Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • Fareed Zakaria Howler: 'Obama’s World View is Rooted in American Exceptionalism'
  • Video: Brent Bozell Cautions Media Will Quickly Revert to Defending Obama, Attacking GOP Over Scandals
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'
  • Tea Partiers Confront Comcast CEO: Why Would a Conservative Want Their Money to Pay Al Sharpton's Salary?

NBC's Brian Williams Helps Ashley Judd Fight the 'Patriarchy'

By Tim Graham | April 12, 2012 | 13:46

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

On Wednesday night's edition of the poorly-performing prime-time show Rock Center, Brian Williams tried to rub some stardust on his ratings and strike a blow for feminism at the same time. He honored actress Ashley Judd for writing an outraged feminist essay about "patriarchy" on The Daily Beast because someone criticized her puffy face.

Williams supportively explained, "This week the 43-year-old actress wrote a bold, and at times angry essay on the Web, calling out our whole culture, the haters, the cheap shots, how easy it's become for everyone to pick apart someone else." He noted she accused the media of having a quote "nasty and misogynistic conversation at her expense about the way she looks," but he left out the rest of the feminist jargon.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

It's unfortunate that Hollywood gossips -- including those paid by NBC Universal -- love to chatter about which aging actress has undergone plastic surgery. It's often unconfirmed speculation, which doesn't fit the definition of "news." But on the Daily Beast -- to be precise, in a section titled "Sexy Beast" -- Judd uncorked a barrel of feminist rhetoric:

That women are joining in the ongoing disassembling of my appearance is salient. Patriarchy is not men. Patriarchy is a system in which both women and men participate. It privileges, inter alia, the interests of boys and men over the bodily integrity, autonomy, and dignity of girls and women. It is subtle, insidious, and never more dangerous than when women passionately deny that they themselves are engaging in it. This abnormal obsession with women’s faces and bodies has become so normal that we (I include myself at times—I absolutely fall for it still) have internalized patriarchy almost seamlessly. We are unable at times to identify ourselves as our own denigrating abusers, or as abusing other girls and women.

Women should be valued as much more than their appearance. Then comes the big "but" -- but Ashley Judd has made millions of dollars starring in movies precisely because of our "patriarchy" of men and women appreciating her appearance and wanting to see it on the big screen. How many much more "normal-looking" women have never been considered to star in all the roles that Judd has won.

But Williams offered Judd a big red carpet to publicize her "inter alia" patriarchy diatribe. If you think he'd let a less famous, less attractive actress do that, you don't know much about the "news" business. (Williams also promoted Judd with an "In Their Own Words" clip on NBC Nightly News.)

This is how the Judd piece on Sexy Beast began: "The Conversation about women’s bodies exists largely outside of us, while it is also directed at (and marketed to) us, and used to define and control us. The Conversation about women happens everywhere, publicly and privately. We are described and detailed, our faces and bodies analyzed and picked apart, our worth ascertained and ascribed based on the reduction of personhood to simple physical objectification. Our voices, our personhood, our potential, and our accomplishments are regularly minimized and muted."

This is how it ended, with talk of "heteronormative" narratives: "If this conversation about me is going to be had, I will do my part to insist that it is a feminist one, because it has been misogynistic from the start. Who makes the fantastic leap from being sick, or gaining some weight over the winter, to a conclusion of plastic surgery? Our culture, that’s who. The insanity has to stop, because as focused on me as it appears to have been, it is about all girls and women. In fact, it’s about boys and men, too, who are equally objectified and ridiculed, according to heteronormative definitions of masculinity that deny the full and dynamic range of their personhood. It affects each and every one of us, in multiple and nefarious ways: our self-image, how we show up in our relationships and at work, our sense of our worth, value, and potential as human beings. Join in—and help change—the Conversation."

Williams closed out his Judd promotion with this line: "Our thanks to the actress and activist and now essayist Ashley Judd."

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Ashley Judd
  • NBC
  • Celebrities
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Errrr Uhhhh!!

Submitted by Samaritan01 on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 1:53pm.

Wasn't her critic a leftist media personality?

  • Login to post comments

Patriarchy

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 1:56pm.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

  • Login to post comments

Thats preposterous...

Submitted by Sude23 on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 9:07pm.

Thats preposterous...

  • Login to post comments

➚Thank you Sude

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 9:35pm.

And just like "gruntled" is a derivative of its prefixed sister, so is "posterous".

  • Login to post comments

"It privileges, inter alia,

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:18pm.

"It privileges, inter alia, the interests of boys and men over the bodily integrity, autonomy, and dignity of girls and women."

Women care more about how they, how they're dressed, etc., look than men do. This has nothing to do with the interests of boys and men.

Men are also equally objective and ridiculed, but what does that have to do with *patriarchy* and moreover heteronormative definitions of masculinity? One of the standards by which men have been ridiculed is women's standards of attractiveness for men, who end up wanting men to look "boyish" which is also in agreement with whatever "gay" standards for masculinity there are. For example, when men grow a beard its seen as a big deal. A man growing a beard is like a women not wearing makeup.

Not to mention the fuss over Santorum's sweater vests. Like Scarlett Johansson making fun of him by saying her "dad wears sweater vests".

The media's attention to looks comes from the fashion industry, which is largely catered to women, and based on standards of glamour that are inculcated in a very liberal culture. Looking "too conservative" is considered unfashionable and boring.

Ms. Judd needs to get out of the feminist box she placed herself in.

  • Login to post comments

Says the woman who owes her

Submitted by forest on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 1:59pm.

Says the woman who owes her lucrative career mostly to her looks.

And judging by her writing style and vocabulary, I'd say she's earned herself enough money and free time to take some sophomore level college classes. So good on her for her continuing indoctrination and non-heteronormative personhood autonomy.

  • Login to post comments

She graduated from UK

Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:03pm.

....school of rioting students after a recent basketball victory.

Poor little Ashley got caught with her face looking uber-puffy after obvious collagen injections (check out the UK Daily Mail).....and became furious, blaming the ultra red and puffy to "steroids" to treat her sinuses.

I'm not buying it. Not the excuse, and certainly not her little feminist rant.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Holy Jeebus, not another "CONVERSATION".

Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:07pm.

If I see another print ad, hear a radio commercial or see a TV commercial about "starting a conversation" about ANYTHING, I'm gonna take someone out from a bell tower! Enough "conversations" already. Suck it up and move on with your life in the direction that you want Ashley. If you don't like how Hollywood works, don't play with that depraved group.

And while I'm ranting about commercials...is there some wisdom that I don't understand that requires that stupid yoga pose be in every other commercial?

  • Login to post comments

Liberals are

Submitted by misterbee241 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 9:55am.

all about conversation and dialogue. As long as they can dominate both.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

Sure, I'll join the Conversation: "Shut up and act."

Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:11pm.

And while you're at it, stop taunting little Brian with your "heteronormative" talk.

  • Login to post comments

"Then comes the big "but" --

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:12pm.

"Then comes the big "but" -- but Ashley Judd has made millions of dollars starring in movies precisely because of our "patriarchy" of men and women appreciating her appearance and wanting to see it on the big screen."

Talent has a little bit to do with it, too. Otherwise Christie Brinkley would've been a huge movie star, same with Cindy Crawford. And I imagine she'd argue that she became an actress because she loves acting, not because she knows she's attractive.

  • Login to post comments

I also think many people here

Submitted by BosTarus on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:23pm.

I also think many people here would agree with the central argument that she is making-that women in public are picked apart on completely superficial levels, when the conversation should be based on merit, not whether or not their face looks puffier this season.

Don't let the fact that she uses feminist lingo distract from the fact that she's making a valid point.

  • Login to post comments

I don't think women are

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:35pm.

I don't think women are specifically targeted over men. Many people say that the media focuses on the dress of women candidates for instance; but men candidates only get less comments on their dress, because most of them are able to stay within the box and dress in the same kind of suits. Whenever a male candidate goes out of that box, though, ie Santorum with sweater vests, or Lamar Alexander in plaid shirts, they get just as many comments. People also poke fun of men who are overweight, men who have facial hair, and so on,... Santorum looked like a little boy, Romney was stiff, fake and over-coiffed, Gingrich was too fat....

Its not just the lingo I don't agree with, I never agreed with the argument that our media culture was sexist. Superficial, yes, but not sexist.

  • Login to post comments

She was talking specifically

Submitted by BosTarus on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:37pm.

She was talking specifically about our celebrity culture-not so much politics... though you could argue that's superficial as well-but more in a different way than straight up looks.

She's complaining about how the appearance of (mostly female) celebrities is a popular topic of discussion, and typically in an extremely negative way.

She was reacting, specifically, to the critical response of her new show, "Missing", in which the quality of the show itself took a back seat to the discussion of how Ashley Judd looks "puffier" and so on.

  • Login to post comments

Yea, I don't know that

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:42pm.

Yea, I don't know that celebrity culture is particularly more biased more against women than men, any more than political reporting is. Following up on the point I was making, its hard to be "leading man" and have facial hair. David Letterman growing a big was a big story. There are specific women whose looks are focused on because they're chosen for their parts for their looks, while others like Kathy Bates don't get criticism, because they're chosen for other reasons. Ashley Judd fits into that category.

  • Login to post comments

Although the attention to

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:48pm.

Although the attention to Letterman was for the reason he grew his beard, along with Conan.

Just take one look at the magazines at the supermarket checkout counter. Way more coverage of women's looks than men.

  • Login to post comments

~Simple reason

Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:58pm.

The desire to be beautiful is hardwired into women. The desire to have a beautiful woman is hardwired into men. To dismiss those desires as superficial or having their derivation solely in 'culture', and act like there's something wrong with them is to dismiss one of the basic drives of both men and women.
It won't work.

Obama's WTF 2012 campaign slogan: "A dog in every pot"
  • Login to post comments

It is superficial to want a

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:06pm.

It is superficial to want a woman only because she's beautiful. Unless you're out trolling for a one-night stand, naturally.

  • Login to post comments

~Missed the point

Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:55pm.

Isolating the desire for a beautiful woman from all other reasons for wanting a woman is unhealthy, but desiring a beautiful woman is not. It's perfectly natural, as is a woman's desire to be beautiful. It's when you drop everything else just for that, that you go wrong.

The point is that the cultural obsession with appearances is an unbalanced response to a natural desire, not a cause.

Obama's WTF 2012 campaign slogan: "A dog in every pot"
  • Login to post comments

balboa

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:55pm.

Funny, I don't consider myself exceptionally superficial, as much as I put great emphasis on my woman being beautiful.

And I contend that the desire to be beautiful can be found in men as well.

- shy on beauty :)

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Good evening MrShy

Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:58pm.

Well said and it's nice to hear your voice, here and elswhere.

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

cocodrie

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 5:37pm.

Hey coco, thank you!

Sorry I'm not on here much except when I find openings in people's posts to be a narcissist. :p But I do reference NB a lot "elsewhere", like facebook, and I continue to lurk this place.

I also had a sucky connection for a long time, but I'm back in business, so look for more substantive posting by me again. :)

- lurking shy

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Ok Shy,

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 5:24pm.

I get the one with you hanging onto her ankle for dear life, but that rainbow tie has got to go! ;-)

  • Login to post comments

bkeyser

Submitted by MrShy on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 5:29pm.

"but that rainbow tie has got to go! ;-)"

For shame! To think, your posts I excerpted and quoted on my facebook wall just today, from the Atheists Darken DC thread.

I don't know what to say. And the general consensus has been positive of said tie. :)

- shy tie

Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent

 
  • Login to post comments

Well, Shy

Submitted by bkeyser on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 6:50pm.

given that my idea of a good looking tie is pretty much limited to this,consider my fashion even more conservative than my politics. Good to see you, bro!

  • Login to post comments

Like the tie, love my brother Shy, and gaze ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 8:11pm.

with delight at his lady.

And, of course, with respect and admiration at the Marine uniform, bk.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Back in the Victorian era,

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:44pm.

Back in the Victorian era, when we had a much more conservative culture -- not necessarily something we completely would want to go back to -- women weren't expected to be ultra-skinny, medium weights were considered normal, wearing a lot of makeup was considered trampish, etc., men wore beards and glasses. Less attention was focused on looks, and men paying too much attention to looks was considered "dandies" and women "quaintrelles." Dress was restricted, so it wasn't an entirely judgment-free culture, but in entirely different ways, you were expected to look "respectable." The change from then to now has a lot to do with an celebrity media driven by reporting on glamour, sex appeal, etc.,

  • Login to post comments

Victorian era?

Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:46pm.

Actually most eras!

But socieatal station was much more important than today - possibly a social trade-off?

Not sure why this quote came to mind other than it matches my point but it is not Victorian"

"Mr. Elton is a very good sort of man, and a very respectable vicar of Highbury, but not at all likely to make an imprudent match. He knows the value of a good income as well as any body. Elton may talk sentimentally, but he will act rationally. He is as well acquainted with his own claims, as you can be with Harriet's. He knows that he is a very handsome young man, and a great favourite wherever he goes; and from his general way of talking in unreserved moments, when there are only men present, I am convinced that he does not mean to throw himself away. I have heard him speak with great animation of a large family of young ladies that his sisters are intimate with, who have all twenty thousand pounds apiece."

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Well, Victorian, because

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:16pm.

Well, Victorian, because that's right before the culture started shifting to becoming more liberal.

You see it in the change in the use of corsets. Feminists will talk about how Victorians forced women to wear corsets and so on, but initially they were just used to shape the clothing and they weren't adjusted to for the women to have a tiny waist. They actually had much more lenient standards about weight back then. But as the culture started focusing more on sex, women started adjusting their corsets...

  • Login to post comments

Do you think if Brad Pitt

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:23pm.

Do you think if Brad Pitt started taking collagen injections, grew a huge beard, or started gaining weight, that nobody in the celebrity press would comment on it?

  • Login to post comments

Alec Baldwin isn't the slim hunky guy he used to be

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:39pm.

but I don't see the press picking him apart, and he still gets roles.

In Baldwin's case, his outside is starting to look like his insides.

Did Ashley Judd grow a beard? By the way, Pitt did grow a beard, but he's living with anorexia central so no one noticed.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Baldwin is the comedy

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:58pm.

Baldwin is the comedy business, usually cast as a loud-mouth, I don't think we'd ever see him in a leading man role, or that he was ever the same pretty-boy category as someone like Brad Pitt or George Clooney. There are plenty of heavier actresses who are cast in films also. Did Marlon Brando get picked on for his weight? Was Kirstie Alley really picked apart by the mainstream press? I remember more sympathy for her, and now she's on TV again.

  • Login to post comments

Kirstie Alley got slammed.

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:00pm.

Kirstie Alley got slammed. Baldwin got _some_ flack when he first put on all that weight. Remember, he used to be Jack Ryan, he was the lead in Heaven's Prisoners.

  • Login to post comments

Alley got slammed by the

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:11pm.

Alley got slammed by the tabloids, as I remember..b ut thats what the tabloids do.

  • Login to post comments

Baldwin started as a dramtic actor, and was

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:13pm.

a pretty boy. I know, before he made his political bent known and his youth he was quite the hottie.

Do I feel bad for Judd? Not really. It's no secret what Hollywood wants of women. Life isn't fair, she better learn to deal with it.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Actually, Baldwin started in the Soaps

Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 5:30pm.

LOL, Rad...he was on The Doctors for years, back when I was in high school.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

redfish

Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:34pm.

I do remember Brando getting slammed for his weight, but it was after his career was all but gone. He was in Tahiti and going through whatever that killing scandal was. I'm pretty sure he was a regular "fat joke" on the late night shows.

President Obama is a Muslim (from his own lips), Kenyan (read it from his publicist) a homosexual (read it on a news magazine cover) and a Socialist (I'm alive and can see it for myself)
  • Login to post comments

He should be picked apart...

Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:15pm.

solely for being an idiot, not because he's a lard-butt.

  • Login to post comments

Sorry, Bos

Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 2:57pm.

Being a celebrity IS her business.

And as such, she had no business going out in public looking the way she did. And then whining about it.

She was reacting, specifically, to the mean coverage she got at the UK Daily Mail concerning her puffy looks whilst travelling. Red and PUFFY. With a follow up a few days later, showing her newly puffed up face vis-a-vis her younger, slimmer cheeks.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Ashley has no clue

Submitted by misterbee241 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 9:59am.

She needs to go through what MGM put Judy Garland through. Ol' Louis B. Meyer had Garland on a regimen of diet pills and starvation diets because she said she was too fat. And he publicly said she was a property of his and/or MGM and would be treated as such. So until Ashley has to deal with something like that, she's just whistling in the dark. And all her feminist rhetoric is just that.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

WE need to see this for what

Submitted by bobtheman on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:10pm.

WE need to see this for what it is... yeah, maybe it's a legit subject, but it's also playing favor with women voters and NBCs effort to get them to trust a network that "cares so much" for womens issue's. After all, if you can trust a network that highlights and takes the lead in womens issue's, can't you also edit and persuade the narrative that the "Republican War on Women" is legit? America is being played to curry favor and link the moral high ground to Barak Obama campaign.

This is not about Ashely Judd. Do you really think NBC gives a rats ass about her? NO. They're using her and the subject to cynically suggest NBC has the bragging rights and moral high ground on womens issues. The playbook is obvious and women will swoon over Brian and believe anything he feeds them, which includes bias for the democrat ticket.

  • Login to post comments

That's not a concept

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:20pm.

That's not a concept exclusive to NBC. All networks try to find a way to get women viewers.

  • Login to post comments

Ashley is a

Submitted by misterbee241 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 10:01am.

property of NBC, that and nothing more. When she's used up, she'll be kicked out the door.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

Judd didn't complain when she got roles because of her looks.

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 3:41pm.

Maybe she should have become a brain surgeon. No one cares what their brain surgeon looks like.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Wasn't she arrested for

Submitted by ricklail on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:34pm.

Wasn't she arrested for shoplifting? Her sister turned out to be a drunk. Neither one of them is like their momma. They turned out to be trashy women.

A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
  • Login to post comments

No, that was her sister Big Winnie.

Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 4:57pm.

Ashley was the cattle rustler.

Claimed the heifers "broke in."

  • Login to post comments

How is Ashley trashy?

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 6:22pm.

How is Ashley trashy?

  • Login to post comments

Trashely Judd:

Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 6:32pm.

"women voting for McCain/Palin is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders."

  • Login to post comments

Yeah that doesn't prove

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 7:46pm.

Yeah that doesn't prove anything.

  • Login to post comments

➚ Much ado about nothing

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 8:36pm.

She still looks good. This reminds me of that lady last week who wrote the article about how so many people hated her because she's beautiful.

She wasn't ugly, but she wasn't Ashley Judd, either.

I think in both cases, but from different directions, the women are fishing for compliments.

  • Login to post comments

Bet she

Submitted by misterbee241 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 10:03am.

has a tramp stamp too.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

Really? Implying that my wife is a suicidal chicken is nothing?

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 10:04am.

YOU try it.

Just make sure you've tied up all your loose ends and have purchased a plot.

  • Login to post comments

Good morning SoL

Submitted by cocodrie on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 10:17am.

Problem is, to him trashy is someone who's been in the grave over two months.

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

Shows she's opinionated, but

Submitted by balboa on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 11:03am.

Shows she's opinionated, but not trashy.

  • Login to post comments

The tramp from TN...

Submitted by jdripper on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 7:27pm.

Judd has not had a box office hit in years. The last film she did she played her part nude for most of the film and it still lost money. When old liberal actresses begin to realize no one want to see them anymore the liberal press makes then into intellectuals.

Jack

 

  • Login to post comments

She's spent almost as much time nude in her films

Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 8:08pm.

as clothed. Never seemed to bother her that pics and videos were floating around. Now, she's upset with the "patriarchy" because unflattering pictures are out there? Much ado about nothing.

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Really? I can think of two

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 8:18pm.

Really? I can think of two movies where she had nude scenes.

  • Login to post comments

Well, that was the beginning of your problem,

Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 8:38pm.

the thinking part. There are 9 or 10 films listed on various sites that list her nude credits. Not to mention her flashing the papparazzi a few times.

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

If you say so.

Submitted by balboa on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 10:33pm.

If you say so.

  • Login to post comments

Let me rephrase that just a little bit

Submitted by misterbee241 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 10:04am.

When old liberal actresses begin to realize no one want to see them [naked] anymore the liberal press makes then into intellectuals.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

and..

Submitted by g55rumpy on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 6:27am.

the obama whitehouse (nbc`s buddy), pays women less than they do men. they care. yeah, right. my aunt fanny

  • Login to post comments

She's using some

Submitted by misterbee241 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 9:52am.

pretty big three and four syllable words there. She'd better be careful. Her head might explode.
I went back and read the whole thing. Does anybody think she has any clue as to what she is saying? Or is she just regurgitating something she heard or was told by some shrink? This is just so much off the wall psychobabble.

If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Bowling for Dollars....to Pay for Baby Deaths
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Media: Obama Down But Not Out
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use