Rush Limbaugh called out Old Media for playing favorites in the GOP presidential race. He was, as usual, dead-on correct.
Audio is at Hot Air.
The transcript, which will remain available at Limbaugh's site until next Friday, is here.
Here is the first portion of what he had to say (bold is mine):
Let me just tell you what's happening. It is absurd and you're going to have to really gut it up here because the Drive-By Media is doing everything it can to disqualify the true conservatives on the Republican side. They're saying, "Romney, he can't win. If he loses Michigan, he's done." They said that about Romney in Iowa, they said that about Romney in New Hampshire. Now Fred Thompson apparently scored. Did you watch it last night, Mr. Snerdley? Fred Thompson was just fabulous, and people said, "Where has this been? All of this time, where's this been?" And I can't answer that, but now the Drive-Bys are saying, "Well, yeah, he was pretty good last night, but it's too late." We've had two states! It's too late for Fred Thompson? And, of course, "Rudy, why, he's lost all of his momentum, Rudy's out of it."
So if you listen to the Drive-Bys, and these people that got it all wrong in New Hampshire, what we're being told is that the only two candidates left that have any chance whatsoever are McCain and Huckabee, which is exactly what the Drive-Bys want. They want a liberal, moderate nominee, and even a liberal, moderate vice presidential nominee because they know, or they think, that whoever the Democrat nominee is can smoke -- they don't want a conservative nominee on the Republican side. Obviously. The Drive-Bys will always tell you, folks, who is a conservative and who isn't by virtue of who they try to destroy and by virtue of who they try to prop up. And right now they're trying to prop up McCain, trying to prop up Huckabee.
The write-up of Thompson's breakthrough performance in the South Carolina debate Thursday night at the New York Times is typical of what Limbaugh referred to. Here is the opening of the report by Michael Cooper and Michael Luo:
Fred D. Thompson tried to salvage his faltering presidential campaign at a debate Thursday night with a barrage of sharp attacks on the “liberal” policies of Mike Huckabee, the fellow Southerner whom he clearly sees as a rival in the South Carolina primary.
The clearly intended message: Oh he did fine, but it's going to take more than this to "salvage" his candidacy. So don't you GOP voters waste your time or your vote on him.
GOP voters need to pick their candidate based on merit. Old Media would prefer to do that for them, and it's up to GOP voters not to let them.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
Disclosure: Yours truly has not endorsed a GOP candidate, but is on record opposing the candidacy of Mitt Romney.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Rish is right
January 12, 2008 - 13:09 ET by iveseenitallAlways look to what the media want, then do just the opposite. It'll save your life.
NEVRE,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Quite so. You know a
January 13, 2008 - 00:26 ET by CortillaenQuite so. You know a candidate's good when the media trashes him. You know he's even better when the media tries to ignore him altogether.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
Fred
January 12, 2008 - 13:24 ET by bigpapaIs the only one I can get behind.
But then again I consider Reagan the best president in my life time..
and (cough) Carter the worst in history...ever
I have noticed the MSM trying to pick the GOP nominee, makes me ill that so many people listen to them.
People listened during the
January 14, 2008 - 14:17 ET by BeowulfPeople listened during the mid-term elections and put the 'Crats in charge of congress for no reason other than the biased and sensationalistic reporting prepetrated by the LSM. The 'Crats had nothing more to offer than the Repub-idiots (much less in fact), yet due to the HUGE (and often nauseating) coverage of Lefty talking points (whether true or not), the constant barrage of political catch phrases ("culture of corruption, etc.), and the blatant endorsements of Lefty candidates, we now have the worst do-nothing congress in recent memory. A do-nothing congress that the leading Dummycrat candidates are a huge part of.
Since the LSM had such success in reorganizing the congressional power block, why is it the slightest bit surprising that they now set their sights on the presidency? The only thing surprising thing to me is how obvious they are being and how INCREDIBLY gullible the American sheeple are about the nose-ring that has been inserted into their collective nose that the LSM is leading them around by...
The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers
Rush must frustrate the MSM
January 12, 2008 - 13:28 ET by JayTeeJust think how the MSM feels about Rush.....his Audience is around 10 times more than MSMs, he reaches the working Audience when none of them that work are watching MSM (they're working or driving).
He has 3 hours to dispell myths and half Truths propagated by the MSM, and he has plenty of Radio company on the airways covering the local/national BS at all hours of the day/night, and they all think like Rush.
It's gonna be a Republican landslide, and the MSM doesn't have a clue.
Fred Thompson Trounced the Others
January 12, 2008 - 13:40 ET by Lame CherryIf people would show some support, Fred has a MySpace site which you can drop by and join. You can keep updated on HE RAISED $750,000 which was his stated goal.
Human Events has thrown their support behind him for President.
.......and you can post a comment like I did that many of the bloggers here at Newsbusters just love him. (Good advertisement for this site too in bringing in more good bloggers.)
In any case, no one is telling the Truth about Fred and that he is doing very well. Rush is right as usual in his 99.84874%
Show the love as Fred's country is the Reagan Country that this is all about to be moving into. He breaks out there he will be the President and then hopefully all those Ron Paul supporters who I believe are starting to figure out "Paul is not the guy we thought he was in all the crap "his people" are pulling" can come home to a Conservative who is espousing all the good American things that Paul has left behind.
Fred's MySpace site is to drop by and show him the love:
http://profile.myspa...
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Hey LC... I went to the
January 12, 2008 - 16:02 ET by bigtimerHey LC...
I went to the link and read the comment about NewsBusters...great stuff!
Thanks for the link and the info.
Thompson/Hunter '08!
It is quite clear the MSM
January 12, 2008 - 14:00 ET by drillanwrIt is quite clear the MSM has lost, not only, ALL objectivity but has now thrown aside the cloak of pretense to having objectivity and unbiased coverage and delivery. It IS quite clear they have an agenda and are boldly trying to influence a major election in this country. Is THIS what the founding "news fathers" intended when the journalistic profession was formed ... a pimp and whorish political machine ... pusher and junkie for certain individuals and their ideologies that twist and contort what this country was intended to be? The MSM has become the dreaded Big Brother. They try to lead the viewing public around by the collective nose, drill a mindset into the masses, mold and craft thought processes to their availability and reach. We have become sheeple to these microphoned circus barkers who would have us buy so much of their over-boiled rotten peanuts and bow to their ass-clowns.
Rush is Right!
January 12, 2008 - 15:55 ET by bigtimerRush is Right!
So on the one hand, it's
January 12, 2008 - 15:58 ET by balboaSo on the one hand, it's crazy for Maher to claim that the GOP wanted HRC to win in New Hampshire, but it's not crazy for Rush to claim that the MSM is trying to dictate who wins on the GOP side?
The proof of this would be
January 12, 2008 - 16:06 ET by tracheostomyThe proof of this would be in the public endorsement given to particularly "weak" candidates.
- If GOP wanted HRC to win in NH, there would be a public statement about that candidate. But as far as Tony Snow and I are concerned, there haven't been any.
- If MSM wanted to dictate who wins on the GOP side, there would be public statements about a particular candidate where (a.) they give a positive editorial spin, and (b.) they give more airtime and public exposure.
Therefore, Rush does make a fair accusation. This is coming from a man who used to roam neighborhoods to tear off the old "Rush is right" bumperstickers (yes, that was me).
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
trach... That was
January 12, 2008 - 16:09 ET by bigtimertrach...
That was you?
ROFL!
I thought of it as an
January 12, 2008 - 16:19 ET by tracheostomyI thought of it as an adventurous; romantic hunt to "protect truth and sanity." No, really. I was young and stupid. The "Churchill rule" applied greatly in my case.
They don't tear off as easily as you'd think. You need to bring backup, like a putty knife. I couldn't allow one shred to stay on the bumper or else someone might see it and think that there used to be a Rush sticker on the car. And heaven forbid one tiny shred of decal make someone think of Rush.
I prided myself for being the neighborhood thought police.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Well trach you've come a
January 12, 2008 - 16:28 ET by bigtimerWell trach you've come a long long way... you got me laughing again with your descriptions in your post...
Even though nobody can agree with others 100% of the time I love ya'... you are a riot..I mean that in the best sense there is.
^_^' -Heh. By the same
January 12, 2008 - 16:32 ET by tracheostomy^_^' -Heh.
By the same token, there are quite a few members here (at least a dozen) that I would buy a steak dinner for in a heartbeat. You've been on that list for awhile now BT.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
trach... Thank you kind
January 12, 2008 - 16:48 ET by bigtimertrach...
Thank you kind sir.
trach....Despite the fact
January 12, 2008 - 17:15 ET by Jertrach....Despite the fact you have inexplicably gone over to the 'dark side'--[I know...you were young and stupid but now old(er) and wise]--still, your past services to the "cause" are deeply appreciated.
Jer
Jer... I know you weren't
January 12, 2008 - 17:24 ET by bigtimerJer...
I know you weren't talking to me but that was LOL funny.
Just my two cents...
bt...it should also be
January 12, 2008 - 17:44 ET by Jerbt...it should also be noted that trach cleverly delayed his mea culpa until the statute of limitations expired.
Jer
I know the feeling
January 12, 2008 - 17:05 ET by well99"Therefore, Rush does make a fair accusation. This is coming from a man who used to roam neighborhoods to tear off the old "Rush is right" bumperstickers (yes, that was me)."
I use to tell the guys in the shop I worked that I would break their radios(when Rush was on) with my sledge when they had it to loud.Funny thing is now I find him spot on about alot of things.Still not a fan but I agree with many things he says.Especially about the msm.The msm has no scruples what so ever.
Hey 99... Did the buddies
January 12, 2008 - 17:08 ET by bigtimerHey 99...
Did the buddies you worked with turn Rush down when you threatened with the sledge?
LOL...
Just curious...
BT
January 12, 2008 - 17:11 ET by well99Actually they did...lol...funny thing is I probably would tell them to turn it up now.
See Well99, that's the
January 12, 2008 - 17:25 ET by tracheostomySee Well99, that's the thing. Since then, I haven't removed a single Kerry, Peta, or F*** Bush bumpersticker. Not one. And if someone is listening to Air America, I wait for an opportunity to ask them about this or that assertion.
I'm pretty sure now that if you have to resort to a show of force or empty appeal to emotionalism, then reason left town somewhere along the line.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
Trach
January 12, 2008 - 17:32 ET by well99That is probably true.Or were just to old for that stuff.
No,
January 12, 2008 - 16:57 ET by bigpapaIt was whether the GOP caused it to win in NH...
What the GOP wants is irrelevant, the GOP didn't put her on the news going.. sniff,, sniff I'm a woman I just feel so much... yadda, yadda crap.
The MSM picks and choses what they want people to hear and see based on their agenda.. which is a democrap in the White House at all costs...
Among other things