Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, while waffling, has wanted to appear to many of his constituents as being opposed to free trade agreements, or at least wanting to renegotiate the terms of many of them.
On Wednesday, the Department of Commerce issued a press release, the kind of thing you would hope business journalists get in their e-mail boxes. But I found no coverage of this news in a Google News Search on [commerce "free trade'] (typed as indicated inside brackets).
Perhaps it's because the news would be inconvenient for Obama, who is in the midst of an Excellent Overseas Adventure, speaking to fawning crowds who fortunately will have no say at the ballot box in November.
U.S. Manufacturing Exports Swing from Deficit to Surplus with Free Trade Agreement Countries
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez announced new U.S. Commerce Department data showing that the United States is running a trade surplus in manufactured exports with our 14 free trade agreement (FTA) partners. In the first five months of 2008, the trade balance in manufactured goods rose to a $2.7 billion surplus with our FTA partners from a $12.3 billion deficit during the same period last year. The U.S. manufactured goods trade balance improved 122 percent with our FTA partners, but only six percent with non-FTA partners in the first five months of 2008.
..... This improvement in the trade balance is due to the increasing competitiveness of U.S. manufactured goods. Since 2002, FTAs have helped U.S. manufactured exports grow steadily and at a faster rate than imports — 63 percent compared to only 42 percent, respectively, year-to-date through May 2008 (compared to same period of 2002).
A look at the Fact Sheet (PDF) accompanying the release shows that the year-to-date 2008 surplus contrasts with deficits that occurred in the previous six years:

Somewhat but not directly related to the news just mentioned, the "Across the Pond" Blog has very recently posted this take on Obama's current Excellent Overseas Adventure and how free trade has scarcely come up (bold is mine):
..... Obama's skeptical view of free trade is surely his least popular position among top European officials, and Obama bringing it up would have highlighted differences that could distract from some of the glossy photos.
..... Here, so far as I can discern, is all he's said, which he uttered at the Column speech: "Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all."
..... while John McCain's more welcoming attitude toward free trade might not do him favors in the U.S., and while George Bush's policies in general are wildly unpopular, this is one of the few areas where the GOP president and his party's 2008 candidate are more in tune with Europe than Obama.
Maybe that's why items like the trade-surplus situation with CAFTA and NAFTA partners isn't news. It distracts from the faux coronation.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This is a great turn around
July 26, 2008 - 02:17 ET by kgThis is a great turn around for the US. Too bad there will be no credit until the end of January of '09 or wait until February of '09 like they did when praising Clinton on the robust economy Feb. 1993.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
"Bloodhound" Blumer - On The Trail Again
July 26, 2008 - 10:54 ET by zeestephenI read business news all day, every day.
I never saw a thing on this story.
By the way, Q2 GDP estimates continue to trend up.
MSN Money's "Market Dispatches," which reviews the economic data at the end of each week, says, ".....economists think [Q2] will show 2% to 2.5% annual growth as business continues to invest in new machinery."
Also from MSN, more sobering news on July employment, which will be released on Friday, 01 August.
Consensus is for a seasonally adjusted loss of 75,000 jobs in July.
However, Global Insight, an economics consulting firm, has recently adjusted downward to 45,000.
Those are not recession numbers, but not healthy numbers, either, and the MSM will highlight that we have "lost" jobs for six consecutive months.
"Bloodhound"
July 26, 2008 - 12:26 ET by Tom BlumerWith a nose like mine.....
Seriously, I was looking for the housing stuff when I stumbled across this. They even did press release, so it's not a total secret.
Obama only wants "fair" trade ---
July 26, 2008 - 06:48 ET by ThisnThat... as long as he gets to define "fair". I can't believe these socialists continue to out themselves with statements like this: "But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all."
It's all about class warfare to them -- 24/7. Absolutely nothing can be said unless they show they are "against the rich and powerfull" and "for the average American". What a bunch of pooh.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
This economic data
July 26, 2008 - 10:15 ET by jdhawkThis economic data dovetails with the several industries that have been "on fire" for the last several years. If you look at precious metals, ferrous metals, fertilizer, coal, and chemical companies, they have been reporting record revenue and earnings for several years. For example, the companies within the fertilizer industry tripled their prices last year and doubled them so far this year and still can't keep up with demand.
These companies that provide the basis for other industries have been the engine that has held up the stock market from a far worse decline. It is their foreign sales that have sustained them throughout this period.
Double post.
July 26, 2008 - 10:20 ET by jdhawkDouble post.