USA Today and WSJ Mask Serious Circulation Problems at Most Other Major Papers

It is understandable, but not forgivable, that business reporters at Old Media newspapers might think that the economy is in bad shape. They first have to get past how poorly most of their employers are doing. The industry as a whole has not been doing well, and it's been that way for quite some time.

This table illustrates that point (September 30, 2007 figures are at this post, which originally came from this Editor & Publisher article, which will soon disappear behind its firewall; March 31, 2005 figures were estimated in reverse using annual percentage changes reported as of March 31, 2006, because older data I thought would remain available no longer is):

NewspCirc033105and093007

Daily circulation at the top 20 US newspapers as of September 30 is down 7.6% from 2-1/2 years ago. USA Today is the only paper that has increased its circulation. Excluding USA Today and the Wall Street Journal, which have mostly held their own, the remaining 18 in the top 20 have dropped by 10.6%. I believe that there's less than meets to the eye to the drop at the WSJ, because the publication has many online subscribers who do not receive the print edition.

I did not do a Sunday comparison, but the situation appears to be just as bad, if not worse. For example, the New York Times's Sunday circulation declined over 7% in just the past year.

The one near-exception to the carnage in the non-WSJ-USAT 18 is the New York Post, which has dropped less than 2% in the past 2-1/2 years, and actually has has several periods of increasing circulation during that time.

Please don't tell me that bias, errors of omission, and errors of commission have nothing to do with the steep declines at the other 17, and that it's all because of the Internet -- especially at the papers having percentage declines that go well into double digits.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Tom Blumer
Tom Blumer
Tom Blumer is a contributing editor for NewsBusters.