WashPost Columnist Sees Catholic Church As Very Conservative 'Authoritarian' Daddy vs. 'Moderate' Mommy
Don’t look for sophistication in The Washington Post’s coverage of the Catholic lawsuits against ObamaCare. Religion columnist Lisa Miller began on Saturday: “Mommy and daddy are fighting, and the anguished children don’t know where to turn.”
“A small group of very conservative bishops has hijacked the church, or at least the public voice of the church,” Miller complained. “The bishops are playing the role of the authoritarian father. In case after case, their message to the faithful is ‘Do it because I say so.’” Mommy, naturally, is represented as the people who support Obama or favor ongoing "dialogue" with Obama:
A much larger group of more moderate bishops has stayed mostly silent, fearful that to take a stand against the brethren would be to lay bare intramural fissures. They play the role of the silent and frustrated mother.
How does Miller know this? Did she undertake a poll of the Catholic bishops? As Brent Bozell explained in Saturday’s Post, every bishop is on record opposing the HHS mandate forcing the funding of contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilization procedures. Miller just presses ahead, assuming the majority is always with her and the other secular liberals who don’t believe in some afterlife where they might have to face some authoritarian minority named God:
Only one brave bishop has so far explained his refusal to sign on with the authoritarian minority. Like a parent who prefers to work on marital disagreements in private, rather than expose the kids to disharmony and force them to choose sides, Bishop Stephen Blaire of Stockton, Calif., told America magazine Tuesday that he wanted the bishops to do more consensus building.
The conservative fathers — whose motto is “Do what I say” — grew ever more enraged at the doubters and ever more punitive. They directed their ire at any and all rule-breakers: pro-choice Catholics who wanted to take Communion; nuns; Girl Scouts; and, finally, the president. The moderate mothers, meanwhile, continue to try to soothe their children into complacence.
But this dynamic is untenable, as any good family therapist will tell you. The real solution is, as Blaire suggests, for mommy and daddy to talk to each other and work it out. Or the kids will find a happier home someplace else.
It's not only silly, but just factually incorrect to take dogmatic liberal "Catholics" who wholeheartedly support abortion -- even for babies unintentionally born alive -- and favor every item of the homosexual revolution, and label them the "moderates" or the "doubters." Miller cannot comprehend that it can seem "authoritarian" to force taxpayers to support Planned Parenthood abortion mills and "authoritarian" to pressure people to shut up instead of speaking out against homosexuality. That's the agenda of the authoritarians at the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
Miller just assumes the Catholic "kids" hate to see "Mommy" and "Daddy" fight in the newspapers -- as if that isn't exactly what Miller is all about creating and stoking. She wants the liberals to fight harder, not make peace. Ultimately, she wants liberal Catholics to either fight or walk away:
In the middle, of course, are the kids, who love their parents and want them to get along — and hate, no matter where they stand on issues of sexual morality and religious liberty — to see their relatives in the headlines day after day. Some, like Hilary Mantel, the British author of “Wolf Hall” and, more lately, “Bring Up the Bodies,” simply leave the family and refuse to come back. “Nowadays,” she told the Telegraph, “the church is not an institution for respectable people.”
That is exactly the bed in which Lisa Miller lies. She wouldn't imagine quoting someone saying "the mosque is not an institution for respectable people." The Washington Post probably wouldn't even let that sentence see the printing press. Only one religion in America -- the Christian one -- is marred by "authoritarians."
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Uh oh, we've lost Lisa Miller
Submitted by KC Mulville on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 2:46pm.
Time for the Catholic Church to close shop, I guess.
It's become ever more clear that the Washington Post, along with the media in general, are so utterly clueless about religion (and the Catholic Church in particular) that anything they say can be dismissed. They have self-proclaimed themselves to be the referees of religious conversation, and yet time and time again, they've shown themselves to be referees who don't know the rules. The editor, Sally Quinn, is an agnostic ... she wants to be a referee, but she doesn't actually play the game.
Just because these people nominated themselves as experts doesn't mean they are.
Hey, KC....good to see you!!
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 3:25pm.
This is just more drivel from the WaPo's feature that should be called Dumping On Faith.
"Utterly clueless" indeed.
That never stops them from pronouncing judgment, however.
They're still waiting for the "next" Pope, who they hope will give the OK to married priests, women priests and gay "marriage."
I find that a pretty sexist
Submitted by redfish on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 2:55pm.
I find that a pretty sexist column.
Sheer idiocy. The WaPo has no
Submitted by rbosque on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 3:23pm.
Sheer idiocy. The WaPo has no clue what Catholics believe or even just the structure of the Church but they sure feel qualified to give unqualified opinions. You'd think they'd at least do a little research, but no. Shilling for Obama supercedes ANY desire to promote the truth.
At least Hilary Mantel has the courage of her convictions.
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 3:35pm.
Quasi-Catholics like Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and Maureen Dowd stubbornly insist on remaining.
I think they're just too insecure to change. Easier to stay where one is and complain.
Well, we now know what one of
Submitted by celator on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 3:41pm.
Well, we now know what one of the story lines the MSM will be pounding away at all week:
"Conservative Catholic Bishops Attempt To Bring Back Inquisition;
Reign of Terror May Begin Soon, Some Say"
Man, these pseudo journalists are so predictable it's pathetic.
Dead solid wrong!
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 3:52pm.
A small group of very conservative bishops has hijacked the church, or at least the public voice of the church,”
I notice she says nothing about a group of "moderates" who are willing to compromise and negotiate. Why? Because there are none!
As Brent Bozell pointed out in his letter to the editor, which was printed in her own paper (does she read her own paper?) every single bishop in the US is against this mandate.
If this is "Daddy and Mommy fighting"
Submitted by OhioHistorian on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 3:47pm.
If this is "Daddy and Mommy fighting", then here is what the argument is about.
Daddy: You went out and killed our baby???
Mommy: Nah, it was just a bunch of cells.
Daddy: Why didn't you just say "No" instead of having sex if you didn't want another baby?
Mommy: I like sex even when I can get pregnant. You know that natural family planning is called "Vatican Roulette". Besides, I would have to take my temperature and check my mucus and keep records and all that hard stuff. Popping a Class I carcinogen pill is much easier, and I don't have to say "No" to getting my rocks off. Besides, I now can get my contraceptives FREE thanks to President Obama.
Daddy: My medical care just went up 25 percent at work. My company mayhave to lay me off because their costs went up so much due to Federal mandates on FREE contraception, FREE mammograms, FREE scooters from Medicare, and other FREE stuff.
Mommy: So, if you lose your job President Obama will give you free medical care. It is part of the mandate, that if you can't afford it, you get it for free.
This is the argument with the "Conservative Daddy" and the "Moderate Mommy". Unfortunately, Mommy never took economics to learn that nothing is ever free, and never took Constitutional law to learn that you cannot force people to subsidize others in behavior you find objectionable. Next is free narcotics for addicts. Ain't Obama wonderful?
Thomas Alva Edison
Again, a barely Jewish person commenting on Christianity?
Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 6:41pm.
Why anyone would take her near-atheist viewpoint seriously is beyond description. She has zero background in Christianity other than being married to an Episcopalian. Even she doesn't describe her religion as being much stronger than a loyalty to a shampoo brand. For her, that might even be a step up in faith because it would force her to believe in something other than herself. It is one thing for her to be cynical about the things she has any personal knowledge of, but it is quite another for her to project her self-loathing and ignorance across an entire faith. If she picked up a bible, it would probably burn her skin as seen in some of the old Dracula movies.
No No No No!!!!!
Submitted by LaVallette on Mon, 05/28/2012 - 4:05am.
It is more like a father who loves his child and therefore guides and disciplines his children to understand and live up to certain moral and social/financial standards and responsibilities as against an over tolerant mother who thinks that discipline is a bad thing and gives way to her children every time and finishes up bringing up spoilt kids without any moral compass who believe that the world owes them a living and support for whatever they want to do, regardless of others and any commensurate responsibilities to society at large.
FMA: "Some, like Hilary Mantel, the British author of “Wolf Hall” and, more lately, “Bring Up the Bodies,” simply leave the family and refuse to come back. “Nowadays,” she told the Telegraph, “the church is not an institution for respectable people.” But the Catholic Church is not an institution for "respectable" people who think they are better than everybody else and are immaculate of any sin. It has never claimed , nor does it now, that it is the Church for, or of Saints. Rather it has always defined itself as a community of sinners striving and helping each other to achieve salvation As for the RESPECTABLE people: Jesus Christ himself anticipated them and had something to say about them: Look up the parable about the Pharisee and the tax collector praying at the same time in the synagogue, Luke 18, 9-14.