NPR's Diane Rehm Honors Bernie Sanders, Insists Public Radio and TV Have Socialist Impulses
Some wonder if NPR is altering its left-wing tilt while it’s in the middle of a budget fight in Congress. For evidence that nothing’s changed, see Thursday’s Diane Rehm show, starring socialist Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont. Rehm touted his latest book, The Speech (published by the radical Nation magazine’s Nation Books), taken from a "historic" Sanders eight-hour filibuster/jeremiad on the Senate floor against last December’s deal extending the Bush tax cuts.
Rehm began: "Thank you. Before we begin to talk about the speech, tell me your thoughts on what is happening in Libya. We now have CIA people on the ground. It strikes me that that is precisely how Vietnam began." From there, she actually insisted to Sanders that public broadcasting has socialist impulses in questioning America’s unequal distribution of wealth:
REHM: You’re saying the networks aren't talking about this at all.
SANDERS: No, come on. I mean, the -- how often when you turn on -- now, let's exclude Fox, which is the Republican network, but go to the other three major networks, and even go to public broadcasting. How often do we have serious discussions about the fact that the United States has the most unequal distribution of wealth and income in the industrialized world? We have the highest rate of childhood poverty. We have more and more billionaires while the middle class sinks. You tell me. You follow the media. Is that an issue that is widely discussed?
REHM: All I can tell you is that on public radio, I hear a fair amount of that. On public television, on Jim Lehrer's program, I hear a fair amount of that. But certainly, I'm glad you're here. You're reaching millions of people in this country and around the world. And it is important to talk about, but I'm happy to know that the Twitter population was very much at work. But what about your peers? What about the other people in the Senate? What about your other legislatures? Did they simply not want to listen?
SANDERS: Well, it's not a question of not listening. Everybody listens to everybody but, you know, that question is best addressed to other people. But the listeners will have to decide how many people in the United States Congress -- and there are some, believe me, I don't want to suggest for one moment I'm the only one -- how many people in the Congress are talking about the growing income and wealth inequality in America.
Rehm shared with Sanders a despair that corporations are somehow running the country, and FDR-style interventionism isn't in vogue:
REHM: How did we get here? You know, over and over, I hear from corporate representatives our priority is the shareholder. Our priority is, as a corporation, to make money and to be responsive to our shareholders. How did we get from the new deal when FDR put in place, so many programs to help the elderly, to help the poor and onward, and now here we are?
SANDERS: Well, what we have seen, for a lot of reasons, is a very significant drift to the right. And whereas years ago we used to have in this country a center left party, which was called the Democratic Party. Never particularly a very progressive party, but it was a center left party who saw as their mission the need to protect the working class of this country, lower income people....So you had the Democrat Party evolve from a center left party to a center party. You have the Republican Party going from a center right party to a rather extreme right party.
Let me throw out something, which I think is hysterically funny. When you read the papers today you see John Boehner is at war with the conservatives of his party, right? What is John Boehner? John was on this show. John -- I know John. John is a conservative, but the media can't even define who the right wing of the Republican Party is. They're rightwing extremists, that's what they are but we can't even say that. So Boehner, Mitch McConnell are proud conservatives, they were on this show. They would say, of course we're conservatives. But they're more moderate than the rightwing. So you have a Republican Party which has now become extreme right.
On the same front, Rehm asked: "President Obama campaigned very passionately for the middle class, for people – ordinary people – in this country. What's happened?"
Sanders replied: "I don't want to speculate about President Obama. I think what I can tell you is the caller who just called a moment ago – there are a lot of people who are extremely disappointed. Who want to see this brilliant president, this articulate president, this guy who ran one of the most inspiring campaigns of our lifetimes go back to where he was and stand up and explain to the American people what is happening and be prepared to take on those powerful forces right now – who have so much power – whose greed, in my view, is destroying this country. Is he doing it? No, he's not. So I think you're hearing a lot of disappointment out there but I can't speak for the president. I don't know why he is doing what he's doing but I'm not happy with it."
Rehm was clearly happy with Sanders. WAMU here in Washington scheduled the Sanders interview for a rebroadcast on Sunday afternoon.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
So Sandman, let me ask you a question on greed.
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 8:55am.
Do you think the unions making almost twice as much as the private sector for the same jobs, having life time cadillac health care, and everyone non union paying for these things is not greed.
In fact, a great deal of the crap hole we're in is due to UNION GREED. What do you think Sandman?
*
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 9:18am.
Never mind
Vote for the American in November
Pull the Plug
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 9:58am.
Yet another reason to stop government funding of NPR. Well done, guys, well done!
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
She Could Be a National Treasure
Submitted by JustAl on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 10:52am.
If only they would use tape recordings of her voice to interrogate terrorists. And, it would save on water.
I think they have toned the
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:09am.
I think they have toned the bias back during this period. I listen for a few minutes in the AM getting up. Don't be fooled! They still need a funding sucked out like an aborted baby. Judgement day for NPR is here I hope.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Unequal distribution?
Submitted by JLin on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:20am.
Oh I get it. America's problems are because poor folks just don't have access to the sophisticated distribution networks that rich folks do. It's a logistics problem, not a money production problem. You see the money precipitates out of the air every morning like manna or rain. Then the government field workers deliver the money to distribution centers around the country where it is bundled up and then loaded onto trucks to be delivered to all the USPS offices in the US. From there, checks are cut for everyone in America to receive their fair share and those checks are dutifully delivered across this great land by faithful and dedicated union letter carriers.
The problem is that evil people intercept this money in the fields before the workers get there, and they steal the money. Thus they become rich and others become poor because too much of their money was taken from them. And that's why we hate capitalism Johnny, now go to sleep.
I'm going to write a book about my post here.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:26am.
I think I shall call it "The Post."
Socialist are enemies within.
Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:45am.
If everyone in America was rich, equally, and thus had everything they needed, nobody would have anything.
This is true because nobody would do the hard work to actually produce things.
Do Americans need more money? Well, more purchasing power? You Betcha. We can never accomplish that with more debt or with more redistribution. We can only do that by cutting government and the amount of money it takes to operate it.
Returning it to within its Constitutional Box will see prosperity return to this nation. That is what we should hear in media and no media should be taxpayer funded.
Socialism
Submitted by Penfire on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 2:58pm.
How are those who propose "sharing the wealth" doing that?
This sounds so good and altruistic, but how is it playing out? If there was no capitalism in the world where would the money come from? Even China and Russia have a capitalistic form of government but only the leaders and elites in their countries have money; even when Communism "fell" during Reagan's term, communists leaders were found to have yachts and villas all over the world.
What these ideologues need to remember is the human factor. People are out to take care of #1, even those who go around proposing "share the wealth" and beating Republicans and Capitalists over the head.
"Well first of all, tell me, is there some society you know of that doesn't run on greed? You think Russia doesn't run on greed? You think China doesn't run on greed? What is greed?
And what does reward virtue? You think the communist commissar rewards virtue? You think a Hitler rewards virtue? You think, excuse me, if you'll pardon me, American presidents reward virtue? Do they choose their appointees on the basis of the virtue of the people appointed or on the basis of their political clout"? Milton Friedman
When all those touting "share the wealth" tell the unions they can't have more than the average non-union worker, nor can they have their Cadillac medical insurance policies while everyone else is stuck with Obamacare, where doctors have to ask a government bureaucrat if he can treat his patients as he sees fit, and if you have those "share the wealth" folks disclose their charitable giving records for the last 20 years I might listen to their arguments a little more closely.
LOL
Submitted by Bob K on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 4:01pm.
Between Sanders and Kookcinich it is hard to decide which is nuttier, or which is the most comically ineffective long time member of the house. Rave on Bernie, no one cares what you say when your preaching to the NPR choir.
It is now SENATOR Bernie Sanders
Submitted by TheHistorian on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 6:33pm.
so Bernie is 1 of 100 (3 if you count Leahy and Sherrod Brown also) where Dennis is in the 30/435+ along with Waxman (who sponsored a bill on limiting EPA authority on GHG but is now against it), Jackson-Lee, Maxine Waters, and Dennis' latest buddy from Ohio, Marcia Fudge from his neighboring district. Socialist stupidity is therefore pretty common in Congress and is not restricted to Bernie.
Dennis Prager
"An enemy within!"
Submitted by Mechanix on Mon, 03/26/2012 - 4:53am.
Have to differ with the article - the show's book interviews are not the debate segments (it's in those they've been inviting the partisan hacks to muddy the discussions; I guess NPR's usually high standards weren't selling like Big Macs). She's generally supportive of the author whether the subject is cancer treatment, democracy, justice, or in this case all of the above in a socioeconomic context - because as she stated there's general public interest, and by any standard she's right.
The commentary's much more colorful with a couple exceptions... misrepresentations of socialism (that's starting to die off with older generations, still blame our underfunded schools and culture), ad-hominem (I like her enunciation), farcical cynicism, non-sequiturs.. Well, there's throwing away 5 minutes, back to the grind!