Omission Watch: Obama Nominated Chicago Agent for ATF Chief, Drawing Opposition from NRA
Cam Edwards of NRANews.com reported on Friday night that there's a really under-reported story out there. President Obama nominated a new head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives -- a local ATF agent from Chicago that's drawing serious opposition from gun-rights groups. Patrik Jonsson of The Christian Science Monitor is one of the few news reporters to notice:
ATF special agent Andrew Traver, who last year let a TV reporter fire an AK-47 from her hip to demonstrate the weapon's lethality, is set to become America's chief firearms inspector. But Mr. Traver, currently the Chicago ATF chief, faces a tough nomination battle as gun-rights groups amass their forces in opposition.
The nomination of the Naperville, Ill., native to be top gun cop is applauded by gun-control activists, who say the 5,000-employee ATF has lost ground in its regulation of the $28 billion US firearms business, having labored under interim directors since 2006.
But the idea of an ATF director who hails from Chicago, a city without gun shops, and who has conflated black market automatic weapons with legal semi-automatic "assault-style" rifles is causing Second Amendment defenders to worry that President Obama intends to blast away at gun rights by force of bureaucracy, if not law.
"This is a demonstration that Obama has ... the same attitudes about Second Amendment rights now as he did [when he was an Illinois state senator], which is quite hostile," says Dave Kopel, research director at the Independence Institute, a nonpartisan think tank in Golden, Colo., that promotes free-market ideas. "He's picked a strong anti-Second Amendment person for an administrative job that has far more influence over the practical exercise of Second Amendment rights than any other job in the country."
Gun control has barely registered as an issue under Obama, except for reporters to complain that there was a rush on gun purchases after Obama's election. National newspapers have found the NRA particularly newsworthy in their moves that were independent of the GOP -- supporting gun-rights Democrat incumbents in House races, and supporting the Democrat-penned "campaign reform" called the Disclose Act. Will they notice now that the NRA is going to push back at Team Obama?
The National Rifle Association and gun rights bloggers panned Traver's Nov. 17 nomination, saying his role as an adviser to an antigun-violence conference attended by Chicago Mayor Richard Daley proves that he's an "antigun zealot." Traver is also involved in the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which lobbies for tougher firearms laws to decrease urban gun violence.
The big question now is whether the Senate will hold confirmation hearings or whether Obama makes Traver a recess appointment after Congress adjourns, meaning Traver would take office but would face a later Senate confirmation.
But even if the Senate were to vote Traver down, the White House doesn't necessarily lose, says Mr. Kopel at the Independence Institute. Traver's nomination by itself is a "way to improve [Obama's] standing" among campaign donors who strongly favor gun control, he says.
- Tim Graham's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Oh, how clever of Obama! He
Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 12:23am.
Oh, how clever of Obama! He nominates a gun control proponent twho also happens to be in law enforcement. Now, he and the media can say his liberal anti-gun policies are part of conservative "law and order" agenda.
Seems like Obama is entitled
Submitted by rbosque on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 12:25am.
Seems like Obama is entitled to his protection but we are not, shows that he's nothing but an elitist.
Hide your SuperSoakers,
Submitted by HockeyKid on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 12:31am.
'cause Traver is one of those idiots who apparently can't tell the difference between them and an AK-47.
Either that, or he's intentionally misleading people, and that certainly couldn't be the case, could it? Not in Obamanation!
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
The NRA is stupid....
Submitted by jdripper on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 1:05am.
Since Chris Cox took over in the political/legislative affairs he has steadily endorsed liberal democrats. Whether from the House or the Senate if they are dimocrats he will endorse them over any Republican no matter who the Republican is or their standing in the NRA.
We just fought out two bitter fights in Southwestern Virginia where the NRA endorsed liberal democrats Tom Perriello and Rick Boucher over two very staunch gun advocates Morgan Griffith former Majority Leader of the Virginia House of Delegates and Roberth Hurt a State Senator. There was the NRA saying vote for the democrats the Republicans were not worth it.
We won both seats and now the NRA has two enemies in the House. Way to go Cox and the rest of your idiots. Don't come looking to us for help. We were not good enough for you remember?
Who am I? I am a life member of the NRA who has sworn to get Chris Cox fired if it is the last thing I do.
Jack
Jack
You've Got More Patience than I Do
Submitted by Tenebrous on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 1:39am.
I gave up my membership in the NRA because of their hostility to gun ownership, backroom deals, and not taking a single gun control case to the Supreme Court -- EVER. The NRA has become the NAACP of the second amendment.
Visions and Principles blog
NRA isn;t exactly as it appears.
Submitted by Ashrak on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 2:24am.
"The NRA has become the NAACP of the second amendment." As the NRA seeks to create a license to carry structure in Illinois where one does not exist, as the NRAhas long tolerated as unimportant and absolutely not on the top of the priority list the fact that NO Citizens in this state can carry a firearm, asn the NRA played fire with the DISCLOSE Act, not to mention the Gun Control act of 68, as the NRA was anything but helpful to Gura and Due Process winning the day over Privileges or Immunisites as a result of their interference, I gotta say that your comment about them being the NAACP of the Second Amendment is being way too kind. But it is an accurate desciption when one considers the facts.The NRA compromises the Second Amendment - to this day even after Heller and McDonald. Today, the NRA's number one priority is the NRA itself, it most certainly is not the Second Amendment or the people on who's behalf it portends to wage legislative and judicial battle.
Illinois stands alone as the only state in the country where it's totally illegal to carry a firearm in case of confrontation. In a campaign where Quinn has said 100 percent he would veto any carry legislation- and supposedly a Republican named Brady with a real chance to beat him after the Blagojevich debacle (not even to mention Mayor Daley's retirement), where were all the NRA commercials like those in Missourri last go 'round? Where was and is the spotlight from the NRA on Illinois when half of their "SINGLE ISSUE" is denied totally? Denied totally is not a TOP priority? Seriously? How can this be?
Is a person required ot purchase a license to pray? Would Americans stand for that requirement? Would they pay to gain an ID to vote? Here, we must pay to have a license to own or even be in possession a firearm- even if inherited. But you cannot use that ID to even cash a check or get into a bar. Can you say Poll Tax? And the NRA want's to create another license scheme? Yup, so they can then go to work fighting against what it helped create. JUST like the GCA! It aims to keep its bread buttered and have the suckers who don't know any better send them more money to "defend" the Second Amendment. Shame Shame Shame! The NRA defends government control over Citizens' exercise of their Second Amendment rights. And to think; I always thought the NRA was on the peoples' side.......
Not even the NRA believes "shall not be infringed" anymore - if it ever really did.
I own guns but will NEVER give a penny to the NRA
Submitted by virginia republican on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 1:40pm.
because of their support for some liberal Democrats. They even toyed with the idea of supporting Dingy Harry. They're just a bloated fat-cat bureaucracy looking out for THEIR best interests, not gun owners.
They've lost their way
Submitted by falcon on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 9:47am.
All of these big advocacy groups - the NRA, the GCA, the NAACP, the NOW, etc. ... have gone from standing up for their members' rights to finding ways to fatten their own wallets. And they're being seduced by government-types, who say, "Go with us and we'll make it worth your while."
Can you say "useful idiots?"
These folks don't realize that they'll be the first to find themselves fitted for concrete galoshes or turned into a carpet doobie, or simply taken out back and shot. Because what these turncoats don't realize is that the folks trying to conquer us from inside believe that, "if you'll turn on your own people, you'll definitely turn on us."
Stalin must be laughing from his perch in Hell.
“I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership, that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.” – Ronald Reagan, July 17, 1980.
...While the left keeps
Submitted by Cowboy on Mon, 11/22/2010 - 1:35pm.
...While the left keeps telling us there is 'obviously' no anti-gun agenda because it is kept below the radar...