Christie Upsets PBS Types by Suggesting State-Owned Broadcasting Seems 'Soviet'
Liberals who love public broadcasting are angry at Gov. Chris Christie for moving to fold the state’s public broadcaster, but let its operations be taken over by other public TV and radio entities in the area. Christie told interviewer Bob Hennelly on WNYC public radio that “state-owned operation of media ended with the Soviet Union,” even if that’s not really an end to public broadcasting in New Jersey:
BOB HENNELLY: You had a big win yesterday [Thursday]. But you did have one setback. The Assembly rejected your proposal to have WNET Channel 13 takeover the state's public broadcaster NJN. Critics of the deal say they are concerned WNET won't deliver the quality news product Michael Aron with NJN has been putting out. What's at stake with this deal?
CHRIS CHRISTIE: What’s at stake is, I really believed that the state-owned operation of media ended with the Soviet Union, and I don’t think we should be in the television business. I think its an inherent conflict of interest for us to be in the television business and for reporters to be state employees and I also think that the expense at this time is not justified into the budget.
Christie is streamlining funds for taxpayer-funded broadcasting. Other Republican governors, like Bob McDonnell in Virginia and Rick Scott in Florida, have cut state funding for public broadcasting, even as federal subsidies keep increasing. Christie quickly defended his decision to let New York PBS superstation WNET take over:
CHRISTIE: The Senate now has to consider this, and I hope that the Senate will decide, I hope, that this is a good deal, you know, and WNET, led by Neil Shapiro [a former NBC News president], is a premiere organization and they have made promises to us contractually, in writing, about the amount of New Jersey programming and the type of New Jersey programming that is going to be on the air. So I don’t think that anyone can validly say, given if they look at the NET deal, that it’s anything but a really good deal for the people of New Jersey.
They’re going to establish not only the outlets they have now but also a studio at Rowan University, put permanent cameras in the Senate and the Assembly so that people can watch that more frequently, as to what’s going on, on the floor of the legislature. And so, I just think this is much ado about nothing in the sense that these folks going forward are going to understand that everyone has to share the sacrifice.
HENNELLY: As you know, WNYC's parent New York Public Radio and WHYY in Philadelphia [also a public radio station] are set to acquire the nine NJN radio stations. Is that part of your proposal affected by a negative vote from the legislature?
CHRISTIE: No, it doesn’t have an impact. The only aspect of the veto on the deal is they’re just taking up the portion of the NET takeover of NJN. As I understand it, regardless of what happens, the purchase of the radio stations will continue to go forward.
This phaseout of NJN, however, didn't begin under Christie: it began under Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
They're upset??
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 8:01am.
All together now....AWWWWWW!
Or, as we say in Italian.....che peccato......(What a shame.)
Sell state-owned media now
Submitted by nkviking75 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 9:02am.
Christie is exactly right. The state has no business owning a news organization. No matter how good the initial intentions might be, eventually the government will succumb to the temptation to turn it into a propaganda machine. If the Republicans can complete their takeover next time around, PBS and NPR should be put up for sale immediately. Their liberal sensibilities would fit nicely with NPC, don't you think?
“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
I'm not sure what they're so upset about
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 9:21am.
I thought the left wing nutjobs loved the Soviets and their great communal society.
Who cares that they murdered more people than the Holocaust. They're not Nazis so it's okay to perform genocide for the "common good."
gman
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 9:42am.
They still do love murdering Commie dictators, they just don't want to admit that we already know it.
Christie should have asked the interviewer why he wouldn't feel some shame about a state run news outlet when they are supposed to be watchdogs of the interests of the citizenry.
Exactly Phil and I guess you can only
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 9:50am.
rebut so much in a time sensitive interview. However that would have been a nice question to get the interviewer sweating a bit;)
Repeat after me:
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:12am.
Nothing Bad Ever Happens On The Left.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
That is exactly what it is.
Submitted by buddyc on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:18am.
That is exactly what it is. It was a nice experiment in journalism and it failed. What would the left do if the Koch's owned much of the media and they were as willing to corrupt journalism as George Soros is and does?
I think the Proletariat Broadcasting Socialists...
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:20am.
...(and that is the kind version) should be cheesed off at every opportunity.
If the spineless House repubs had any stones at all, the PBSers would be off the taxpayer's dole already.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
PBS
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:24am.
They did vote to take PBS's funding away this session. But it won't go anywhere with the Senate and HMTS in the way.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
State has no business in
Submitted by bmac32 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:31am.
State has no business in broadcasting, public or other wise.
Astounding news. A State run radio and TV station, in the U. S.?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:38am.
New Jersey? Figures. Big Government capitol.
Any other States have their own radio/TV stations?
Who knew?
While this gets public
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:41am.
While this gets public broadcasting off the books for NJ, it does nothing to actually rid the citizenry of NJ from the dimocrats propagana machine that is public radio and TV. It just shifts the "ownership" over to NY.
But, it's a start . . . .
Small Potatoes
Submitted by iveseenitall on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 10:59am.
Stop funding PBS. Yes, a good start. But it's small potatoes compared to the largest state-run propagnda machine--public education. The largest teachers union in the nation just endorced Barry---what a surprise!
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal" (progressive)
Oh, the humanity!
Submitted by Morganfrost on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 11:12am.
How will the citizens of NJ be able to get the entertainment and views that are good for them? If this goes through, they'll only have the programming they want, not the programming their betters believe they need! Then where will we be?
I've always been mystified by
Submitted by Lgbpop on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 11:26am.
I've always been mystified by the left's depiction of NPR/PBS. They claim it's necessary to have and fund them for unbiased, objective news reporting and for programming no one else will produce. Doesn't that insinuate that MSM news is NOT unbiased as the left claims? No, wait, the MSM is unbiased (except for Fox, everybody knows that) so why do we need NPR/PBS?
Why is this glaring lie not seen the the general populace?
State owned broadcasting.
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 11:47am.
I keep hearing that state-owned, or funded, television is necessary to insure that "quality " programs, like news programs, can continue, but I have to ask: how many state-owned newspaper are there? How many state-owned magazines are there? How many state-owned movie theaters? Orchestras? Rock (or Jazz, or Bluegrass, or Country, or whatever) bands? Dance troops? etc. etc.
Of all the possible entertainment and information venues in America, why are only two, radio and television, deemed so vulnerable to, shall we say, less than unacceptable quality of "programming" that state funding is necessary for "alternative" programing sources? It just doesn't make any sense.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
NJ public "broadcasting"
Submitted by JeffC... on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 12:32pm.
When I was a wee lad in pre-cable Marlton (southern) NJ, I had to watch Sesame Street and Mister Rogers on Channel 12 WHYY Wilmington/Philadelphia because the signal from NJN's Camden Channel 23 was so weak. And if I twisted the rabbit ears just right, I could pick up NJN Trenton through the static.
Yeah, those signals were AWFUL!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 1:48pm.
Cable saved that crap idea, unfortunately. You couldnt get Camden signals in Marlton? Wow, theyre not that far, air miles wise either! I grew up on the Northern Shore, and it wasnt until we got NJ New Brunswick on UHF 50 that we were able to get anything besides Channel 13 on VHF. Of course, our posting will look like another language to all these young-uns whove never known anything besides cable!
Give em HELL, Christie!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 07/05/2011 - 1:45pm.
Hes right, absolutely RIGHT! And not only is he from NJ, but hes also ITALIAN! Salute!