Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Tim Graham's blog
  • MSNBC: Obama and Merkel Are the New 'Ronnie and Maggie'; Matthews Sees Conspiracy to Push Hillary 2016
  • NBC's Todd Excuses Obama's Poor Speech Performance: Crowd Too Small, 'It Was Hot'
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons

NPR Summarizes Conservatives: 'Point Out the Homo and Yell Kill It!'

By Tim Graham | February 11, 2011 | 08:46

A  A
Tim Graham's picture

On Thursday, National Public Radio's Morning Edition decided to revisit the censorship controversy over the National Portrait Gallery removing a video image of ants crawling on a crucifix in an ideological exhibit promoting homosexuality. (The show closes Sunday.) The irony or the outrage in this story is that the "villains" of this piece -- conservative Christians and Republican politicians -- were not allowed to speak. NPR reporter Neda Ulaby quoted only the two left-wing curators of the exhibit, a left-wing critic for the Village Voice, and a left-wing man protesting the apparently ruined exhibit.

The most outrageous part was this soundbite of co-curator Jonathan Katz: "It's no longer the same game that it was 15, 20 years ago, where you simply had to point out the homo and yell 'Kill it!' And the mob attacked. Now, you have to clothe your homophobia in something else."

A story this biased makes it worth pointing out that Neda Ulaby is a lesbian journalist and activist who found this NPR job through the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association. The Advocate celebrated a list of openly gay people with cool careers and explained:

When she quit as managing editor of the Chicago gay paper Windy City Times to join National Public Radio in 2000, she recalls, “I went from having my own staff to being the mail opener for the arts desk.” But Ulaby stayed on after that first month, and within a few years she worked up to her current position as arts reporter. “I say a prayer of thankfulness every day, multiple times,” says Ulaby, who connected with NPR through a workshop at the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association convention in 1999.

Ulaby is a regular at gay activist confabs. She and openly gay NPR White House correspondent Ari Shapiro moderated panels at the International Gay and Lesbian Leadership Conference in 2006. She was a panelist at the NLGJA convention in 2009 in Montreal, touted for how she works "every day to promote balanced and responsible news coverage." That would sound very odd -- but what NLGJA means by "balanced" is actually Orwellian. It means "promotes homosexuality without balance." 

The NPR story began with serious dishonesty, begging for rebuttal, that the show wasn't political, or meant to be controversial:

STEVE INSKEEP, anchor; Next week, the National Portrait Gallery bids goodbye to a controversial exhibit. It gained less attention for whats in it than what was taken out, a video that shows a crucifix covered in ants. It was part of the first gay and lesbian themed show at the Smithsonian Institution. When it opened last fall, one of the curators told NPR's Neda Ulaby he did not expect controversy.

Mr. DAVID WARD (Curator, National Portrait Gallery): We're not doing Up with Gay People. We're not doing a political exhibition.

INSKEEP: It became political. Conservative members of Congress called for the exhibit's cancellation. And then the video's removal infuriated the art world.

Days before the show closes, Neda Ulaby revisited the Portrait Gallery.

NEDA ULABY: David Ward is an unlikely culture warrior. He's a straight American history scholar and a self-described bureaucrat who's worked for the Smithsonian for 30 years.

Mr. WARD: It's been interesting since last we talked.

ULABY: Ward says he believed from the beginning, that the art would speak for itself.

Mr. WARD: the show deals with masterpieces by major American artists. It doesnt deal with weird, strange outsider artists; it ideals with canonical figures.

ULABY: Andy Warhol, Annie Leibovitz, Thomas Eakins.

Mr. WARD: This is mainstream America. We thought that the art would carry our argument.

ULABY: But the argument, that gay, lesbian and queer contributed to American culture, was apparently too much for some conservative members of Congress. They wanted the show cancelled. It's unclear if any of them saw it.

See the smear? Ulaby didn't seem to ask a conservative member of Congress if they saw it: she just asserted it without apparently asking.

It's actually a fairer question to ask if NPR and the curators saw it. It's there, in black and white, their political aims, in the exhibit program, and on the wall in the museum. They wanted to strike a blow for “the struggle for justice, so that people and groups can claim their full inheritance in America’s promise of equality, inclusion, and social dignity.” That's not political? That's not "Up With Gay People"?

Anyone who saw the exhibit would also know there were "weird, strange outsider artists" in it, starting with the star of the censorship battle, David Wojnarowicz, who clearly loathed Jesus and Christians. (Let's recall again, not just the ants on the crucifix, but the ghoulish, green, disembodied Jesus head in his painting "The Death of American Spirituality," which was not in the exhibit, but underlines the artist's loathing.) The exhibit had plenty of trendy gay artists from the last three decades, not just "canonical figures."

You can't in any way call the art in this exhibit "mainstream America." Anyone who does is a con man, or someone who never gets outside the hermetically sealed leftism of the "art world." 

In the "art world," there are very one-sided debates where conservatives are smeared as Nazis and the American Taliban, and no one in the liberal media seems to see the need for an opposing view. See Neda Ulaby. She just lets these curators smear at will.

Here's another marker that Ulaby didn't seem to follow this controversy in the media. She cited only the Catholic League in the battle, especially as where the controversy started. Actually, the Catholic League's own initial press release collegially cited a news story by Penny Starr of CNSNews.com (a division of the MRC).

ULABY: The controversy started when the Catholic League targeted a video in the show by artist David Wojnarowicz called "Fire in My Belly."

Dr. JONATHAN KATZ (Curator): "Fire in My Belly" offers among the most poignant and powerful images of what it was like to live with AIDS.

ULABY: That's curator Jonathan Katz. He says Wojnarowicz worked on the video while his lover, while much of his community, was dying from AIDS.

The video includes 11 seconds of large black ants crawling on a small plastic crucifix. The League blasted out emails calling it Catholic-bashing, a full month after the show opened.

Dr. KATZ: In my more paranoid moments, I'm often wondering if the reason it took them a month to attack the show was that they were actually focus grouping, trying to figure out what the proper handle to get at the exhibition would be.

ULABY: There's a long history of loud fights over controversial art in museums with public funding; from Andre Serrano's "Piss Christ" to Robert Mapplethorpe's unsettling photographs of gay leather culture.

Dr. KATZ: It's no longer the same game that it was 15, 20 years ago, where you simply had to point out the homo and yell, kill it, and the mob attacked. Now, you have to clothe your homophobia in something else.

ULABY: Bullying the gays may no longer be socially acceptable, says Jeff Weinstein, who covered the art controversies of the 1980s and '90s for The Village Voice. Whats different this time, he says, is the Internet.

Mr. JEFF WEINSTEIN (Journalist): Basically the right wing bloggers pushed it along very quickly, much more quickly than that would have been possible in the past.

ULABY: The Portrait Gallery got over a thousand emails and letters, criticizing the show - every single one of them after the Catholic League's callout. The head of the Smithsonian ordered the video pulled, and that was wrong, according to an internal review by the Smithsonian's board of regents.

Notice how Dr. Katz gets to describe his "paranoid moments" with the religious conservatives mysteriously having to hold focus groups to determine if putting big black ants on a plastic crucifix of Jesus might seem offensive. Religious conservatives don't get a phone call from the taxpayer-funded activists at National Public Radio.

Katz's story of a "Kill it" mob is not only beyond outrageous. It misleads people about what actually happened in 1991 over Serrano and Mapplethorpe. Conservatives weren't calling for murder, just for denying subsidies to bizarre "transgressive" artist-activists. Conservatives were outraged that the National Endowment for the Arts would fund artists like the maker of  "Piss Christ," or Mapplethorpe's sadomasochistic images (most infamously, one with a bullwhip up an anus). Liberal media largely came to the artists' defense, and the NEA suffered some bad publicity, but no reduction in funding -- at least, until conservatives took over Congress in 1995. This might be what the Village Voice writer means by today's faster outrage cycle.

Ulaby wrapped up by celebrating Wojnarowicz as a "free-speech cause celebre" and covering the left-wing protest trailer outside the gallery:

ULABY: Wojnarowicz's video has been viewed online more than a million times. And it's been screened, in solidarity, by galleries nationwide, including a temporary one right outside the Portrait Gallery.

ULABY: Members of D.C.'s artistic communities scraped together $6,000 to plant this nondescript trailer just 50 feet from the Portrait Gallery entrance. The video plays on a continuous loop. Organizers say 5,000 people have seen it here, so far.

Mr. DEREK SMITH (Attorney): It is very provocative.

ULABY: Derek Smith is a lawyer. He wandered in during lunch. He stood in his winter coat and absorbed the video's surreal images: The crucifix, coins falling in a bowl of blood, red string stitching a mouth shut.

Mr. SMITH: I'm glad that I'm seeing it, and I would be sort of disturbed to be denied the ability to see something like this, cause it is - I definitely would consider it art, without a doubt.

ULABY: As for the artist, David Wojnarowicz, journalist Jeff Weinstein, who knew him, is not sure what he'd make of the controversy today.

Mr. WEINSTEIN: If he were alive, he would be so thrilled that people weren't dying; gay men weren't dying right and left, all over, dropping. I don't know what he would make of it, because the world is a different place.

ULABY: Wojnarowicz's video was recently purchased by the Museum of Modern Art. The show it was removed from, "Hide/Seek" at the National Portrait Gallery, closes the day before Valentines Day.

NPR's anchor then promoted visual images from the exhibit on NPR.org -- and typically, none of them show nudity, even though many art works in the exhibit do -- like this larger-than-life 8 foot-by-5 foot nude Frank O'Hara. Once again, as with the NEA controversies in the 1990s, the media often censor the controversial pieces that spur debate over taxpayer-funded art.

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Tim Graham on Twitter.
  • Censorship
  • Neda Ulaby
  • Steve Inskeep
  • Morning Edition
  • NPR
  • Tim Graham's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

False truths

Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:06am.

Radical gays, who apparently have a strong hold on the education, media, arts and entertainment industries, would have us believe that gays are about 50% (or more) of the population. They then force themselves into positions in every level of those industries, to push their agenda which is that gay is normal and heterosexuality is abnormal, due to some sort of psychic repression. They molest our children's minds with twisted ideas and call it 'diversity'.

Americans keeping their own earnings is a Civil Right! Demand your Civil Rights!
  • Login to post comments

Why Yes. The gay population is bigger than the blacks.

Submitted by Red Jeep on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:50am.

And they deserve the same or more civil rights than the blacks. So they are very, very normal and need to have your children join their lifestyle to maintain their numbers.

Women should consider giving unwanted babies to gay couples to adopt rather than killing those babies, so the number of citizens of the gay world can grow.

  • Login to post comments

 Gay is the new Black.

Submitted by StillRight on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 12:15pm.

 Gay is the new Black. Liberals have gotten board with civil rights for Blacks so now they have are pushing radical gay rights crap. This is nothing more than an extension of secular self-righteousness to attain "collective salvation". Pushing gay “rights” is nothing more than a liberals attempt to attain righteousness, which is truly self-righteousness because the righteousness is found in themselves not in God or some other “higher power”.

Right as allways, never left.
  • Login to post comments

problem: blacks will never be

Submitted by TruthMonger on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 1:16pm.

problem: blacks will never be on board with this...

it will become like abortion and conservatives will eventually win in out - could take a hundred years or so tho

Congratulations Jimmy Carter!

  • Login to post comments

Zero Gay Population...

Submitted by adamsmith on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 12:18pm.

I wrote of this concept on the Huffington Post quite some time ago. I thought I would have leftists crying for my head on a plate, and all I got was crickets. To the consternation of most of the people that post here, abortion laws are never going to change. That's a political football that will never move off the fifty yard line, but it does get candidates elected or not. That being said, the advancement of gender determination and chromosomal determination will one day lead to the discovery of the abnormal "gay" gene. Once that happens, homosexuals will cease to be born. If a couple discovers their fetus is gay, abortion will follow much as it does with Downs Syndrome fetuses today. Who wants to have a gay kid? The politically correct will say they do, but nitty to gritty, they want their offspring to have offspring. Gay kids aren't going to carry on in the gene pool, so gays will eventually be as rare as Downs kids....

By the way, NPR is unbelievable. I remember twenty five years ago when I was at UF, they were actually good to listen to. I tuned in recently, and they might as well call it National Communist Radio. This crap should be defunded yesterday....

  • Login to post comments

Sports

Submitted by jdlybrand on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:13am.

I visited the 'Advocate' website and while perusing the site content bar, I noticed that all categories had multiple items in the drop down columns except sports. I can only assume they have not yet sanctioned 'Muff Diving' as an official Olympic event.

 

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

Chester Riley

  • Login to post comments

We’re all sexpots now

Submitted by needle on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:43am.

ULABY: Andy Warhol, Annie Leibovitz, Thomas Eakins.

Mr. WARD: This is mainstream America.

This is like Newsweek announcing: “We’re all sexpots now

Sorry, Andy Warhol, Annie Leibovitz, and Thomas Eakins may be somewhat mainstream within American art.  But mainstream America?  Hardly.  Ulaby and Ward may also agree with Obama that we are not a Christian nation; but that does not mean they are correct.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

Hyposcrisy on stilts.

Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:28am.

It's positively hilarious that they can say 

Now, you have to clothe your homophobia in something else.

while they clothe their  agenda  in the mantle of art, and claim that this display is "not political" at all.

 

 

  • Login to post comments

Zing......

Submitted by NeoKong on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 10:03am.

N/T

Follow me on Twitter
  • Login to post comments

→ Clothe your homo?

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 10:16am.

Now, you have to clothe your homophobia in something else.

Otherwise known as accessorizing?

  • Login to post comments

Point out the homo and yell kill it??

Submitted by sentry_99 on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:29am.

I that anything like smear the queer? 

  • Login to post comments

I LOL'd

Submitted by astonrickenbach on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:51am.

I all but forgot about that game.  Good times. Good times.

  • Login to post comments

When I was growing up my

Submitted by ricklail on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 11:18am.

When I was growing up my grandmother always used the term "queer" to describe somebody that was odd. She would pronounce it "quare."

A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
  • Login to post comments

NPR, Ah

Submitted by NVRAT on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:51am.

Now, lets cancel NPR and save many hundreds of thousands of dollars.

NVRAT
  • Login to post comments

Suggestion

Submitted by Doktor Riktor V... on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:54am.

Perhaps someone should piece together a collage of homosexuals being stoned in IRAN, or some other enlightened mid-eastern nation and submit said collage to the smithonian. I would love to see the face of the NPR art's director....

  • Login to post comments

Point out the funding for NPR

Submitted by Van Halen on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 9:52am.

Point out the funding for NPR and yell, "Kill it!"

  • Login to post comments

→ Whack-A-Homo

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 10:43am.

This is how NPR justifies its existence?

  • Login to post comments

Local Exhibitions

Submitted by NC Boy on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 10:14am.

My community was "blessed" with one of these local exhibitions, accompanied by a full-page article in the local newspaper's "Arts" section.  The same kind of selective editing of the display content was used.  

The focus of the article was on "censorship" and the oppression of AIDs sufferers in the 1980's.  She wrote, "At the time (1986), there was no federal interest in research for AIDS . . . "

I responded to her with the fact that the NIH spent more than $120 million on AIDS before 1986, and $135 million in 1986.  (Double these figures for inflation effects).  Also, AIDS funding growth equaled or exceeded NIH budget growth every year after 1981 (the year AIDS was identified).  

But, hey, it's OK to lie if it helps your "cause".

  • Login to post comments

I thought that High Point and

Submitted by ricklail on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 11:18am.

I thought that High Point and that immediate areas where still fairly conservative. Now Greensboro and Winston-Salme to some extent would be a different story.

A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
  • Login to post comments

Beukeboom summarizes NPR:

Submitted by Beukeboom on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 10:40am.

Beukeboom summarizes NPR: "Point out the conservatives and smear them!!!"

...or...

"Truth be damned! Full smear ahead!"

  • Login to post comments

Liberals are very worried

Submitted by dscott on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 11:50am.

Liberals are very worried about the budget cuts.  They know NPR and CPB are on the hit list.  They are ginning themselves up that the whole issue is about an attack on liberalism instead of what it actually is, setting spending priorities for a sustainable budget.  Of course, as a conservative I take exception to the idea that I have to subsidize with my tax dollars the opinions of liberals presented as fact while at the same time they refuse me equal time and respect for my opinions. You are entitled to your opinions but not your own facts much less at my expense.

At $1.5 trillion annual deficits, the time has come to make a choice, either we cut CPB and NPR or we cut an equal amount from some other social program like food stamps.  Pick one, you can't have both. Everything is NOT a priority, there can be only one.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
  • Login to post comments

Just how crude does NPR think

Submitted by bassndude on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 12:05pm.

Just how crude does NPR think I am?? I would never say it like that.....

 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!

  • Login to post comments

clothe your homophobia like

Submitted by TruthMonger on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 1:22pm.

clothe your homophobia like jessie jackson does...

Congratulations Jimmy Carter!

  • Login to post comments

Sounds Like Some People Have Very Thin Skins...

Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 2:54pm.

There you go again, proving once again that it ain't just liberals who have thin skins. You may claim all you want that sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt you the way it hurts liberals. Apparently, ant-covered crucifixes will hurt your feelings though. Which is kind of sad, because if this is what you think is bigotry against Christians, I've got news for you: it ain't. If making fun of the Prophet Mohamed through caricatures isn't bigotry, then how is this any different? You want to know what bigotry is? It's the kind of stuff I used to say here that got me banned in the first place. You know, the stuff about Pope Pius XII being a Nazi sympathizer and aiding Hitler in the Holocaust? You want to know the truth about that? The truth is I simply said that to show you what real bigotry sounds like, and not these phony-baloney claims like ant-covered crucifixes or cartoons about Jesus. I simply parroted what my old man said for so many years about the Church, none of which I even believe. If it makes me a hypocrite, then I'm a hypocrite and not particularly proud of it. But at least I start off on a clean slate that way.

  • Login to post comments

7,

Submitted by Agnostic on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 3:07pm.

 Why is it when one side expresses an opinion or even goes so far as to call for a boycott the other calls it censorship?  No doubt this is a planned part of certain liberal groups but the general population does it as well.  A person being offended is an expression of their opinion and if you have a problem with that then deal with it.  I am more than willing to listen to why you don't think I should be offended and maybe I'll change my mind, maybe I won't or maybe I will be closed minded but then that is my problem.

Spouting beliefs you don't hold as fact without acknowledging it was an example was wrong on so many levels.  Being a hypocrite does not start you off on a clean slate it puts you somewhere near the boy who cried wolf.  How is anyone supposed to believe any argument you make at this point?

That being said I get your intention and understand your point about perspective without all the lies you spread about the Pope and the Church.  However, can you understand the perspective of differentiating between the numbers of people who died from the opinions cast against the crucifix in urine as compared to the number of people who died due to cartoons of Mohamed?

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

spend one day as a

Submitted by TruthMonger on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 5:29pm.

spend one day as a conservative Christian in the US and we will show you the very definition of thick skin my friend:)

Congratulations Jimmy Carter!

  • Login to post comments

You left out the "oh yeah, and I'm a secular Jew" part

Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 5:30pm.

.

  • Login to post comments

The only reason why liberals

Submitted by dscott on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 6:30pm.

The only reason why liberals even dare to present ant-covered crucifixes is that Christians don't go Jihad on them as the Muslims would.  Go ahead brave little liberal, go show the Mohammed drawing with his head as a bomb on the HuffPo or other liberal publication, see what happens to you.   Lot's of big talk about trivializing bigotry against Christians when it doesn't cost you anything or you don't have to stand up to anyone.   Pansy.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
  • Login to post comments

They do it because it was taxpayer funded

Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 02/14/2011 - 11:37am.

If they had to pay for that garbage themselves, they'd not bother.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

Well

Submitted by ozarkian on Sat, 02/12/2011 - 10:24pm.

I don't know about hypocrite, but you sure are a Christian hater. Relax, dude. We don't hate the gays, and we don't hate the atheists like you. You're expending all this energy on us for nothing. Seems like you should at least be charging us rent for letting us live in your head like that.

Okay, that said, a lot of the left uses "gay rights" to bash Christians. I happen to be a fan of a very...ahem...openly gay entertainer, and on the fan sites, Christians are blamed every time he doesn't get nominated for an award. (Or, likewise, if it's not "stupid, bigoted Christians," it's "stupid, bigoted Americans." Sheesh!)

 

 

 

  • Login to post comments

TROLL

Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 02/14/2011 - 11:28am.

Just a troll. Don't feed it.

  • Login to post comments

Your Tax Dollars At Work....

Submitted by bigdaddy on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 3:22pm.

I know it's not as much as Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd's yearly booze bill was, but how 'bout we start cutting the deficit by defunding Nazi Preferred Radio.  The "journalists" that would be released could go share their brilliance with Zsa Zsa Huffinpuff over on AOL.

  • Login to post comments

The death of spiritualty?

Submitted by troglodyt on Fri, 02/11/2011 - 5:48pm.

Have you ever seen Matthias Grüneberg's Isenheimer Altar? "The death of spirituality" pales compared to that. And I wouldn't be too surprised if the former is simply quoted.

  • Login to post comments

Isn''t it odd how the "new

Submitted by ozarkian on Sat, 02/12/2011 - 10:26pm.

Isn''t it odd how the "new atheists" never say anything about islam?

  • Login to post comments

maybe those on the left

Submitted by Agnostic on Sun, 02/13/2011 - 7:30am.

but atheists and agnostics center to right are always condemning islam both for their failure to police the worst of their religion and for continuing to practice the worst interpretations of the Koran. 

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • NewsBusters Interview: Amity Shlaes on Coolidge, Media, and Neo-Keynesianism
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use