NYT Howler of the Day: Obama Makes 'Few Rhetorical Stumbles'

Photo of Tom Blumer.
  • Bookmark and Share

Is reporter Michael Powell at the New York Times auditioning for Comic Relief?

At next year's event, Powell's headline at his August 2 story (HT Weapons of Mass Discussion) about Obama's repeated hypocritical invocations and charges relating to race (of course, that's not how he sees it), along with his report's first 10 words, would bring the house down:

With Genie Out of Bottle, Obama Is Careful on Race

Senator Barack Obama is a man of few rhetorical stumbles .....

Only someone locked inside the Old Media bubble could possibly believe that Obama hasn't "stumbled" repeatedly, to the point where he's making Bush 41 Vice President Dan Quayle look like a certified genius.

Answers.com identifies a dozen verbal gaffes committed by Mr. Quayle. Add the potato/potatoe episode, and you have a baker's dozen of 13 in the space of 4-plus years, or roughly three per year.

As you will see, Obama has more than tripled Quayle's number in just under two years, and heaven knows how many others have gone unreported.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

An official GOP web site, barackgaffes.com, has been compiling a comprehensive list of gaffes ever since it became clear that the presumptive Democratic nominee is perhaps the most mistake-prone nominee of any party in American history. The gaffes are in eleven categories, ranging from Bill Ayers to taxes to "energy and enviroment" (the site's managers may be checking to see if we're awake).

The compilers have indeed been very busy.

Some are admittedly minor. But many betray a disturbing degree of cultural and economic ignorance, bordering on illiteracy, that would cause a person evaluating a job applicant for any intellectually challenging position -- let alone Commander in Chief of the most powerful country in the world -- to have serious second thoughts.

Here are some, but by no means all, of the more disturbing examples:

  • Basic geography -- Discussing the upcoming Kentucky Primary in May, Obama said, "Sen. Clinton, I think, is much better known, coming from a nearby state of Arkansas." 20 years in Illinois, and he doesn't pick up the fact that his home-state Land of Lincoln borders the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and is thus closer to Kentucky (i.e., adjacent to it) than Arkansas (which isn't)?
  • Middle East/War on Terror -- He doesn't know that spoken languages in Iraq and Afghanistan are different. If that's not enough, the same ABC post notes Obama's belief that "agricultural specialists" who would teach farmers how to grow crops other than opium were being sent to Baghdad, where there is very little if any opium production.
  • World Affairs (even carried at Obama's own web site) -- He clearly didn't know that the chief executive of Canada is the Prime Minister, not its president. Over three decades as an adult, how many news articles has he read and not comprehended, or news reports has he heard and not understood, to still believe that?
  • Basic Finance -- Obama has said, "If we went back to the obesity rates that existed in 1980, that would save the Medicare system a trillion dollars." The entire annual federal budget is about $3.1 trillion. The Medicaid/SCHIP portion of that budget is $224 billion; if you assume that the Feds cover 50% of all Medicaid costs, you're still only up to about $450 billion, or less than half of Obama's claimed savings. Even if you try to excuse Obama's statement by claiming that it refers to multiple years, you can't get anywhere near $1 trillion. It's shocking enough that a US Senator would make such a fundamentally ignorant statement, let alone a presidential nominee.
  • Energy Basics (this one hasn't even made it to the GOP's list yet) -- Obama claimed that proper tire inflation and regular tune-ups "could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling." Again, laughably, not even close.

That the Times's Powell would open an article analyzing the presidential race with such an obvious gaffe of his own demonstrates just how out of touch those in the world of the Old Gray Lady have become.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Oh, come on, Tom...give him

Oh, come on, Tom...give him a chance...he just hasn't gotten around to "rewording" those things that were "inartfully" stated; I'm sure he will "clarify," and "recalibrate."

you know mb

You'd think the most gifted orator of our generation, someone who is known as a deft wordsmith, would not spend so much time needing "do overs."

It's not change you can believe in - it's change that keeps on changing.

Tom Sweetie

You have a word misspelled in the opening of the article. : - )

That said, I'm not surprised the NYT is covering for him. After spending so much time painting Republicans as stupid hillbillies (Quayle, Bush, etc) they refuse to let that label apply to one of theirs.

Even if it takes a blatant lie. Baghdad Bob would be proud.

Hay, Hay

 Hay cd

Lay offen us hillbillies, r i reckon we'll have to bullwhup the dookie outta ya.!!

(GRINS)  kilrod

Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier

Thanks, dearest

Just seeing if you're paying attention (/BS :-->).

Reagan was an amiable dunce. Bush 43 isn't intellectually curious. They even went after Eisenhower, who only orchestrated the largest invasion in human history.

But divinity school flunkout Al Gore, expelled cheater Ted Kennedy, and that mediocrity known as John Kerrey are geniuses, I tell ya.

is bh'0' in a contest ?

with john f'n kerry , for 'foot in mouth desease.'

Uhhhbamuhhhh is a great,

Uhhhbamuhhhh is a great, ummm, let me put it this way, errrr, public speaker!

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

Dem gasbags

This reminds me of all the hype over Bill Clinton's oratory skills. Bubba is great at parsing words and spinning, but he's also a noted gasbag. If memory serves, I think he set records for the longest State of The Union speeches in history. And when he was the Governor of Arkansas, he addressed the Democrat Convention in 1988. He droned on so long that when he said "And finally..." the hall erupted in applause. I think the hidden message is that Democrats have candidates who are like Reagan, but better. What a crock.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Obama's Mouth

I believe Obama overloads his proverbial ass with the garbage put in his mouth with his own hand and speechwriter's glibness.  His speeches are riddled with phrases that define "sound bite". My favorite of the little known is "digital grid". That impressive wordage is Obama's name for  an electric grid incorporating the technology needed for two-way feeds at all levels. If your house produced excess energy, say with solar panels, you could sell it to the main power company. According to

his web site, this is based on two pilot programs. One is at Univ. of Ill, the other in a proposed development in New Mexico. Looking at the actual plan for the NM community and using the absolute best and favorable estimates, I come up with a minimum of $15,000 additional cost for each house just to ready it to exchange electricity. That does not count the cost of solar panels, or geothermal wells, or rabbits in a rotating drum that would be needed to produce the power. With 114 million households in the US (2006) it comes up to about $1.5 Trillion. Not counting industry, not counting the added cost involved in retrofitting existing homes. And, like many of his dreams, he wants it done in 10 years!

This is just another example of of a great sounding phrase that means doodly squat. Obama probably saw the term while voting to spend money on it. Of course, now he has moved in with the big spenders. If anyone in the MSM would ask he would say something like this: "Hey its new, its digital. Because it is good for the country I will require every American household to spend whatever it takes to help the country enter the digital age. Of course if you can't afford it we'll tax the wealthy/big oil/SUV owners/profitable companies so on and so forth, you see, and have THEM pay for it. I might even give all the middle class folks another $1000 just for voting for me, uhm, I mean voting to enter the New Digital Electric Age!"

After I calm down, I guess I'll just have to wonder how many trillions, over ten years of course, the MSM will let this charlatan spend before they begin to ask honest questions and demand to know how his changes are going to be funded. When those people and companies that he says will fund his dreams are tapped out, what then?