WSJ Writers Note Absence of Recession; AP's Crutsinger Still Holds Out

Photo of Tom Blumer.

Someone forgot to tell the Wall Street Journal's Kelly Evans and Justin Lahart, carried here at the Arizona Republic, that they're supposed to portray the economy in a bad light whenever and wherever possible. I'll get to the pair's report later.

That "bad light" directive seems seared into the minds of the Associated Press's Martin Crutsinger and his AP colleagues, as they continue to "cling to recession," and attempt to convince consumers and businesses that if perchance we're not already in one, it's just around the bend.

The AP's persistence has borne dreadful fruit. Relentlessly downbeat reporting during at least the past six years by the wire service's business reporters -- who largely determine what most Americans see, hear, and read about the economy -- is a big reason, if not the most important reason, why most Americans, as seen in the latest consumer confidence report, have a negative economic outlook and are convinced that we are in a recession.

Friday, Crutsinger worked mightily to take the lemonade that was the good housing starts report and turn it into lemons:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Construction of new homes increased by the biggest percentage in more than two years in April, a rare spot of good news amid the worst downturn in housing in more than two decades.

Analysts, however, played down the increase, noting that all the strength came from the volatile apartment sector. They said the painful housing slump is far from over as a record flood of foreclosures continues to add to the sizable stockpile of unsold homes.

..... The correction has proven to be a serious drag on the overall economy, raising worries that the country could be in danger of falling into a recession.

A second report yesterday showed that consumer confidence as measured by the University of Michigan/Reuters survey fell to a 28-year low of 59.5 in early May, down from 62.6 in April. The drop was blamed in part on rising concerns about higher gas and food prices.

Well, at least the AP reporter seemed to be acknowledging that we're not currently in a recession.

But earlier today, in a story about a speech by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Crutsinger found some curiously unnamed others to do it for him:

Treasury secretary says markets are calmer now

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Friday that financial markets are "considerably calmer" now than they were two months ago. He predicted the economy will be rebounding by the second half of this year.

The economy has been pushed to the brink of a recession by a prolonged housing slump, a credit crisis, soaring energy prices and more than a quarter-million job layoffs over the past four months.

In his remarks, Paulson never used the word recession, although many private economists believe the country is in one.

But he did forecast that the stimulus checks going to 130 million households would help spur growth in the second half of the year.

Part of the problem with Crutsinger, AP's business writers, and others is that they really don't seem to understand that no one can show that "a quarter-million job layoffs" have occurred (starting point for obtaining the data below is here):

JobChangesJan07toApr08

What HAS occurred is that total employment in the economy on a seasonally adjusted basis has gone down by 260,000 so far this year. But on the ground in the past four months, larger than usual job reductions in January, many of which represent seasonal workers leaving the workforce, were followed by smaller than usual job increases in February, March, and April. The net change is a pretty big negative number (-1,209,000), and does not compare well to the same months in the three preceding years. No one around here is claiming that the employment situation is wonderful, because it isn't.

But no one, not even AP business reporters, can tell whether how much of these changes represent layoffs, voluntary terminations, firings for cause, retirements, or merely returning home after working the Christmas season or the post-Christmas retail closing season. Crutsinger's characterization of what has occurred as "a quarter-million layoffs" (or "pink slips," a favorite term of AP's Jeannine Aversa) makes it look as if one can identify each person in the reported number by name. These and similar renderings by other AP business reporters during the past few months are totally disconnected from reality.

Clearly, we aren't getting enough of the balanced output exemplified in the report by the WSJ's Evans and Lahart.

In fact, given what we've been fed for so long by AP, what the pair wrote Thursday will come as a shock to some (original was published Wednesday in the Wall Street Journal; original title was "Recession? Not So Fast, Say Some"; link may require paid subscription; bolds are mine):

As recession fails to materialize, economists revise predictions

A funny thing happened to the economy on its way to recession: It has taken a detour.

That, at least, is the view of a growing number of economists, including some who not long ago were saying a recession was all but inevitable.

They note that stock and credit markets have steadily improved since the Federal Reserve intervened to keep Bear Stearns Cos. from bankruptcy in early March, while a series of economic reports have been stronger than expected.

..... "A couple months ago it seemed like we were on the abyss," said Jay Bryson, global economist with Wachovia Corp., referring to the seizing up of credit markets and the collapse of Bear Stearns. "Things have changed. . . . The numbers we've seen recently haven't been as bad as we were led to believe just a few months ago."

..... Job losses, meanwhile, have been less severe than they usually are in recessions. Many economists think the government's earliest estimate of first-quarter GDP growth - 0.6 percent - will be revised upward. After reviewing the retail-sales data, economists at Global Insight, a Waltham, Mass.-based forecasting firm, predicted the government would increase its assessment of GDP growth in the first quarter to 1 percent at an annual rate. They forecast continued growth in consumer spending, partly because of tax rebates and stimulus checks.

In February, Global Insight joined Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS and Merrill Lynch in declaring the U.S. to be in recession. Now, Global Insight's Brian Bethune says that while the firm is still forecasting a recession, "it's conceivable we could avoid it" .....

When are the luminaries just cited, who just a few months ago said that a recession had already begun, going to say, "We were wrong. We are sorry"? And how could the crack AP business reporting corps not have picked up on the change of sentiment reported by Evans and Lahart?

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Didn't the Dims take credit

Didn't the Dims take credit for the Surge? Wait till you see what they do if they win in November. AP Headline: "Economy narrowly missed recession; pollsters point to "hope", inspired by Obama, that caused ordinary Americans to hang in there and tough out Bush's horrible economy.

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Doom and Gloom

Crutsinger and his cohorts are just doing their job when there is a Republican in the white house. Everything is doom and gloom according to them.

yeah Jerry

and if John Kerry was the President right now, no one would blame him for the high gas prices and delay saying we are in a recession huh?.....nooo never.

Shawn

Actually John Kerry is partially responsible for high gas prices. He has a record of voting against any oil well drilling and building nuclear plants.

Jerry... As much as I

Jerry...

As much as I hate Kerry, the same blame could be put on George Bush. If it's legal, I want a POTUS that has the guts to sign an exutive order that basically tells the enviro nuts to go to hell. 

"Abstain from McCain"

Clear Thinker

Exactly what kind of executive order would that be?

Jerry Mack... Something

Jerry Mack...

Something that allows drilling in ANWR and off the coast of  the USA, and sends the enviros packing. 

"Abstain from McCain"

Ct, I agree.

I think we are fast approaching the point where a pretty good argument can be made that this is a national security issue.

I know more than a few people who are of the considered belief that this may very well be a Clancy-like economic assault on this country by people who want to do us harm. And these people are not conspiracy kooks by any stretch.

Look at the people who essentially control the bulk of the world's oil production. Many are not exactly on this nation's Christmas card list.

Yeah, I know this seems a little out there, but just perhaps our refusal to sign the Kyoto Protocals may have caused our detractors to look for alternative means to accomplish a similar goal.

That goal being to put us in the economic toilet, which is where we are headed if this isn't addressed soon.

Maybe Jerry

The point i'm making is I hear day in and day out on this site about how the msm is exaggerating how bad everything is in this country.

Things are pretty darn bad right now. If oil keeps going up at the pace it is going, the country cannot afford that.

If a Dem was President right, now the finger pointing from the GOP would be relentless.

Cheer up Shawn

In case you haven't noticed, things are pretty darn good if you're house hunting.

Looks to get even better.

You have a point Cool Arrow

Your right about the dropping real estate for new home buyers. It is one good thing right now.

The thing is, I am not looking for a new house. I have 2 mortgages to pay. My wife and I pull in a decent figure every year, but with the economy, both our jobs are not very stable and the price of gas and food is kind of unsettling right now.

Shawn... I must disagree.

Shawn...

I must disagree. Everyone and their grandmother knew that gas prices would go higher, and they knew it was just a matter of time. Other than the cost of gas, what else is so bad right now? 

"Abstain from McCain"

Clear Thinker

Yes I know gas prices would rise, but nowhere in my wildest dreams would it pass over a 100 dollars a barrel and now only 2 months later it is 127. Doesn't it scare you just a little bit?

It is not just the price of gas, it is the ripple effect from the price of gas. Farmers have to pay double as much to fuel their tractors and the cost trickle down to us the consumer.

It also cost us twice as much to fuel our tanks, Destroyers and F-18s

As far as what else is bad. Many restaurants cannot afford to buy the ingredients to dishes without raising the prices and many people are staying home instead of eating out right now.

The dollar is in freefall. Bush has no choice to kiss the Saudis A$$, but they still wont' give face to President of the United States. Banks are losing money like crazy, but the government is willing to bail them out.

We are 9 trillion in debt and there is not end in site for Iraq. Does not sound very peachy to me CT.

Shawn...You act as if we

Shawn...

You act as if we have never been through tough times before. This country can stand almost any disaster that comes along. It's not all about the money. In fact, our country has always pulled out of troubling times because of it's people.

However, I am mad at GWB for NOT signing an executive order telling the enviromentalists to go to hell. We need to be building Nuke power plants. We need to be drilling for oil in anwar. We need to be drilling for oil off of our coasts. Etc, etc! 

"Abstain from McCain"

Abstain from McCain"

So, you're voting for...?

Clear thinker

I'm sorry, and in no way am trying to be accussing, but I sometimes don't understand the inconsistency of your comments.

You have lost faith in the Republican party and might leave as soon as the convention is over. The other half of the country is Liberal, which you refer to as the enemy.

Now your saying that America has he character to pull out of these troubled times?

If the price keeps going up as quick as it has been going up and it reaches 200-300 for a barrell of oil and gas cost 10 dollars a gallon. How are people going to get to work and drive their kids to school , if they cannot afford it?

You yourself have said how difficult it is to raise your granddaughter and foot many of her parents bills as well. How will you afford it?

Even if we started drilling tomorrow, it will take a long time to reap the benefits and all electric cars mass produced is maybe a decade away.

The Saudis have us by the b*lls and that is the truth.

 

 

Wow Shawn... That's some

Wow Shawn...

That's some scatalogical thinking if I have ever seen it.

I never said it was difficult raising my granddaughter. In fact, I feel blessed every single day that she is with us. Her parents are another whole story. They failed as parents because they like irresponsible liberal ideology much more than conservative ideology. 

The ONLY reason the Saudis have us by the balls is because we don't have leaders in this country that does have balls!

"Abstain from McCain"

Let me phrase it differenty CT

I meant financially difficult.

Regardless, of leadership or not. They have us by the gonads. You said that we can pull through as a country, but how? You know as well as I do, including the crises in the 80's. we have never had a gas rise as fast as as this before.

Just do the math. A person that commutes a fair distance in someting even like a Honda Accord and makes 20 bucks an hr cannot afford his 2000 dollor a month mortgage and pay 200 bucks a week for gas.

Lots of people have a bigger mortgage than that, not mention bigger cars and car payments. This can cripple our economy which is not in very good shape, not to mention the 9 trillion dollar debt we have.

So Shawn... What's your

So Shawn...

What's your answer? Bend over and kiss our collective asses goodbye?

We will come out of this just fine. As an obscure musical composer once said... "Don't worry, be happy"! 

"Abstain from McCain"

Clear thinker

Honestly i really don't know. I cannot recall a time in my lifetime with the exception of 911, when I have been so nervious for our country.

Maybe make a special deal with the Canadians? If they cap the price for us, we will relax the tariffs we give them on their lumber.

I hope your right CT. I truly do.

whining

Wow Shawn, that's some impressive whining you got going on there.  You are whining about two mortgages-who told you to get two mortgages?  Car payments-Waaaa!!!!  I will also bet you have at least some other forms of debt too. You probably could have held off on some of them purchases, huh? Oh no, people are not going out to eat.  Shudder the thought.  You made some poor financial decisions, and now you have to deal with them along with others in this country.  Let's get this point out again-the country is not even in a recession.  Quit crying, straighten out your financial mess, and quit blaming others for your problems.

For others who are blaming the Saudis for our problems, think again.  Its our fault for not holding our politicians accountable for pandering to environmental groups.  Now we are paying the piper.  Fear not, the free market will take care of itself.

 

Excuse me BobbyD

I suggest you read again. Cool Arrow was saying that the price of homes are dropping, and that is good for new home buyers.

I agreed with him and the only reason I brought up my 2 mortgages is because, I was saying that good news does not apply to me. The thought that I still have the 2 mortgages with the ecomomy as unstable as it is, is just a little nerve rattling.

Also where in world are you coming up with a I have a financial mess?. I have 2 mortgages because I have 2 homes. One of them I have only about 7 yrs left on. Both my cars are paid for in full, I pay my credit card bill in full every month and my credit rating is above 800

Where did you hear me whine about my problems? did I blame others for my problems, or this a false accusation on your part? Seriously...can you back that up?

$2,000 a month mortgage payments?

"A person that commutes a fair distance in someting even like a Honda
Accord and makes 20 bucks an hr cannot afford his 2000 dollor a month
mortgage and pay 200 bucks a week for gas
."

Are you actually paying $2,000 a month for your mortgage, or are you just pulling that number out of thin air? If you are paying that much, then just how big is your house? I pay a little more than $350.00 a month for my mortgage and I own a two story, four bedroom house in South Minneapolis, a place that is not known for nominally low housing costs. If you’re really paying that much, you may want to consider refinancing. Try finding a better deal with lower monthly payments and a fixed rate. I got mine at 4.53 percent.

As for paying $200 dollars a week on gas for commuting back and forth to work, try finding a home that's a lot closer to your place of employment. I bet you'll save on both gas and mortgage expenses.

Cobraman

I pay a little over 2000 on two properties Cobraman. I currently live in a townhouse and did want to put myself at financial risk by buying a new bigger home here. The price for a 1800 square foot home here is about 600,000 and that is a fixer upper. So I bought a rental property about 100 miles away, so I could actually get some money back.

Ask anyone in Northern California. A 2000 dollar a month mortgage is considered conservative, with the price of real estate.

I do not pay 200 dollars a week right now for gas, I was saying if the price of oil keeps going up as rapidly as it is and the price for a gallon is say...10 dollars. There is no way a person can afford that, and it is not always your choice on if find a place near your home to work.

So, you're NOT in dire straies

So you admit that you're NOT in dire straits financially, yet you use your financial situation as an example of the dire economic situation here in America? Excuse me, but isn't that a little dishonest?

Cobraman?

I'm sorry, i really don't know where you are getting this from. Your the 2nd person today I am questioning their reading comprehension.

When did I use my financial situation as an example of a dire economic situation?

I said I have 2 mortgages and the economy and job situation frighten me a little? That is all I said.

My main worry is the price of gas and oil. When I talked about the situation about someone that has a 2000 a month mortgage and pays 200 dollar for gas, did i say or even imply that was me?

So I would say your accusation is what is a little dishonest :-)

read your own words

"When did I use my financial situation as an example of a dire economic situation?"

Read your own words!

"Just do the math. A person that commutes a fair distance in someting even like a Honda Accord and makes 20 bucks an hr cannot afford his 2000 dollor a month mortgage and pay 200 bucks a week for gas."

Why else would you ask us to "do the math" if you're not trying to defend your claim that : "Things are pretty darn bad right now."

You use the 2,000 dollar a month mortgage figure in that "do the math" argument, right? When I asked you if you were paying 2,000 dollars a month yourself or just pulled that figure out of thin air, you admitted that you're paying that much on TWO mortgages and not one. Yet your “do the math” argument didn’t indicate that you were referring to TWO mortgages or that it was hypothetical in nature.

You also used the 200.00 dollar a week gas figure, yet you admitted that you are not paying 200.00 dollars a week for gas just to commute back and forth to work. While I do believe that a few people pay this much, I highly doubt that they’re also paying exorbitant mortgages on TWO properties like you are.

So, tell me again, isn't that all just a bit dishonest? What else should we conclude when you asked us to "do the math" yet don't bother to tell us that this is just a hypothetical situation that you, or anyone you know, is not actually facing?

cobra

you got locked at a good time, i think currently the best you could hope would be 5.75%  and yes $2000mo. is considered low in CA!  Lucky for me that since i am forced to buy in the next 3 months the prices are down.  

  i am the quixotic botg and i approved this message”   

Yea, I jump on that rate as soon as it was available

"you got locked at a good time, i think currently the best you could hope would be 5.75% and yes $2000mo. is considered low in CA! Lucky for me that since i am forced to buy in the next 3 months the prices are down."

Yea, I jumped on that rate as soon as it was available. That was the second best decision I ever made. Marriage being the best, of course.

While I don't have trouble believing that $2,000.00 a month is considered somewhat normal for parts of California, that amount is not indicative of what the majority of Americans, or even the majority of Californians, are paying for their mortgages. That's a local phenomena and I kind of feel sorry for you for that. Still, that doesn't indicate that America is facing a recession and that things are not already improving over just a few months ago.

cobra

i'm not complaining i can move.  And when i do the difference in property values will be totally in my favor.  Shawn does have a point however that:  liberal policies (no refineries, no nuclear generation plants, no drilling ANWR, no new oil wells, anti-business enviro handicaps) really have the country over a barrel.

  i am the quixotic botg and i approved this message”   

I agree with Shawn on that

I agree with Shawn that liberal policies has helped to create the current situation, I just don't believe that it's as bad as people think. I've seen MUCH worse in my own lifetime.

I also believe that the liberals actually LIKE this current situation and have make this “recession” possible just so they can claim it's all the fault of someone else, like Bush, and claim that they, and only they, have a solution. That's a classic political ploy and politicians have used that time and time again in the past, especially liberals.

agreed Cobra

but i expect Shawn to claim i'm putting words in his mouth!!

  i am the quixotic botg and i approved this message”   

your right about that cobraman

I used the example of 2 thousand a month mortgage example, because that is a typical mortgage for someone in California.

The gas example is what can be a reality if gas prices go any further. If you read anything of what I was talking to CT about, I only hardly mentioned house payments at all, it was mainly gas prices.

Again, I said a person, which is totally hypothetical. Lets not play these silly games anymore okay?

Wouldn't you say we could be in a for a world of hurt if oil prices keep increasing the same rate they are now? 

To each their own Cobraman.

"Abstain from McCain"

Once again - so, you're voting for...?

Once again Harry, the best

Once again Harry, the best person for the job.

Ok, I will stop with the games. I plan on writing-in Fred Thompson. 

"Abstain from McCain"

Clear Thinker

Thanks for the reply and the honesty.

Sorry for taking so long to respond but I was intruded upon by guests bearing single malt.

Fred is a great choice but, unfortunately, it's a vote for Obambi.

Nevertheless, your choice as an American and I have full respect and honor for it.

 

 

Shawn, learn to deal with "things"

"Things are pretty darn bad right now."

Shawn, "things" are not as bad as portrayed by the MSM and are a lot better than you realise.

Do you remember the 70's? I do. I first entered the job market in 1977 when the economy was a hell of a lot worse then it is today, yet I still managed to survive, and even prosper. Don't fall for the gloom and doom scenarios presented by the MSM, the economy will improve as it always does. This economy is cyclic in nature and there will always be times of expansion, followed by period of contraction. That's just a natural part of the economical system. Learn to deal with it, ok?

Shawn

I do believe that the Msm is over exaggerating how bad things are. But they are not telling the true story about the reason for high gas prices. In 1995 Bill Clinton vetoed a bill that would permit drilling in Anwr. He said that it would not help because it would take 10 years for the 3000 barrels per day to arrive.  Since 2000 Democrats have blocked drilling in Anwr (4 bills) and drilling off the coast of California.

There is a difference in finger pointing by a political party and the Msm.

But Shawn... Nancy Pelosi

But Shawn...

Nancy Pelosi IS Speaker of the House right now.

Didn't she run on a platform in 2006 claiming she had a “commonsense plan” to lower gas prices?

Still waiting. Maybe the "plan" was to "blame Bush."

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

For a Democrat....

That IS a "plan."

Jack

Just like I said to Harry in another thread, I have never said the Democrats were blameless.

Things are not very pretty for our country right now and it will be no easy fix regardless which party gets elected come November

Funny thing is --- it's

Funny thing is --- it's exactly 500 days since she made that promise! Jan 4, 2007.

Vote 4 change. Vote 4 anything. See Jack & Mr Shy's first campaign ad for the ONLY viable 3rd party candidate.

am I supposed to laugh or cry?

I'm catching up on the comics, and this morning I read the Wednesday Sally Forth comic strip where Sally says to her husband, Ted, "You got a job during a recession. What's more incredible than that?"

 *sigh*

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw, 1944

They just don't give up, do they?

Liberals are hell bent on trying to convince people that we are in or are heading in a recession. It used to be comical, but now it's just annoying.

WWE

What would be comical would be to see Triple H clothesline one of these people at the keypad.