Lawrence O'Donnell Accuses Newsweek of Corrupt Deal for Sarah Palin 'Love Letter' Cover Story
On MSNBC’s The Last Word on Monday, host Lawrence O’Donnell suggested Newsweek magazine is not only failing badly at the newsstand, it’s allegedly making corrupt deals with Sarah Palin to boost its own flagging sales.
Without citing him by name, O’Donnell slammed Palin profiler Peter Boyer, a long-time favorite of Newsweek editor-in-chief Tina Brown, insisting he just sold his soul on this puff piece for the money.
As to why Newsweek decided to give Palin the softest treatment the lamestream media ever has, the answer actually lies at the end of the article, where Newsweek inadvertently confesses to the deal it obviously made to Palin for the cover, the flattering photography, and the puff piece.
"’The mainstream press is becoming less and less relevant,’ she said. Adding that she would have no hesitation in shunning media outlets she does not trust. ‘I would say no to those who have lied about me. There is no need to reward bad behavior. I`ve learned, you know, once bitten, twice shy. I have learned.’"
There’s Newsweek telling you that she would have no hesitation in shunning media outlets she does not trust. That means Newsweek had to make promises to her to get her trust. I have specifically avoided mention of the author of the Newsweek piece because he has done good work in the past and he surely will again and should not be known for this love letter to Sarah Palin.
But there’s a puzzle O’Donnell missed: if Palin were really using a “once bitten, twice shy” approach, why on Earth would she be granting access to Newsweek, who’s slammed her in several cover stories, including the controversial one with the cover photo borrowed from Runner’s World?
The segment’s introduction was amusing, as O’Donnell suggested Newsweek was a poor value and a collapsing business proposition, but then to him, so was Palin:
Time for tonight’s Rewrite. The once-noble "Newsweek" and now the fastest sinking ship on the newsstand, in a desperate attempt to boost newsstand sales of a five dollar magazine that is 68 pages long, 17 and a half of which are advertising, has put this lie on its cover this week. Sarah Palin`s lie, quote, "I can win" goes uncontested in Newsweek’s lengthy, adoring profile.
O'Donnell never has a problem when Newsweek is offering its long, adoring profiles to Barack or Michelle Obama. But Palin-boosting is corrupt, since it promotes the corrupt conservatives.
It’s awfully tiring to hear O’Donnell claim it’s a “lie” to predict a crystal-ball proposition. Is it a “lie” that O’Donnell promises that MSNBC’s job is to “lean forward”? O’Donnell then launched into a lecture on Palin’s current unpopularity, and then another lecture on how it was stupid to let Palin mourn about trying to “return to the governor’s chair after defeat on a national ticket. Michael Dukakis was the last to manage it in 1988.”
Most people would read that and think that Dukakis was the last governor to lose on a national ticket, but O’Donnell somehow thinks it incorrectly implies that “others have tried and failed” in between Palin and Dukakis, because “Newsweek does everything it can to make the madness of Sarah Palin seem reasonable.”
One could joke that Larry O'Donnell is now admitting that George W. Bush actually won in 2000 -- although he never did agree with the liberals and acknowledge defeat and go back to Austin.
O'Donnell claimed: “So another way of writing that sentence is the last sitting governor to lose on a presidential ticket had no problem managing the return to his governor's job. Such is the pathetic pro-Palin tilt that permeates this utterly absurdist piece.” O'Donnell knows who will "lose the future" and it is Palin:
Palin obviously negotiated and successfully demanded Newsweek's cover in order to cooperate with the magazine. "Newsweek" said she`s worthy of the cover because of, quote, "her standing as a possible presidential candidate with presumed front runner potential."
But, of course, as viewers of this program knows, Sarah Palin is never going to run for president or any other elective office. She has discovered the joys of the responsibility-free celebrity and the millions in income that are hers through deft management of that celebrity. Surely some at "Newsweek" are smart enough to know this and may have decided to go with the Palin cover because, with Michele Bachmann soaring in the polls, they are only days away from the utter irrelevance of Sarah Palin.
The all-knowing Larry O’Donnell has read every crystal ball about Palin’s future and can say that she can never win and will never run. (He clearly hasn't seen the Palin documentary "The Undefeated," where she's painted as Reagan's natural heir.) But after all of that bluster about how horrid and corrupt Newsweek is, guess what O’Donnell said seconds later as he went to commercial?
After saying Peter Boyer sold out for money, he added: “Speaking of the money, it turns out that this week's Newsweek is, for once, worth every penny of the five bucks it costs at the newsstand because of Carl Bernstein’s masterful article, ‘Murdoch's Watergate.’”
It's too bad O'Donnell didn't get an interview with Tina Brown, so he could show her his Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde routine in person.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Calumny
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:39pm.
Is there a law suit here? Wouldn't it be fun to see left on left violence?
______________________________________________________________________________
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
AAWWWW......
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:45pm.
Poor little laurie o'donnell... gonna throw a tantrum because someone else got the cover of newsweek other than his "man" Barack! I was expecting him to pull his dress over his head and scream about Barack being his god.. and that all should worship and adore Barack... laurie O'donnell.. just another Obama "Prison wife"
I said it before, Newsweak is
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:51pm.
I said it before, Newsweak is just resorting to capitalist measures to drum up business. Circling the drain and looking at the unemployment lines must be making the folks at Newsweak soil their undies.
Of course Socialist Larry the libturd cannot abide a company trying to make a profit.
Scoob
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:13pm.
You're probably right. It would be interesting to see what their sales were for this week.
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
As I wrote yesterday about the cover, sex sells
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:14pm.
To a degree, O'Donnell is correct. Newsweek must sell magazines, and Palin on the cover sells magazines, so it's a no brainer. Whatever they write inside the covers is superfluous.
O'DONNELL: "Sarah Palin`s lie, quote, "I can win" goes uncontested in Newsweek’s lengthy, adoring profile."
Not knowing what's in the article, I don't know how Newsweek addresses her quote. But she's won elections before, so why would her "I can win" quote be a lie?
Lies are when individuals or groups deny a fact that they know to be true. Anthony Weiner lied.
O'Donnell may be suffering from the same lustful syndrome that Maher and his ilk endure -- the conflict between sexual desire for Palin and the absolute disdain for her poitics.
Shame on Newsweek for putting business ahead of O'Donnell's preferences.
And what did O'Donnell think
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:01pm.
And what did O'Donnell think about the adoration, worship and messianic glory that the news mags lavished on Obama in '08?
Nevermind.
Lawrence O’Donnell IS
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:30pm.
Lawrence O’Donnell IS part of the lamestream media.
The irony is so thick whenever the liberals start throwing each other under the bus.
Speaking of Newsweek*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:14pm.
This may not be the thread but talking about money and pandering, thought you guys might find this interesting.
Scroll down to the end of the article and check out the list of this guys holdings. Veeeerrry interESting.
And of course we cant forget media holdings as well
But.....
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:33pm.
if Palin would agree to come on his show his ratings would skyrocket. But pity him, he can only talk about her in a desperate attempt to get some ratings.
Less than 100% negative
Submitted by rockyracoon on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:52pm.
Less than 100% negative reporting on anything regarding Sarah Palin is unacceptable.
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
Big deal, I accuse the lame
Submitted by jessieH on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 4:08pm.
Big deal, I accuse the lame stream media of making a corrupt deal with obama. The only difference is, I have proof.
OK...
Submitted by Brad90956 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:01pm.
"Time for tonight’s Rewrite. The once-noble "Newsweek" and now the fastest sinking ship on the newsstand, in a desperate attempt to boost newsstand sales of a five dollar magazine that is 68 pages long, 17 and a half of which are advertising..."
Time for tonight's Rewrite. The never-noble "MSNBC" and now the fastest sinking ship on TV, in a desperate attempt to boost ratings of a fledgling network that is 100% biased against conservatives, especially conservative women, will run continuous hit pieces on Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann...stay tuned.
Larry is projecting again
Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:11pm.
He knows that he is the one banking it up and can never win an election. It makes him feel better to say those things about another, as it helps him assuage his own guilty and fallen status.
I would love to see Rassmussen poll like this -
If you had the choice between two individuals, them being Lawrence O'Donnell, a self described Socialist, and Sarah Palin, a self described Conservative, which person would you choose to represent you in government?
TIME to cancel your Newsweek subscription, Lawrence
Submitted by needle on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:28pm.
Apparently Newsweek is not quite as reliable as it used to be for satisfying your thirst for hate.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Arguing over a one dollar
Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 07/13/2011 - 3:29am.
Arguing over a one dollar whore. He does realize that nobody reads Newsweek, yes?