Chicago Trib Ignores Pro-2nd Amendment Rally, Has Covered Similar Opposition Demos

Photo of Tom Blumer.
  • Bookmark and Share

The July 11 Second Amendment Freedom Rally in downtown Chicago was ignored by both of Chicago's major newspapers (Tribune search on "gun rally," not in quotes, is here [HT Say Uncle]; Sun-Times search on "gun" is here).

Pictures, audio, and video from rally supporters can be found here.

Focusing on the Tribune: Its editorial board last month advocated repealing the Second Amendment in the wake of the Supreme Court's Heller ruling, holding that the amendment confers an individual right. Perhaps not coincidentally, it has frequently covered anti-gun events with a similar number, or even fewer, participants, than were at Thursday's event.

At least one Chicago TV station did cover the Second Amendment Freedom Rally. Here is part of the report filed by Leah Hope at ABC affiliate WLS (video is also at the link; bold is mine):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Proponents of gun rights gathered in the Loop Friday to push legislation legalizing concealed weapons in Illinois. Among the speakers at the rally was a Texas state representative whose parents were among 23 people gunned down at Luby's cafeteria in 1991.

Recent rallies at the Thompson Center have been demands for gun control laws following fatal shootings of Chicago children. Thursday, the plaza was full again, but the message was from those demanding the right to bear arms.

In a show of support for responsible gun ownership, about 200 chose the plaza of the Thompson Center for what they called a Second Amendment freedom rally. The rally comes after a recent decision by the Supreme Court Allowing handguns in Washington D.C.

..... Several Chicagoans are challenging Chicago's ban on handguns. They hope the Supreme Court decision opens the doors to more gun owner rights here.

"If we win this case, we win for every single person here," said Colleen Lawson, lawsuit plaintiff.

This report from a McLean County, Illinois radio station also says that "hundreds" attended. Say Uncle's first commenter claims that the number was "closer to 500."

Examples of the Tribune giving coverage to smaller previous anti-gun gatherings include at least these:

  • June 18, 2008 -- "Pfleger speaks at Loop anti-violence rally." The paper reported that Father Michael Pfleger, now infamous from his "sermons" at Barack Obama's former church, the Trinity United Church of Christ, "spoke at an anti-violence demonstration Thursday," and further, that "more than 200 people attended."
  • Lest one think that Fr. Pfleger's recent notoriety is what drove the Tribune's coverage, here are three examples from 2007, well before the priest received national exposure (obtained from the Proquest Library database for fair use and discussion purposes):

    TribJacksonPflegerAntiGun2007

    The first item reports that "About 200 activists, who marched in front of D.S. Arms, called for the northwest suburban community to vote the assault-weapon manufacturer out of town (Barrington, IL)."

    The second reported that "Surrounded by ministers, anti-gun activists and two mothers who recently lost a child to gun violence, Reverends Jesse Jackson and Michael Pfleger said Monday they will keep the pressure on a Riverdale gun shop, even as they head to trial on trespassing charges." The size of the crowd was not noted.

    The third said that "Three school buses filled with anti-gun activists joined forces with Jackson and Pfleger, while nearly 30 pro-gun activists packed into the gun store."

The Tribune exemplifies an Old Media elite that consistently fails to give equal coverage to Second Amendment supporters. Further, in this particular case, it's fair to ask whether the paper is allowing its editorial position to affect how it covers this area of the news.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well, it seems to be

Well, it seems to be working . . .  The Tribune is reporting what people DO NOT want to read.   What is the persuasive argument that that is the case? 

Editor-in-Chief, Lipinski resigned today and the news staff will be pared by 60. 

Unfortunately, the assistant editor of the editorial page is taking over Lipinski's job. 

Well, they'll just have to redouble their efforts to report what people DO NOT want to read until they run the paper into the ground.

Does the new owner of the Tribune, Sam Zell, give a wit?  Time will tell. 

The problem is that they don't want to report anymore

What they want to do, ever since the MSM has been taken over by idiologicaly extreme activists, it to educate and indoctrinate.

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

In the mirrow

The media idiots had better keep a close watch in the mirrow.  The same type of anti-american that would kill the 2nd amendment will kill the 1st amendment if they get away with killing one, and there goes all requirements for  a reporter. Print what the government tell you to print and disappear if you print anything else. The educated elitest are too stupid to see the writing on the wall. Start a wrecking ball rolling down a steep hill and you can't stop it. Is this just another case of the media doing Hussein's bidding?

 

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Not to mention that none of them covered it beforehand

either like they all did for every war protest rally to give them free publicity. Even Cindy Sheehan got pretty low turnout around here and her protest was covered before, during and after. I don't remember the numbers, but I'm pretty sure her turnout was smaller than this from seeing the pictures.

ABC is the fairest local coverage here.

 

"Constantly attacking (peaceful) religions rather than politely sharing your own shows lack of faith " DB

These liberals simply ignore the facts

FACT: more people's lives are saved by brandishing a gun than by those who use one to kill someone (source: FBI)

FACT: those who take away guns are violating basic human rights, civil rights, Constitutional rights, God-given rights, even the law of nature. What can be more of a basic human right than the right to stay alive, no matter what the weapon? (source: history of the world)

If these weenies had their way in the animal kingdom, sharks would have all their teeth pulled, snakes would all have their fangs removed, wild cats and bears would be de-clawed, spiders would live in glass cages, etc, etc, etc.

FACT: animals have more rights and means to defend themselves than liberal weenies let humans have; they have made us less important than animals; thanks weenie, for making me lower in importance than animals. (source: animal rights groups & gun control freaks charters)

FACT: in countries than have unarmed their citizens, murder rates have climbed (source: Australian and Great Britain police archives)

FACT: convicted felons overwhelmingly tell you that they will not attack an armed person, whether in their home, business or on the street. The criminal's thought of dying does not make it worth it. (source: multiple interviews with felons)

FACT: liberal weenies are cold-hearted, sinister criminal lovers who make sure the criminals have guns, but not law-abiding citizens (source: laws prohibiting self-defense by use of weapons)

FACT: in a few states ex-cops can get a permit to carry concealed weapons, but an ex-military, with far more weapons experience cannot, and the rest of the citizens are turkeys in a turkey shoot thanks to these evil, cold-hearted, criminal-lover, liberal weenies. (source: selected state laws). How the hell do you sleep nights, knowing that hundreds of thousands of women are raped every year, and many of them murdered without a gun to save their lives? How is that for a women's right to choose? I mean if she chooses life, how is she going to live without a gun in her hand, you stupid, moron weenies.

 

 

A couple of questions for the liberals...

Why is it that banning automobiles is not the answer to all the deaths caused by them?

Why is it that banning bicycles is not the answer to all the children injured while riding on them?

Why is it that banning construction is not the answer to all the deaths and injuries caused during contruction?

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.

C5 and swimming pools

Many more children die from swimming pool accidents than gun accidents.

 

"Constantly attacking (peaceful) religions rather than politely sharing your own shows lack of faith " DB

What To Write

The same Chicago Trib whose editor in chief resigned today?

JDW

SAPPY NEWS

DAILY WAVE