Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
  • Crowley to Obama Advisor: 'Why Didn't the President Just Say, Yeah, Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack?'
  • CBS's Sharyl Attkisson Says Team Obama 'Perfected' Delaying Info Release And Has 'Quit Talking to Me Altogether'
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled

Will Media Fact Checkers Find Obama's 'Outspent' Underdog Whoppers In Ohio?

By Tim Graham | July 06, 2012 | 15:33

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

Neil Munro at The Daily Caller is pointing out that Barack Obama has a truth-telling problem when it comes to being outspent on his previous campaigns. Someone should alert Politifact and its users in the press corps.

“I got outspent when I ran [the] first time for Senate,” the president claimed in his campaign speech Thursday in Maumee, Ohio. Munro found "Obama was misleading." Yeah, that's one word you could use.

The Federal Election Committee’s website shows that Obama’s campaign claimed $14,807,432 in donations by December 2004.

In contrast, his opponent, Alan Keyes, had only $2,545,325, according to the FEC.

That’s a six-fold advantage for Obama, not a deficit.

The imbalance in funding was the largest in that year’s Senate races, according to a 2006 book, “In The Election After Reform: Money, Politics, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.”

Munro explained that Obama did look like he would be outspent in the 2004 primary by Blair Hull, but his campaign imploded. I'd add that came in part after the Chicago Tribune picked apart his nasty divorce, just as the Tribune later pressed GOP candidate Jack Ryan out of the fall election over his nasty divorce. But Keyes was never a serious challenger. Then came 2008:

“The thing that I want everybody here to understand – each of you personally — is that back in 2008, everybody said we couldn’t do it because we were outspent,” he said during a 4.12 p.m. speech in Sandusky, Ohio.

Obama did not correct the claim, although he immediately revised it, by adding that “we weren’t favored.”

During the 2008 race, Obama raised $779 million. His GOP rival, Sen. John McCain, raised less than half as much, or $347 million.

In the Democratic primary, Obama raised $237 million, while his rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, raised $229 million.

This is a fun challenge. I listened to the Sandusky speech last night, and here's something else Obama said shortly after the "outspent in '08" stuff:

That first race that I ran as a state senator, Michelle and I, we were going around knocking on doors, passing out leaflets. Nobody gave us a shot. Everybody said, "Nobody can pronounce your name, how are you going to win?" (Laughter.) You don't come from a famous family. We couldn't afford to advertise on TV.

Which state Senate candidates advertise on TV in the Chicago media market? That’s just a bizarre story. This tale also obscures the little fact that Obama had no opponent in the 13th District when the primary election rolled around in March 1996, or in November. He successfully kept primary opponents (including the incumbent, Alice Palmer) off the ballot by challenging their signatures.

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Barack Obama
  • Neil Munro
  • Ohio
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Obama has a truthtelling problem...

Submitted by journoprof on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 3:47pm.

Two observations:

1. The problem isn't limited to statements about being outspent. It's ubiquitous.
2. It will get worse as the campaign drags on...I know...mind-boggling.

Media ethics shouldn't be the oxymoron it seems to be.
  • Login to post comments

Obama...

Submitted by GeneralAl on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 4:25pm.

Obama can't handle the truth!

"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!

  • Login to post comments

When your whole life and your

Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 2:30pm.

When your whole life and your very existence has been a lie, then 'handling the truth' isn't even a consideration. This is why Boy Baraka can lie so easily and readily - it is all he has ever known. He talks his version of the TROOF to his advisers, the unions, and his handlers - because they all have the same agenda - and he doesn't have much friction with the StateRun Media either, so when he gets in front of a microphone, he reverts to his 'my word is the TROOF' form, and it just flows out of his big purple lips like diahrea............................

  • Login to post comments

Barack Obama has a

Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 3:49pm.

Barack Obama has a "truth-telling problem" about a great many things.

  • Login to post comments

What a Shock!?!?

Submitted by paratisi on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 3:52pm.

ObamaTax, the Prevaricator-in-Chief.

I personally prefer the Taxer-in-Chief

but, whatever works for you. Pass it on ;0)

God Bless America!
  • Login to post comments

Is Munro a reporter or a partisan political opinion blogger?

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 4:12pm.

Additionally, as president, Obama has presided over $5 trillion in deficit spending that has boosted the national debt to $16 trillion. Compared to those sums, his $14 million expenditure during the 2004 Senate race is small.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/05/obama-rewrites-history-claims-he-had-l...

A preposterous non sequitur.

Jer


 

  • Login to post comments

Actually, Jer, It's Cogent

Submitted by stratman on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 8:14pm.

Obama is not just a profligate spender of other people's money in campaigns, Obama is the nation's most prolific spender of other people's money before and after election of all times by a landslide. Oh, and he's a liar too.

Thanks for highlighting those facts. I glossed over them the first time.

  • Login to post comments

Actually, strat, it is only marginally cogent

Submitted by Jer on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:02pm.

while barely relevant--and that's being generous--to the theme of the article. It is also an indisputably gratuitous, profoundly partisan swipe, redolent of journalism at its sloppiest.

Obama's spending record has been highlighted hundreds of times at this website alone. I doubt you've been disadvantaged by any lack of information on the subject.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by stratman on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:42pm.

The pedantic I can handle.  It's the duplicative grammar that's worrisome.  I blame Disqus.  Bad mojo.

Pick your poison - either marginally cogent or barely relevant. 

  • Login to post comments

Jer's preferred poison seems to be ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 1:17am.

the excuse, defend, and support flavored Obama Kool-Aid on even numbered days of the month.

On the odd days of the month he swears off drinking altogether in the form of swearing he does not excuse, defend, or support Obama; rather , he calls him out, takes him to task, and castigates him unmercifully.

So he says, anyway.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Well, MD,

Submitted by stratman on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:02pm.

Jer does have a PhD in building castles in the sky.

  • Login to post comments

PhD, indeed, strat ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:14pm.

Pile it high, Democrat.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Perfect, Matthew. :-)

Submitted by stratman on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:47pm.

Perfect, Matthew. :-)

 

Edit: Talk about coincidence, I just read an email from a friend who sent me this video.

  • Login to post comments

strat ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 6:05pm.

Great video.

Sure do miss that fellow !

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

I suspect Unsane's entry would be...

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 1:45pm.

Partisan hack Democrat.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

strat...

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 2:05pm.

Fortunately I can handle the pedantic as well. [As evidence of same, two words: Matthew Dean]

Regarding duplicative grammar, stop worrying. I have always used "cogent" in this sense and therefore need not 'pick a poison'. To be honest, I was unaware of a secondary definition, viz., "pertinent" or "relevant" as provided in Merriam-Webster for example.

I hope that resolves any confusion.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Matthew is our alliteration

Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 6:58pm.

Matthew is our alliteration master. If so inclined he could be Natty Matty laying down some dope tracks for the NB's crib and burning up Benjamins.

Translation: Matthew is a great guy who could make music so popular with NewsBusters members that he would be wealthy enough to light his cigars with $100 Dollar bills, but of course wouldn't do that because he is a Constitutionalist and wouldn't destroy currency pursuant to the law.

  • Login to post comments

Thank you, strat,---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 7:41pm.

for a very nice neutralizer to Jer's use of "pedantic" towards me as an obvious pejorative.

He of course misses the irony therein; as he himself flaunts a vocabulary of multi-syllabic words as though doing so is somehow not only different - but accomplished at a much higher plane of existence.

Must be that liberal sense of elitism.

It is to laugh.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Tell the truth, md. Were you able to keep a straight face

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:16pm.

while following up your dismissive tripe about liberal elitism with the ludicrously stilted "It is to laugh"?

Do human beings really talk like that?

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Well, Jer, it sure as hell doesn't sound any worse than ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:54pm.

" --dismissive tripe about liberal elitism with the ludicrously stilted --"

Do barristers really talk like that?

MD


 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Gag. Admit it, strat...

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:06pm.

You're actually hoping Dean will slide a few pristine C-notes in your direction to remunerate your shameless flattery.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:29pm.

I also accept bearer bonds and precious gems and metals. Homemade pies, beef, lamb, chicken, seafood, firearms and ammo are also suitable barter.

  • Login to post comments

Which is why no one directs any shameless flattery ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:08pm.

at Jer - he can only pay off with diatribes against the zippered weasel, the Rush of Limbaugh, and the tapes of Breitbart.

He will, though, if one is seeking a typed purgative for either end of the alimentary canal, regale one with tales of his ability to call out Obama for imaginary faults, bestow conservatism on Joe Scarborough, and build up Fareed Zachariah's (or Zakaria's) chops as an astoundingly resolute and intrepid scholar.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

strat...

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:15pm.

How about my signed 1963 vintage autographed pics of Hubert Humphrey, Stuart Symington, Abe Ribicoff, Barry Goldwater, and V-P LBJ [all suitable for framing]--plus a virtually untouched copy of My Life by Bill Clinton--in return for 90 days of free med care for my family.  This priceless political memorabilia can be passed down and treasured through generations of the strat family,while your reciprocal obligations will be fully satisfied in three short months.

And, what the hell, I'll make and toss in your favorite pie to sweeten the deal.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:40pm.

Let's start with the pie, forget the rest, and then we can talk turkey.

One problem for me is if you have medical insurance - bartering or freebie medical care might constitute fraud. One problem for you is who knows what legal quicksand you might get caught up in for obtaining care outside your network.

You know your cousins in medical law have gone to great lengths to figure out all the ways of screwing the patient over, with contingencies for contingencies,  if the fine print is not followed.

 

Q:  What kind of law did you practice, Jer?

  • Login to post comments

strat..

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 10:03pm.

bringing doctors to their knees.

No, I had good relations with the medical community. Business practice, creditors rights, contracts, corporate documents and agreements, drafting legal briefs, some litigation...wish I had done more of it and had developed a greater comfort level in court. I was generally pretty good with juries.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Jer

Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 11:35pm.

And you wonder why physicians do not accept attorneys as patients?

Sounds like a good career.

But... Creditor Rights?  Weren't you in favor of Obama's handling of GM, which included stripping the rights of creditors?

In the mortal words of The Vet -- I iz confuzed.

  • Login to post comments

Obama's record needs to be

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:08pm.

Obama's record needs to be told loudly and often. It can never be enough.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

Actually Jer,

Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 2:16am.

I'm thinking of making the 0's profligate spending record my tag line.

At least while tag lines exist. :)

(I do so love the one I have now though).

"I don't like repeat offenders, I like dead offenders". - Ted Nugent
  • Login to post comments

Do you love it as much as Ted's recent favorable

Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:23pm.

musings about the Confederacy?

Jer

  • Login to post comments

You need to start your own blog, Jer

Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:49am.

You need to start your own anit-bias blog, Jer. You can call it "RepubBusters."

By the way, speaking of non sequiturs, what does this have to do with Obama's, ahh, misstatements? Is Munroe right or wrong with his conclusions about the dishonesty of Obama's own statements? Oh, wait, if you can't attack the conclusions, attack the person who made them, correct?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Lies

Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 4:43pm.

Criticize Bush however you want, but I do not EVER remember him just lying, lying, lying. Not EVER.
Obama seems to lie with every other breath, and doesn't seem to care if it's just flat out obvious. His mental illness, and I am sure he has at least one, must just block the truth from his mind all the time.

Americans keeping their own earnings is a Civil Right! Demand your Civil Rights!
  • Login to post comments

The entire Obama story is a

Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 5:33pm.

The entire Obama story is a fictional movie about a US president, entirely produced by the MSM.

The lead character in this fictional movie, played by Barry Soetoro, creates a web of lies in his own autobiography, promises what he will not or cannot deliver so people will support him, lies about his social security number, jobs and life experiences, and creates odd behaving composite "girl friends" to move the story along.

It's initially a well executed script, written by long term writer of fiction, David Axelrod. Indeed, Mr. Soetoro is elected President of the United States. But by the the last half of the movie people were leaving the theater and complaining of inconsistencies in the plot line, increasingly desperate scenes and over the top dialog by the main character, Mr. Soetoro. "This is a completely stupid movie," according to one person leaving the theater in disgust.

By the end of the movie, there were only a handful of people in the audience, all from the MSM, and all of whom were drinking a blue liquid from paper cups.

This movie reviewer gives the movie 19 pinocchios.

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

19 Pinnocchios!!!!

Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 5:45pm.

LOL.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

I give it....

Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 6:14pm.

two thumbs up in a circle!!

  • Login to post comments

Thank you! I give credit to

Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:17pm.

Thank you! I give credit to my parents, my agent, and the guy down the street who keeps getting my name wrong. ;+}

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

J... I have a drawer full of

Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:15pm.

J... I have a drawer full of them with Obama's name on them. ;+}

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

Cajun has a question*

Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:50pm.

If GWB was to blame for all of Obama's woes of his first four years and if he is re-elected, who is he going to blame for the "last" four years?

  • Login to post comments

Mitt, Rush, Levin

Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:52pm.

Beck, Fox news, and it will still be a little bit of Bush's fault.

Seek Truth, Defend Liberty
  • Login to post comments

Mitt Romney

Submitted by Blonde on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:12am.

....or maybe Felix the Cat.

I'm not sure yet. Stay tuned.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Hmmm, good question. No doubt

Submitted by celator on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:36am.

Hmmm, good question. No doubt Mitt Romney, for what he might have done in the last four years? Sort of a future past pluperfect tactic.;+}

Maybe Millard Filmore if it works with the MSM.

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

sorry celator*

Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:48pm.

I thought you meant Mallard Filmore

http://www.mallardfillmoreonline.com/uploads/1/2/0/6/12065635/4325060_or...

  • Login to post comments

Caj... LOL, very good. I give

Submitted by celator on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 3:02pm.

Caj... LOL, very good. I give it four quacks.

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

Munro needs to be fact checked.

Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:18pm.

Munro, himself, needs to be fact checked, for his comparisons are invalid. He's comparing receipts and not expenditures. He's not telling us how much Obama actually spent in he various campaigns, only how much he received, so how can he claim that Obama isn't being truthful in stating that he was outspent? Nothing Monroe has shown can substantiate the claim that Obama is, well, untruthful.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Coming from Illinois, it's my

Submitted by dmntd1 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:21pm.

Coming from Illinois, it's my belief that Pres. Obama has never run in a fully opposed election before. This will be his first. He's succeeded in running off his main contestants via cheap tricks, media outings and challenges to signatures. Even his most recent election, to the Presidency, had more focus spent on his challengers running mate, Sarah Palin, than on himself. It's for this reason that Mitt Romney MUST choose a stellar running mate, with clean shorts, shoes and no skeletons lurking. Won't help too much, however, when the Chicago Machine starts putting fake stories out there (much like I believe they did with Herman Cain and the sexual harassment suits).

We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Leno: It’s Gotten So Bad for Obama Fox News Changed Its Slogan to ‘See, I Told You So!’
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • The Guardian Glamorizes New ‘Assault on Wall Street’ Movie as Justice
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use