WaPo: Arne Duncan Offered to Meet Matt Damon at the Airport Before Protest
Washington Post education columnist Valerie Strauss reported Monday that people in the Obama administration made several desperate attempts to lobby actor Matt Damon just before he spoke at last month's "Save Our Schools" rally in Washington D.C., blasting an emphasis on standardized tests and insisting he would never have become a movie star under that kind of education system.
Citing unnamed sources in sensitive spots, Strauss claimed "Duncan was willing to meet Damon at the airport when he flew into the Washington region and talk to him on the drive into the city, according to the sources. Damon declined all of the requests."
This the way Democrat politics work. Liberal actors parachuting in for protests get White House political officals and cabinet secretaries hovering for a chance to prevent any rumbles in the liberal media. The media was obviously pro-Obama enough that the Damon protests didn't attract network news coverage. The cable channels offered some buzz, including Larry O'Donnell on MSNBC on August 2 claiming "Matt Damon takes on the political myth of the incompetent public school teacher clinging to tenure and ruining education in America."
Strauss had more:
Damon flew to the teachers march on the day of the event from Vancouver, where he has been filming a movie called “Elysium.” He came at the request of his mother, Nancy Carlsson-Paige, a child development expert and professor at Lesley University in Cambridge, Mass., who was involved with the rally.
Damon refused to meet with administration officials before the march.
His criticism of Obama administration policy has clearly been on the White House’s radar.
Damon spoke out earlier this year on education reform. In a March interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan, he said President Obama had disappointed him on a number of issues and criticized an administration-encouraged initiative to link teacher evaluation to the standardized test scores of students. It’s a bad idea, and Damon said so.
Two months later, President Obama noted Damon’s dissent. In his comic address to the White House Correspondents dinner in May, Obama said:
“I’ve even let down my key core constituency: movie stars. Just the other day, Matt Damon -- I love Matt Damon, love the guy -- Matt Damon said he was disappointed in my performance. Well, Matt, I just saw ‘The Adjustment Bureau’ so...right back atcha, buddy.”
Fast forward to July. Leaders of the teachers march, who had tried for months through letters and blogposts to get the attention of the White House, were, on July 28, suddenly invited to a meeting with administration officials for the next day, the day before the march. The offer was declined, the leaders said, because they were busy with an education conference at American University and preparations for the rally. They asked if administration officials could meet with them after the march, but the answer was “no.”
The Post publicized the Damon protest on July 31 on page A4, which in classic Post fashion, was a rally of "public education advocates," not a bunch of lefties who thought Obama was too centrist:
The speakers included a long list of longtime education advocates and a few Hollywood celebrities whose mothers are teachers or public education advocates.
"The Daily Show's" Jon Stewart sent his support by jumbo-size screen rather than driving to the march because, he said, "the dog ate his car."
Actor Matt Damon elicited cheers when he commiserated with the crowd. "This has been a horrible decade for teachers," he said. "The next time you feel down or exhausted . . . please know there are millions of people behind you."
With that send-off, they marched off the lawn, up 17th Street and around the White House, many chanting, "Education under attack! What do we do? Stand up, fight back."
They also joked as they tested the microphones: "No testing, no testing, 1, 2, 3."
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Gee, that's too bad
Submitted by Lakewood Ed on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 8:14am.
"... insisting he would never have become a movie star under that kind of education system." "
No, he would have become something more useful to society.
I agree...
Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 3:40pm.
There are high school drop outs that are movie stars. All you have to do is look pretty and repeat memorized lines in a believable way. No education required.
I think Stone and Parker had Damon down pat in Team America, World Police when they had him as the buffoon that could only repeat his name like the Incredible Hulk. Damon is a bum.
What a letdown
Submitted by Ed Gregory on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 8:27am.
“I’ve even let down my key core constituency: movie stars. Just the other day, Matt Damon -- I love Matt Damon, love the guy -- Matt Damon said he was disappointed in my performance. Well, Matt, I just saw ‘The Adjustment Bureau’ so...right back atcha, buddy.”
Don't forget who else you've let down: your country, the people who voted for you, the world and so on. However, you've far exceeded my expectations. You're way worse than I ever thought possible. So you have that going for you, which is nice.
I find it interesting he compares his
Submitted by nonncom on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 4:28pm.
"performance" to that of a movie actor......very telling.... the thing I could never stand about obama from day one was.....he's a fake...he's pseudo-arrogant....he's a half black man who hates that he's not all white....and, unlike the black guys you work with every day, you have to be a racist if you disagree with him....talk about divorced from the real world....hey, asshole, wake up and smell the coffee....I don't care if you're pink with purple polka dots....I still disagree with your policies on the economy, the wars, jobs, spending, obamacare, the budget, or lack of one....Mom and Dad told me I could disagree with all of the above and it didn't make me a racist.....geez....
What does Damon know about public education?
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 8:33am.
Damon -- the son of a stockbroker and college professor -- didn't even attend public schools. He attended a private "alternative" school in Cambridge, MA.
I have no idea if his private education included standardized testing, but such means are absolutely necessary for public education for determining (a) student progress and (b) teacher effectiveness.
The teachers' unions have been against standardized testing for decades because they don't want a report card on the teachers. And it's not the good teachers that are concerned; it's unions protecting the employment of the bad teachers. No matter what they say about the education of children, the primary focus of teachers unions is to protect and enhance the employment of its members.
Standardized Testing...
Submitted by dvdaughtry on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 11:45am.
...would work if the kids were standardized. Facts are that some teachers get the bright kids. Some get the not so bright kids. Some get great parental involvement, while others get too much or not at all.
I'm all for weeding out poor instructors, but there is WAY to many variables to measure success by a template.
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
The standardized test is a
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 2:14pm.
The standardized test is a tool to not only gauge whether the student has learned concepts sufficiently. While random division of a population of students into subsets (classrooms run by teachers) decreases selection bias (stacking better or worse students in a single classroom), there are always other factors involved in student performance, such as teacher performance, home life, etc..
There is nothing wrong with utilizing standardized tests. Afterall, there should be a foundation of knowledge we should expect to be taught in schools and, hopefully, learned. What standardized tests may not tell is the reason for a student's performance. In this circumstance, the standardized test only highlights there is a problem which requires further investigation as to cause(s).
However, evaluation of teacher performance may be possible using comparative trends of student performance against peers in the same as well as different classrooms. If teachers were teaching equivalently then you would expect stratified peers of students to perform similarly for a given subject regardless of teacher. This concept holds true for singular students between classrooms as well for whole classrooms compared to other whole classrooms. Statistical analysis of these types of data may allow evaluation of teacher performance.
No one likes being judged, especially if the methods of evaluation are unfair. Great diligence is required in evaluating teachers not only because it is the right thing to do but also because there are outside factors for which teachers have no control over.
I think the money is on evaluating the student's life outside school, including American culture at large, and righting the mess Leftists have wrought since the end of WWII.
The standardized test is a
Submitted by dvdaughtry on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 3:32pm.
The standardized test is a tool to not only gauge whether the student has learned concepts sufficiently.
I don't disagree, but what else were you going to say the standardized tests do?
There is nothing wrong with utilizing standardized tests.
Again, I don't disagree. However, something needs to be accounted for the teachers that have autistic kids, problem kids, and even dumb kids all in the same class (our public school district calls that "inclusion").
No one likes being judged, especially if the methods of evaluation are unfair. Great diligence is required in evaluating teachers not only because it is the right thing to do but also because there are outside factors for which teachers have no control over.
I think the money is on evaluating the student's life outside school, including American culture at large, and righting the mess Leftists have wrought since the end of WWII.
Yes, teachers need to be evaluated like every other employee. However, standardized testing cannot address the point made in these last couple thoughts. There has to be something more.
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
The standardized test is a
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 5:57pm.
This is what happens when I don't proof read. Sloppy! I think I was going to add something about the test being used to decide if a student required remediation before advancing to the next grade level.
I agree with your point that the tests should not soley be used to evaluate teachers because of extrinsic factors not under control of the teacher. Standardized test can be used in the evaluation of a teacher in the manner I wrote. As DrSam wrote below, the tests need to be evaluated and modified continuously to decrease introduction of error in the resultant data. It's not perfect, but it is a valid component of evaluation, though other extrinsic factors should be incorporated in the complete evaluation.
The Leftist managed erosion of American society/culture is gasoline for the firestorm of destruction of the family unit and traditional values. The soft bigotry of lowered expectations for certain minorities is one societal Molotov cocktail of the Left. Another would be revamping curricula to promote Leftist ideology rather than accuracy. That more students fail today than in past years is in part a measure of the Leftisit ideological teachings which reinforces the societal malaise in children who then grow up to pass it along to their children. It is a destructive cycle, but not one unexpected, as this was the Left's reason for infiltrating academia in the first place - indoctrination for a bloodless revolution.
Good write up, Strat.
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 3:36pm.
I would add that the majority of standardized tests are validated continuously as questions are changed and as to adjust for popular idiom and language. This goes from the educational tests like ACT, SAT, Iowa, etc., to other psychometric instruments used for diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of various mental illnesses and quality of life instruments for new therapies. As you probably know, the re-validation process is as arduous and rigorous as the original validation process.
Thanks, Sam. Speaking of
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 6:14pm.
Thanks, Sam.
Speaking of psychometric testing... at one time I entertained the idea of practicing in Nevada. The health care entity in Las Vegas required physicians to take an online psychometric test before being granted an interview.
I passed the test but passed on the job.
Seriously? Was it a personality inventory?
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 6:33pm.
I don't put much stock in tests like the MMPI or the four-dimensional tests (introvert, extrovert, etc.). I have found limited utility in tests of that type because most individuals are not very honest with them. Either the test subject is trying to bend their answers to their expectation of the researcher administering the test or to the individual's perception of what the "right" answer is.
Check your Inbox.
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 9:24pm.
Check your Inbox.
Great post Galvanic
Submitted by telecaster on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 12:26pm.
Besides the absolute truth contained in your post........Damon makes a great show of being a kind of disaffected actor/intellectual/social/political crusader but he learned most of his "alternative" chops and distortions from people like Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky. Yeah, he's compelling when he can read his spontaneous, witty zingers from a script (like his NSA diatribe in Good Will Hunting) but he's a spoiled primper who thinks it's cool to say "shitty" in front of his mother.
I'm pretty sure I could take him without too much trouble.
In your eye Obama. Barack
Submitted by Barack Must Go on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 8:58am.
In your eye Obama.
Barack still seems to struggle with that whole democracy vs. banana republic thingy.
We Are In Control! Do Not Doubt Us!
Submitted by neutron on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 9:06pm.
First the WH ignored the teachers, until they heard some star-power would attend the rally, then the WH really needed to meet them.
When rebuffed, the WH begged and pleaded and tried to hijack the star from attending and speaking at the rally.
"There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We can roll the image, make it flutter. We can change the focus to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear. We repeat: there is nothing wrong with your television set. You are about to participate in a great adventure. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the inner mind to... The Outer Limits."
— Opening narration – The Control Voice – 1960s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Outer_Limits_%281963_TV_series%29
Matt Damon has a baby face, so when he shaves his head
Submitted by Lipton on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 9:04am.
he looks like a giant baby.
Where are all the alpha males?
It is not myth. Incompetent
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 9:36am.
It is not myth. Incompetent public school teachers clinging to tenure and ruining education in America is a well-documented fact the liberal MSM and the NEA wish would be forgotten.
You gotta love Obama's reply
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 9:54am.
"right back atcha, buddy". This is the way a leader takes criticism?
The president is just a very
Submitted by redmike on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 10:41am.
The president is just a very small man. That was so petty.
hb, that is what I thought!
Submitted by inquiringmind on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 10:23am.
hb, that is what I thought! Wow Obama, can't take a little criticism from you friends.
In addition, all Matt was doing was making another movie. He wasn't affecting the lives of millions in the US and around the world with his policies!
"....the Obama administration....."
Submitted by almostacowboy on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 10:47am.
".....made several desperate attempts...."
That will be Maobama's legacy.
"several desperate attempts" - sounds familiar
Submitted by Agnostic on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 11:49am.
President Obama has already lamented on the separation and limitation of power and he is coming face to face with the limitation of time because he wasn't elected President for Life except by the media. Since we are about to be inundated with calls for giving Obama's administration more time to complete their wonderful work I though I would look up another list of "several desperate attempts": (my comments are over simplifications)
Yan'an Rectification Movement (promotion of 'struggle' - shared sacrifice)
Land reform (anti-big farming and giving to the 'oppressed' farmers - giving money to more black farming families than existed)
Campaign to Suppress Counterrevolutionaries (media suppression of opposition and their ideas)
Three-Anti/Five-Anti campaigns (the attack against big-business as corrupt and propping up of the state as the protector.
Withdraw from the sects movements (denouncement against societies (TEA Party) and religious groups)
Sufan movement (purging of opposing political ideas - in this case often the purging of the person all together)
Hundred Flowers Campaign (Promotion of 'elitist' ideas - until of course it is realized that Socialism doesn't work then the 'Elitist' are attacked themselves.)
Anti-Rightist Movement (purge critics - the once 'elitist' socialist are now knows from the previous campaign and can now be purged because some realized that the failed ideas of Socialism that were so brilliant in the past do not work)
Great Leap Forward (Economic reformation that ends up having the opposite effect)
Four Pests Campaign (blaming failures on pest - taking action - creating bigger failures)
Socialist Education Movement (no one must question the state, Communism or the leader)
Learn from Comrade Lei Feng (Would work well with a president who wanted to establish a 'voluntary' group of citizens that was as well equipped and funded as the military.
Down to the Countryside Movement (EPA and various environmental groups have this well in hand)
What about the students?
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 11:04am.
Horrible decade for teachers? How about the last 50 years and how horrible it's been for students? You do know, Matt, that America long ago lost it's spot at number 1 in education after liberal policies went into use country wide?
Please...don't let a bunch of facts
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 12:57pm.
interfere with a good script (not that Damon is terribly familiar with "good scripts").
The O'bozo administration is
Submitted by jdhawk on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 11:04am.
The O'bozo administration is busy as I write this dismantling, "No Child Left Behind." That includes linking testing results to teacher evalutions.
Meanwhile, there is something all of you can do and it will only take a few minutes of your time. Go to www.studentsfirst.org and sign the petition sending e-mails to the WH and a number of key admininstration officials that have as their purview education.
The above organization is headed up by Michelle Rhee. She is the one that got fired for actually firing teachers that were incompetent and closing down failing schools in the D.C. school district. She was fired for doing her job too well. She should be the Secretary of Education not that moron we have in charge now.
What's really wrong with education?
Submitted by Iron Zerg on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 11:23am.
Fact: One bad parent > One hundred great teachers
When people ask, "What's wrong with our education system?" they're looking at the wrong things.
The government can't create jobs. Nor can it legislate learning. If you're a parent, and you're relying 100% on the government to educate your child, you're making an enourmous mistake.
Frankly, I feel like I do a pretty large percentage of the
Submitted by Lipton on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 11:37am.
teaching of my child, but I didn't know I would still be homeschooling despite sending him to public school?
Damon is looking back fondly
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 2:18pm.
Damon is looking back fondly on the days when teachers didn't have to teach kids anything at all. I guess Damon fears that if his teachers taught him out to take a test then maybe that would have stimulated his 7 brain cells and caused him to take a low-wage job outside the intellectually bankrupt industry of playing make-believe.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
Does Matt send his own kids to public or private schools?
Submitted by drsamherman on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 3:39pm.
Matt Damon is another limousine denizen who bemoans the introduction of responsibility and accountability in public education, yet probably sends his own kids to private school.
If his kids were going to PS 108 or Garfield Middle School or Malibu High, it would be one thing. If his kids are in private school, at the very least it is hypocritical for him to whine about public education when he has no vested interest in it.