Will Media Fact Checkers Find Obama's 'Outspent' Underdog Whoppers In Ohio?
Neil Munro at The Daily Caller is pointing out that Barack Obama has a truth-telling problem when it comes to being outspent on his previous campaigns. Someone should alert Politifact and its users in the press corps.
“I got outspent when I ran [the] first time for Senate,” the president claimed in his campaign speech Thursday in Maumee, Ohio. Munro found "Obama was misleading." Yeah, that's one word you could use.
The Federal Election Committee’s website shows that Obama’s campaign claimed $14,807,432 in donations by December 2004.
In contrast, his opponent, Alan Keyes, had only $2,545,325, according to the FEC.
That’s a six-fold advantage for Obama, not a deficit.
The imbalance in funding was the largest in that year’s Senate races, according to a 2006 book, “In The Election After Reform: Money, Politics, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.”
Munro explained that Obama did look like he would be outspent in the 2004 primary by Blair Hull, but his campaign imploded. I'd add that came in part after the Chicago Tribune picked apart his nasty divorce, just as the Tribune later pressed GOP candidate Jack Ryan out of the fall election over his nasty divorce. But Keyes was never a serious challenger. Then came 2008:
“The thing that I want everybody here to understand – each of you personally — is that back in 2008, everybody said we couldn’t do it because we were outspent,” he said during a 4.12 p.m. speech in Sandusky, Ohio.
Obama did not correct the claim, although he immediately revised it, by adding that “we weren’t favored.”
During the 2008 race, Obama raised $779 million. His GOP rival, Sen. John McCain, raised less than half as much, or $347 million.
In the Democratic primary, Obama raised $237 million, while his rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, raised $229 million.
This is a fun challenge. I listened to the Sandusky speech last night, and here's something else Obama said shortly after the "outspent in '08" stuff:
That first race that I ran as a state senator, Michelle and I, we were going around knocking on doors, passing out leaflets. Nobody gave us a shot. Everybody said, "Nobody can pronounce your name, how are you going to win?" (Laughter.) You don't come from a famous family. We couldn't afford to advertise on TV.
Which state Senate candidates advertise on TV in the Chicago media market? That’s just a bizarre story. This tale also obscures the little fact that Obama had no opponent in the 13th District when the primary election rolled around in March 1996, or in November. He successfully kept primary opponents (including the incumbent, Alice Palmer) off the ballot by challenging their signatures.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Obama has a truthtelling problem...
Submitted by journoprof on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 3:47pm.
Two observations:
1. The problem isn't limited to statements about being outspent. It's ubiquitous.
2. It will get worse as the campaign drags on...I know...mind-boggling.
Obama...
Submitted by GeneralAl on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 4:25pm.
Obama can't handle the truth!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
When your whole life and your
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 2:30pm.
When your whole life and your very existence has been a lie, then 'handling the truth' isn't even a consideration. This is why Boy Baraka can lie so easily and readily - it is all he has ever known. He talks his version of the TROOF to his advisers, the unions, and his handlers - because they all have the same agenda - and he doesn't have much friction with the StateRun Media either, so when he gets in front of a microphone, he reverts to his 'my word is the TROOF' form, and it just flows out of his big purple lips like diahrea............................
Barack Obama has a
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 3:49pm.
Barack Obama has a "truth-telling problem" about a great many things.
What a Shock!?!?
Submitted by paratisi on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 3:52pm.
ObamaTax, the Prevaricator-in-Chief.
I personally prefer the Taxer-in-Chief
but, whatever works for you. Pass it on ;0)
Is Munro a reporter or a partisan political opinion blogger?
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 4:12pm.
Additionally, as president, Obama has presided over $5 trillion in deficit spending that has boosted the national debt to $16 trillion. Compared to those sums, his $14 million expenditure during the 2004 Senate race is small.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/05/obama-rewrites-history-claims-he-had-l...
A preposterous non sequitur.
Jer
Actually, Jer, It's Cogent
Submitted by stratman on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 8:14pm.
Obama is not just a profligate spender of other people's money in campaigns, Obama is the nation's most prolific spender of other people's money before and after election of all times by a landslide. Oh, and he's a liar too.
Thanks for highlighting those facts. I glossed over them the first time.
Actually, strat, it is only marginally cogent
Submitted by Jer on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:02pm.
while barely relevant--and that's being generous--to the theme of the article. It is also an indisputably gratuitous, profoundly partisan swipe, redolent of journalism at its sloppiest.
Obama's spending record has been highlighted hundreds of times at this website alone. I doubt you've been disadvantaged by any lack of information on the subject.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by stratman on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:42pm.
The pedantic I can handle. It's the duplicative grammar that's worrisome. I blame Disqus. Bad mojo.
Pick your poison - either marginally cogent or barely relevant.
Jer's preferred poison seems to be ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 1:17am.
the excuse, defend, and support flavored Obama Kool-Aid on even numbered days of the month.
On the odd days of the month he swears off drinking altogether in the form of swearing he does not excuse, defend, or support Obama; rather , he calls him out, takes him to task, and castigates him unmercifully.
So he says, anyway.
MD
Well, MD,
Submitted by stratman on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:02pm.
Jer does have a PhD in building castles in the sky.
PhD, indeed, strat ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:14pm.
Pile it high, Democrat.
MD
Perfect, Matthew. :-)
Submitted by stratman on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:47pm.
Perfect, Matthew. :-)
Edit: Talk about coincidence, I just read an email from a friend who sent me this video.
strat ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 6:05pm.
Great video.
Sure do miss that fellow !
MD
I suspect Unsane's entry would be...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 1:45pm.
Partisan hack Democrat.
Jer
strat...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 2:05pm.
Fortunately I can handle the pedantic as well. [As evidence of same, two words: Matthew Dean]
Regarding duplicative grammar, stop worrying. I have always used "cogent" in this sense and therefore need not 'pick a poison'. To be honest, I was unaware of a secondary definition, viz., "pertinent" or "relevant" as provided in Merriam-Webster for example.
I hope that resolves any confusion.
Jer
Matthew is our alliteration
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 6:58pm.
Matthew is our alliteration master. If so inclined he could be Natty Matty laying down some dope tracks for the NB's crib and burning up Benjamins.
Translation: Matthew is a great guy who could make music so popular with NewsBusters members that he would be wealthy enough to light his cigars with $100 Dollar bills, but of course wouldn't do that because he is a Constitutionalist and wouldn't destroy currency pursuant to the law.
Thank you, strat,---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 7:41pm.
for a very nice neutralizer to Jer's use of "pedantic" towards me as an obvious pejorative.
He of course misses the irony therein; as he himself flaunts a vocabulary of multi-syllabic words as though doing so is somehow not only different - but accomplished at a much higher plane of existence.
Must be that liberal sense of elitism.
It is to laugh.
MD
Tell the truth, md. Were you able to keep a straight face
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:16pm.
while following up your dismissive tripe about liberal elitism with the ludicrously stilted "It is to laugh"?
Do human beings really talk like that?
Jer
Well, Jer, it sure as hell doesn't sound any worse than ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:54pm.
" --dismissive tripe about liberal elitism with the ludicrously stilted --"
Do barristers really talk like that?
MD
Gag. Admit it, strat...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:06pm.
You're actually hoping Dean will slide a few pristine C-notes in your direction to remunerate your shameless flattery.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 8:29pm.
I also accept bearer bonds and precious gems and metals. Homemade pies, beef, lamb, chicken, seafood, firearms and ammo are also suitable barter.
Which is why no one directs any shameless flattery ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:08pm.
at Jer - he can only pay off with diatribes against the zippered weasel, the Rush of Limbaugh, and the tapes of Breitbart.
He will, though, if one is seeking a typed purgative for either end of the alimentary canal, regale one with tales of his ability to call out Obama for imaginary faults, bestow conservatism on Joe Scarborough, and build up Fareed Zachariah's (or Zakaria's) chops as an astoundingly resolute and intrepid scholar.
MD
strat...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:15pm.
How about my signed 1963 vintage autographed pics of Hubert Humphrey, Stuart Symington, Abe Ribicoff, Barry Goldwater, and V-P LBJ [all suitable for framing]--plus a virtually untouched copy of My Life by Bill Clinton--in return for 90 days of free med care for my family. This priceless political memorabilia can be passed down and treasured through generations of the strat family,while your reciprocal obligations will be fully satisfied in three short months.
And, what the hell, I'll make and toss in your favorite pie to sweeten the deal.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:40pm.
Let's start with the pie, forget the rest, and then we can talk turkey.
One problem for me is if you have medical insurance - bartering or freebie medical care might constitute fraud. One problem for you is who knows what legal quicksand you might get caught up in for obtaining care outside your network.
You know your cousins in medical law have gone to great lengths to figure out all the ways of screwing the patient over, with contingencies for contingencies, if the fine print is not followed.
Q: What kind of law did you practice, Jer?
strat..
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 10:03pm.
bringing doctors to their knees.
No, I had good relations with the medical community. Business practice, creditors rights, contracts, corporate documents and agreements, drafting legal briefs, some litigation...wish I had done more of it and had developed a greater comfort level in court. I was generally pretty good with juries.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by stratman on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 11:35pm.
Sounds like a good career.
But... Creditor Rights? Weren't you in favor of Obama's handling of GM, which included stripping the rights of creditors?
In the mortal words of The Vet -- I iz confuzed.
Obama's record needs to be
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:08pm.
Obama's record needs to be told loudly and often. It can never be enough.
Actually Jer,
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 2:16am.
I'm thinking of making the 0's profligate spending record my tag line.
At least while tag lines exist. :)
(I do so love the one I have now though).
Do you love it as much as Ted's recent favorable
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 9:23pm.
musings about the Confederacy?
Jer
You need to start your own blog, Jer
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 11:49am.
You need to start your own anit-bias blog, Jer. You can call it "RepubBusters."
By the way, speaking of non sequiturs, what does this have to do with Obama's, ahh, misstatements? Is Munroe right or wrong with his conclusions about the dishonesty of Obama's own statements? Oh, wait, if you can't attack the conclusions, attack the person who made them, correct?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Lies
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 4:43pm.
Criticize Bush however you want, but I do not EVER remember him just lying, lying, lying. Not EVER.
Obama seems to lie with every other breath, and doesn't seem to care if it's just flat out obvious. His mental illness, and I am sure he has at least one, must just block the truth from his mind all the time.
The entire Obama story is a
Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 5:33pm.
The entire Obama story is a fictional movie about a US president, entirely produced by the MSM.
The lead character in this fictional movie, played by Barry Soetoro, creates a web of lies in his own autobiography, promises what he will not or cannot deliver so people will support him, lies about his social security number, jobs and life experiences, and creates odd behaving composite "girl friends" to move the story along.
It's initially a well executed script, written by long term writer of fiction, David Axelrod. Indeed, Mr. Soetoro is elected President of the United States. But by the the last half of the movie people were leaving the theater and complaining of inconsistencies in the plot line, increasingly desperate scenes and over the top dialog by the main character, Mr. Soetoro. "This is a completely stupid movie," according to one person leaving the theater in disgust.
By the end of the movie, there were only a handful of people in the audience, all from the MSM, and all of whom were drinking a blue liquid from paper cups.
This movie reviewer gives the movie 19 pinocchios.
19 Pinnocchios!!!!
Submitted by Blonde on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 5:45pm.
LOL.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I give it....
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 6:14pm.
two thumbs up in a circle!!
Thank you! I give credit to
Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:17pm.
Thank you! I give credit to my parents, my agent, and the guy down the street who keeps getting my name wrong. ;+}
J... I have a drawer full of
Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:15pm.
J... I have a drawer full of them with Obama's name on them. ;+}
Cajun has a question*
Submitted by cajun2 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:50pm.
If GWB was to blame for all of Obama's woes of his first four years and if he is re-elected, who is he going to blame for the "last" four years?
Mitt, Rush, Levin
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:52pm.
Beck, Fox news, and it will still be a little bit of Bush's fault.
Mitt Romney
Submitted by Blonde on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:12am.
....or maybe Felix the Cat.
I'm not sure yet. Stay tuned.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Hmmm, good question. No doubt
Submitted by celator on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:36am.
Hmmm, good question. No doubt Mitt Romney, for what he might have done in the last four years? Sort of a future past pluperfect tactic.;+}
Maybe Millard Filmore if it works with the MSM.
sorry celator*
Submitted by cajun2 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:48pm.
I thought you meant Mallard Filmore
http://www.mallardfillmoreonline.com/uploads/1/2/0/6/12065635/4325060_or...
Caj... LOL, very good. I give
Submitted by celator on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 3:02pm.
Caj... LOL, very good. I give it four quacks.
Munro needs to be fact checked.
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:18pm.
Munro, himself, needs to be fact checked, for his comparisons are invalid. He's comparing receipts and not expenditures. He's not telling us how much Obama actually spent in he various campaigns, only how much he received, so how can he claim that Obama isn't being truthful in stating that he was outspent? Nothing Monroe has shown can substantiate the claim that Obama is, well, untruthful.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Coming from Illinois, it's my
Submitted by dmntd1 on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:21pm.
Coming from Illinois, it's my belief that Pres. Obama has never run in a fully opposed election before. This will be his first. He's succeeded in running off his main contestants via cheap tricks, media outings and challenges to signatures. Even his most recent election, to the Presidency, had more focus spent on his challengers running mate, Sarah Palin, than on himself. It's for this reason that Mitt Romney MUST choose a stellar running mate, with clean shorts, shoes and no skeletons lurking. Won't help too much, however, when the Chicago Machine starts putting fake stories out there (much like I believe they did with Herman Cain and the sexual harassment suits).
We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.