrats.org) and its chairman Howard Dean, but they do not control us in any way.

Democrats.com was launched at the 2000 Democratic convention in Los Angeles by two veteran Democratic consultants Bob Fertik and David Lytel. (Lytel left at the end of 2002 to launch ReDefeatBush.com.)

Our vision was to create the leading news and community Web site for the progressive base of the Democratic Party, in order to lead the fight against the radical right and the Republican Party. We called ourselves the "Aggressive Progressives."

The site's History page also notes no pre-2000 activity.

How convenient that democrats.com conceals its true origins.

A 2003 version of the "About" page indicates that Mr. Lytel and others weren't mere web-savvy iconoclasts, but were (and perhaps still are) actively involved in Democratic political campaigns:

Democrats.com was founded by two veteran Democrats, David Lytel and Bob Fertik.  We operate the premier online community site for Democratic voters and activists, and create and implement effective Internet campaign services for Democratic campaigns and committees.

We draw on the expertise of talented and committed Democrats in the Internet community, giving us a unique combination of partisan dedication, technical expertise and energetic commitment to innovation.

The site even had its own Director of Candidate Services.

Scroll down that 2003 "About" page, and you see what appears to be a list of mainstream Democratic luminaries.

The Tribune piece demonstrates that for all these years a large plurality, if not a majority, of Democrats who hold the levers of power, up to and including Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, really haven't had a problem welcoming Ayers, Dohrn, and their unrepentant views of their violent pasts, capsulized in this infamous September 11, 2001 article about Ayers in the New York Times, into their inner circle. So it shouldn't be all that surprising that Barack Obama didn't see any problem either, until people outside the fever swamp of so-called "progressive" thought called him on it.

It's safe to say that most of the rest of the country doesn't share the forgiving view apparently held by so many powerful Democrats of someone (Ayers) who said of his domestic terrorism: "I don't regret setting bombs ..... I feel we didn't do enough." When asked if he would do it all again, he replied, ''I don't want to discount the possibility."

It's also safe to say that the degree of sympathy and support Ayers and Dohrn have within Democratic circles -- in some cases, as noted above, being seen as "folk heroes" -- has been furiously downplayed by the media elite, many of whom, like the Tribune's Coates in 1996, seem to have similar leanings.

If they were to be installed as members of an Obama administration, it's legitimate to ask what those who have been okay with the "mainstreaming" of Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn all these years would do with their newfound powers. Will they want to "do it all again" -- this time as de facto oppressors? And would a President Obama simply let them run rampant over those whom they disagree with or dislike?

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who would be responsible

Who would be responsible for approving the appointment of Ayers to a position in Obama's administration?

Say it with me.... "Boss

Say it with me.... "Boss Tweed."

Why be in government when you can lead Tamany Hall....

Dept. of Education

I will say it again. While Barack Hussein Obama was Chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, he was funding the Small Schools Project being run by unrepentent terrorist William Ayers, and Maoist Communist Michael Klonsky. As a professor, unrepentent terrorist Ayers, teaches prosective teachers how to teach (indoctrinate) our children. Michael Klonsky had an education oriented blog page on the Obama '08 website until his connection to communism was made public.

Obama's continued association with these two leads me to believe that they could wind up as Secretary and Under Secretary at the Department of Education. Or will we be calling it the Ministry of Indoctrination in an Obama administration? Can you say "Hitler Youth?"

It's not guilt by association...

rather foundation by alliance. Ayers, Dohrn, Resko, Wright, Talbott,  ACORN , et al, has made Barak Obama who he is. Under the Alinsky model, he seems to have been molded with their activist ideology and the a second training to look, act, and sound like a run of the mill Democrat. From he foundational training, he has infiltrated the political system from the inside and is now looking to take this ideology national.

The whole ACORN voter registration fraud process is right out of Alinsky's model also. Overwhelm the governemt system (boards of elections) with huge volumes of registrants at the last minute and that sets it up for severe criticism during the election cycle.

My suggestion is for the IRS to do what ACORN threatens, audit everything, revoke their tax exempt status. In corporate (capatalist) America, the criminal activity of an employee is sufficient to bring down and destroy a company, why the no such standard for ACORN and their felonious employees? Simple, the majority party in Congress (both houses) are blinded by the activism and voters that they bring. Following the money gets you to the root of all the problems.

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, You're welcome. Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)

They love all a lot of criminals.

  They had the lovey heart heart going for cop killer Mumia Abu-Jaml and Tookie the shotgun killer of bound 7-11 employees.

  If they are criminals, liberals love 'em. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

THat is because liberals

THat is because liberals desire lives of consequenseless.

Murder someone?  Don't worry, you will be rehabilitiated and returned to society in record time so liberals do not have to face the consequense of executing the guilty.

Like to have lots of promiscuous sex?  Don't worry, you can have an abortion to dispose of consequenses of your actions and you can have free drugs if you get HIV.

Wanna become a performance artist who rubs themselves in feces and praces on a stage?  Don't worry, you will not have to face the consequense of poverty due to the lack of value in your work.  Liberals will give you an NEA Grant to keep your head above water.

nailed it

very well said, BD

 

Don't forget, "Wanna lie,

Don't forget, "Wanna lie, cheat, extort, and threaten?  Fugeddabout da Mafia--run for President!"

"Aggressive

"Aggressive Progressives"...

Fits the bill to a Tee.

...and they are doing exactly what they have set out to do.

Thank you Mr. Blumer for this information...just another huge tid-bit to store in all the inner-working of the enemy within.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

So do young voters know Obama is all about "back to the 60s?"

And we thought BHO was all about "Change" . . . .  

Yeah--change it back to the

Yeah--change it back to the it was, so there's something to rile "real black folks" up.  Just another race extortionist.

JT...

You mean the radical 60's right?

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

»→ Unrepentant

If I hear "unrepentant" one more time, I'll puke.

Ayers is a terrorist braggart.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Same here..."my

Same here..."my friend"....

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh