What Time of Year Is It? (2007 Edition, Part 3)

Photo of Tom Blumer.
  • Bookmark and Share

In 2005, I sensed that journalists in general prefer to call this time of the year in commerce that of "holiday shopping" instead of "Christmas shopping," but that when it came to people losing their jobs, they preferred to describe layoffs as relating to "Christmas."

My instincts were proven correct that year and in 2006, so I chose to track the same items this year to look for any noticeable change or trend.

As in previous years, it was pretty easy to predict the results. But the extent of the disparity might surprise you.

Here are results from the three sets of Google News searches I did during during this year's Christmas season, compared to the previous two years (the Dec. 22, 2007 searches were done at about 2 p.m.; previous 2007 posts are here and here; links to 2005's related posts are here, here, and here; 2006's are here, here, and here):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

XmasSearchYear3Part3

Here are the grand totals for each of the three years:

Xmas2007CompTo2006and2005

The association of Christmas with layoffs in 2007 occurred at over triple the rate (39.3% ÷ 12.2%) of its association with shopping. That is the highest ratio of the three years reviewed.

Here are just two examples of headlines that piled on in difficulat situations where people were let people go:
- Workers Laid Off One Week Before Christmas
- Merry Christmas: 80 Are Laid Off (link requires subscription)

So what I found in 2007 holds even more strongly than what I saw in 2006 and 2005, which is this -- It seems beyond dispute that there is a strong bias against using the word “Christmas” to describe not only the shopping season, as noted above, but also events, parades, and festivals that happen during the Christmas season. There is, however, one notable exception -- "Christmas" is a word that is much more acceptable to use when "Scrooge" employers are letting people go.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Merry Chistmas, Mr. Blumer

You're right, the results are not surprising, unfortunately. Could it be that the journalists are closet 'Xians', and they can excoriate the running-dog capitalist pigs by invoking Jesus?  Their opposition to Christ in Christmas is obviously more a matter of political orientation than spirituality. They know that Jesus loved the little guy, too, and want to emulate His wonderful role of compassion, but without giving Him credit.

 

Liberals don't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory.  -Franksam

Ditto, Franksam. Every

want to emulate His wonderful role of compassion, but without giving Him credit.

Well put, Franksam. Every year I chuckle at the hilarity of the media and liberals attempting to impart some sort of so-called "spirt of the season" without the least mention of what season it is....even the TV shows "Rudolf" et al...talk about the "Christmas spirit" as if it's just some nebulous gas wafting through the air every December that magically makes people behave more generously and graciously.

My thought: if you (not you, Franksam, that's a generic "you") don't want to celebrate Christmas, fine. Just don't pretend that you are imbued with some kind of lovely generous "spirit" every December, but it comes from....well, nowhere.

One or two carefully words

One or two carefully words can really affect the thrust of the story, as can the tone of voice, or the expression on the reporter's face, etc.