One needs to look no further than the Associated Press's story on the Scott Beauchamp saga to understand why the general public not following the news closely doesn't "get" just how biased and antagonistic towards the war, the military, and American soldiers Old Media outlets are.
In the case of Scott Beauchamp, now that their brethren at The New Republic (TNR) have been caught red-handed publishing made-up stories, John Milburn and Ellen Simon of the Associated Press appear to be doing everything they can to cover for them -- first, with a headline (probably determined elsewhere within AP) that fails to communicate anything resembling the essence of the story, and second, by struggling mightily in their reporting to make it appear that this is a "he said, she said" dispute, instead of a situation where Beauchamp and TNR have been thoroughly discredited.
Here's the headline:
Army denounces articles written by GI
Trouble is, Paragraphs 4 through 7 of the story make it clear that this is no mere denunciation -- it's a complete repudiation that the person the Army is supposedly only "denouncing" agrees with:
The Army said this week it had concluded an investigation of Beauchamp's claims and found them false.
"During that investigation, all the soldiers from his unit refuted all claims that Pvt. Beauchamp made in his blog," Sgt. 1st Class Robert Timmons, a spokesman in Baghdad for the 4th Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, based at Fort Riley, Kan., said in an e-mail interview.
The Weekly Standard said Beauchamp signed a sworn statement admitting all three articles were exaggerations and falsehoods.
Calls to Editor Franklin Foer at The New Republic in Washington were not returned, but the magazine said on its website that it has conducted its own investigation and stands by Beauchamp's work.
This is rich -- TNR is standing by work its author has refuted.
And even the paragraphs above aren't right. Separately, and before the statement ascribed to Timmons, The Weekly Standard's Michael Goldfarb (who, quite rudely, isn't named by AP) didn't merely "say" that Beachamp recanted (as if it were just a rumor). Goldfarb had, and has, at least two sources (bold is mine):
Beauchamp Recants
THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned from a military source close to the investigation that Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp--author of the much-disputed "Shock Troops" article in the New Republic's July 23 issue as well as two previous "Baghdad Diarist" columns--signed a sworn statement admitting that all three articles he published in the New Republic were exaggerations and falsehoods--fabrications containing only "a smidgen of truth," in the words of our source.
Separately, we received this statement from Major Steven F. Lamb, the deputy Public Affairs Officer for Multi National Division-Baghdad: "An investigation has been completed and the allegations made by PVT Beauchamp were found to be false. His platoon and company were interviewed and no one could substantiate the claims."
Although a deeper look at Google News shows that the deceptive headline in USA Today is not being universally used, it is at multiple places. The following shows Google News results as of about 2PM on a search for the words in the USAT headline ("Army Denounces Articles Written by GI," without quotes):

Note the use of an old picture of someone not at all related to the story -- military poseur Jesse MacBeth, who was exposed as a fraud year.
Now here's a Google News search on "Army denounces 3 articles written by GI" (also without quotes) done at about the same time:

A general Google search on USAT headline above (again, without quotes) shows that the following other outlets are running with the deceptive headline accompanying the AP story:
Surely more outlets will carry the deceptive headline as the day wears on, accompanied by the weak coverage follows it. The story, presented as it is in non-compelling fashion, won't most likely no make the evening news or the top-of-hour radio broadcasts.
So most of the 85% of the country not paying close attention to the news will be no wiser to the real truth of the Beauchamp affair. AP's mission would appear to be accomplished.
Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.
—Tom Blumer is president of a training and development company in Mason, Ohio, and is a contributing editor to NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Isn't this one of the most
August 9, 2007 - 14:06 ET by Chris NormanIsn't this one of the most insidious forms of media bias - the nuanced mislead? AP preserves the "plausible" defense that the headline is technically correct, even while it skews the truth and doesn't tell the real thrust of the story.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Of course, Chris. We can
August 9, 2007 - 17:38 ET by BlondeOf course, Chris.
We can thank Dan Rather for this one....that paragon of journalistic virtuosity.
Sheesh!
On the plus side, how many
August 9, 2007 - 14:57 ET by dervishOn the plus side, how many of the general public have any idea that there is a TNR, let alone a Beauchamp?
And if they're reporting accurately (always doubtful), do I detect a bit of disdain from the Army toward the press? No offense to E-7's, but press briefings are usually commissioned officer territory, particularly at a brigade level, no? Is the 1st Infantry saying that their officers had better things to spend their time on? (Not that I would be surprised if an AP reporter confused SFC with LTC.)
TNR has been around a long
August 9, 2007 - 17:06 ET by Del DolemonteTNR has been around a long time. In fact it's almost 100 years old!
So, perhaps, has the
August 9, 2007 - 17:25 ET by dervishSo, perhaps, has the Congolese Journal of Philately. But does anyone subscribe to, or read it?
Maybe the AP has concluded
August 9, 2007 - 16:47 ET by MightyMouthMaybe the AP has concluded that most Americans don't know the definition of "repudiation" and would have to look it up. The AP knowing they won't look it up, just "dumbed" it down.
Just a thought.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Liberals still believe Beauchamp
August 9, 2007 - 16:58 ET by Lame CherryOn Huffington last night a featured liberal blogger was still defending Beauchamp as telling the facts AFTER BEAUCHAMP ADMITTED HE WAS A LIAR.
It doesn't matter if Beauchamp tomorrow wrote that the sun was the moon.......these liberals would still believe him, because it is what they want to believe.
That is the key to being a liberal darling......just be part of the Molotov Mob making things up about Bush, the military or Christians and it gets printed. Truth does not matter or even a liar admitting he is a liar.......just bash what liberals hate and they will defend you past the last 3 women you raped and assaulted. (Bill Clinton)
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Liberal still believe Beauchamp
August 10, 2007 - 12:53 ET by PTWLibs still want to believe what the military reports to us....in this case Beauchamp is part of the serving in Iraq military, not the MSM. Also recall the rescue of Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman, AG, mission accomplished...and the rest.
However, every time someone in the Military says something negative about the Iraq situation, like Powell, Shinseki, or a host of other Generals, including those replaced by the Administration are completely discredited....please stop and consider the bias is not simply limited to the MSM.....
Please calify your comments,
August 10, 2007 - 14:46 ET by BDPlease calify your comments, are you saying that the military lies, or that the MSM does?
More lies from The New Republic revealed.
August 9, 2007 - 17:09 ET by GeepersOne of TNR's Experts... Refutes TNR
Come soon to a college
August 9, 2007 - 17:12 ET by Roger the ShrubberCome soon to a college campus near you!
Ethics in Journalism Tour 2007!
Featuring
Scott Beauchamp
Mary Mapes
Special Guests Joe Biden, Ward Churchill, and Jayson Blair hold a roundtable discussion on plagiarism
Get your tickets now!
Excellent Roger...rotflmao
August 9, 2007 - 17:14 ET by LionKingVery true and hillarious.