This just goes back to the point that democrats want to see our country destroyed because they hate republicans that much.   And this goes for democrats across the board.  I would like to hear any liberals argument against my statement.

This boarders on criminal behavior of Rep. Obey.  I suggest that AQ has many targets in which to destroy.  If the left in this country had any brains they might figure out that the one target AQ would most like to destroy is THEM!  The Hollywood left in the first case,  the rest of the Godless left next. 

Well they've had enough warning.  

David Obey is an idiot, & I will question his absolute "we can never solve anything by kicking one's butt" montra till I die, but I see how he's working this. He's been in the House for almost 40 years, he helped legislate defeat in Vietnam, & this is the last bite at the apple for this old hippy. He played his part in making his generation the worst in mordern American history. The only victory he cares about is every 2 years when he's up for election, victory on the battlefield...he'll fight that to the death.

He's just another example of why we should set up term limits, he'll die before he quits, my neighbors 10 minutes away in Wisconsin should be ashamed of this fossil. Hey cheeseheads, some new blood might be in order over there.

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

Yesterday I heard ABC radio (in between segments of Rush) touting 2 more military deaths in Iraq, making this the "deadliest year yet" for the US Military in Iraq. Must be like 1944 was the deadliest year yet for WWII. You know, the year we were kicking fascist butts into oblivion.

  MSM in Iraq: we can find a cloud in every silver lining.

SSS, it's very curious that in a 3-sentence post (including signature line), you basically advocate genocidal action against two distinct groups with whom you have some sort of ideological beef. Neither one is even narrowed down to something like "Islamic Terrorists" or "Treasonous Journalists", though I suppose your implication is that those qualifiers would be redundant.

This is the sort of thing that I see from the right that makes no more sense than ridiculous assertions about Bush being a Nazi or that 9/11 was an inside job; fitting everything one finds threatening into a tidy little conspiracy theory and descending into a histrionic fit about it (or in your case, saying "Kill 'em All").

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte

By 'curious' I mean 'alarming'.

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte

Let's see, depending on the weight of your average "journalist" (I'm beginning a self-imposed ban on that word)-

42,000 / 145lbs. = 288

42,000 / 175lbs. = 240

42,000 / 200lbs. = 210

Now, if it were a C130J-30, the max payload is 44,000 which means another ton of "storywritingpersons".

 "liberals" are just as much, if not more, bigoted, homophobic, sexist, racist, etc.

But doesn't being liberal absolve them from their sins?