Ellen DeGeneres Hosts Little Redhead Who Says He Wants Obama to Win Because Gay Marriage Is 'Right'
Funny things that little kids say is one part of the mix of the Ellen DeGeneres show. On Thursday, she brought on young Rainer Muuss and his even younger brother Atticus to discuss presidential history. Rainer knows more about presidents than your usual kindergartner. Atticus was just on to be cute. He really loves President Martin Van Buren -- for the sideburns.
But Ellen's favorite part was undoubtedly young Rainer expressing his hope that Barack Obama wins re-election because Obama "said that men and men can marry each other and woman and woman can marry each other and I think that’s right." Thunderous applause and approval from DeGeneres followed. "I really like you," she said to laughs: (video and transcript below)
DeGENERES: What’s going on in this election year?
RAINER: Well, Barack Obama’s – I think Barack Obama should win. (Pause, then whooping applause)
DeGENERES: People agree with you there. Instead of Mitt Romney? And why do you say that?
RAINER: Because – um, ah – well, Barack Obama said that men and men can marry each other and woman and woman can marry each other and I think that’s right. (Whooping applause)
DeGENERES: I really like you. (Laughter)
Rainer and Atticus are liberally raised by their literary parents Matt Pasca and Terri Muuss. (The little fact they use their mother's surname signals the feminism.) Muuss is a survivor of incest and travels with her own stage show called "Anatomy of a Doll." She touts herself as "an actor, poet, teacher, director, and social worker." Rainer's recitation of liberal mantras also came out in this section:
DeGENERES: Who is your favorite president, Rainer?
RAINER: My favorite president is John F. Kennedy because he gave people hope.
DeGENERES: Yes, he did.
Atticus touting Van Buren makes the whole show much more enjoyable. A social-media wave checking out Van Buren followed.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Gingers got no
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 8:27pm.
souls.
;)
I remember a while ago
Submitted by LinTaylor on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 8:38pm.
I remember a while ago talking about how the Libs were only a couple of steps away from waving doe-eyed puppies in front of the camera while they shilled for Obamacare, soaking the rich, climate change legislation, or whatever their current flavor of the month crusade was.
Well, it's not puppies, but it's close enough.
Excuse me a moment...
Submitted by DrSnakepriest on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:01pm.
*PUUUUUUKE*
Well, isn't that special.
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:04pm.
How desperate are libs that they bring out 5-year-olds to parrot what their parents teach them to say?
And what was Rainer's opinion on Obamacare? The Middle East? Keynesian economics? Oh, I'm sorry, they cover that first grade.
My 5-year-old grandson can name all 44 presidents, in order. That doesn't mean I'm going to him for an opinion on World War I or the Great Depression.
Your grandson impresses me
Submitted by misterbee241 on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 12:15pm.
I get lost somewhere between Jefferson and Lincoln. I can usually pick it up again with FDR.
Hey, kids
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:11pm.
If you think the homosexual lobby only wants same sex, get ready for something REALLY "right." You and animals are next when they legally redefine the words, "consenting" and "adult." It may not happen in time for you two to find out what man-on-man love is like, but maybe your kids will know that "love."
And shows like Ellen, Today, Okrah and such are just the way it will happen. We'll see the exceptions of society portrayed in a fuzzy-lensed, psycho-babble, honey-dripping light. Finally there will be several kids and their NAMBLA "friends" and a few cute animals on a show to prove just how "right" it is for the new consenting adults to be able to practice their "love".
Phil I bring up this idea
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:20pm.
Phil I bring up this idea "You and animals are next when they legally redefine the words, "consenting" and "adult." and am regulary pillaried for such talk. I then point out that homos were criminal and a psychological disorder a few years ago.
Phil and Dan
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:24pm.
Yep, we always get the "well kids and animals can't consent". They'll just keep lowering the age of consent for kids. And I still believe homosexuality is a psychological disorder.
Kids can get abortions, which
Submitted by MrSnuggles on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:30pm.
Kids can get abortions, which means kids can have sex, so why cant kids have sex with adults of the same gender? It really is not that far of a stretch and it will be on the agenda sooner or later.
Is there any depth that they won't sink to?
Submitted by TempusFugit on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:13pm.
That's right. Use kids to spread your propaganda. If Ear Leader wins another term, don't be surprised to see an Obama Youth Corps spring up. Of course, then they'll have to officially change the pronunciation to "corpse"
If kids are so "wise" that we need to listen to them
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:21pm.
why is MO trying so hard to indoctrinate them into eating correctly?
Kids that age don't know Jack about anything. The fact that they are putting them out there to disseminate propaganda is another sign of the desperation of the left.
One problem--children that age lack the ability to form complex
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:32pm.
judgments and especially those that impact their own lives. That is one very simple reason why minors have no authority to enter into contracts, consent to sex, receive a license to practice a profession (in most jurisdictions) or to own significant financial or physical assets that require contractual arrangements.
The video of those two tells me that phraseology was rehearsed and drilled into them, precisely in the manner of false memories and other conditioning techniques. Children are highly susceptible to this kind of conditioning because they have no innate self-defenses borne except those which nature provided by instinct and not those built of emotional maturity. They were coached, and anyone who thinks those answers were spontaneous probably would be interested in purchasing that bridge connecting Lower Manhattan with Brooklyn.
Reminds Me
Submitted by truemidwest on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:44pm.
of that CBS so-called "reality" show a few years back,where they took kids off supposedly with no "adults" around and let them set up a "society" by themselves,then had the phoney "interviews" with the individual contestants,ala "Survivor" and its ilk. The way the kids aped adults in those segments,led me to nickname the show "Lord of the Flies-the Series".Don't remember what the actual name of the show was,and I don't really care...I thoroughly detest any and all reality shows! But anyhow,I digress...my point being that these kids on Ellen Degenreate's show are just as unauthentic as those on that CBS show!
truemidwest
Q: What is marriage for? Kid:
Submitted by redfish on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:48pm.
Q: What is marriage for?
Kid: Its when two people really love each other and want to be together.
Q: Who told you that?
Kid: My parents, my teachers, my tv set.
the name of show
Submitted by dmacleo on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:16pm.
was CBS Evening news.... :)
Little Rainier loves his kitty kat...
Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 9:47pm.
....I mean he REALLY loves his kitty kat and he knows that President Baracko understands the depth of feeling he has for his kitty kat....
Find out what they really want.
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:19pm.
Scenario............Allow same-sex couples all privileges of every married couple - taxes, hospital visitation, etc etc. Every single thing...........except, don't call it marriage. Give it another name, but have that word be the ONLY thing that won't apply.
Many will say that's what they want. Many will say no, it can only be equal treatment if it's also called marriage.
So, aside from gay marriage, everyone wants equal treatment of men and women correct? Sounds noble. So we need to eliminate one of the words..........man, or woman. Everyone needs to be called one or the other.
Greg
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:29pm.
Many states allow civil unions, which would give the same civil rights to gays. Now that they have that, it's not good enough. Now gays want marriage. Why? I think because they want to attack churches that refuse to marry them. It's another route to destroying religion and the family.
and they want the power of
Submitted by MrSnuggles on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:33pm.
and they want the power of the state to enforce their views onto our kids via public schools.
Good point.
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:41pm.
You're right, many states do have civil unions already.
Marriage is historically a religious institution, not a government one. Government exists to protect the society and the direction is so chooses to move, not to shape society and set the direction shape them. Yet government is being used as the tool to shape and direct this issue. People act like all the government benefits of marriage are what defines marriage and makes it so.
You are right in that they want to attack churches that refuse to marry them, and if they can instead have government create laws to force the "right" they can cause more issues for churches. Though a church is not necessary for a marriage to legally happen. Even that fact isn't good enough.
When one really thinks about it, it's quite a militant push going on. Most people don't really think about it though.
I agree with Radical.
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 6:46am.
I've said before that once they get gay "marriage" the next step will be trying to force Churches to perform them.
I'm not saying it's the ultimate aim of the Left in general, but this push by the gay community fits right in with their agenda to push religion out of the public square altogether.
When that happens, the state replaces God as the final authority; there is no "right and wrong," only "legal and illegal."
And once something is "legal," no one has a right to oppose it.
Think about how many times has the Left said "Abortion is legal. Get over it."
Ok, officially CREEPY
Submitted by merly1 on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 10:21pm.
What's next ? Is she hosting the 5yo WaPo transgender prodigy?
Next week Ellen can bring
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 11:17pm.
Next week Ellen can bring back little Atticus, Rainer and the nice man from NAMBLA.
......
Submitted by Aubrey on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 8:19am.
uuugggghhhh
Awwwwww- ain't that the cutest and PC thing?
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 9:56am.
Yeah, like a five-year old came up with those "opinions" by himself. Kids like these perform for approval hoping what they say will get Mommy nodding and the promise of organic carob tofu fudge after their performance. Phony and shameless.
wait a minute
Submitted by misterbee241 on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 12:11pm.
The kids have the MOTHER's last name? Wow. So I guess ol' Matt is just a sperm donor who pays the bills. Then maybe not. Maybe Moma is the bread winner. She's clearly the boss of the family. I dont wonder the kids are screwed up at such a young age.
And isnt Ellen married to some woman already? So what's her beef?
Funny
Submitted by chiefpayne on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 2:49pm.
I seem to recall a PAST leader who USED little children to FURTHER his political ambitions...at the detriment of his country's people.
Fortunately, MOST Americans are WISER than that...at least 30 states worth!
Ah, gee,
Submitted by nolefan2 on Tue, 05/29/2012 - 3:25pm.
the things I miss by not watching "Ellen" and other liberal propaganda shows. Don't tell me that this little output wasn't planned from the start. I'm happy to say that prior to this article, I was not even aware of who the parents of these little future Obama Youth members were. I have to say that in Liberal Indoctrination 101, they get an A.
Nice
Submitted by feisty on Wed, 05/30/2012 - 10:05am.
There's no way a 5 year old comes out and says something like that -- he barely even knows what marriage is. And it was clear she fed him the question and he regurgitated the answer. He spoke like he was trying to recall something someone else said.
Very pathetic to use to little kids as campaign tools. These are sick people.