Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

NPR Airs Shocking Piece Challenging China's One-Child Policy and 'Gruesome' Forced Abortions

By Tim Graham | July 07, 2012 | 22:32

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

NPR's All Things Considered on Friday night aired a shocking piece questioning China's one-child population policy and the forced abortions that result when people try to go around the prohibitions.

Host Melissa Block said loud pleas inside China "come after gruesome photos of a 7-month-old fetus whose mother was forced to have abortion spread across the Internet last month. Increasingly, Chinese scholars say the government's population policy is not only inhumane, it's also creating a demographic disaster, one that will leave China with far fewer workers and more elderly people to take care of." Reporter Frank Langfitt told the story of Deng Jiyuan and his wife Feng Jianmei, who have a six-year-old daughter. After Feng got pregnant again, she was abducted and given a labor-inducing injection : 

LANGFITT: We want justice, he says. I want those gangster-like officials to be punished. Then family members uploaded a photo of the dead child to the Internet, and the story exploded. Last week, the government announced it had fired one local official and punished others involved in the case. Deng says China's population policy is out of control.

DENG JIYUAN: (Through Translator) If the one-child policy was to continue, then after 100 years, there would be very few people left in China.

LANGFITT: That, of course, is hyperbole. China has more than 1.3 billion people. But Deng is on to something. Demographers and economists say restrictions on births aren't helping China but hurting it.

ZHENG ZHENZHEN: In the field of population studies, everybody think the policy should be modified.

JAMES LIANG: Well, it's actually a pretty absurd policy.

WANG FENG: Phasing out the policy should have started at least 10 years ago.

LANGFITT: That's Zheng Zhenzhen, a demographer with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; James Liang, a leading businessman in Shanghai; and Wang Feng, who runs the Brookings-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy in Beijing. Wang says the problem now isn't that Chinese couples are having too many kids. It's that they're having too few. Last year, census results showed what demographers had long suspected. The fertility rate is very low.

FENG: For each couple, the expected number of children in their lifetime is 1.5.

LANGFITT: That's well below the number needed to replace China's current population, and so Wang says this dynamic country - now widely seen as a world-beater - is fated to age very rapidly.

FENG: The magnitude of the challenge brought about by population aging is mind-boggling. China now has about 180 million elderly population. In less than 20 years, by 2030, that number is going to be 360 million. That's going to be larger than the total population of the United States right now.

LANGFITT: How is the country going to pay for that?

FENG: It's a very scary situation.

LANGFITT: As the population ages, health care costs are expected to soar. And with couples having fewer kids, there will be far fewer workers to pay for that health care. Again, Wang Feng.

FENG: I think the harm has already been done. So even if China, say, stopped one-child policy tomorrow, this new birth would not become adult labor until 20 years from now.

Langfitt explained that most Chinese now have no desire to have more than one child, which is another obstacle for those worried about the fertility rate. He also explained that family planning workers are feeling guilty:

LANGFITT: Zhang Erli used to work as a high-ranking official with the National Population and Family Planning Commission. Last month, he made an extraordinary, tearful apology on TV to the millions of women who've had to end their pregnancies because of the policy.

ZHANG ERLI: (Through Translator) I felt sorry for our Chinese women. I feel quite guilty. Chinese women have made huge sacrifices. A responsible government should repay them.

The NPR reporter concluded that a change is not imminent: "So given the demographic data, the public anger and the official guilt, why not declare victory and change the policy? NPR requested an interview with China's family planning commission. It never responded. Demographers say some officials are reluctant to make changes because they still think China has too many people, and China's current leadership is cautious and risk averse."

Jill Stanek posted the gruesome photos here.

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Abortion
  • China
  • All Things Considered
  • NPR
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Cultures whose birth

Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 10:55pm.

Cultures whose birth replacement rate has gone below 1.7 can never recover. China's is at 1 right now. And with the lopsided male/female ratio in addition, they have signed their country's death warrant already.

And in the meantime they face the problem of a horde of young men without the stabilizing and "civilizing" influence of marriage.

  • Login to post comments

Looks to me as if China

Submitted by Radical1979 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:02pm.

will be needing to acquire some women. Probably through the takeover (war) of another country.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Oh, yeah.

Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:17pm.

Human Trafficking in China

And regarding war, well that's one way to put the suppressed rage of all those young men to good use.

  • Login to post comments

Unintended consequences

Submitted by Dragoon on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 3:29am.

That seems to be what the politicians always forget about. China is now facing higher crime rates since males who have way too much free time on their hands (i.e., not working or chasing skirts) will find other means of relieving their boredom and frustrations. Sex trafficking is on the rise in China as a result of sex selective abortions.

The other thing I find funny is that as the population ages, the medical expenses drastically increase. With such a narrow bottom on the age groups and a large bulge getting up there in age, society has no replacement of workforce (or in the case of social security, enough workers paying in to cover the expenses going out) that would normally handle the elderly.

My sarcastic suggestion would be for us to enter the age of soylent green but I'm kind of afraid that someone would take me seriously.

  • Login to post comments

Yea , that's what the army's...

Submitted by paratisi on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 1:37pm.

for. Hate to state the obvious, but the chinese govt. does have to find a way of getting rid of all the male children(soon to be adults) and do it in a manner that does not get blown back at them. I don't mean to make this sound cold but, how do you discuss the willful termination of millions of people without sounding cold or ghoulish? The same as trying to discuss China's one baby policy. How do you talk/write about millions of forced abortions(something even most liberals consider murderous or at least barbaric), without some stomach wrenching pauses. That being said...

The Chinese Red Army is growing rapidly. Last I heard, the Chinese, long range planners are prepping for a 300million man armed service. How do you maintain such a large service and the retirees, without war taking a large portion of them? By definition, the Chinese Red Army, has to be involved in a truly bloody war in order to maintain the Chinese Govt's ability to stay in control of the population.

Pardon me a moment while I go wretch!

God Bless America!
  • Login to post comments

or revolution/civil war

Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 7:52am.

Considering that few countries could do signifacant damage to the Chinese Army - killing there own people may be the only option unless they want to take on Russia or all of Islam.

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

China seems to be in a

Submitted by Bruzilla on Mon, 07/09/2012 - 9:02am.

China seems to be in a classic Damned if you do-Damned if you don't situation. They have over 1.3 billion people now, and that's after decades of this policy. What would the population count be if they hadn't taken such drastic measures? They would be well north of two billion!

The Chinese people have shown they often look out for their own needs when it comes to children, and don't have much of a view of the national danger too large a population presents. So while forced abortions isn't an ideal way to overcome this lack of concern, what options does the Chinese government have? Ask them nicely and hope they start looking out for the country instead of themselves? That didn't work over there before, and more and more it's not working over here on subjects like taking welfare, having too many kids to get more child support payments, etc.

Is losing a million children to forced abortions worse than losing hundreds of millions to disease, war, famine, and the other pestilence brought about by an out-of-control population?

"Strange women, lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony." Peasant
  • Login to post comments

More hypocracy from NPR

Submitted by Stan T on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 10:56pm.

And yet NPR praises Planned Parenthood for their tens of thousands of abortions a year....i guess to NPR, it's only okay to murder unborn babies in the United States because Planned Parenthood are liberals.

Perfection is a state of mind, not of being. The closer you get to perfection, the further away you find yourself.
  • Login to post comments

Ms Rad makes cajun wonder too*

Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:16pm.

What is China up to?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2005231/Chinas-ghost-towns-New-s...

And not just in China...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2168507/Footage-shows-brand-new-...

  • Login to post comments

cajun, I had posted a link to

Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:33pm.

cajun, I had posted a link to an article on that phenomenon quite some time ago.

LOL....it appears to be an earlier article by the Daily Mail on that subject in December 2010

  • Login to post comments

yes motherbelt*

Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:47pm.

I do remember that which is why I found that second DM story on the empty city in AFRICA ...what is China up to?

  • Login to post comments

China actually has too few people...

Submitted by MightyMouth on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:59pm.

for the square milage. If China where to allow their population to procreate naturally and allow them to flourish and provide for the natural needs of the population, unobstructed by the government all would be well. BUT NO as we see so many times centeralized gooberment only serves those in power, much the same as here in the US of F'ing A.

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend, unless my friend is more evil than my enemy."
  • Login to post comments

MM. as Rush would say about

Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 6:25am.

MM. as Rush would say about countries like this, including those in grinding poverty in Africa (paraphrasing) ....the problem isn't too many people, it's too little freedom and capitalism.

Now China is trying, in desperation, to "adjust" its male/femal ratio artificially. They will "allow" a second child if the first one is a girl, in some cases.

This is like trying to "manage" climate bye "adjusting" things here and there. Ain't gonna happen.

Let's face it: God knew what He was doing.

  • Login to post comments

delete double

Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 6:24am.

delete double

  • Login to post comments

This was on NPR?

Submitted by journoprof on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 12:17am.

What amazes me is that NPR aired this...what boss had the day off and this got through the censors?

Media ethics shouldn't be the oxymoron it seems to be.
  • Login to post comments

This is the point that needs to be made...

Submitted by falcon on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 10:27am.

...that one of our media outlets is actually attacking China's one-child policy. We can debate and discuss the relative hypocrisy of attacking China's abortion policies while simultaneously praising Planned Parenthood later. The main point of this website is to point out liberal media bias, hypocrisy and spin. When something like this airs, one does indeed have to wonder if it was aired simply for its shock value, or if it was an issue of a story too big to cover up? Whatever the reason, it is somewhat refreshing to see a story of this magnitude being aired. Too bad the mainstream media won't pick up on it - they're still too deep in the tank for Obama to see the surface.

“I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership, that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.” – Ronald Reagan, July 17, 1980.

  • Login to post comments

As Rush would say,...

Submitted by paratisi on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 1:43pm.

Every once in a while, the Drive-by's do commit a random act of journalism. The perpetrator will likely be disciplined and sent to a re-indoctrination center so they don't go off message again, but it does happen from time to time.

God Bless America!
  • Login to post comments

Why is NPR

Submitted by NVRAT on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:54am.

Picking on China for their forced abortion? I thought abortion was the lefties favorite killing thing.

NVRAT
  • Login to post comments

its so odd..they dont care about the fertility rate in America..

Submitted by seen the light on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:06am.

but they do care about it in China? How...odd? They care more about the strength of China than their own nation?

  • Login to post comments

It's one thing the PRC and Ted Turner have in common

Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 10:23am.

Turner -- a father of five -- has advocated that the US impose a one-child policy to reduce consumption and carbon production.

China is now dealing with the fallout of that policy. Turner and his ilk are ignoring the reality to sustain the fantasy.

  • Login to post comments

You have to think one step ahead ...

Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 12:45pm.

... when it comes to liberals.

If NPR reported the story, they are probably setting the stage for Obama and other Democrats to criticize the Chinese policy to pander to America's pro-lifers.

It's much less diabolical, the left thinks, to simply "encourage" Americans to have abortions (for now) and replace those "terminated" babies with children/young adults from other countries they approve of ... killing 2 birds with one stone ... socially engineering the population and expanding their voter base.

They are so transparant.

metaphorsbwithu
  • Login to post comments

China

Submitted by Jersey Girl on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 4:30pm.

Right now Obamao is criticizing China's trade policies so NPR is piling on.

Of course, LaHood just got finished praising China for having a dictator in charge.

This is one screwed up adminstration with the luck of having idiots in the media paying no attention to their malfeasance.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use