N.Y. Times (Sort of) Hails New 'Glee' Movie As 'Tutorial on Tolerance'
The New York Times was torn in reviewing the new move “Glee: The 3D Concert Movie.” The liberal paper felt forced to admire its LGBT sermonizing. The headline was “A Tutorial on Tolerance, with Beats and Upbeats.” But it’s also just a concert film and merchandising opportunity for a TV show, so critic Stephen Holden began by calling it a “carbonated, low-calorie, vitamin-packed high-energy drink that tastes like strawberry bubblegum.”
Somehow, this movie is an odd hybrid. The Times thinks it’s an offshoot of Disney’s “High School Musical” with a lot more gay propaganda in it. Holden said it sounded like “an infomercial,” especially on the front of cultural politics:
Its encouraging message - that "Glee" is good for you, especially if you're an outsider and feel different from the popular kids - is continually reiterated and culminates with a pounding choral rendition of Lady Gaga's "Born This Way."
Since one of the show's major characters, the ingenuous Kurt Hummel, is gay - as is Chris Colfer, the gifted 21-year-old performer playing him - "Glee" hammers home variations on the same message of reassurance and self-empowerment as the It Gets Better Project to combat lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender teenage suicides: Just screw up your courage, hang in there, be who you are and you will triumph.
The most outspoken Gleek testimonial is that of Trenton Thompson, a gay teenager who was dragged out of the closet in the eighth grade after his journal was stolen by a friend and put on the desk of his secret crush. Trenton credits Mr. Colfer's character for his determination to stand up for himself and be out and proud.
Holden wondered if this story (and others from a dwarf prom queen and a girl with Asperger’s syndrome) are real or “prefab fairy tales.” But Holden seems to know how Ryan Murphy has turned his TV series into a relentless "It Gets Better” lecture, and yet somehow it still carries a “Disney ethos.” He must be focusing only on its commercial applications, not is sociopolitical ones:
Before "Glee: The 3D Concert Movie," there was "High School Musical" and its never-never land of mostly happy teenagers singing and dancing in the gym and engaging in smiley-faced rites of puppy love; before that there was "Fame." The insular "Glee" world of William McKinley High School is just as otherworldly as that of "High School Musical." The series, for all its little melodramas, evokes the same Disney ethos in which every quirk is an opportunity for self-branding, often on a T-shirt.
The Times had no concern that the young children that love the musical energy of "Glee" might be too young for gay propaganda. But liberals never do.
No one would expect the Times to notice that “It Gets Better” organizer Dan Savage suggested the Republicans should die on the HBO show Real Time with Bill Maher in mid-July. The Times never did, even after Savage felt the need to apologize for it. Instead, just a month ago, the Times Magazine celebrated Savage as reminsicent of “a smart, tough old grandmother, randy yet stern. It’s Dr. Ruth if she were interested in bondage and threesomes.”
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
"A Tutorial on Tolerance"
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 8:30am.
An "infomercial." "Propaganda."
Yup, that's about what liberal Hollywood thinks a movie should be.
And mix it all into five pounds of sugar, to help the medicine go down.
Why do you hate gays so much?
Submitted by JackandMarilyn on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 9:09am.
Or is it the concern that young children who just love the show (which is on at 8pm, mind you) might get the wrong message--------gays exist! In real life too!
The Queerification of America, continues.
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 9:44am.
I could care less what queers do in the privacy of their bedrooms, just keep it private. That's all many of us want.
You could care less?
Submitted by JackandMarilyn on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:02am.
Could you care less about our Constitution too? You could move to Iran where you won't have to worry about seeing this crap on TV.
Non sequitur much?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:20am.
I advocate that all queers move to Iran.
See? Only in a tolerant Christian nation can queers live.
Or you could change the channel
Submitted by Boudin on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:33am.
But it wont change the fact that they are promoting a destructive and unhealthy lifestyle to very young impressionable people. Make no mistake, that is the objective.
Recruiting
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:40am.
Come on boys give it a try. It's not that bad. Only a real man can be a fag.
HA!
Submitted by JackandMarilyn on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 11:32am.
Good one.
You are kidding, right?
Submitted by Unsane on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 8:50pm.
That's hilarious. A Leftist who actually cares about the Constitution?
I think it is actually YOU who should go to Iran. Why? Because it is YOU who is enraged by people voicing opposition, which is not tolerated in Iran. You also selectively support free speech: you think the artist has unlimited free speech while the critic has no rights whatsoever, other than to SHUT UP.
Need help packing for Tehran?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Is that my tarot card reading?
Submitted by JackandMarilyn on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 12:30am.
That is hilarious! Ha! What's hilarious? Enraged by opposition? Ha! What's your point?
Interesting...
Submitted by Unsane on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 9:54pm.
Actually, I should be asking you what's YOUR point?
You are totally enraged that things like critics exist and that not everyone follows your point of view slavishly. Your vomiting on this thread provides ample evidence of this.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
The Wrong Message
Submitted by SamC on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 12:03pm.
My concern with this show is that there is an overwhelming presence of homosexual behavior being portrayed in every episode. Just the number of homosexual characters they have on the show is blatantly overstated and over emphasized - not true to reality. I mean, is it really possible that 20% of my child's schoolmates are gay? I find that very hard to believe.
In that they are gearing this show towards early teens, it sends a very confusing message to impressionable kids who are trying to find their way to 'fit in' socially.
It's almost like a weekly propaganda film for new gay recruits.
You watch the she that much?
Submitted by JackandMarilyn on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 12:34am.
I watched the first 5 minutes of the first episode and I realized, oh shitballs! I hate this show as much as I hated the drama kids in high school. If you're going to make a show about the not-cool kids, Freaks and Geeks is the way to go.
Unwatchable
Submitted by Unsane on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 9:56pm.
Both those shows are unwatchable. But more or less everything on TV is unwatchable, IMHO.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Today's talking points,
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:09am.
Gays exist!!! And they exist in the constitution, too.
But, thanks for admitting that Glee is crap, JaM.
movie's going to suck anyway?
Submitted by jon_torlin on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:20am.
I thought one of the actresses in the movie (Jane Lynch) said in one of the adverts that the movie's going to suck anyway.
-Jon
I like the tv show
Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:25am.
First season was better than the second season. Won't spend money to watch it in theater though.
The One Thing Not Tolerated is the Normal Mature Hetro Male
Submitted by Avitar on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:53am.
In fairness mature male were wiped from television the year Norman Lear got his first show on the network. Normal Women are pretty rare too. Most mature women onf television are sluts.
Glee is like a show built around a traveling circus. The people are entertaining but none will ever make a positive contribution to the communitees that they do business in. .
Glee makes a postive contribution
Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:57am.
.......to Fox's bottom line which is money in advertising dollars.
Yup. I trace it all back to Maude.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 10:59am.
Hey, my testicles just retreated when I said the M word.
Tolerance For Thee, But Not For Glee
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Sat, 08/13/2011 - 12:13pm.
Tolerance to the repressives is like bipartisan compromise is to dictators.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
You WILL be tolerant...or
Submitted by mattm on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 7:10pm.
You WILL be tolerant...or else!
Glee and the perception of gays
Submitted by Question_Assumptions on Sun, 08/14/2011 - 7:26pm.
Frankly, I think Glee does more to harm the perception of gays then help them by reinforcing negative stereotypes of gays. One character, a male teacher fired for having an interest in a male student, describes himself as a "predatory" gay in one episode. The main character Kurt is one of the worst narcissists on the show. Not only is he stereotypically effeminate and have a chip on his shoulder about religion but he, too, has been depicted as "predatory" with a creepy fixation on the heterosexual Finn. The lesbian character Santana is also depicted as nasty, narcissistic, and intent on preserving her relationship with the apparently bisexual Brittany, instead of letting Brittany have a heterosexual relationship with Artie. As for the actors, Jane Lynch, an open lesbian actress, portrays the most unpleasant and nasty character on the show and the character Jesse St. James, another cruel and narcissistic character was also played by a gay actor. The one decent and kind gay character, Kurt's boyfriend Blaine, is played by an actor who isn't gay. So how, exactly, is portraying gays and lesbians as narcissistic, nasty, and even sometimes even downright creepy and giving gay and lesbian actors roles that are narcissistic and nasty, if not psychopathic, supposed to help public perception of gays?