Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'
  • Tea Partiers Confront Comcast CEO: Why Would a Conservative Want Their Money to Pay Al Sharpton's Salary?
  • Bob Schieffer Spins Obama Scandals: White House Not Like Nixon's, Which Had Burglars and Bomb Plots
  • NBC's Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, 'The Voters Will Punish Them'

Lawrence O'Donnell Accuses Newsweek of Corrupt Deal for Sarah Palin 'Love Letter' Cover Story

By Tim Graham | July 12, 2011 | 13:33

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

On MSNBC’s The Last Word on Monday, host Lawrence O’Donnell suggested Newsweek magazine is not only failing badly at the newsstand, it’s allegedly making corrupt deals with Sarah Palin to boost its own flagging sales.

Without citing him by name, O’Donnell slammed Palin profiler Peter Boyer, a long-time favorite of Newsweek editor-in-chief Tina Brown, insisting he just sold his soul on this puff piece for the money.

As to why Newsweek decided to give Palin the softest treatment the lamestream media ever has, the answer actually lies at the end of the article, where Newsweek inadvertently confesses to the deal it obviously made to Palin for the cover, the flattering photography, and the puff piece.

"’The mainstream press is becoming less and less relevant,’ she said. Adding that she would have no hesitation in shunning media outlets she does not trust. ‘I would say no to those who have lied about me. There is no need to reward bad behavior. I`ve learned, you know, once bitten, twice shy. I have learned.’"

There’s Newsweek telling you that she would have no hesitation in shunning media outlets she does not trust. That means Newsweek had to make promises to her to get her trust. I have specifically avoided mention of the author of the Newsweek piece because he has done good work in the past and he surely will again and should not be known for this love letter to Sarah Palin.

But there’s a puzzle O’Donnell missed: if Palin were really using a “once bitten, twice shy” approach, why on Earth would she be granting access to Newsweek, who’s slammed her in several cover stories, including the controversial one with the cover photo borrowed from Runner’s World?

The segment’s introduction was amusing, as O’Donnell suggested Newsweek was a poor value and a collapsing business proposition, but then to him, so was Palin:

Time for tonight’s Rewrite. The once-noble "Newsweek" and now the fastest sinking ship on the newsstand, in a desperate attempt to boost newsstand sales of a five dollar magazine that is 68 pages long, 17 and a half of which are advertising, has put this lie on its cover this week. Sarah Palin`s lie, quote, "I can win" goes uncontested in Newsweek’s lengthy, adoring profile.

O'Donnell never has a problem when Newsweek is offering its long, adoring profiles to Barack or Michelle Obama. But Palin-boosting is corrupt, since it promotes the corrupt conservatives.

It’s awfully tiring to hear O’Donnell claim it’s a “lie” to predict a crystal-ball proposition. Is it a “lie” that O’Donnell promises that MSNBC’s job is to “lean forward”? O’Donnell then launched into a lecture on Palin’s current unpopularity, and then another lecture on how it was stupid to let Palin mourn about trying to “return to the governor’s chair after defeat on a national ticket. Michael Dukakis was the last to manage it in 1988.”

Most people would read that and think that Dukakis was the last governor to lose on a national ticket, but O’Donnell somehow thinks it incorrectly implies that “others have tried and failed” in between Palin and Dukakis, because “Newsweek does everything it can to make the madness of Sarah Palin seem reasonable.”

One could joke that Larry O'Donnell is now admitting that George W. Bush actually won in 2000 -- although he never did agree with the liberals and acknowledge defeat and go back to Austin.

O'Donnell claimed: “So another way of writing that sentence is the last sitting governor to lose on a presidential ticket had no problem managing the return to his governor's job. Such is the pathetic pro-Palin tilt that permeates this utterly absurdist piece.” O'Donnell knows who will "lose the future" and it is Palin:

Palin obviously negotiated and successfully demanded Newsweek's cover in order to cooperate with the magazine. "Newsweek" said she`s worthy of the cover because of, quote, "her standing as a possible presidential candidate with presumed front runner potential."

But, of course, as viewers of this program knows, Sarah Palin is never going to run for president or any other elective office. She has discovered the joys of the responsibility-free celebrity and the millions in income that are hers through deft management of that celebrity. Surely some at "Newsweek" are smart enough to know this and may have decided to go with the Palin cover because, with Michele Bachmann soaring in the polls, they are only days away from the utter irrelevance of Sarah Palin.

The all-knowing Larry O’Donnell has read every crystal ball about Palin’s future and can say that she can never win and will never run. (He clearly hasn't seen the Palin documentary "The Undefeated," where she's painted as Reagan's natural heir.) But after all of that bluster about how horrid and corrupt Newsweek is, guess what O’Donnell said seconds later as he went to commercial?

After saying Peter Boyer sold out for money, he added: “Speaking of the money, it turns out that this week's Newsweek is, for once, worth every penny of the five bucks it costs at the newsstand because of Carl Bernstein’s masterful article, ‘Murdoch's Watergate.’”

It's too bad O'Donnell didn't get an interview with Tina Brown, so he could show her his Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde routine in person.

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Calumny

Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:39pm.

Is there a law suit here? Wouldn't it be fun to see left on left violence?
______________________________________________________________________________

To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html

  • Login to post comments

AAWWWW......

Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:45pm.

Poor little laurie o'donnell... gonna throw a tantrum because someone else got the cover of newsweek other than his "man" Barack! I was expecting him to pull his dress over his head and scream about Barack being his god.. and that all should worship and adore Barack... laurie O'donnell.. just another Obama "Prison wife"

Liberals: No Morals, No Standards, NO Problem!
  • Login to post comments

I said it before, Newsweak is

Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 1:51pm.

I said it before, Newsweak is just resorting to capitalist measures to drum up business. Circling the drain and looking at the unemployment lines must be making the folks at Newsweak soil their undies.

Of course Socialist Larry the libturd cannot abide a company trying to make a profit.

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." President Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Scoob

Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:13pm.

You're probably right. It would be interesting to see what their sales were for this week.

 

   /// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 ///    خال

  • Login to post comments

As I wrote yesterday about the cover, sex sells

Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:14pm.

To a degree, O'Donnell is correct. Newsweek must sell magazines, and Palin on the cover sells magazines, so it's a no brainer. Whatever they write inside the covers is superfluous.

O'DONNELL:  "Sarah Palin`s lie, quote, "I can win" goes uncontested in Newsweek’s lengthy, adoring profile."

Not knowing what's in the article, I don't know how Newsweek addresses her quote.  But she's won elections before, so why would her "I can win" quote be a lie?

Lies are when individuals or groups deny a fact that they know to be true.  Anthony Weiner lied. 

O'Donnell may be suffering from the same lustful syndrome that Maher and his ilk endure -- the conflict between sexual desire for Palin and the absolute disdain for her poitics.

Shame on Newsweek for putting business ahead of O'Donnell's preferences.

  • Login to post comments

And what did O'Donnell think

Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:01pm.

And what did O'Donnell think about the adoration, worship and messianic glory that the news mags lavished on Obama in '08?

Nevermind.

  • Login to post comments

Lawrence O’Donnell IS

Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 2:30pm.

Lawrence O’Donnell IS part of the lamestream media.

The irony is so thick whenever the liberals start throwing each other under the bus.

  • Login to post comments

Speaking of Newsweek*

Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:14pm.

This may not be the thread but talking about money and pandering, thought you guys might find this interesting.

Scroll down to the end of the article and check out the list of this guys holdings. Veeeerrry interESting.

And of course we cant forget media holdings as well

  • Login to post comments

But.....

Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:33pm.

if Palin would agree to come on his show his ratings would skyrocket.  But pity him, he can only talk about her in a desperate attempt to get some ratings.

  • Login to post comments

Less than 100% negative

Submitted by rockyracoon on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 3:52pm.

Less than 100% negative reporting on anything regarding Sarah Palin is unacceptable.

 

Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.

  • Login to post comments

Big deal, I accuse the lame

Submitted by jessieH on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 4:08pm.

Big deal, I accuse the lame stream media of making a corrupt deal with obama. The only difference is, I have proof.

                                                                                                                                                                    

  • Login to post comments

OK...

Submitted by Brad90956 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:01pm.

"Time for tonight’s Rewrite. The once-noble "Newsweek" and now the fastest sinking ship on the newsstand, in a desperate attempt to boost newsstand sales of a five dollar magazine that is 68 pages long, 17 and a half of which are advertising..."

Time for tonight's Rewrite.  The never-noble "MSNBC" and now the fastest sinking ship on TV, in a desperate attempt to boost ratings of a fledgling network that is 100% biased against conservatives, especially conservative women, will run continuous hit pieces on Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann...stay tuned.

  • Login to post comments

Larry is projecting again

Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:11pm.

He knows that he is the one banking it up and can never win an election. It makes him feel better to say those things about another, as it helps him assuage his own guilty and fallen status.

I would love to see Rassmussen poll like this -

If you had the choice between two individuals, them being Lawrence O'Donnell, a self described Socialist, and Sarah Palin, a self described Conservative, which person would you choose to represent you in government?

That an individual right exists requires that some policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
  • Login to post comments

TIME to cancel your Newsweek subscription, Lawrence

Submitted by needle on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 5:28pm.

Apparently Newsweek is not quite as reliable as it used to be for satisfying your thirst for hate.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

Arguing over a one dollar

Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 07/13/2011 - 3:29am.

Arguing over a one dollar whore. He does realize that nobody reads Newsweek, yes?

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
  • ABC Drama Warns of ‘Conservative Overlords’ Bringing Anti-Black ‘Salem Witch Trials’ to DC
  • Gay NBA Player’s Twin Brother Gets ‘I’m The Straight One’ T-shirt From Jimmy Kimmel
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use